Dose-proportional pharmacokinetic properties of GLA5PR GLARS-NF1 controlled-release pregabalin in healthy Korean volunteers: a randomized, open, single-dose, parallel study

Evaluation of Gabapentin and Pregabalin Use in Hospitalized Patients With Decreased Kidney Function

Background: Gabapentin and pregabalin are well-tolerated medications primarily cleared by the kidney. Patients receiving higher gabapentinoid doses with decreased kidney function may be at an increased risk of adverse effects (AEs), but limited evidence exists evaluating gabapentinoid dosing and AEs in this population. Objective: To determine whether patients with decreased creatinine clearance (CrCl) experienced increased frequency of AEs related to gabapentinoid dose at hospital admission. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study in adults with a gabapentinoid prescription and serum creatinine measurement documented on hospital admission. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of gabapentinoid prescription based on CrCl (stratified by CrCl ≥60 mL/min, <60 mL/min, 15-29 mL/min, and <15 mL/min) at admission. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of AEs related to gabapentinoids and concomitant opioid and psychiatric prescriptions. Results: A total of 286 patients were included in this study (gabapentin n = 234, pregabalin n = 52). Patients with a CrCl <60 mL/min and doses above the manufacturer's recommendation were prescribed gabapentin (34%) and pregabalin (22.7%). For patients with a CrCl of 15 to 29 mL/min and <15 mL/min groups, inappropriately high doses were prescribed for gabapentin (48.8%) and pregabalin (45%). A significant increase in recorded falls (P = 0.029) was identified in patients with a CrCl <60 mL/min. Concomitant opioid and psychiatric medications contributed to a higher prevalence of AEs regardless of CrCl. Conclusions: Patients with a CrCl <60 mL/min were frequently prescribed inappropriately high doses of gabapentinoids. The relationship between gabapentinoid dosing, kidney function, and the incidence of gabapentinoid-related AEs at hospital admission requires larger, multicentre studies.

A phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a novel, potent GABA analog HSK16149 in healthy Chinese subjects

Purpose: HSK16149 is a novel, potent gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analog for the treatment of neuropathic pain. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of HSK16149 after single and multiple doses in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comprised two parts: SAD (single ascending-dose study) and MAD (multiple ascending-dose study). A total of 122 healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. HSK16149 capsule or placebo was administered as the protocol required. The safety of the drug was evaluated through clinical examinations and adverse events. Blood and urine samples were collected at the designated time intervals for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results: Subjects were generally well tolerated after HSK16149 administration and the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) was dizziness, which was expected based on the mechanism of action of HSK16149. In SAD, AUC and Cmax were shown to have a dose-proportional relationship in the dose range of 5-120 mg. The t1/2 of HSK16149 is 3.7-6.4 h. In MAD, after a single and multiple administration of 15-80 mg, AUC and Cmax are proportional to the increased dose of HSK16149, and the accumulative ratios of AUC and Cmax at steady-state were 1.05-1.44 and 1.07-1.36, respectively, indicating that HSK16149 only accumulated slightly after repeated administration. Conclusion: HSK16149 was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Based on the safety and pharmacokinetic data, 80 mg twice daily (BID) was suggested as the highest target dose for further clinical development. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20182535 and CTR20191317.

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib is an irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Co-administration of TKIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can lead to potential drug-drug interactions, which decreases solubility and absorption of TKIs and is ultimately associated with reduced efficacy of TKIs. This retrospective analysis evaluated the effect of ARAs on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib using data obtained from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In a total of 234 patients with lazertinib pharmacokinetics observed at steady state, dose-normalized (DN) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_ss), maximum concentration (C_max,ss), and/or trough concentration on day 15 (C_D15) were compared between a group receiving ARA concomitantly for at least 4 days (ARA group) and another group not receiving ARA (non-ARA group) in a dose-proportional range. Additionally, a comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters at a therapeutic dose of 240 mg once daily was evaluated.

RESULTS

Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ARA group to non-ARA group for DNAUC_ss, DNC_max,ss, and DNC_D15 at 40 mg to 320 mg once daily showing the dose proportionality were 0.8743 (0.7285-1.0493), 0.9035 (0.7482-1.0910), and 0.9126 (0.7364-1.1311), respectively. GMRs with 90% CIs for AUC_ss, C_max,ss, and C_D15 at 240 mg were 0.9136 (0.6637-1.2576), 0.9012 (0.6703-1.2116), and 0.8850 (0.6463-1.2118), respectively.

CONCLUSION

All pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (p values > 0.05), indicating that co-administered ARAs did not significantly affect the steady state pharmacokinetics of lazertinib. Therefore, no dose adjustment of lazertinib is required in patients receiving concomitant ARAs.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT03046992, NCT04075396.

Use of extended-release and immediate-release anti-seizure medications with a long half-life to improve adherence in epilepsy: A guide for clinicians

Poor adherence to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is associated with breakthrough seizures and potentially increased toxicity in patients with epilepsy. Extended-release (ER) drugs and immediate-release (IR) drugs with a long half-life (t_1/2) that permit once-daily dosing (such as, perampanel, zonisamide, lamotrigine [IR, ER] and topiramate [ER]) have a number of advantages over short t_1/2 ASMs that require multiple daily dosing. These advantages include simplification of dosing regimens, reduction in pill burden, and a decrease in the peak-to-trough fluctuations in serum drug concentration that may be associated with a decreased risk of adverse effects and seizures. Such properties have wider implications in improving patient adherence to treatment. This article is intended as a practical guide for clinicians that provides an overview of the features of ER ASMs and long t_1/2 IR ASMs that are advantageous in the context of patient adherence and pharmacokinetic "forgiveness" (after missing a dose). In addition, we note that efforts to improve adherence should not depend solely on drug dosing regimens and drug pharmacokinetics, but should be part of a wider strategy that includes therapeutic drug monitoring, improved healthcare provider-patient dialogue, patient education, and the use of "reminder" technology.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics assessment of oestriol and trimegestone containing vaginal rings in healthy women with childbearing potential

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oestriol (E3) and trimegestone (TMG) in healthy women after application of three different vaginal rings over 21 days. The vaginal rings had a nominal delivery rate of 0.413/0.050 mg/day (Test 1), 0.311/0.090 mg/day (Test 2) and 0.209/0.137 mg/day (Test 3) E3/TMG.

METHODS

Thirty-five healthy women were randomised to receive a single application of Test 1, 2 or 3 (Clinical Trial NCT03343912). The E3 and TMG plasma concentration was determined by LC-MS/MS. Oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (PG) serum concentrations, and bleeding patern were determined as pharmacodynamic parameters. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events and local tolerability.

RESULTS

The total and maximum exposure of E3 and TMG increased in a proportional ratio to dose. However, not in a magnitude which was expected from the dose differences for E3. During Test 2 and 3 treatment all E2 and PG values remained on a well suppressed level until end of treatment. E2 and PG serum levels increased distinctly earlier after ring removal with Test 1 compared to Test 2 and 3. Test 3 achieved 95.24% of "no bleeding" days under treatment followed by Test 1 (91.67%), and Test 2 (86.15%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Test 3 formulation presented the best dose combination of E3/TMG for contraception. Moreover, all vaginal rings were well tolerated.

Efficacy and Safety of the Controlled-release Pregabalin Tablet (GLA5PR GLARS-NF1) and Immediate-release Pregabalin Capsule for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Phase III Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of controlled-release pregabalin (GLA5PR GLARS-NF1 tablets) with those of an immediate-release pregabalin capsule after 12 weeks' administration to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, Phase III study, the primary outcome was to confirm that a single treatment with the study drug (after the evening meal) is clinically noninferior to the control drug (BID regimen) at improving the mean Daily Pain Rating Scale score for treating peripheral neuropathic pain. Secondary outcomes were the Daily Sleep Interference Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, and frequency of rescue medication use. The safety and tolerability of GLA5PR GLARS-NF1 tablets were also evaluated. The total daily dose of pregabalin is 150-600 mg.

FINDINGS

Of the 352 randomized subjects, 261 (n = 130, study group; n = 131, control group) were analyzed. The difference in adjusted mean Daily Pain Rating Scale scores between the groups was -0.11 (95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.30), indicating that the study group is noninferior to the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in Daily Sleep Interference Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale scores between the groups at treatment termination. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant difference in the use of rescue medication between the groups (P = 0.217). The overall adverse event profile of the groups was similar, and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed.

IMPLICATIONS

GLA5PR GLARS-NF1 tablets can be effectively and safely administered to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Furthermore, we found that sleep, anxiety, and depression were improved with pain control. Owing to the once-daily administration, treatment effects can be maximized by improved treatment compliance. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03221907.