Nebivolol effect on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer

Stress regulatory hormones and cancer: the contribution of epinephrine and cancer therapeutic value of beta blockers

The word "cancer" evokes myriad emotions, ranging from fear and despair to hope and determination. Cancer is aptly defined as a complex and multifaceted group of diseases that has unapologetically led to the loss of countless lives and affected innumerable families across the globe. The battle with cancer is not only a physical battle, but also an emotional, as well as a psychological skirmish for patients and for their loved ones. Cancer has been a part of our history, stories, and lives for centuries and has challenged the ingenuity of health and medical science, and the resilience of the human spirit. From the early days of surgery and radiation therapy to cutting-edge developments in chemotherapeutic agents, immunotherapy, and targeted treatments, the medical field continues to make significant headway in the fight against cancer. However, even after all these advancements, cancer is still among the leading cause of death globally. This urges us to understand the central hallmarks of neoplastic cells to identify novel molecular targets for the development of promising therapeutic approaches. Growing research suggests that stress mediators, including epinephrine, play a critical role in the development and progression of cancer by inducing neoplastic features through activating adrenergic receptors, particularly β-adrenoreceptors. Further, our experimental data has also shown that epinephrine mediates the growth of T-cell lymphoma by inducing proliferation, glycolysis, and apoptosis evasion via altering the expression levels of key regulators of these vital cellular processes. The beauty of receptor-based therapy lies in its precision and higher therapeutic value. Interestingly, the enhanced expression of β-adrenergic receptors (ADRBs), namely ADRB2 (β2-adrenoreceptor) and ADRB3 (β3-adrenoreceptor) has been noted in many cancers, such as breast, colon, gastric, pancreatic, and prostate and has been reported to play a pivotal role in facilitating cancer growth mainly by promoting proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis, and chemoresistance. The present review article is an attempt to summarize the available findings which indicate a distinct relationship between stress hormones and cancer, with a special emphasis on epinephrine, considered as a key stress regulatory molecule. This article also discusses the possibility of using beta-blockers for cancer therapy.

Factors Associated With the Recovery of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Anthracycline-Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Neurohormonal blocking drugs, like beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are recommended for treating anthracycline-induced left ventricular dysfunction (AILVD). However, there is limited evidence supporting their benefit. Therefore, this study evaluated associations of neurohormonal blockers and other clinical factors with recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AILVD.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review assessed patients treated with at least one dose of anthracycline, then had ≥10% LVEF reduction or post-anthracycline LVEF value <50%, and then had a follow-up LVEF measurement ≥90 days later. The primary endpoint was LVEF recovery (highest follow-up LVEF-lowest LVEF post-anthracycline). Variables from univariable tests with P < .1 were incorporated in a multiple linear regression model for independent factors significantly associated with LVEF recovery (P < .05).

RESULTS

Out of 104 patients, 83% were female, 86% self-reported white race, 53% had breast cancer, median (IQR) age was 52 (22) years, and LVEF recovery was 14% (16%). The final multivariable model included 2 significant variables: beta-blocker dose after anthracycline exposure (every 25 mg increase in beta-blocker dose was associated with 5.0% increase in LVEF recovery; P = .0005) and the time between the start of the anthracycline and the lowest LVEF post-anthracycline (every 5-year increase in time was associated with 1.8% decrease in LVEF recovery; P = .0379).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AILVD, a higher beta-blocker dose and earlier detection of LVEF reduction post-anthracycline were significantly and independently associated with improved LVEF recovery. These findings need to be validated in a larger, independent cohort.

Anthracyclines, Diastolic Dysfunction and the road to Heart Failure in Cancer survivors: An untold story

Many cardiovascular diseases are characterized by diastolic dysfunction, which associates with worse clinical outcomes like overall mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Diastolic dysfunction has also been suspected to represent an early manifestation of cardiotoxicity induced by cancer drugs, with most of the information deriving from patients treated with anthracyclines; however, the prognostic implications of diastolic dysfunction in the anthracycline-treated patient have remained poorly explored or neglected. Here the molecular, pathophysiologic and diagnostic aspects of anthracycline-related diastolic dysfunction are reviewed in the light of HF incidence and phenotype in cancer survivors. We describe that the trajectories of diastolic dysfunction toward HF are influenced by a constellation of patient- or treatment- related factors, such as comorbidities and exposure to other cardiotoxic drugs or treatments, but also by prospective novel opportunities to treat diastolic dysfunction. The importance of a research-oriented multidimensional approach to patient surveillance or treatment is discussed within the framework of what appears to be a distinct pathophysiologic entity that develops early during anthracycline treatment and gradually worsens over the years.

Preoperative right ventricular longitudinal strain as a prognosticator of postoperative residual or recurrent tricuspid regurgitation in Ebstein anomaly: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Background

The preoperative predictors of residual or recurrent tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after cone reconstruction (CR) remains unclear in patients with Ebstein anomaly (EA). We aimed to determine the predictive value of right ventricular longitudinal strain, assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, for residual or recurrent TR after CR in patients with EA.

Methods

This single-centre, retrospective study analysed data from 48 patients with EA [mean ± standard deviation (SD), age, 35.0±13.6 years; 13 males] who underwent CMR before CR between January 2017 and February 2023. Two-dimensional colour Doppler echocardiography was performed before CR and mid-term (>6 months) after CR to evaluate the degree of TR in patients with EA. Thirty healthy volunteers served as controls. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify CMR predictors of moderate or severe TR >6 months after CR.

Results

Mid-term postoperative results revealed severe, moderate, and mild TR in 8 (17%), 7 (15%), and 33 (69%) patients, respectively. For patients with EA and moderate or severe TR after CR, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were significantly worse compared to patients with mild TR (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that RVGLS was independently associated with moderate or severe TR >6 months after CR [odds ratio (OR) 1.193, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.025-1.388; P=0.02].

Conclusions

RVGLS was a significant predictor of moderate or severe TR >6 months after CR. This finding emphasizes that early and accurate measurement of RV function may help to identify patients at high risk for severe residual or recurrent TR.

Natural Products for Preventing and Managing Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Comprehensive Review

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anthracycline anticancer agent that is highly effective in the treatment of solid tumors. Given the multiplicity of mechanisms involved in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, it is difficult to identify a precise molecular target for toxicity. The findings of a literature review suggest that natural products may offer cardioprotective benefits against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, both in vitro and in vivo. However, further confirmatory studies are required to substantiate this claim. It is of the utmost importance to direct greater attention towards the intricate signaling networks that are of paramount importance for the survival and dysfunction of cardiomyocytes. Notwithstanding encouraging progress made in preclinical studies of natural products for the prevention of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, these have not yet been translated for clinical use. One of the most significant obstacles hindering the development of cardioprotective adjuvants based on natural products is the lack of adequate bioavailability in humans. This review presents an overview of current knowledge on doxorubicin DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, with a focus on the potential benefits of natural compounds and herbal preparations in preventing this adverse effect. As literature search engines, the browsers in the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were used.

Prevention of Anthracyclines and HER2 Inhibitor-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis and systematic review aim to consolidate evidence on cardiotoxicity prevention and treatment strategies in patients receiving anthracyclines or HER2 receptor inhibitors, vital treatments for breast cancer and hematologic malignancies. By synthesizing existing research, the goal is to provide impactful insights that enhance patient care and outcomes.

METHODS

Comprehensive research across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials was conducted, selecting clinical trials focusing on cardioprotection in anthracyclines or HER2 inhibitor-treated individuals. Effect sizes were computed using OpenMeta (Analyst), with leave-out meta-analysis to assess potential small study effects. Meta-regression explored treatment duration and sample size effects. Evidence quality for primary outcomes was evaluated using ROB, Robins 2, and Newcastle-Ottawa tools.

RESULTS

Twenty -three studies involving a total of 14,652 patients (13,221 adults and 1431 kids) were included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. The risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies suggested good and moderate quality. Patients prescribed β-blockers demonstrated a 74% lower likelihood of exhibiting cardiotoxicity symptoms (OR 1.736). Similarly, the use of dexrazoxane was linked to a threefold decrease in cardiac abnormalities risk (OR 2.989), and ACE inhibitor administration showed half the risk compared with the control group (OR 1.956).

CONCLUSIONS

Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, it was shown that there is a reduction in cardiotoxicity from either anthracyclines or HER2 inhibitors in patients receiving pharmacoprophylaxis.

Prophylaxis to Prevent Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Anthracycline for Breast Cancer: A Combined Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The benefits in survivorship gained with anthracycline (ANT)-based chemotherapies for breast cancer are unfortunately mitigated for some patients by irreversible cardiotoxicity. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have explored multiple cardioprotection options, however, it remains unclear which drug is most effective in preserving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis, using Bayesian and frequentist approaches, of RCTs evaluating cardioprotective agents.

METHODS

Two authors searched four databases (CENTRAL, Cochrane Reviews, MEDLINE, SCOPUS), to find RCTs evaluating cardioprotective agents. Trial populations were limited to patients with breast cancer without prior ANT exposure. The primary outcome was mean LVEF change pre and post ANT dosing. Our primary analysis utilised a Bayesian approach, while our sensitivity analysis used frequentist methodology (Prospero registration number CRD42020199580).

RESULTS

From 4,007 search results, we identified 12 RCTs, with their various trial arms considered separately-nine beta-blocker (BB), two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin receptor blockers [(AA)+BB=AABB], one AA, one spironolactone, one statin-evaluating 1,126 patients (age 50.5 years). Bayesian network meta-analysis showed no difference in LVEF preservation between AA (1.3%, 95% credible interval [-0.20, 2.9]), BB (0.77, [-0.21, 1.8]), AABB (0.84 [-1.1, 2.8]), spironolactone (0.72, [-2.3, 3.7]) or statin (0.60, [-2.4, 3.6]) when compared against placebo. However, the frequentist analysis showed benefits from using AA (mean difference, 1.32% [0.32, 2.33]) and BB (mean difference, 0.76% [0.12, 1.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support prophylactic cardioprotection to prevent EF reduction. However, frequentist analysis suggested that AA or BBs provide cardioprotection. Thus, for those already on other anti-hypertensives, switching to AA or BBs could be considered.

Left ventricular diastolic function and cardiotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular ejection fraction falls when the myocardium has already lost a significant portion of its functional capacity. There are conflicting data on whether diastolic dysfunction precedes systolic dysfunction after cardiotoxic chemotherapy. We aimed to study systolic and diastolic dysfunction after cardiotoxic chemotherapy and whether diastolic dysfunction can predict subsequent risk of systolic dysfunction. It was an observational prospective cohort study, and patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy were included. Baseline, demographic, and clinical details were recorded. Echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular systolic function, global longitudinal strain, and diastolic function were noted at baseline, three months, and 6 months.

RESULTS

We included eighty patients. The mean age of the patients was 54.92 ± 7.6 years, predominantly females (80%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction fell from 64.92 ± 1.96 to 60.97 ± 4.94 at 6 months. Low ejection fraction was seen in 8 (10%) patients at 6 months. The mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) at baseline was - 18.81 ± 0.797 and fell to - 17.65 ± 2.057 at 6 months, with 12 (15%) patients having low GLS (< - 18). Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction was seen in 22 (27.5%) patients, and grade 2 diastolic dysfunction was seen in 3 (3.8%) patients at 6 months. There was a significant decrease in E/A ratio (inflow early diastolic velocity/Inflow late diastolic velocity), mitral tissue Doppler velocity, and an increase in isovolumic relaxation time, mitral valve deceleration time, and E/e' (inflow early diastolic velocity/tissue Doppler mitral annular velocity), at three months and 6 months. Ejection fraction at 6 months was significantly and negatively correlated with diastolic dysfunction at three months (r = - 0.595, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiotoxic chemotherapy is associated with early diastolic dysfunction. Early diastolic dysfunction predicts subsequent left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

ACEI/ARB and beta-blocker therapies for preventing cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anthracyclines and trastuzumab are widely used to treat breast cancer but increase the risk of cardiomyopathy and heart failure. With the use of trastuzumab and anthracycline-containing medications, this study intends to evaluate the effectiveness and security of current treatments against cardiotoxicity. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which used at least one angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), or beta-blocker (BB) to prevent cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents for breast cancer, in 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science) from inception to 11 May 2022, without language restrictions. The outcome of interest was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events. Stata 15 and R software 4.2.1 were used to perform all statistical analyses. The Cochrane version 2 of the risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) assessment was used to appraise the quality of the evidence. Fifteen randomized clinical studies with a total of 1977 patients were included in the analysis. The included studies demonstrated statistically significant LVEF in the ACEI/ARB and BB treatment groups (χ2 = 184.75, I2 = 88.6%, p = 0.000; SMD 0.556, 95% CI 0.299 to 0.813). In an exploratory subgroup analysis, the benefit of experimental agents on LVEF, whether anthracyclines or trastuzumab, was prominent in patients treated with ACEIs, ARBs, and BBs. Compared to placebo, ACEI/ARB and BB treatments in breast cancer patients protect against cardiotoxicity after trastuzumab and anthracycline-containing medication treatment, indicating a benefit for both.

Renin-angiotensin System Antagonists and Beta-blockers in Prevention of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The evidence supporting the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers for the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of these drugs in preventing cardiotoxicity.

METHODS

The meta-analysis included prospective, randomized studies in adults receiving anthracycline chemotherapy and compared the use of RAAS inhibitors or beta-blockers versus placebo with a follow-up of 6 to 18 months. The primary outcome was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of heart failure, all-cause mortality, and changes in end-diastolic measurement. Heterogeneity was assessed by stratification and meta-regression. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 17 studies, totaling 1,530 patients. The variation (delta) in LVEF was evaluated in 14 studies. Neurohormonal therapy was associated with a lower delta in pre- versus post-therapy LVEF (weighted mean difference 4.42 [95% confidence interval 2.3 to 6.6]) and higher final LVEF (p < 0.001). Treatment resulted in a lower incidence of heart failure (risk ratio 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.7]). There was no effect on mortality (p = 0.3). For analysis of LVEF, substantial heterogeneity was documented, which was not explained by the variables explored in the study.

CONCLUSION

The use of RAAS inhibitors and beta-blockers to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity was associated with less pronounced reduction in LVEF, higher final LVEF, and lower incidence of heart failure. No changes in mortality were observed. (CRD PROSPERO 42019133615).

Natural Progression of Left Ventricular Function following Anthracyclines without Cardioprotective Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines form the backbone of many systemic chemotherapy regimens but are accompanied by dose-limiting cardiotoxicity. We elucidate the progression and severity of cardiac function over time, in the absence of cardioprotection, which less is known about.

METHODS

This PRISMA-guideline-adherent review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022373496).

RESULTS

26 studies met the eligibility criteria including a total of 910 patients. The overall reduction in post-anthracycline pooled mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in placebo arms of the included randomised-controlled trials was 4.5% (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.4). The trend in LVEF showed a progressive decline until approximately 180 days, after which there was no significant change. Those receiving a cumulative anthracycline dose of 300 mg/m2 experienced a more profound reduction. The overall pooled risk of a 10% absolute decline in LVEF from baseline, or a decline to an LVEF below 50%, was 17% (95% CI: 11 to 24; I2 = 71%). Sensitivity analyses of baseline LVEF and trastuzumab treatment status did not yield significant differences.

CONCLUSION

While the mean LVEF decline in patients without cardioprotective therapy was clinically small, a vulnerable subset experienced significant impairment. Further research to best identify those who benefit most from cardioprotective therapies when receiving anthracyclines is required.

Beta-Blockers for Primary Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiac Toxicity: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

AIM

Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognized complication of chemotherapy with Anthracyclines. However, results from trials evaluating beta-blockers for prevention are controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to find whether prophylactic administration of beta-blockers can help prevent Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity.

METHODS

We assessed randomized trials and observational studies where a prophylactic intervention was compared with a control arm in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) receiving Anthracyclines. The primary outcome was EF reduction. The secondary outcome was the development of Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction (CTRCD), defined as a decrease in the LVEF of >10% to a value of <53%.

RESULTS

We included 17 trials comprising 1291 patients (671 patients in the intervention arm and 620 in the control arm). Carvedilol was administered in eight studies, and others used bisoprolol, metoprolol, or nebivolol. Compared with baseline, LVEF reduced in both intervention and control groups after chemotherapy (MD = -1.93%, 95% CI: -2.94, -0.92, p = 0.001, I2 = 72.1% vs. MD = -4.78%, 95% CI: -6.51, -3.04, p = 0.001, I 2 = 91.6%, respectively). LVEF was less reduced among the beta-blocker receivers (MD = 3.44%, 95% CI: 1.41-5.46, p = 0.001, I2 = 94.0%). Among the eight studies reporting the incidence of CTRCD, 45 out of 370 participants in the intervention arm and 54 out of 341 in the control arm were reported to experience this complication (RR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.53,1.09; I 2 = 24.4%; p = 0.235).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with beta-blockers prevents dilatation of the left ventricle, development of diastolic dysfunction, and reduction of LVEF. However, these hemodynamic effects do not translate into a significant reduction in CTRCD incidence and prevention of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiac death.

Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and dynamic changes in asymptomatic heart-transplanted patients

OBJECTIVES

To describe the dynamic changes in cardiac deformation and tissue characteristics using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in asymptomatic patients during 12 months after heart transplantation (HT).

METHODS

From April 2020 to January 2021, 21 consecutive HT patients without clinical symptoms were included in this prospective study. Multiparametric CMR was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after HT. Twenty-five healthy volunteers served as controls.

RESULTS

During follow-up, a decline in left ventricular (LV) global radial strain (GRS) (p = 0.020) and right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p < 0.001) and an increase in post-contrast T1 (p = 0.024) and T2 (p < 0.001) in asymptomatic HT patients occurred at 3 months, which normalized at 6 months postoperatively, compared with those in healthy controls. A decline in LVGLS (p < 0.001) and LV global circumferential strain (GCS) (p < 0.001) and an increase in native T1 (p < 0.001), T2 (p < 0.001), and extracellular volume (ECV) (p < 0.001) occurred at 3 months. Although most parameters improved gradually, LVGLS, native T1, and ECV remained abnormal compared with those in healthy controls at 12 months; only T2 and LVGCS were normalized at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. ECV was significantly correlated with LVGLS, LVGCS, and LVGRS.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac deformation and tissue characteristics were abnormal early after HT, although the patients were clinically asymptomatic. The dynamic changes in CMR characteristics demonstrate a gradual recovery of myocardial injury associated with transplantation during the first 12 months after HT.

KEY POINTS

• Multiparametric CMR can detect the dynamic changes of transplantation-associated myocardial injury. • Post-contrast T1, T2, LVGRS, and RVGLS values are normalized at 6 months after HT. • Native T1, ECV, and LVGLS values remain abnormal compared with those in healthy controls at 12 months after HT.

A global case meta-analysis of three-dimensional speckle tracking for evaluating the cardiotoxicity of anthracycline chemotherapy in breast cancer

Background

Anthracycline cardiotoxicity has become one of the most common complications of anthracycline therapy. Regular follow-up of chemotherapy patients with myocardial deformation parameters might be helpful for early diagnosis of myocardial damage and protective intervention. This study aimed to investigate the value of three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (3D-STI) in diagnosing and predicting potential cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline therapy through meta-analysis based on global cases collection.

Methods

Relevant case-control studies published prior to November 2021 were extracted to assess cardiotoxicity by 3D-STI in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as pooled statistics. Meta regression and subgroup analysis were employed to identify sources of heterogeneity and publication bias was evaluated by Egger’s test and funnel plot.

Results

A total of 1,515 breast cancer patients from 14 studies were enrolled and followed up for 4 or 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, absolute values of Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) WMD = –1.59, 95% CI (–1.99, –1.20); p < 0.001; global longitudinal strain (GLS) WMD = 2.19, 95% CI (1.87, 2.51); p < 0.001; global circumferential strain (GCS) WMD = 1.69, 95% CI (1.11, 2.26); p < 0.001; global radial strain (GRS) WMD = –1.72,95% CI (–2.44, –1.00); p < 0.001, and global area strain (GAS) WMD = 6.25, 95% CI (4.48, 8.02); p < 0.001 were decreased. A medium degree of heterogeneity was shown for values of LVEF (I² = 44.4%, p = 0.037) while values for GLS (I² = 59.0%, p = 0.003), GCS (I² = 81.3%, p < 0.001) and GRS (I² = 57.5%, P = 0.004) showed a large degree of heterogeneity. Egger’s test and funnel plot showed no significant publication bias in GLS, GCS and GAS data (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

3D-STI has utility for the non-invasive and objective evaluation of changes in left ventricular function in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with anthracyclines. The current findings have clinical potential for the early evaluation of myocardial injury caused by chemotherapy toxicity.

Long-term effectiveness of empiric cardio-protection in patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapies: A systematic review & bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardioprotective therapies represent an important avenue to reduce treatment-limiting cardiotoxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the optimal duration, strategy and long-term efficacy of empiric cardio-protection remains unknown.

METHODS

Leveraging the MEDLINE/Pubmed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov databases, we identified all randomised controlled trials investigating cardioprotective therapies from inception to November 2021 (PROSPERO-ID:CRD42021265006). Cardioprotective classes included ACEIs, ARBs, Beta-blockers, dexrazoxane (DEX), statins and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The primary end-point was new-onset heart failure (HF). Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change, hypotension and all-cause mortality. Network meta-analyses were used to assess the cardioprotective effects of each therapy to deduce the most effective therapies. Both analyses were performed using a Bayesian random effects model to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI).

RESULTS

Overall, from 726 articles, 39 trials evaluating 5931 participants (38.0 ± 19.1 years, 72.0% females) were identified. The use of any cardioprotective strategy associated with reduction in new-onset HF (RR:0.32; 95% CrI:0.19-0.55), improved LVEF (mean difference: 3.92%; 95% CrI:2.81-5.07), increased hypotension (RR:3.27; 95% CrI:1.38-9.87) and no difference in mortality. Based on control arms, the number-needed-to-treat for 'any' cardioprotective therapy to prevent one incident HF event was 45, including a number-needed-to-treat of 21 with ≥1 year of therapy. Dexrazoxane was most effective at HF prevention (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve: 81.47%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were most effective at preserving LVEF (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve: 99.22%).

CONCLUSION

Cardiotoxicity remains a challenge for patients requiring anticancer therapies. The initiation of extended duration cardioprotection reduces incident HF. Additional head-to-head trials are needed.

Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Drugs: Molecular Mechanisms and Strategies for Cardioprotection

Chemotherapy and targeted therapies have significantly improved the prognosis of oncology patients. However, these antineoplastic treatments may also induce adverse cardiovascular effects, which may lead to acute or delayed onset of cardiac dysfunction. These common cardiovascular complications, commonly referred to as cardiotoxicity, not only may require the modification, suspension, or withdrawal of life-saving antineoplastic therapies, with the risk of reducing their efficacy, but can also strongly impact the quality of life and overall survival, regardless of the oncological prognosis. The onset of cardiotoxicity may depend on the class, dose, route, and duration of administration of anticancer drugs, as well as on individual risk factors. Importantly, the cardiotoxic side effects may be reversible, if cardiac function is restored upon discontinuation of the therapy, or irreversible, characterized by injury and loss of cardiac muscle cells. Subclinical myocardial dysfunction induced by anticancer therapies may also subsequently evolve in symptomatic congestive heart failure. Hence, there is an urgent need for cardioprotective therapies to reduce the clinical and subclinical cardiotoxicity onset and progression and to limit the acute or chronic manifestation of cardiac damages. In this review, we summarize the knowledge regarding the cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to the onset of cardiotoxicity associated with common classes of chemotherapy and targeted therapy drugs. Furthermore, we describe and discuss current and potential strategies to cope with the cardiotoxic side effects as well as cardioprotective preventive approaches that may be useful to flank anticancer therapies.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Following Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer without Previous Cardiac Disease-A Meta-Analysis

Background: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy (ANT) remains among the most effective therapies for breast cancer. Cardiotoxicity from ANT represents a severe adverse event and may predominantly manifest as heart failure. While it is well-recognised that left ventricular systolic heart failure assessment is key in ANT-treated patients, less is known about the relevance of LV diastolic functional impairment and its characterisation. Methods: Studies reporting on echocardiographic diastolic function parameters before and after ANT in breast cancer patients without cardiac disease were included. We evaluated pulsed wave (E/A ratio and mitral E-wave deceleration time (EDT)) and tissue Doppler (mean velocities of the mitral ring in the early diastole (e′) and E/e′ ratio) echocardiographic parameters. Results: A total of 892 patients from 13 studies were included. E/A ratio was significantly reduced at the end of ANT while EDT was not influenced by ANT. Additionally, e’ and E/e’ ratio showed no significant change after ANT. A modest reduction in LV ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain was observed at the end of ANT therapy. Conclusions: ANT had a modest early impact on E/A ratio, without changing EDT, e’, or E/e’ in patients with breast cancer without cardiac disease. Randomised studies on larger populations, using new parameters are required to define the role of diastolic dysfunction in the early diagnosis of ANT-induced cardiotoxicity.

Mechanisms of anthracycline-mediated cardiotoxicity and preventative strategies in women with breast cancer

While anthracyclines (ACs) are a class of chemotherapeutic agents that have improved the prognosis of many women with breast cancer, it is one of the most cardiotoxic agents used to treat cancer. Despite their reported dose-dependent cardiotoxicity, AC-based chemotherapy has become the mainstay of breast cancer therapy due to its efficacy. Elucidating the mechanisms of anthracycline-mediated cardiotoxicity and associated therapeutic interventions continue to be the main focus in the field of cardio-oncology. Herein, we summarized the current literature surrounding the mechanisms of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, including the role of topoisomerase II inhibition, generation of reactive oxygen species, and elevations in free radicals. Furthermore, this review highlights the molecular mechanisms of potential cardioprotective interventions in this setting. The benefits of pharmaceuticals, including dexrazoxane, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins, and antioxidants in this setting, are reviewed. Finally, the mechanisms of emerging preventative interventions within this patient population including nutraceuticals and aerobic exercise are explored.

Cardiotoxic Effect of Modern Anthracycline Dosing on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo Arms From Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Anthracyclines are a key chemotherapeutic agent used against hematological and solid organ malignancies. However, their benefits in cancer survival are limited by cumulative, dose‐related cardiotoxicity. The impact of anthracyclines on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), in the era of modern chemotherapy regimens, remains unclear.

Methods and Results

Three databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS) were systematically searched for randomized trials evaluating cardioprotective agents against placebo, in preventing cardiotoxicity. Echocardiography or magnetic resonance measured LVEF pre‐ and post‐anthracycline‐based chemotherapy was abstracted from placebo trial arms. The key terms included “anthracycline,” “cardiotoxicity” and “randomized.” A doxorubicin equivalent anthracycline dose metric was calculated to compare different anthracyclines. A random‐effects model was used to pool mean difference in LVEF after anthracycline. Meta‐regressions were calculated to identify variation sources. We included 660 patients from 19 trials. The weighted mean baseline LVEF across studies was 62.6%, and follow‐up LVEF assessment was performed at 6 months. The pooled mean decline in LVEF among placebo arms was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.5%–7.3%) with a doxorubicin equivalent anthracycline dose of 385 mg/m². Meta‐regression analysis showed no significant difference in LVEF against doxorubicin equivalent anthracycline dose as continuous (P=0.29) or against published cut‐offs for cardiotoxicity (250 mg/m², P=0.21; 360 mg/m², P=0.40; and 400 mg/m², P=0.66). The differences in mean LVEF were not associated with sex, adjunct chemotherapy, or cancer type.

Conclusions

The magnitude of LVEF impairment post‐anthracycline therapy appears less than previously described with modern dosing regimens. This may improve the accuracy of power calculation for future clinical trials assessing the role of cardioprotective therapy.

Prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anthracyclines are extensively used in oncologic patients, in particular for breast cancer and hematological malignancies. Cardiac injury is a potentially dangerous side effect of these drugs. In this systematic review, we analyzed published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess if potential cardioprotective drugs (i.e., renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] blockers and β-blockers) may prevent heart damage by anthracyclines. Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE database until August 2020. The impact of cardioprotective drugs to prevent anthracyclines-induced cardiac injury was expressed as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic. Twelve RCTs for a total of 1.035 cancer patients treated with anthracyclines were included. RAAS blockers, β-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists showed a statistically significant benefit in preventing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction (MD 3.57, 95% CI 1.04, 6.09) in 11 studies. A non-statistically significant difference was observed in preventing E/A velocity decrease (MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.00, 0.17; 9 studies), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) increase (MD - 0.88, 95% CI, - 2.75,0.99; 6 studies), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) increase (MD -0.95, 95% CI - 2.67,0.76; 6 studies), and mitral A velocity decrease (MD - 1.42, 95% CI - 3.01,0.17; 4 studies). Heart failure was non-significantly reduced in the cardioprotective arm (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.06, 1.59; 5 studies). Hypotension was non-significantly increased in the cardioprotective arm (OR 3.91, 95% CI 0.42, 36.46, 3 studies). Cardioprotective drugs reduce anthracycline-induced cardiac damage as assessed by echocardiographic parameters. The clinical relevance of this positive effect is still to be defined.

Role of Oxidative Stress in the Mechanisms of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Effects of Preventive Strategies

Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) persists as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Although many protective strategies have been evaluated, cardiotoxicity remains an ongoing threat. The mechanisms of AIC remain unclear; however, several pathways have been proposed, suggesting a multifactorial origin. When the central role of topoisomerase 2β in the pathophysiology of AIC was described some years ago, the classical reactive oxygen species (ROS) hypothesis shifted to a secondary position. However, new insights have reemphasized the importance of the role of oxidative stress-mediated signaling as a common pathway and a critical modulator of the different mechanisms involved in AIC. A better understanding of the mechanisms of cardiotoxicity is crucial for the development of treatment strategies. It has been suggested that the available therapeutic interventions for AIC could act on the modulation of oxidative balance, leading to a reduction in oxidative stress injury. These indirect antioxidant effects make them an option for the primary prevention of AIC. In this review, our objective is to provide an update of the accumulated knowledge on the role of oxidative stress in AIC and the modulation of the redox balance by potential preventive strategies.

Prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background Anthracycline based chemotherapy is commonly used in many malignancies. While life expectancy increases with the use of this medication, cardiac toxicity causes a risk for patients' health due to anthracyclines. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasizes on prevention of anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019 collecting published articles on primary prevention of anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. We conducted a network meta-analysis and a pairwise meta-analysis in order to compare direct and indirect cardiac agents group with control group calculate left ventricular ejection fraction change. Primary studies results were pooled using random effects model, frequent network meta-analyses, and performed pairwise meta-analysis using netmeta and meta packages respectively in R software version 3.5.1. Results Twelve studies reported left ventricular ejection fraction outcome among 526 patients in the cardiac agent group and 508 in the control group. Based on Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking cure result, spironolactone was the best in left ventricular ejection fraction change and based on meta-analysis, cardiac group had 1.98 unit left ventricular ejection fraction more than the control group (MD = 1.98, 95% CI 0.15-3.81, p value = 0.03). Conclusions The amount of left ventricular ejection fraction used by cardiac agents in anthracycline-based chemotherapy was reduced to a lesser extent. The effective and ineffective drugs were spironolactone and metoprolol, respectively.

Levosimendan Protects against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity by Regulating the PTEN/Akt Pathway

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Myocyte apoptosis plays a critical role in the development of doxorubicin- (DOX-) induced cardiotoxicity. In addition to its cardiotonic effect, laboratory evidence indicates that levosimendan can inhibit apoptosis, but its role in DOX-induced cardiac injury remains unclear. Therefore, the present study is aimed at exploring whether levosimendan could attenuate DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.

METHODS

Levosimendan (1 mg/kg) was administered to mice through oral gavage once daily for 4 weeks, and the mice were also subjected to an intraperitoneal injection of DOX (5 mg/kg) or saline, once a week for 4 weeks, to create a chronic model of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. A morphological examination and biochemical analysis were used to evaluate the effects of levosimendan. H9C2 cells were used to verify the protective role of levosimendan in vitro. And an Akt inhibitor was utilized to verify the cardioprotection of levosimendan.

RESULTS

Levosimendan reduced the cardiac dysfunction and attenuated the myocardial apoptosis induced by DOX in vivo and in vitro. Levosimendan also inhibited the activation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and upregulated P-Akt expression both in vivo and in vitro. And inhibition of Akt abolished the cardioprotection of levosimendan in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Levosimendan may protect against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity via modulation of the PTEN/Akt signaling pathway.

Heart failure from cancer therapy: can we prevent it?

Aims

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is still among the most effective treatment options for many types of cancer. However, cardiotoxicity, notably the decrease in left ventricular function under these regimens, can impair prognosis. Thus, prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity are crucial. The present meta‐analysis aims to assess the efficacy of beta‐blockers or angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for prevention of cardiotoxicity.

Methods and results

We systematically searched Pubmed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials published until February 2019. The analysis included randomized studies that reported on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 6 months of chemotherapy in cancer patients who received beta‐blockers or ACE inhibitors/ARBs for prevention of cardiotoxicity compared with controls. Studies on combination cardioprotective therapies were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoint was prevention of a decrease in LVEF as defined by the individual study and as assessed by either transthoracic echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging. We here show that patients under anthracycline‐based chemotherapy have a moderate yet significant benefit in LVEF from beta‐blockers or ACEs/ARBs. The beta‐blocker analysis included 769 cancer patients, and the ACE inhibitors/ARBs analysis included a total of 581 cancer patients. The mean LVEF difference between the beta‐blocker group and the control group was 2.57% (95% confidence interval 0.63–4.51, P = 0.009). The mean difference for ACE inhibitors/ARBs was 4.71% (95% confidence interval 0.38–9.03, P = 0.03). However, the beneficial effects throughout the studies were variable as documented by significant heterogeneity between the studies.

Conclusions

Systematic evidence is needed to solidly found recommendations for cardioprotective prevention during chemotherapy. Likewise, trials on other neurohumoral drugs (spironolactone) and lipid‐lowering approaches are required to improve protection for cardio‐oncology patients.

Therapy-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients: a well-known yet unresolved problem

Breast cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer, being one of the main health issues that needs to be addressed worldwide. New therapies have led to a remarkable increase in survival rates, which is unfortunately overshadowed by their negative impact on cardiac structure and function in disease-free patients. Since anthracyclines and trastuzumab cause the most undesired outcome in breast cancer patients - cardiac-related mortality, they have been widely studied. However, other therapies (such as hormonal therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-VEGF drugs etc.) can also affect the cardiovascular system and lead to ischemia, hypertension or vascular thromboembolism. Even though excessive research has been conducted in thepast decades, there are still no guidelines regarding the most adequate methods neither to detect and prevent severe cardiotoxicity that can finally lead to heart failure and ultimately death nor for the further management of patients after cardiotoxicity is detected. Biomarkers of ischemia (troponins T and I) and of overload (BNP and NT-proBNP) in association with periodic echocardiographies (assessment of the global longitudinal strain) are two of the most important means used by physicians in the evaluation of cardiac disease in this group of patients. Given that no internationally accepted guidelines for screening and surveillance of different populations exist, the cardio-oncology team is crucial in the management of these patients, their collaboration resulting in individualized treatment regimens. After careful evaluation of different variables (treatment effects, malignancy status, and the patient's pre-existing conditions), a decision is made to either reduce the dosage or rate of administration, change the medication or interrupt the treatment and initiate the cardioprotective therapeutic associations. Consequently, it is an absolute necessity the development of customized treatment guidelines and the conduction of multiple clinical studies in order to demonstrate their effect on long-term survival.