Clinical Impact of Compensatory Hyperinflation of the Nontreated Adjacent Lobe After Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Valves

A 6-year experience of Zephyr endobronchial valves for severe emphysema in an Australian single-centre cohort

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial valve (EBV) insertion for lung volume reduction is a management option for patients with severe emphysema. One-way valves cause lobar deflation and improve lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life.

AIMS

To retrospectively analyse and compare the outcomes of the first 57 patients treated with EBVs between 2015 and 2021 at the Royal Adelaide Hospital to international standards.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), treated lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 3, 6 and 12 months after valve insertion were reviewed against established minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). Complications and subjective breathlessness measured by Borg scores were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included. At 12 months, 77.2% achieved TLVR. FEV1 improved by 170 mL (95% confidence interval (CI): 100-250, P < 0.001), 80 mL (95% CI: 10-150, P = 0.019) and 40 mL (95% CI: -60 to 130, P 0.66) at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. RV improved by -610 mL (95% CI: -330 to -900, P < 0.0001) at 3 months, -640 mL (95% CI: -360 to -920, P < 0.0001) at 6 months and -360 mL (95% CI: -60 to -680, P = 0.017) at 12 months. 6MWD improved by 57.34 m (95% CI: 36.23-78.45, P < 0.0001) and 44.93 m (95% CI: 7.19-82.67, P = 0.02) at 3 and 6 months. Borg score improved by -0.53 (95% CI: 0.11 to -1.2, P = 0.11) and -0.49 (95% CI: 0.17 to -1.15, P = 0.16) at 3 and 6 months. Complication rates aligned with international standards with mucous/infection (26.3%) and pneumothorax (17.5%) as the most common. Subgroup analysis signalled improved outcomes in patients with heterogeneous emphysema.

CONCLUSION

Our study represents the first publicly funded Australian analysis of EBVs. The results align with international prospective trials demonstrating improved lung function and exercise capacity. Australians with severe emphysema and gas trapping should be referred to a multidisciplinary centre for consideration of EBVs.

A preclinical animal study to evaluate the operability and safety of domestic one-way endobronchial valves

Purpose

To evaluate the operability and safety of bronchoscopic domestic one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) on animals.

Methods

Nine pigs were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive domestic one-way EBV (the experimental group, n = 6) and Zephyr® EBV (the control group, n = 3). Routine blood tests, arterial blood gases, and CT scans of the lungs were performed 1 day pre-procedure in addition to 1 week and 1 month post-procedure to assess changes in blood markers and lung volumes. At 1 month post-procedure, the animals were sacrificed, followed by removal of all valves via bronchoscopy. Pathological examinations of critical organs were subsequently performed.

Results

A total of 15 valves were placed in the experimental group and 6 valves were placed in the control group, without serious complications. Routine blood tests and arterial blood gas examinations at 1 day pre-procedure, 1 week post-procedure, and 1 month post-procedure did not differ significantly in both groups. No EBV displacement was noted under bronchoscopy, and the valve was smoothly removable by bronchoscope at 1 month post-procedure. At 1 week post-procedure, varying degrees of target lung lobe volume reduction were observed on lung CT in both groups. Lung volume reduction was achieved at 1 month post-procedure in both groups, without significant statistical difference. Although 3 cases in the experimental group and 1 case in the control group developed varying degrees of pneumonia, the inflammatory response did not increase over time during the experimental period. Pathological examination revealed no significant abnormal changes in the critical organs for both groups.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that domestic EBV is safe and reliable for endobronchial application in general-grade laboratory white pigs. The safety of domestic EBV is similar to that of Zephyr® EBV, with good ease of use and operability. This kind of domestic EBV can meet the safety evaluation requirements for animal testing.

The impact of emphysema heterogeneity on treatment response after endobronchial valve treatment

Background

Lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves can significantly improve functional outcomes in patients with advanced emphysema. The extent and spatial distribution pattern of emphysema shows considerable heterogeneity, which might affect response to endobronchial valve treatment. Our aim was to study the effect of emphysema heterogeneity on change in clinical outcomes after endobronchial valve treatment.

Methods

Data were collected from our national registry of patients who received endobronchial valve treatment between 2016 and 2020. We assessed the association between the heterogeneity index, absolute difference in destruction between the target and ipsilateral lobe, and relative change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 6-week, 6-month and 12-month follow-up.

Results

In total, 236 patients were included. Heterogeneity index was significantly associated with improvements in FEV1, RV and 6MWD at all follow-up visits, and in SGRQ at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. The majority of patients, independent of heterogeneity index, showed clinically meaningful improvements based on minimal important difference thresholds.

Conclusions

Heterogeneity index influences the degree of clinical improvement after endobronchial valve treatment where in general a more heterogeneous distribution translates to larger improvements. However, patients with a more homogeneous distribution also showed clinically meaningful improvements. Therefore, we believe emphysema heterogeneity alone should not be used as a decisive patient selection criterion, but should be weighed in the context of all other relevant patient and target lobe characteristics when deciding on a patient's treatment eligibility.