1
|
Serenari M, Berti D, Rivera B, Newhook TE, Kristjanpoller W, Ruzzenente A, Okuno M, De Bellis M, Panettieri E, Ahmad MU, Merlo I, De Rose AM, Nishino H, Sinnamon AJ, Donadon M, Hauger MS, Guevara OM, Munoz C, Denbo J, Chun YS, Tran Cao HS, Sanchez Claria R, Tzeng CWD, De Aretxabala X, Vivanco M, Brudvik KW, Seo S, Pekolj J, Poultsides GA, Anaya DA, Torzilli G, Giuliante F, Guglielmi A, Vinuela E, Vauthey JN, Cescon M, Vega EA. Optimizing Outcomes in Gallbladder Cancer: Identifying Predictors of Futile Up-Front Surgery in a Global Multi-center Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:4374-4382. [PMID: 40050485 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17083-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a poor prognosis, particularly in advanced stages, with surgery often offering limited survival benefit. This study aimed to identify risk factors for futile surgery (FS), defined as procedures followed by early recurrence or death. METHODS An international cohort of 788 patients who underwent up-front GBC surgery across 18 centers was analyzed. Futility was defined as recurrence within 5 months or death within 90 days after oncological surgery. A multivariate model was built, and an online calculator was developed to predict the probability of FS. RESULTS A total of 107 patients (13.6%) experienced FS, with a median survival of only 6.8 months, compared with 57.4 months for nonfutile cases. The key risk factors identified were the T3-T4 tumor stage (odds ratio [OR] 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-3.71), lymph node involvement (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.22-2.98), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.28-3.94). Incidental GBC diagnoses showed a lower risk of FS (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.25-0.67). The predictive model had a strong discriminative ability (c-statistic: 0.749). Decision curve analysis demonstrated the superiority of the multivariate model over individual predictors. CONCLUSIONS Refining patient selection can reduce futile surgeries in GBC. The predictive model provides a valuable online tool ( https://aicep.website/?cff-form=25 ) to improve decision-making and outcomes by minimizing unnecessary interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Berti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Belen Rivera
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Werner Kristjanpoller
- Department of Industries, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso, Chile
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - M Usman Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ignacio Merlo
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Agostino Maria De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrew J Sinnamon
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Marit S Hauger
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Cesar Munoz
- UGI and HPB Surgery Unit, Hospital Regional de Talca, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
| | - Jason Denbo
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xabier De Aretxabala
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Kristoffer W Brudvik
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Daniel A Anaya
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Eduardo Vinuela
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tripathi M, Vineet K, Joshi N, Pal A, Vispute T, Kapoor A, Paul P. Conundrum of station 13 lymph nodes in Gallbladder Carcinoma: Retrospective tryst with a forgotten entity. Updates Surg 2025:10.1007/s13304-025-02237-7. [PMID: 40360805 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02237-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025]
Abstract
Gallbladder cancers are one of the lethal cancers with dismal prognosis. There is discrepancy between various biliary societies regarding extent of regional lymph nodes of gallbladder. Some consider station 13 as regional nodes, whereas others consider it as distant metastatic node. This is a retrospective analysis of disease-free survival of stage IIIB and IVB-M0 patients in gall bladder cancer with positive station 13 lymph node. Electronic medical records of patients were used to retrieve the data. The mean and median disease-free survival of gallbladder carcinoma patients with station 13 lymph-node positivity is 16.2 months (95% CI 11.57-20.85 months) and 12 months (95% CI 9.57-14.43 months), respectively. Disease-free survival of Stage IIIB and IVB-M0 gallbladder carcinoma patients with station 13 lymph-node positivity is better than overall survival of stage IVB-M1 patients and supports the inclusion of station 13 lymph node as regional lymph-nodal basin of gall bladder carcinoma. This study paves the way for a large prospective study to consider station 13 lymph node as regional lymph node in gallbladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Tripathi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India
| | - Kumar Vineet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India.
| | - Nitesh Joshi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India
| | - Ankita Pal
- Clinical Research Secretariat, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India
| | - Tejas Vispute
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India
| | - Akhil Kapoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India
| | - Paramita Paul
- Department of Onco Pathology, MPMMCC & HBCH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Catalano G, Alaimo L, Chatzipanagiotou OP, Rashid Z, Kawashima J, Ruzzenente A, Aucejo F, Marques HP, Bandovas J, Hugh T, Bhimani N, Maithel SK, Kitago M, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Recurrence patterns and prediction of survival after recurrence for gallbladder cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 29:101997. [PMID: 39971095 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Recurrence patterns and their effect on survival remain ill-defined. This study aimed to analyze recurrence patterns and develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict survival after recurrence (SAR) of GBC. METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of GBC between 1999 and 2022 were identified using an international database. An Extreme Gradient Boosting ML model to predict SAR was developed and validated. RESULTS Among 348 patients, 110 (31.6%) developed disease recurrence during follow-up. The most common recurrence site was local (29.1%), followed by multiple site (26.4%), liver (21.8%), peritoneal (18.2%), and lung (0.05%). The median SAR was the longest in patients with lung recurrence (36.0 months), followed by those with local recurrence (15.7 months). In contrast, patients with peritoneal (8.9 months), liver (8.5 months), or multiple-site (6.4 months) recurrence had a considerably shorter SAR. Patients with multiple-site recurrence had a worse SAR than individuals with single-site recurrence (6.4 vs 11.10 months, respectively; P =.014). The model demonstrated good performance in the evaluation and bootstrapping cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 71.4 and 71.0, respectively). The most influential variables were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, local recurrence, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, American Joint Committee on Cancer T and N categories, and developing early disease recurrence (<12 months). To enable clinical applicability, an easy-to-use calculator was made available (https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/SARGB). CONCLUSION Except for lung recurrence, SAR for GBC was poor. A subset of patients with less aggressive disease biology may have favorable SAR. ML-based SAR prediction may help individuate candidates for curative re-resection when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Catalano
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States; Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Zayed Rashid
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jun Kawashima
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Aucejo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joao Bandovas
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nazim Bhimani
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang SQ, Zou RQ, Dai YS, Hu HJ, Li FY. Prognostic evaluation in gallbladder carcinoma: Introducing a composite risk model integrating nutritional and immune markers. BIOMOLECULES & BIOMEDICINE 2025; 25:425-435. [PMID: 39067064 PMCID: PMC11734823 DOI: 10.17305/bb.2024.10673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
The importance of evaluating the nutritional status and immune condition prior to surgery has gained significant attention in predicting the prognosis of cancer patients in recent years. The objective of this study is to establish a risk model for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients. Data from GBC patients who underwent radical resection at West China Hospital of Sichuan University (China) from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. A novel risk model was created by incorporating the prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio, and each patient was assigned a risk score. The patients were then divided into low- and high-risk cohorts, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of clinicopathological features and prognosis. Propensity score matching was conducted to reduce potential bias. A total of 300 GBC patients receiving radical surgery were identified and included in this study. Patients in the high-risk group were older, had higher levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), were more likely to experience postoperative complications, and had more aggressive tumor characteristics, such as poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. They also had lower overall survival (OS) rates (5-year OS rate: 11.2% vs. 37.4%) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (5-year DFS rate: 5.1% vs. 18.2%). After propensity score matching, the high-risk population still experienced poorer prognosis (5-year OS rate: 12.7% vs 20.5%; 5-year DFS rate: 3.2% vs 8.2%). The risk model combining prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio can serve as a standalone predictor for the prognosis and assist in optimizing the treatment approach for GBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-qi Yang
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Rui-qi Zou
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu-shi Dai
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hai-jie Hu
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fu-yu Li
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Catalano G, Alaimo L, Chatzipanagiotou OP, Ruzzenente A, Aucejo F, Marques HP, Lam V, Hugh T, Bhimani N, Maithel SK, Kitago M, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Machine learning prediction of early recurrence after surgery for gallbladder cancer. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae297. [PMID: 39569737 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2024] [Revised: 10/08/2024] [Accepted: 11/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer is often associated with poor prognosis, especially when patients experience early recurrence after surgery. Machine learning may improve prediction accuracy by analysing complex non-linear relationships. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a machine learning model to predict early recurrence risk after resection of gallbladder cancer. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, patients who underwent resection of gallbladder cancer with curative intent between 2001 and 2022 were identified using an international database. Patients were assigned randomly to a development and an evaluation cohort. Four machine learning models were trained to predict early recurrence (within 12 months) and compared using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS Among 374 patients, 56 (15.0%) experienced early recurrence; most patients had T1 (51, 13.6%) or T2 (180, 48.1%) disease, and a subset had lymph node metastasis (120, 32.1%). In multivariable Cox analysis, resection margins (HR 2.34, 95% c.i. 1.55 to 3.80; P < 0.001), and greater AJCC T (HR 2.14, 1.41 to 3.25; P < 0.001) and N (HR 1.59, 1.05 to 2.42; P = 0.029) categories were independent predictors of early recurrence. The random forest model demonstrated the highest discrimination in the evaluation cohort (AUC 76.4, 95% c.i. 66.3 to 86.5), compared with XGBoost (AUC 74.4, 53.4 to 85.3), support vector machine (AUC 67.2, 54.4 to 80.0), and logistic regression (AUC 73.1, 60.6 to 85.7), as well as good accuracy after bootstrapping validation (AUC 75.3, 75.0 to 75.6). Patients classified as being at high versus low risk of early recurrence had much worse overall survival (36.1 versus 63.8% respectively; P < 0.001). An easy-to-use calculator was made available (https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/GallbladderER). CONCLUSION Machine learning-based prediction of early recurrence after resection of gallbladder cancer may help stratify patients, as well as help inform postoperative adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Catalano
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Federico Aucejo
- Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vincent Lam
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, School of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nazim Bhimani
- Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, School of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang SQ, Feng H, Tian Y, Zou RQ, Dai YS, Hu HJ, Li FY. Unraveling early recurrence of risk factors in Gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108372. [PMID: 38718620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most prevalent biliary tract tumor characterized by a high incidence of recurrence, even after curative-intent surgery. The object of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the risk factors related to early recurrence (ER). METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify published articles up to February 2024. Data on risk factors associated with ER reported by two or more studies were collected. Selection of different effect models based on data heterogeneity. RESULTS Out of 6497 initially identified articles based on our search strategies, only 5 were eligible and included in this meta-analysis and 12 ER-related factors were collected. The overall recurrence rate was reported between 32.3% and 61.0 %, and the ER rate ranged from 19.6% to 26.5 %. Concentrations of CA19-9 (OR 3.03 95 % CI 2.20-4.17) and CEA (OR 1.85 95 % CI 1.24-2.77), tumor differentiation (OR 2.79, 95 % CI 1.86-4.20), AJCC T stage (OR 7.64, 95%CI 3.40-17.18), lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.71, 95 % CI 1.83-4.03), perineural invasion (OR 2.71, 95 % CI 1.79-4.12), liver involvement (OR 5.69, 95%CI 3.78-8.56) and adjuvant therapy (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.06-4.55) were identified as the risk factors of ER. CONCLUSION This study may provide valuable insights for early identification of increased ER risk and making informed decisions regarding the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of patients with GBC. To draw more definitive conclusions, there is a need for high-quality prospective studies involving multiple centers and diverse racial populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Qi Yang
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Huan Feng
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Rui-Qi Zou
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu-Shi Dai
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hai-Jie Hu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou Y, Chen S, Wu Y, Li L, Lou Q, Chen Y, Xu S. Multi-clinical index classifier combined with AI algorithm model to predict the prognosis of gallbladder cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1171837. [PMID: 37234992 PMCID: PMC10206143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1171837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives It is significant to develop effective prognostic strategies and techniques for improving the survival rate of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). We aim to develop the prediction model from multi-clinical indicators combined artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for the prognosis of GBC. Methods A total of 122 patients with GBC from January 2015 to December 2019 were collected in this study. Based on the analysis of correlation, relative risk, receiver operator characteristic curve, and importance by AI algorithm analysis between clinical factors and recurrence and survival, the two multi-index classifiers (MIC1 and MIC2) were obtained. The two classifiers combined eight AI algorithms to model the recurrence and survival. The two models with the highest area under the curve (AUC) were selected to test the performance of prognosis prediction in the testing dataset. Results The MIC1 has ten indicators, and the MIC2 has nine indicators. The combination of the MIC1 classifier and the "avNNet" model can predict recurrence with an AUC of 0.944. The MIC2 classifier and "glmet" model combination can predict survival with an AUC of 0.882. The Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that MIC1 and MIC2 indicators can effectively predict the median survival of DFS and OS, and there is no statistically significant difference in the prediction results of the indicators (MIC1: χ2 = 6.849, P = 0.653; MIC2: χ2 = 9.14, P = 0.519). Conclusions The MIC1 and MIC2 combined with avNNet and mda models have high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the prognosis of GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Zhou
- Physical Examination Center, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Aptamers and Theranostics, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- The Clinical Laboratory Department, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Aptamers and Theranostics, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Siyu Chen
- The Clinical Laboratory Department, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Aptamers and Theranostics, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuchen Wu
- The Clinical Laboratory Department, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Aptamers and Theranostics, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lanqing Li
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine in Diagnosis and Monitoring Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qinqin Lou
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine in Diagnosis and Monitoring Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yongyi Chen
- The Clinical Laboratory Department, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Aptamers and Theranostics, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Songxiao Xu
- The Clinical Laboratory Department, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Aptamers and Theranostics, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang L, Zhang C, Tian Y, Liao C, Yan M, Qiu F, Zhou S, Lai Z, Wang Y, Lin Y, Chen S. Laparoscopic segment 4b+5 liver resection for stage T3 gallbladder cancer. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8893-8907. [PMID: 35906460 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09325-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still controversy over whether to perform laparoscopic surgery for T3 stage gallbladder cancer. In addition, the necessity of segment 4b+5 liver resection for stage T3 gallbladder has not been reported. This article aims to explore the safety, effectiveness, and short-term prognosis of laparoscopic segment 4b+5 liver resection for T3 stage gallbladder cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study. Disease-free survival, perioperative complications, and intraoperative safety were analyzed to evaluate safety and effectiveness. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, number of lymph nodes obtained, postoperative complications, or disease-free survival (DFS) between the open group (OG) and laparoscopic group (LG) (P > 0.05). The DFS time of the S4b+5 resection group (S4b5) was longer than that of the wedge group (P = 0.016). Cox regression showed that positive margins (HR, 5.32; 95% CI 1.03-27.63; P = 0.047), lymph node metastasis (HR, 2.70; 95% CI 1.31-5.53; P = 0.007), and liver S4b+5 resection (HR, 0.30; 95% CI 0.14-0.66; P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for DFS. The operative time of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided liver S4b5 segment resection was shorter than that of traditional laparoscopic S4b+5 resection guided by hepatic veins (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic liver S4b+5 resection for T3 stage gallbladder cancer is safe and feasible and can prolong DFS. ICG fluorescence-guided negative staining may reduce the difficulty of the operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Chenjun Zhang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Yifeng Tian
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Chengyu Liao
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Maolin Yan
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Funan Qiu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Songqiang Zhou
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Zhide Lai
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Yaodong Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Ye Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 106 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Shi Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
| |
Collapse
|