The Effect of Nintedanib on T-Cell Activation, Subsets and Functions

Emerging role of immune cells as drivers of pulmonary fibrosis

The pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other forms of interstitial lung disease, involves a complex interplay of various factors including host genetics, environmental pollutants, infection, aberrant repair and dysregulated immune responses. Highly variable clinical outcomes of some ILDs, in particular IPF, have made it difficult to identify the precise mechanisms involved in disease pathogenesis and thus the development of a specific cure or treatment to halt and reverse the decline in patient health. With the advent of in-depth molecular diagnostics, it is becoming evident that the pathogenesis of IPF is unlikely to be the same for all patients and therefore will likely require different treatment approaches. Chronic inflammation is a cardinal feature of IPF and is driven by both innate and adaptive immune responses. Inflammatory cells and activated fibroblasts secrete various pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that perpetuate the inflammatory response and contribute to the recruitment and activation of more immune cells and fibroblasts. The balance between pro-inflammatory and regulatory immune cell subsets, as well as the interactions between immune cell types and resident cells within the lung microenvironment, ultimately determines the extent of fibrosis and the potential for resolution. This review examines the role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in pulmonary fibrosis, with an emphasis on IPF. The role of different immune cell types is discussed as well as novel anti-inflammatory and immunotherapy approaches currently in clinical trial or in preclinical development.

Add-on therapy for pulmonary fibrosis, a forthcoming era with implications for practice: the BI 101550 and RELIEF trials

The therapeutic landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PFILD) is increasingly complex, with add-on antifibrotic options now in clinical trials, or available for patients progressing on first-line therapy in both conditions. Here, we review two recent trials of potential add-on therapeutic options, the BI 101550 and RELIEF trials. BI 101550 was a phase 2 randomised control trial (RCT) of a novel phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor in patients with IPF, with a primary end-point of change in forced vital capacity (ΔFVC) (in mL) at 12 weeks. The RELIEF trial was a phase 2 RCT in patients with PFILD, with a primary end-point of ΔFVC (absolute % predicted) over 48 weeks. Whilst the BI 101550 and RELIEF trials showed positive results in their primary end-points, the strengths and weaknesses of both trials are discussed with importance for their interpretation and clinical impact. We review current clinical practice in IPF and PFILD and place the BI101550 and RELIEF trial results in context, highlighting advances and problems with antifibrotic therapies.

Commentary on

Richeldi L, et al. Trial of a preferential phosphodiesterase 4B inhibitor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 2178-2187.Behr J, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (RELIEF): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 476-486.

Impact of ILD-Specific Therapies on Perioperative Course in Patients with Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Undergoing Lung Transplantation

Immunosuppressants and antifibrotics are currently used to treat patients with various interstitial lung diseases, which may undergo lung transplantation (LTx). The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of therapeutic regimen on the perioperative course in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) undergoing LTx. All patients with IPF and PPF undergoing LTx between January 2014 and December 2021 were included. We retrospectively screened for previous use of immunosuppressants and antifibrotic therapy. We analyzed perioperative courses, short-term outcomes, and safety retrospectively. In total, 286 patients with diagnosis of IPF or PPF were analyzed. According to the treatment regimen before LTx, the study cohort was divided into four groups and compared. No differences between antifibrotic monotherapy, combined antifibrotic and immunosuppressive therapy with regard to postoperative complications were observed. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in patients with antifibrotics prior to LTx. Pretreatment with antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy, lower body mass index (BMI) and lower blood loss, were independently associated with primary graft dysfunction grades 0-3 72 hours after LTx (p < 0.001). Finally, patients with antifibrotic monotherapy developed significantly less de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (p = 0.009). Higher intraoperative blood loss, etiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and older age were independently associated with shorter survival after LTx. Use of antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy in IPF/PPF patients undergoing LTx, proved to be safe and might lead to beneficial effects after LTx.

Re-hospitalisation predicts poor prognosis after acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Several markers have been identified to increase the risk for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) or mortality related to AE-ILD. However, less is known about the risk predictors of ILD patients who have survived AE. The aim of the study was to characterise AE-ILD survivors and investigate prognostic factors in this subpopulation.

METHODS

All AE-ILD patients (n = 95) who had been discharged alive from two hospitals located in Northern Finland were selected from a population of 128 AE-ILD patients. Clinical data related to the hospital treatment and six-month follow-up visit were collected retrospectively from medical records.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and 42 patients with other ILD were identified. Two thirds of the patients had been treated without invasive or non-invasive ventilation support. The clinical features of six-month survivors (n = 65) and non-survivors (n = 30) did not differ in terms of medical treatment or oxygen requirements. Of the patients, 82.5% used corticosteroids at the six-month follow-up visit. Fifty-two patients experienced at least one non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation before the six-month follow-up visit. In a univariate model, IPF diagnosis, high age and a non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation increased the risk of death, although re-hospitalisation was the only independent risk factor in a multivariate model. In six-month survivors, there was no statistically significant decrease in pulmonary function test results (PFT) examined at the follow-up visit compared with earlier PFT examined near the time of AE-ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

The AE-ILD survivors were a heterogeneous group of patients both clinically and in terms of their outcome. A non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation was identified as a marker of poor prognosis among AE-ILD survivors.

Interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: A multidisciplinary problem in rheumatology and pulmonology

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRDs) characterized by chronic erosive arthritis and systemic damage to internal organs, leading to early disability and reduced life expectancy in patients. A particularly important place among the systemic manifestations of RA is occupied by interstitial lung diseases (ILD) – the most severe form of pulmonary pathology in RA, defined as RA-ILD, which is pathogenetically associated with risk factors (smoking, etc.) and autoimmune mechanisms underlying RA. RA-ILD is a subtype of RA characterized by a severe course and a poor prognosis и неблагоприятным прогнозом. The review presents new data regarding risk factors and biomarkers for RA-ILD; modern diagnostic capabilities based on the use of functional lung tests, high-resolution computed tomography, ultrasound examination of the lungs. Particular attention is paid to the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy, including methotrexate, biologics, JAK inhibitors, and antifibrotic therapy. An algorithm for the pharmacotherapy of RA-ILD has been proposed.

The lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase-specific inhibitor A-770041 attenuates lung fibrosis via the suppression of TGF-β production in regulatory T-cells

Background

Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) is a member of the Src family of tyrosine kinases. The significance of Lck inhibition in lung fibrosis has not yet been fully elucidated, even though lung fibrosis is commonly preceded by inflammation caused by infiltration of T-cells expressing Lck. In this study, we examined the effect of Lck inhibition in an experimental mouse model of lung fibrosis. We also evaluated the effect of Lck inhibition on the expression of TGF-β1, an inhibitory cytokine regulating the immune function, in regulatory T-cells (Tregs).

Methods

Lung fibrosis was induced in mice by intratracheal administration of bleomycin. A-770041, a Lck-specific inhibitor, was administrated daily by gavage. Tregs were isolated from the lung using a CD4⁺CD25⁺ Regulatory T-cell Isolation Kit. The expression of Tgfb on Tregs was examined by flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The concentration of TGF-β in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and cell culture supernatant from Tregs was quantified by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

A-770041 inhibited the phosphorylation of Lck in murine lymphocytes to the same degree as nintedanib. A-770041 attenuated lung fibrosis in bleomycin-treated mice and reduced the concentration of TGF-β in BALF. A flow-cytometry analysis showed that A-770041 reduced the number of Tregs producing TGF-β1 in the lung. In isolated Tregs, Lck inhibition by A-770041 decreased the Tgfb mRNA level as well as the concentration of TGF-β in the supernatant.

Conclusions

These results suggest that Lck inhibition attenuated lung fibrosis by suppressing TGF-β production in Tregs and support the role of Tregs in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis.

Humoral response among patients with interstitial lung disease vaccinated with the BNT162b2 SARS-Cov-2 vaccine: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are at high risk of severe COVID-19 infection. Additionally, their anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic treatment may cause immunosuppression. Nevertheless, their ability to mount an adequate immune response to messenger RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines was not evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the humoral response after the BNT162b2 vaccine among idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients treated with antifibrotic therapy and among non-IPF ILD patients treated with anti-inflammatory therapy.

METHODS

We conducted an observational prospective cohort study to evaluate the level of anti-spike (S-IgG) antibodies after two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with ILD. The cohort included 40 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with anti-fibrotic therapy and 29 patients with non-IPF ILD treated with anti-inflammatory therapy. For S-IgG titer measurement, one serology test was drawn from all patients 4-6 months after the second vaccine dose. In addition a control group matched for age and sex was created from a healthy control cohort of 107 patients. The study was conducted in Rabin Medical Center (Israel) between June and August 2021.

RESULTS

All patients in the anti-fibrotic arm were seropositive (40/40), corresponding to the matched control group (P = 1.0). The anti-fibrotic arm had a significantly lower median antibody titer in comparison to the matched control group (361.10 [IQR, 207-811] AU/ml vs. 820.75 [IQR, 459-1313] AU/ml; P < 0.001). Only 48.3% (14/29) of patients in the anti-inflammatory arm were seropositive in comparison to 100% (29/29) in the healthy control group (P < 0.001). The anti-inflammatory arm had a significantly lower median antibody titer in comparison to the healthy control group (39.6 [IQR, 4.25-165] AU/ml vs. 970.1 [IQR, 505-1926] AU/ml; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IPF patients treated with antifibrotic therapy mount an adequate immune response after 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, and maintain a 100% seropositivity rate 4-6 months after vaccination. However, their antibody titer was reduced in comparison to a healthy control group. Among patients with non-IPF ILD treated with anti-inflammatory therapy, 48% were seronegative 4-6 months after the second vaccine dose. Moreover, treatment with rituximab caused significant immunosuppression, even in comparison to other anti-inflammatory treatments.

The role of immune response in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: far beyond the Th1/Th2 imbalance

INTRODUCTION

. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic disease of unknown origin characterized by progressive scarring of the lung leading to irreversible loss of function. Despite the availability of two drugs that are able to slow down disease progression, IPF remains a deadly disease. The pathogenesis of IPF is poorly understood, but a dysregulated wound healing response following recurrent alveolar epithelial injury is thought to be crucial. Areas covered. In the last few years, the role of the immune system in IPF pathobiology has been reconsidered; indeed, recent data suggest that a dysfunctional immune system may promote and unfavorable interplay with pro-fibrotic pathways thus acting as a cofactor in disease development and progression. In this article, we review and critically discuss the role of T cells in the pathogenesis and progression of IPF in the attempt to highlight ways in which further research in this area may enable the development of targeted immunomodulatory therapies for this dreadful disease.

EXPERT OPINION

A better understanding of T cells interactions has the potential to facilitate the development of immune modulators targeting multiple T cell-mediated pathways thus halting disease initiation and progression.

The use of exhaled air analysis in discriminating interstitial lung diseases: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Fibrotic Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of chronic lung diseases characterized by diverse degrees of lung inflammation and remodeling. They include idiopathic ILD such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and ILD secondary to chronic inflammatory diseases such as connective tissue disease (CTD). Precise differential diagnosis of ILD is critical since anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs, which are beneficial in inflammatory ILD, are detrimental in IPF. However, differential diagnosis of ILD is still difficult and often requires an invasive lung biopsy. The primary aim of this study is to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) patterns in exhaled air to non-invasively discriminate IPF and CTD-ILD. As secondary aim, the association between the IPF and CTD-ILD discriminating VOC patterns and functional impairment is investigated.

METHODS

Fifty-three IPF patients, 53 CTD-ILD patients and 51 controls donated exhaled air, which was analyzed for its VOC content using gas chromatograph- time of flight- mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

By applying multivariate analysis, a discriminative profile of 34 VOCs was observed to discriminate between IPF patients and healthy controls whereas 11 VOCs were able to distinguish between CTD-ILD patients and healthy controls. The separation between IPF and CTD-ILD could be made using 16 discriminating VOCs, that also displayed a significant correlation with total lung capacity and the 6 min' walk distance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports for the first time that specific VOC profiles can be found to differentiate IPF and CTD-ILD from both healthy controls and each other. Moreover, an ILD-specific VOC profile was strongly correlated with functional parameters. Future research applying larger cohorts of patients suffering from a larger variety of ILDs should confirm the potential use of breathomics to facilitate fast, non-invasive and proper differential diagnosis of specific ILDs in the future as first step towards personalized medicine for these complex diseases.

Role of antifibrotics in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy associated interstitial lung disease

The antifibrotic therapies nintedanib and pirfenidone were first approved by the United States for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 2014. In 2020, nintedanib received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of all progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD). Given that a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is progressive interstitial lung disease and respiratory failure, antifibrotic therapies may be useful as adjuvant to traditional immunosuppression. However, randomized controlled trials of antifibrotic therapies in IIM are lacking. The purpose of this review is to (1) summarize the mechanism of action of nintedanib and pirfenidone in ILD with possible role in IIM-ILD, (2) review the clinical data supporting their use in interstitial lung disease in general, and more specifically in connective tissue disease associated ILD, and (3) discuss the evidence and remaining challenges for using antifibrotic therapies in IIM-ILD.

Systemic Sclerosis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease and Nintedanib: A Rare Disease and a Promising Drug

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a rare disease with a progressive nature, eventually leading to lung fibrosis. Nintedanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a widely accepted drug for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a disease that shares some similarities with SSc-ILD regarding pathological disease processes. In this review, we aim to discuss the pathogenesis of SSc-ILD and the overall role of nintedanib in the management of SSc-ILD. SSc-ILD involves multiple pathological mediators contributing to various pathways that ultimately cause lung fibrosis. The pathogenesis of SSc-ILD is a complex phenomenon and still needs further study. Nintedanib has demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of SSc-ILD by reducing the progression of the pathological process. It has also proven its clinical significance in the management of SSc-ILD. However, the currently available literature does not have any evidence to compare the effectiveness of nintedanib with the already available treatment modalities such as cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and azathioprine (AZT). The current literature also lacks information about nintedanib's long-term consequences on patients with SSc-ILD. Therefore, to create better evidence-based treatment guidelines, we recommend that researchers conduct randomized clinical trials comparing nintedanib to MMF, CYC, AZT, etc., and continue surveillance to explore the long-term consequences of nintedanib.