The barriers against initiating insulin therapy among patients with diabetes living in Yazd, Iran

Challenges to Lifestyle Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes in Iran: A Synoptic Review

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major public health issue in Iran. The principal context for T2D management is the prevention of cardiovascular disease development and progression. These preventive strategies can be enhanced with routine implementation of comprehensive lifestyle modification, guideline-directed medical therapies, and creation of infrastructure that considers social determinants of health, ethnocultural variables, and financial challenges. In this synoptic review, scientific evidence sourced from Iran is analyzed to identify tactics to optimize the lifestyle medicine component of T2D care in Iran. Important evidence-based factors gleaned from the literature were curated into 9 categories: self-care, dietary adherence, mental health, self-comparison, transcultural adaptation, family support and community engagement, physical activity, the global pandemic, and service delivery. These categories were then assigned to 1 of 4 a priori aspects challenging diabetes care in Iran: behavioral factors, belief system, drivers, and implementation. By codifying discussion points and individual tactics, the improvement and optimization of T2D care in Iran can be facilitated. This reductionist model of approaching lifestyle medicine and complex chronic disease such as T2D can be applied to other ethnocultural populations.

Real world evidence of insulin and biosimilar insulin therapy-Opportunities to improve adherence, outcomes and cost-effectiveness

Insulin has been discovered for more than a century; however, its benefits to people with diabetes are yet to be fully realized due to barriers related to access, quality of care and costs. Insulin therapy remains the cornerstone of diabetes management. The multicausality of diabetes and its subtypes calls for comprehensive phenotyping and use of biomarkers to ensure timely use of insulin to achieve early glycaemic control for long-term benefits. Biosimilar insulins are biologic products that closely resemble originator insulins without significant differences in safety or efficacy. The lower investment costs needed for research and development make biosimilar insulin more affordable to improve access. While the efficacy of insulin products is proven in controlled settings, real world evidence (RWE) from real world data (RWD) plays a crucial role in assessing the safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, adherence to and impacts of different insulin products, including biosimilars, on clinical outcomes. In this narrative review, we summarized the trends of insulin use and patterns of biosimilar insulin utilization in real world practice across different regions. We reviewed RWE on clinical safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of biosimilar insulin, as well as therapeutic inertia and non-adherence with insulin therapy. We also highlighted barriers to insulin adherence and enablers for persistence, along with potential solutions to promote the use of insulin and technologies for optimizing glycaemic control in different subtypes of diabetes. During our extensive literature review, we identified data gaps in the usage of biosimilar insulin in real world practice. We advocate for implementing a diabetes register designed fit-for-purpose, managed by a trained doctor-nurse team with system support, to generate RWE. By setting up registers with structured data collection, we can generate high quality data for integrative analysis with electronic health records (EHR) and health claims to evaluate the impacts of insulin products and other diabetes programmes on clinical outcomes, quality of life and healthcare costs to inform practice and policies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Diabetes affects approximately 10.5% of the global population and insulin is a vital treatment for diabetes management. Insulin was discovered more than a century ago, although its benefits to people with diabetes are yet to be fully realized due to barriers related to access, quality of care, and costs. Real-world evidence from real-world data plays a crucial role in assessing the safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, adherence to, and impacts of different insulin products, including biosimilars, on clinical outcomes. In this publication, the authors provided a detailed review of the patterns of use and cost-effectiveness of biosimilar insulin, and identified major data gaps. The authors explained the methodology, utility, and limitations of generating real-world evidence based on real-world data from sources such as registers, electronic health records and health claims for assessing treatment effectiveness and safety. The authors proposed the implementation of a purpose-built diabetes register with structured data collection, managed by a trained doctor-nurse team with system support. These high-quality data can be integrated with electronic health records and health claims for evaluation of interventions, including insulin on outcomes, quality of life, and costs to inform practice and policy. Based on these premises and available data, the authors summarized trends in insulin use including biosimilar insulin, and reviewed real-world evidence on the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of these products. They also identified barriers like therapeutic inertia and non-adherence, discussed enablers for persistence, and proposed solutions to evaluate the impacts of insulin products and other diabetes programs on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare costs to inform practice and policies.

Once-weekly insulin icodec as novel treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIMS

The primary objective of this investigation is to examine the efficacy and safety of insulin icodec when compared to regular basal insulin for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on the Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Medline databases up until August 19th, 2023. This review incorporates literature that examines the comparison between insulin icodec and basal insulin. The risk of bias was assessed by using RoB v2 tool from Cochrane Collaborations. We employed random-effect models to analyze the mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) for presentation of the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of nine trials with 3,963 participants were incorporated. Five included trials had "low-risk" of bias, whereas the remaining four trials had "some-concern" risk of bias due to protocol deviations from intended intervention. The results of our meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the reduction of HbA1c levels between insulin icodec and regular basal insulin (MD -0.11 %; 95 %CI: -0.23, 0.01, p = 0.08, I2 = 91 %). The fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight change from baseline also did not differ significantly between two groups. Meanwhile, the total adverse events (TAEs) were shown to be higher in the insulin icodec; however, the serious AEs (SAEs) and clinically significant hypoglycemia did not differ significantly between insulin icodec and these active controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests similar efficacy and safety between insulin icodec and regular basal insulin. Further clinical trials are still needed to confirm the results of our study.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

CRD42023453635.

Factors associated with adherence or nonadherence to insulin therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

One of the greatest barriers to the treatment of T2DM is nonadherence which particularly applies to insulin therapy. There is a need for a comprehensive overview of all factors associated with nonadherence to insulin therapy. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with adherence or nonadherence to insulin therapy among adults with T2DM.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cinahl, and Web of Science (January 2013 to March 2023).

RESULTS

A final sample of 48 studies was included in the scoping review. The synthesis revealed 30 factors associated with adherence or nonadherence. The factors were grouped into 6 themes: demographics, attitude and perceptions, management of diabetes, impact on daily living, disease and medication, and healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

The most prominent factors identified were age, cost of healthcare, personal beliefs towards insulin therapy, social stigma, patient education, complexity of diabetes treatment, impact of insulin therapy on daily life, and fear of side effects. The results indicate a need for further research to determine threshold values for the factors associated with adherence or nonadherence.

Assessment of Adherence to Insulin Injections among Diabetic Patients on Basal-Bolus Regimen in Primary and Secondary Healthcare Centers in Al-Jouf Region of Saudi Arabia; A Descriptive Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence to insulin therapy is one of the major challenges during the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Considering the dearth of investigations, this study aimed to determine the adherence pattern and factors linked with nonadherence among diabetic patients using insulin in Al-Jouf region of Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included diabetic patients using basal-bolus regimens, whether they had type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This study's objective was determined using a validated data collection form that included sections on demographics, reasons for missed insulin doses, list of barriers to therapy, difficulties during insulin administration, and factors that may improve insulin inaction adherence.

RESULTS

Of 415 diabetic patients, 169 (40.7%) were reported to forget doses of insulin every week. The majority of these patients (38.5%) forget one or two doses. Away from home (36,1%), inability to adhere to the diet (24.3%) and embarrassment to administer injections in public (23.7%) were frequently cited as reasons for missing insulin doses. The occurrence of hypoglycemia (31%), weight gain (26%), and needle phobia (22%) were frequently cited as obstacles to insulin injection use. Preparing injections (18.3%), using insulin at bedtime (18.3%), and storing insulin at a cold temperature (18.1%) were the most challenging aspects of insulin use for patients. Reduction in the number of injections (30.8%) and convenient timing for insulin administration (29.6%) were frequently cited as factors that may improve participant adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the majority of diabetic patients forget to inject insulin, primarily as a result of travel. By identifying potential obstacles faced by patients, these findings direct health authorities to design and implement initiatives to increase insulin adherence among patients.

Barriers and Facilitators in Access to Diabetes, Hypertension, and Dyslipidemia Medicines: A Scoping Review

Objective: Identify barriers and facilitators in access to medicines for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, considering patient, health provider, and health system perspectives. Methods: Scoping review based on Joanna Briggs methodology. The search considered PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Academic Search Ultimate, Web of Science, SciELO Citation Index, and grey literature. Two researchers conducted screening and eligibility phases. Data were thematically analyzed. Results: The review included 219 documents. Diabetes was the most studied condition; most of the evidence comes from patients and the United States. Affordability and availability of medicines were the most reported dimension and specific barrier respectively, both cross-cutting concerns. Among high- and middle-income countries, identified barriers were cost of medicines, accompaniment by professionals, long distances to facilities, and cultural aspects; cost of transportation emerges in low-income settings. Facilitators reported were financial accessibility, trained health workers, medicines closer to communities, and patients' education. Conclusion: Barriers and facilitators are determined by socioeconomic and cultural conditions, highlighting the role of health systems in regulatory and policy context (assuring financial coverage and free medicines); providers' role bringing medicines closer; and patients' health education and disease management.

Impact of patients' beliefs about insulin on acceptance and adherence to insulin therapy: a qualitative study in primary care

BACKGROUND

Insulin therapy forms a cornerstone of pharmacological management of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, there remains a lack of acceptance and adherence to insulin, thereby contributing to poor DM control. This study aimed to determine the impact of patients' beliefs about insulin on acceptance and adherence to insulin therapy.

METHOD

This was a qualitative study using grounded theory approach. The study took place from September 2019 to January 2021 at a cluster of primary healthcare clinics in Singapore. Maximum variation sampling was used to recruit adult patients with type 2 DM on basal or premixed insulin for at least 6 months. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted using a topic guide and audio recorded. Data collection continued until saturation. Data analysis utilised a constant comparison procedure and a synthesis approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-one participants (mean age 61 years) were interviewed for this study. Data analyses showed that there were 6 main themes that emerged. Four themes influenced both insulin acceptance and adherence. These were concerns about insulin being a lifelong treatment, physical fear of insulin injection, erroneous beliefs about insulin, and perceived fear of DM complications. Two additional themes influenced adherence to insulin therapy. These were socioeconomic concerns, and concerns about side effects of insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' beliefs about insulin impact on the acceptance and adherence to insulin therapy. Health care providers need to elicit and address these beliefs during counselling to improve acceptance and adherence to insulin therapy.

The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prevalence and best management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease, who may experience frequent and long-term exposure to needles for lifesaving therapies such as renal dialysis and cancer treatment. Identifying interventions that assist in management of needle fear and associated distress is essential to support these patients with repeated needle and cannula exposure.

METHOD

We followed the PRISMA methodology for scoping reviews and systematically searched PsychINFO, PubMed (MEDLINE), ProQuest, Embase and grey literature and reference lists between 1989 and October 2020 for articles related to needle discomfort, distress, anxiety, fear or phobia. The following chronic diseases were included: arthritis, asthma, chronic back pain, cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and mental illness, or kidney failure. Literature concerning dentistry, vaccination, intravenous drug users and paediatric populations were excluded.

RESULTS

We identified 32 papers reporting prevalence (n = 24), management (n = 5) or both (n = 3). Needle fear prevalence varied in disease cohorts: 17-52% (cancer), 25-47% (chronic kidney disease) and 0.2-80% (diabetes). Assessment methods varied across studies. Management strategies had poor evidence-base, but included needle-specific education, decorated devices, cognitive-behavioural stress management techniques, distraction, and changing the therapy environment or modality.

CONCLUSION

Although needle fear is common there is a paucity of evidence regarding interventions to address it among adults living with chronic disease. This scoping review has highlighted the need for improved identification of needle fear in adults and development of interventions are required for these cohorts.

Current Pharmacological Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Undocumented Migrants: Is It Appropriate for the Phenotype of the Disease?

Type 2 diabetes is increasingly recognized as a spectrum of metabolic disorders sharing chronic hyperglycaemia. In Europe, the continually growing number of migrants from developing countries could affect diabetes phenotypes. We evaluated a population of 426 Italians and 412 undocumented migrants. Using 17 variables (with the exclusion of ethnic origin) we performed a multiple component analysis to detect potential clusters, independently from ethnicity. We also compared the two groups to evaluate potential ethnicity associated differences. We found five clusters of patients with different disease phenotypes. Comparing Italians with undocumented migrants, we noted that the first had more often cardiovascular risk factors and neurologic involvement, while the latter had a higher frequency of diabetic ulcers and renal involvement. Metformin was used in a comparable percentage of patients in all clusters, but other antidiabetic treatments showed some differences. Italians were more often on insulin, due to a larger use of long acting insulin, and received a larger number of oral antidiabetics in combination. Pharmacological treatment of comorbidities showed some differences too. We suggest that type 2 diabetes should be considered as a spectrum of diseases with different phenotypes also in heterogeneous populations, and that this is not due only to ethnic differences.