Comparative Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Fixed-Dose Combination of Esomeprazole and Calcium Carbonate (AD-206) to the Conventional Esomeprazole

Construction of C-S and C-Se Bonds from Unstrained Ketone Precursors under Photoredox Catalysis

A mild photoredox catalyzed construction of sulfides, disulfides, selenides, sulfoxides and sulfones from unstrained ketone precursors is introduced. Combination of this deacylative process with SN 2 or coupling reactions provides novel and convenient modular strategies toward unsymmetrical or symmetric disulfides. Reactivity studies favor a bromine radical that initiates a HAT (Hydrogen Atom Transfer) from the aminal intermediate resulting in expulsion of a C-centered radical that is intercepted to make C-S and C-Se bonds. Gram scale reactions, broad substrate scope and tolerance towards various functional groups render this method appealing for future applications in the synthesis of organosulfur and selenium complexes.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic exploration of various combinations of tegoprazan immediate and delayed-release formulations

AIMS

The new modified-release formulation of tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to improve the management of acid-related disease, including nocturnal acid breakthrough, by prolonging the duration of acid suppression. This study aimed to explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of various combinations of tegoprazan with immediate-release (IR) and delayed-release (DR) formulations.

METHODS

A three-cohort, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-treatment, six-sequence, three-period crossover study was conducted. Various combinations of tegoprazan IR and DR formulations (50, 75 or 100 mg) were administered orally once per period. The 24-h intragastric pH was monitored before and after each administration. PK blood samples were collected for up to 48 h. PK and PD were compared among treatments.

RESULTS

Eighteen healthy Korean subjects completed the study. All treatment groups showed intragastric pH above 4 approximately 1 h following tegoprazan administration. Among the various combinations, the IR and DR combination at a 1:1 ratio induced greater gastric acid suppression (%Time pH ≥ 4) than IR alone in each dose group, both for 24 h (50 mg; 59% vs. 52%, P = .2188, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.92-22.27, 100 mg; 85% vs. 70%, P < .05, 95% CI 8.92-22.19) and at night (50 mg; 27% vs. 16%, P = .1563, 95% CI -11.79-37.71, 100 mg; 77% vs. 49%, P < .05, 95% CI 16.14-42.98), with similar systemic exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The combinatorial tegoprazan in the IR and DR 1:1 ratio formulation was found to induce stronger gastric acid suppression throughout the day and at night, compared to the conventional IR formulation.

Development of a Fast Onset Proton Pump Inhibitor: Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Rabeprazole and Sodium Bicarbonate (YPI-011) to the Conventional Enteric-Coated Rabeprazole

Purpose

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). Unlike conventional PPIs, non-enteric coated PPIs with antacid salt enable a faster acid suppression through the rapid absorption of the PPI. YPI-011 is a newly developed fixed-dose combination of a rabeprazole with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃). This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of YPI-011 to the conventional enteric-coated rabeprazole (Pariet^®).

Materials and Methods

A randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted with two different doses (10 and 20 mg) and 44 subjects in each group. They randomly received either a test or reference treatment for 7 days in the first period and the other treatment in the second period. Blood samples for the PK analysis were taken after the single- and multiple-dose. Intragastric pH monitoring for the PD analysis was implemented for baseline and after the single- and multiple-dose.

Results

Gastric acid suppression evaluated by the percentage decrease from baseline in the integrated gastric acidity for a 24-hour interval after the multiple-dose was similar between the treatments in both dose groups. The systemic exposure of rabeprazole at steady state after the multiple-dose was also similar between the treatments in both dose groups. The time to reach the maximum rabeprazole concentration was faster in the test treatment. The PK-PD relationship of PPI is well known, and the faster absorption of rabeprazole resulted in a more rapid mode of action in acid suppression.

Conclusion

The fixed dose combination of rabeprazole with NaHCO₃ showed a faster absorption and consequently, a more rapid gastric acid suppression with a similar systemic exposure of rabeprazole at steady state compared to the conventional enteric-coated rabeprazole.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esomezol DR, a New Dual Delayed-Release Formulation of Esomeprazole 20 Mg or 40 Mg, in Healthy Subjects

Background

Esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is widely used to treat acid-related disorders, but it has short plasma half-life which can cause insufficient gastric acid suppression, such as nocturnal acid breakthrough. A new dual delayed-release (DR) formulation of esomeprazole (Esomezol DR), was developed to extend the duration of gastric acid suppression.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of esomeprazole for the DR formulation compared to a conventional enteric-coated (EC) formulation (Nexium) in healthy male subjects.

Methods

Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-way crossover studies with esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg were conducted. Subjects received the DR formulation or the EC formulation once daily for 7 days in each period with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the 1st dose, and 24-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored before the 1st dose as baseline and after the 1st and the 7th dose.

Results

In 20 mg and 40 mg dose groups, 38 and 44 subjects completed the study, respectively. The DR formulation exhibited the dual-release pattern of esomeprazole, resulting in more sustained plasma concentration-time profiles compared to the EC formulation. The systemic exposure of esomeprazole for the DR formulation was comparable to that for the EC formulation, showing the similar area under the plasma concentration-time curve. The 24-hour gastric acid suppression was also similar between the two formulations, while the inhibition during night-time (22:00-06:00) showed a better tendency in the DR formulation.

Conclusion

The sustained exposure of esomeprazole in the DR formulation led to well-maintained and higher acid inhibition compared to the EC formulation, especially during the night-time. These results suggest that the DR formulation can be an alternative formulation to the conventional EC formulation, expecting the potential of relieving nocturnal acid-related symptoms.

Pharmacokinetics of Esomeprazole Magnesium After Single Oral Doses in Healthy Subjects: Bioequivalence Study and Food Effects

This study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of the newly developed delayed-release oral suspension (test) 40 mg esomeprazole magnesium compared to its marketed counterpart (40 mg; reference) in healthy adult Chinese subjects. We conducted randomized, open-label, two-period, single-dose, two-way crossover trials over a 7-day washout period, comprising a fasting trial and a fed trial. The subjects were administered the test or reference products in a 1:1 ratio at random throughout each period. Then, in the next session, they received the alternate products. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and WinNonlin software were used to assess the bioequivalence of esomeprazole peak plasma concentration (C_max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Overall, 33 subjects participated in the fasting trial and 42 subjects participated in the fed trial. Under both situations, the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means of C_max , AUC_0-t , and AUC_0-∞ were within equivalence ranges (80%-125%). In these trials, no severe adverse events or protocol violations were observed. Moreover, when esomeprazole was administered while fed, the t_max was delayed, and both C_max and AUC were reduced. The results of this research suggest that the test and reference formulations were bioequivalent under fasting and fed states.