Asking what do residents value most: a recent overview of internal medicine residents' learning preferences

Understanding burnout in Pediatric residency through the lens of the 'Areas of worklife'

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Burnout is a widespread problem in medicine, especially among trainees. Despite this, data on effective interventions are limited. An organizational context for burnout entitled Areas of Worklife identified six areas of the work environment that can affect burnout through mismatches between individuals expectations of that area and the reality of the work environment. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of pediatric residents' perspectives of the Areas of Worklife to allow programs to utilize this framework in the development of future interventions.

METHODS

Using qualitative methodology founded in grounded theory, we employed an iterative data collection by conducting semi-structured interviews, until data saturation was achieved, with 15 pediatric residents in 2018. We recorded interviews and transcribed them verbatim. Content analysis was conducted concurrently with data collection using constant comparison methods; the principal investigator and co-investigators worked jointly to generate codes and identify themes.

RESULTS

Themes were identified for the individual Areas of Worklife that represented resident perspectives and mismatches with the work environment. Overall, patient care was a central focus connecting the areas of control, reward, values, and workload; themes in these areas concentrated on resident's ability to interact with and learn from patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents' definitions of the Areas of Worklife can be used to identify mismatches between residents' expectations and their work environment, which can inform organizational interventions. These findings highlight the importance of a patient-focused approach to residency training, which is consistent with literature that shows patient care is a means to find meaning in their work. Resident definitions of the Areas of Worklife offer residency programs a practical approach in their battle against burnout by providing focused direction to respond to resident needs and identify tangible targets for intervention.

The Development of an Innovative Crowdsourced Resident Procedure Team Model to Improve Bedside Procedural Proficiency in the Inpatient Setting

Background Bedside procedures are a necessary skill for many residents. Practice changes, including the discontinuation of a minimum number of procedures required by the American Board of Internal Medicine, may have resulted in decreased incentive for residents to seek procedural opportunities. Objective To improve residents' procedural output and confidence in abdominal paracentesis, arterial and central venous line placement, nasogastric intubation, and ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter insertions (USPIV). Methods A novel Resident Procedure Team (RPT) model was created using crowdsourced proficient (having completed ≥5 procedures) near-peers in combination with peer-led USPIV simulation workshops to increase the number of supervising residents available. Procedure logs and the number of residents who became qualified to perform and supervise procedures were tracked from July 2018 to June 2022 and compared before and after the implementation of the RPT in July 2020. Results Implementing the novel RPT model significantly increased the number of procedures performed (1875 procedures post-RPT vs 1292 pre-RPT; P=.02). Abdominal paracentesis increased from 411 to 482 (17.3%), central venous line placement increased from 344 to 401 (16.6%), USPIV increased from 318 to 389 (22.3%), arterial line placement increased from 189 to 360 (90.5%), and nasogastric intubation increased from 30 to 243 (710.0%). Resident confidence levels increased significantly after RPT-led USPIV workshops (P<.05 for all). Conclusions Implementation of a novel, crowdsourced, resident-led procedure team and peer-led USPIV workshops helped increase the number of procedures performed by residents.

Barriers and Facilitators to Pediatric Resident Education in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

Objective Local resident evaluations of the pediatric emergency department (ED) declined over the last five years. Sparse literature exists on resident perspectives of educational experiences. This study explored the barriers and facilitators to resident education in the Pediatric ED. Methods This qualitative study utilized focus groups at a large pediatric training hospital. Trained facilitators performed semi-structured interviews prompting discussion of resident experiences in the pediatric ED. One pilot and six focus groups (38 pediatric residents) achieved data saturation. Sessions were audio recorded, de-identified and transcribed by a professional service. Three authors (CJ, JM, SS) analyzed the transcripts independently using line-by-line coding. Following code agreement, authors identified central themes drawing on grounded theory. Results Six categories emerged: (1) ED environment, (2) consistent goals, expectations, and resources, (3) ED workflow, (4) preceptor accessibility, (5) resident growth and development, (6) ED preconceived notions. Residents value a respectful work environment despite the chaotic nature of the ED. They need clear goals and expectations with a strong orientation. Autonomy, open communication and shared decision-making allow residents to feel like team members. Residents gravitate toward welcoming, available preceptors that enthusiastically teach. More ED environment exposure increases comfort and efficiency and helps develop medical decision-making skills. Residents admit ED preconceptions and personality traits affect performance. Conclusion Residents self-identified barriers and facilitators to ED education. Educators must provide a safe and open learning environment, clear rotation expectations and goals, consistent positivity supporting shared decision making, and allow residents autonomy to build their practice styles.

A single center pilot study: assessing resident needs and faculty perceptions to improve training in rheumatology

BACKGROUND

Internal medicine (IM) residents lack confidence in rheumatology. Due to the wide variety of topics in rheumatology, identifying the most important subjects to learn during training is vital to create future interventions to increase confidence and knowledge. The preferred teaching modality for both attendings/fellows and residents is not known.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to all IM residents, rheumatology fellows, and rheumatology faculty at the University of Chicago during the 2020-2021 academic year. Residents reported self-confidence levels on 10 rheumatology topics, while rheumatology attendings/fellows were asked to rank these from most to least important to learn during IM residency. All groups were asked preferred teaching modality.

RESULTS

Median confidence level [interquartile range] among residents for caring for patients with rheumatological conditions was 6 [3.6-7.5] for inpatient and 5 [3.7-6.5] for outpatient settings (10 being very confident). Attendings and fellows identified the most important topics to learn during the rheumatology rotation as ordering and interpreting autoimmune serologies and musculoskeletal exam. Both attendings/fellows and residents preferred bedside teaching in the inpatient setting and case-based learning in the outpatient setting.

CONCLUSIONS

While some disease-specific topics such as autoimmune serologies were identified as important rheumatology topics for IM residents to learn, more practical topics like musculoskeletal exam skills were also deemed important. This highlights the need for comprehensive interventions that focus on more than standardized exam topics alone to improve rheumatology confidence in IM residents. There are different preferences of teaching styles in various clinical settings.

Evaluating General Surgical Residency Education Structure and Incorporation of the Resident as Educator Model

BACKGROUND

General surgery education has continued to evolve regarding test preparation, simulation, and skill acquisition. The "Resident as Educator" (RAE) model has been proposed and enacted by programs as a viable education model for general surgery education. This study examines the current education structures in general surgery residency programs in the United States and how many programs have adopted the RAE model or aspects of the model.

METHODS

A 20-question survey regarding education structure was distributed to all program directors in October 2021. Questions focused on the involvement of residents in leading education sessions, creating the weekly education schedule, program feedback to residents on teaching, and recognition for distinguished resident educators.

RESULTS

A total of 156 programs responded to the survey. The response rate was 60%. 76.4% of the respondents have a combination of resident and faculty-led didactic sessions, 8.5% have an RAE model, and 15% have faculty-led education sessions. In terms of concerns regarding resident-led didactics-24.4% of respondents stated that their main concern would be the quality of education provided, and 20.4% referenced low resident satisfaction levels with resident-led education. There were no differences among the groups regarding the American Board of Surgery board passage rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Most residency programs have adopted a model in which residents have significant involvement in creating and maintaining the education calendar and leading formal education sessions. However, only 8.5% have a purely resident-led educational curriculum among the responding programs. More studies are needed to assess how to implement a resident as educator model successfully.

Inpatient teaching with a clinical review game

BACKGROUND

Shortened preclinical curricula, social distancing policies and the fast-paced nature of inpatient medicine make clinical education challenging. Crowdsourced learning and a review game derived from real-time patient cases can offer an engaging solution for inpatient teaching.

APPROACH

We implemented a clinical review game with 67 participants (10 physician instructors, 40 residents and 17 medical students) rotating through the adult inpatient medicine service at an academic medical centre from July 2018 through July 2020. During 2-week rotations, participants identified shareable teaching points about their patients on rounds. Teaching points were compiled by an instructor into a 30-minute end-of-rotation review game formatted from a free gameshow-based PowerPoint template. After the review game was completed, learners were then asked to complete end-of-rotation evaluations.

EVALUATION

Learners were surveyed on their educational experience, and teaching point submissions were studied. After eight rotations, 39 participants (39/67 = 58.2% response rate) submitted a total of 268 teaching points, and nearly half of which were from learners (n = 131 [48.9%]). In the review game, 35 residents and 17 medical students participated and correctly answered 80% of questions. Learner evaluations highlighted the activity strengths including self-directed learning, peer teaching from primary literature and a warm, collaborative educational environment.

IMPLICATIONS

Our crowdsourced clinical review game approach helped to highlight clinically relevant content for teaching rounds, build a collaborative culture across trainee levels and encourage self-study for trainees to stay informed with current evidence-based practice, even during pandemic restrictions.

Nurse-Doctor Co-Teaching: A Pilot Study of the Design, Development, and Implementation of Structured Interprofessional Co-Teaching Sessions

INTRODUCTION

High levels of interprofessional collaboration are beneficial for patients and healthcare providers. Co-teaching may be one method for creating a collaborative environment. This pilot study designed, developed, and implemented Nurse-Doctor Co-Teaching on an inpatient medicine service.

METHODS

Ten Nurse-Doctor Co-Teaching pairs designed 30-minute, structured co-teaching sessions with learning objectives, evidence-based content, interactive teaching strategies and a Take-Away of key content with the help of a coaching team. Each session was presented by a nurse and senior doctor to nurse and resident learners. Our assessment blueprint included: 1. Anonymous surveys assessing the overall rating of each session and 2. Pre- and post-anonymous surveys assessing measures of interprofessional collaboration and communication between nurses and residents before and after the series of ten co-teaching sessions.

RESULTS

Data from ten post-session surveys included 121 of 156 participants (77.6%). Attendance at each session ranged from 13-19 participants with 8-17 participants completing a survey per session for an average of 12.1 surveys analyzed. All Nurse-Doctor Co-Teaching sessions scored in the excellent range between 1.00 and 1.43 on a Likert scale (1 is excellent and 5 is poor). In response to the question "What did you like best?", interactive teaching strategies was the most frequent spontaneous answer. A significant correlation between the number of interactive teaching strategies and enjoyability of the session (p-value=0.01) was observed. Measures of interprofessional collaboration and communication did not change significantly in the pre-intervention compared to post-intervention period.

CONCLUSION

We created a unique model of interprofessional co-teaching on an inpatient service. The overall excellent ratings of our interactive sessions indicate that Nurse-Doctor Co-Teaching is a valued form of learning. Our structured format is adaptable to various medical settings and could be expanded to include additional allied health professionals. We plan further studies to assess if Nurse-Doctor Co-Teaching improves measures of interprofessional collaboration.

Reshaping the residency environment to enhance education and mitigate burnout

Burnout remains a widespread issue in graduate medical education, with current trends to mitigate burnout shifting toward institutional systematic interventions as opposed to personal individual interventions. In this article, we propose utilizing Knowle's adult learning theory in conjunction with Maslach's organizational context for burnout to implement systemic changes within the postgraduate training environment that we posit would both optimize the learning experience and reduce the incidence of burnout.