Pharmacokinetics of Esomeprazole Magnesium After Single Oral Doses in Healthy Subjects: Bioequivalence Study and Food Effects

This study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of the newly developed delayed-release oral suspension (test) 40 mg esomeprazole magnesium compared to its marketed counterpart (40 mg; reference) in healthy adult Chinese subjects. We conducted randomized, open-label, two-period, single-dose, two-way crossover trials over a 7-day washout period, comprising a fasting trial and a fed trial. The subjects were administered the test or reference products in a 1:1 ratio at random throughout each period. Then, in the next session, they received the alternate products. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and WinNonlin software were used to assess the bioequivalence of esomeprazole peak plasma concentration (C_max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Overall, 33 subjects participated in the fasting trial and 42 subjects participated in the fed trial. Under both situations, the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means of C_max , AUC_0-t , and AUC_0-∞ were within equivalence ranges (80%-125%). In these trials, no severe adverse events or protocol violations were observed. Moreover, when esomeprazole was administered while fed, the t_max was delayed, and both C_max and AUC were reduced. The results of this research suggest that the test and reference formulations were bioequivalent under fasting and fed states.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Olmesartan Medoxomil and Amlodipine Besylate Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

Combined antihypertensive drugs have become the basic method of treating hypertension. Olmesartan and amlodipine, as representative drugs of angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers, were developed as a compound formulation for antihypertensive treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine besylate tablet (20 mg/5 mg) under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers. A phase 1 randomized, open-label, 2-period, single-dose crossover study (n = 56) was designed, with subjects under fasting (n = 28) or fed (n = 28) conditions. Of the 56 enrolled participants, 55 healthy volunteers completed the study. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected from 1.5 hours before dosing to 168 hours after dosing. The 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios of maximum plasma drug concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration and AUC from time 0 to infinity of the test/reference were all within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (80%-125%). The data showed that the absorption of amlodipine is not affected by food, but the exposure of olmesartan (both AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration and AUC from time 0 to infinity were P < .05) reduced significantly after consuming a high-fat meal, which indicates that the effects of food on olmesartan exposure in healthy Chinese were clinically relevant. During the study, there were no suspected serious adverse reactions or serious adverse events. All adverse events were determined to be mild after Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0 evaluation. These results indicated that both the test and reference formulations were bioequivalent with similar safety profiles.

Pharmacokinetics of Flunarizine Hydrochloride After Single Oral Doses in Healthy Subjects: Bioequivalence Study and Food Effects

We designed a study to compare the newly developed 5-mg flunarizine hydrochloride capsules (test) to that of its marketed counterpart (5-mg; reference) among healthy adult Chinese volunteers. We performed an open-label, single-center study that consisted of 2 randomized, crossover trials, including a fasting trial and a fed trial. In each part of the study, the subjects were randomly assigned to either receive the test or reference products (5-mg flunarizine) in a 1:1 ratio. Subjects then received the alternative products, following a 14-day washout period. Concentrations of plasma flunarizine were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters (noncompartmental model) were evaluated using the WinNonlin software. The analysis of variance and Food and Drug Administration bioequivalence statistical criterion of 90% confidence interval for 80% to 125% range (set at P ≤ .05) of geometric means ratios of test: reference product for peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to time t, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were determined. Tolerability was evaluated during the entire study period. Overall, 23 volunteers completed the fasting study, while 40 volunteers completed the fed study. The test formulation was found to be bioequivalent to the marketed formulation, as the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means of peak plasma concentration (fasting: 87.61%-101.67%; fed: 87.38%-104.06%), AUC from time 0 to time t (fasting: 89.44%-99.92%; fed: 92.65%-98.28%), and AUC from time 0 to infinity (fasting: 95.02%-104.33%; fed: 90.41%-96.96%) were within equivalence limits (80-125%) under both the fasting and fed conditions. When flunarizine was given alongside high-fat meals, time to maximum concentration was delayed ≈3.5 hours compared to fasting conditions. Meantime, high-fat meals increased its exposure by nearly 50%. Furthermore, there were no serious adverse events found among the subjects. This study confirmed that test and reference flunarizine hydrochloride capsules were bioequivalent under fasting and postprandial conditions.

An Open-Label, Randomized, 2-Way, Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Cefradine Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether test cefradine capsules and reference cefradine capsules were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese volunteers. An open-label, randomized, biperiodic, crossover design was used. In each of the 2 study periods (separated by a 1-week washout period), 250-mg single doses of either the test or reference cefradine capsule were administered to study participants under fasted and fed conditions. Blood samples were collected at intervals from predose to 8 hours afterward. In the fasting study, the 90% confidence intervals (90%CI) of the C_max , AUC_0-8h , and AUC_0-∞ for the test and reference preparations were 93.7%-112.2%, 94.6%-100.8%, and 94.7%-100.9%, respectively. In the fed study, the 90%CI of the C_max , AUC_0-8h , and AUC_0-∞ for the test and reference preparations was 81.0%-99.1%, 100.5%-106.3%, and 100.5%-105.9%, respectively. The results showed that the test cefradine capsules and the reference formulation are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions.

Bioavailability testing of a newly developed clindamycin oral suspension in a pediatric porcine model

Background: Clindamycin's bitter taste and odor is known to affect treatment adherence in children. Recently, a formulation of clindamycin HCl complexed with ion exchange resin IRP 69 was shown to mask the bitter taste. Because of the potential benefit of this formulation for children, a pilot study using a porcine model was conducted to evaluate its relative bioavailability. Methods: A randomized two-way crossover study design using six (n = 6) healthy male piglets 10-12 kg was used to evaluate the absorption profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters of clindamycin from the resinate complex formulation (Test) compared to a commercialized reference suspension. A dose of 15 mg/kg was administered orally by gastric gavage to each piglet followed by repeated blood sampling over 12 h. A wash-out period of 48 h occurred between treatments. Plasma concentration vs. time data was analyzed by non-compartmental analysis. Results: The mean relative bioavailability of clindamycin from the resinate formulation was 78.8%. A two-tailed, paired Student t test yielded a p < 0.05 for AUC∞ and Tmax parameters. A two one-sided test (TOST) suggested a difference in AUC∞ and Cmax for the Test formulation compared to the reference formulation according to the FDA's criteria for bioequivalence. Conclusion: The bioavailability of clindamycin from this novel oral formulation supports continued evaluation of the drug in humans for potential pediatric applications.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Studies of Teriflunomide in Healthy Iranian Volunteers

Multiple sclerosis, which is characterized by inflammation and neurodegeneration, is considered a chronic disease of the central nervous system. Given the lack of pharmacokinetic evaluation of teriflunomide in the Iranian context, the present 2-way crossover study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of 2 teriflunomide formulations. To this end, 2 single-dose generic and branded teriflunomide formulations were orally administered to 14 healthy Iranian male volunteers. A washout period of 21 days was allowed between the treatments. The plasma samples containing teriflunomide were analyzed by a simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method using standard ultraviolet detection. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for bioequivalence evaluation. The peak area ratio between the teriflunomide and the internal standard was the source of calibration curves, which were linear over the range of 20-40,000 ng/mL (R² = 0.9994). The results indicated that the 2 formulations had similar pharmacokinetics. Further, the 90%CI of the mean ratios of the test versus the reference formulations of log-transformed area under the concentration-time curve over 72 hours (93% to 107%) and peak concentration (92% to 108%) were within the acceptable range of 80% to 125%. Based on the obtained results, the test formulation of teriflunomide could be similar to that of the reference formulation.

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel high concentration formulation is clinically bioequivalent to commercial formulation

A new levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) system featuring a higher levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD) concentration and viscosity, LCIG-HV, is being developed to reduce the intrajejunal volume of LD/CD that is administered as compared to the current commercial formulation, LCIG-LV. This study characterizes the LCIG-HV formulation and compares it to the LCIG-LV formulation via dissolution testing and a clinical pharmacokinetic bioequivalence study. In vitro release profiles of LD/CD were determined using a USP Dissolution Apparatus 2 with 500 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 4.5) operating at 25 RPM. A single dose, open-label study was conducted according to a two-period, randomized, crossover design in 28 healthy subjects. The point estimate (PE) of the levodopa Cmax geometric mean for the LCIG-HV formulation was 4% higher than that of the LCIG-LV formulation. PEs of levodopa AUCt and AUCinf geometric means were comparable for both formulations. PEs of carbidopa Cmax , AUCt and AUCinf geometric means for the LCIG-HV formulation were 3%-5% higher than those of the LCIG-LV formulation. For both formulations, the median Tmax for levodopa was 1.0 and 3.0 hours for carbidopa. The levodopa half-life harmonic mean was 1.6 hour for both formulations. The carbidopa half-life harmonic mean was 1.9 and 2.0 hour, respectively, for the LCIG-HV and LCIG-LV formulations. Cmax , AUCt and AUCinf of LD/CD carbidopa were comparable for both formulations. The current study demonstrates that the LCIG-LV and LCIG-HV formulations are clinically bioequivalent for LD/CD according to FDA guidance. However, the dissolution method was over discriminatory of formulation differences.

Induction of Vasculo- and Osteogenesis in Spheroids Formed by Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells

Vascularization of bioengineered bone tissue constructs remains a challenging problem of regenerative medicine. Spheroids generated in 3D culture of adipose-derived stromal cells supplemented with inducing factors demonstrate stable characteristics and express of mesenchymal, endothelial, and osteoblasts markers, and represent a prototype of vascularized microtissue. Adipose-derived stromal cells spheroids induced to both angio- and osteogenic differentiation can be used in development of new innovative technologies for in vitro fabrication of vascularized bioequivalents for repair of large bone defects.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a liquid formulation of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell anemia

Hydroxyurea (HU) is a crucial therapy for children with sickle cell anemia, but its off-label use is a barrier to widespread acceptance. We found HU exposure is not significantly altered by liquid vs capsule formulation, and weight-based dosing schemes provide consistent exposure. HU is recommended for all children starting as young as 9 months of age with sickle cell anemia (SCA; HbSS and HbSβspan(0) thalassemia); however; a paucity of pediatric data exists regarding the pharmacokinetics (PK) or the exposure-response relationship of HU. This trial aimed to characterize the PK of HU in children and to evaluate and compare the bioavailability of a liquid vs capsule formulation. This multicenter; prospective; open-label trial enrolled 39 children with SCA who provided 682 plasma samples for PK analysis following administration of HU. Noncompartmental and population PK models are described. We report that liquid and capsule formulations of HU are bioequivalent; weight-based dosing schemes provide consistent drug exposure; and age-based dosing schemes are unnecessary. These data support the use of liquid HU in children unable to swallow capsules and in those whose weight precludes the use of fixed capsule formulations. Taken with existing safety and efficacy literature; these findings should encourage the use of HU across the spectrum of age and weight in children with SCA; and they should facilitate the expanded use of HU as recommended in the National Heart; Lung; and Blood Institute guidelines for individuals with SCA.

Multiple Source Biosimilar Insulin, What's a Provider to Do?

In the United States the FDA designates generic products that are bioequivalent as AB substitutable (FDA rating signifying the approved application contains adequate scientific evidence establishing through in vivo and/or in vitro studies the bioequivalence of the product to a selected reference product) and are expected to produce the same therapeutic results as the innovator product. In the case of biological proteins that are similar to already approved innovator biologicals, such as recombinant human insulin, the insulin molecule and accompanying secondary and tertiary structures will differ between manufacturing sources. Even subtle differences between innovator (branded) and alternative "biosimilar" products may produce different therapeutic endpoints. Substitution of a branded insulin with a biosimilar insulin product may result in more, less, or equal therapeutic response making in difficult for the practitioner to assess glycemic control between patient follow-up visits. Significant therapeutic difference is possible, which could result in mild to severe hypoglycemia reaction or hyperglycemia induced tissue damage. Slight molecular changes along with different accompanying proteins, protein fragments, and other naturally occurring contaminants theoretically increase odds of insulin resistance or allergic reaction. Current review of medication product and device quality relies on manufacturer self-oversight and individual reporting of product adverse events after use. While this is usually sufficient for oral medications and many medical devices, critical use products such as sterile products, biosimilar insulin, insulin delivery devices, self-monitoring blood glucose monitoring systems, and test strips require much more vigorous oversight to prevent individual and/or large scale catastrophe. Health care providers should advocate for their patient to have access to affordable, consistent, quality-assured products to effectively and safely manage their medical issues. A potential commonsense solution would be to utilize existing nonprofit organizations with access to pharmacy/laboratory services that have vested interest in ensuring product quality throughout the supply pipeline. The old adage "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" holds even more true in today's medical environment.