Methane emission from stems of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) offsets as much as half of methane oxidation in soil

Trees are known to be atmospheric methane (CH₄ ) emitters. Little is known about seasonal dynamics of tree CH₄ fluxes and relationships to environmental conditions. That prevents the correct estimation of net annual tree and forest CH₄ exchange. We aimed to explore the contribution of stem emissions to forest CH₄ exchange. We determined seasonal CH₄ fluxes of mature European beech (Fagus sylvatica) stems and adjacent soil in a typical temperate beech forest of the White Carpathians with high spatial heterogeneity in soil moisture. The beech stems were net annual CH₄ sources, whereas the soil was a net CH₄ sink. High CH₄ emitters showed clear seasonality in their stem CH₄ emissions that followed stem CO₂ efflux. Elevated CH₄ fluxes were detected during the vegetation season. Observed high spatial variability in stem CH₄ emissions was neither explicably by soil CH₄ exchange nor by CH₄ concentrations, water content, or temperature studied in soil profiles near each measured tree. The stem CH₄ emissions offset the soil CH₄ uptake by up to 46.5% and on average by 13% on stand level. In Central Europe, widely grown beech contributes markedly to seasonal dynamics of ecosystem CH₄ exchange. Its contribution should be included into forest greenhouse gas flux inventories.

Methane oxidation in water-spreading and compost biofilters

This study evaluated two biofilter designs to mitigate methane emissions from landfill vents. Water-spreading biofilters were designed to use the capillarity of coarse sand overlain by a finer sand to increase the active depth for methane oxidation. Compost biofilters consisted of 238-L barrels containing a 1:1 mixture (by volume) of compost to expanded polystyrene pellets. Two replicates of each type of biofilter were tested at an outdoor facility. Gas inflow consisted of an approximately 1:1 mixture (by volume) of CH4 and CO2. Methane output rates (J(out); g m(-2) day(-1)) were measured using the static chamber technique and the Pedersen et al. (2001) diffusion model. Methane oxidation rate (J(ox); g m(-2) day(-1)) and fraction of methane oxidized (f(ox)) were determined by mass balance. For methane inflow rates (J(in)) between 250 and 500 g m(-2) day(-1), the compost biofilter J(ox), 242 g m(-2) day(-1), was not significantly different (P = 0.0647) than the water-spreading biofilter J(ox), 203 g m(-2) day(-1); and the compost f(ox), 69%, was not significantly different (P = 0.7354) than water-spreading f(ox), 63%. The water-spreading biofilter was shown to generally perform as well as the compost biofilter, and it may be easier to implement at a landfill and require less maintenance.