A Comparison Between the Therapeutic Effect of Metformin Alone versus a Combination Therapy with Insulin in Uncontrolled, Non-Adherence Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Six Months Follow-Up

HbA1c control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. These patients require optimal glucose control to prevent the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Contemporary guidelines recommend an HbA1c ≤7% to mitigate this risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate HbA1c control in T2DM patients with angiographically proven ASCVD.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study on consecutive T2DM patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes managed in a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. Glycaemic control was assessed by evaluating the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level measured at index presentation with acute and chronic coronary syndromes and during the most recent follow-up visit.

Results

The study population comprised 262 T2DM patients with a mean age of 61.3 ± 10.4 years. At index presentation, 110 (42.0%) T2DM patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 69 (26.3%) had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 43 (16.4%) had unstable angina, and 40 (15.3%) had stable angina. After a median duration of 16.5 months (IQR: 7-29), 28.7% of the study participants had an HbA1c ≤7%. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, females were less likely to have poor glycaemic control (HbA1c above 7%) [odds ratio (OR): 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.95, p=0.038]. Also, T2DM patients prescribed metformin monotherapy (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.82, p=0.017) and patients with ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.96, p=0.041) were less likely to have poor glycaemic control.

Conclusion

After a median duration of 16.5 months, only 28.7% of T2DM patients with CAD had an HbA1c ≤7%. This finding underscores the substantial unmet need for optimal diabetes control in this very high-risk group.

Pharmacological effect of Heritiera fomes on Long Evans rats against Postprandial Hyperglycemia and adsorption in vitro

Background

Natural restoratives from traditional medicinal plants are considered to be a convenient, potent, and risk-free substitute treatment for hyperglycaemia. Our objective was to explore the activity of the crude extract of Heritiera fomes on postprandial hyperglycaemia by assessing relative measurements in a laboratory animal model.

Methods

The Streptozotocin induced diabetic rat (n = 88, twenty-two per group) was used for the glucose tolerance test as an initial support for the study. BaSO4 was administered orally as a marker to measure gut motility after one hour of methanolic extract (500 mg/kg body weight) administration where, only purified water (10 ml/kg) was used to treat the control group (n = 12) and a dose (500 mg/kg) of H. fomes extract was used for the test group (n = 12 in each group). After 60 min of incubation of the mixture of extract and glucose with 10% (v/v) yeast cell suspension, the absorbance was measured to determine the capacity of glucose absorption by yeast cells. Sixty Long Evans rats (n = 12 in each group) were used to assess disaccharidase enzyme activity as µmol/mg protein per hour by Lowry's protein estimation method. The carbohydrate absorption investigation was executed to evaluate the leftover sucrose content in the gastrointestinal system (n = 64).

Results

After oral administration of MHFL (71.84%), MHFB (71.41%), and MHFR (72.55%), GI motility (%) increased significantly (p < 0.001) compared to the control group (59.06%). A significant increase in glucose uptake and adsorption capacity measured by different concentrations of glucose ensures the decrease of glucose bound rate and a significant drop in blood glucose concentration. The significant (p < 0.001) decrease in intestinal disaccharidase activity of MHFL (1.40), MHFB (1.36), and MHFR (1.20) in comparison to the control group (1.50) indicates that the presence of H. fomes may reduce glucose absorption in the small bowel. Significant (p < 0.001 & p < 0.05) accumulation of sucrose content in the six different parts of the GI tract suggests the absorption of sucrose was decreased.

Conclusions

The findings of this study provide evidence on probable mechanisms for the anti-diabetic characteristics of H. fomes, and it is predicted that this plant will be studied further for the development of strong anti-hyperglycemic medicines.

Circulating selenoprotein P levels predict glucose-lowering and insulinotropic effects of metformin, but not alogliptin: A post-hoc analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Selenoprotein P (SeP; encoded by SEPP1 in humans) is a hepatokine that causes impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance. Metformin downregulates SELENOP promoter activity through an adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase-forkhead box protein O3a pathway in hepatocytes. This study aimed to test our hypothesis that circulating SeP levels are associated with the glucose-lowering effect of metformin in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 84 participants with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive metformin (1,000 mg, twice daily) or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, alogliptin (25 mg, once daily) for 12 weeks. We tested metformin and alogliptin on SeP levels and factors associated therewith as a post-hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Both metformin and aloglipitin did not change the SeP levels. Although metformin significantly increased the insulin secretory index secretory units of islets in transplantation only in participants with higher baseline SeP (>3.87), both agents similarly reduced fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin. SeP levels at baseline were correlated negatively with changes in SeP (r = -0.484, P = 0.004) and fasting plasma glucose (r = -0.433, P = 0.011), and positively with changes in C-peptide immunoreactivity (r = 0.420, P = 0.017) and secretory units of islets in transplantation (r = 0.388, P = 0.028) in the metformin, but not alogliptin, group.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline levels of SeP significantly predicted metformin-mediated, but not alogliptin-mediated, glucose-lowering and insulinotropic effects. Serum SeP levels might be a novel biomarker for predicting the outcomes of metformin therapy, which might be helpful in tailoring diabetes medication.