1
|
Anagnostou A, Yaworsky A, Brova M, Ibrahim N, Kakked S, Spite S, Duluc L, Shields AL, Lee T, Leonard S, Przywara K, Smith A. Evaluation and Modification of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Peanut Allergy Management. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2024; 24:303-315. [PMID: 38639896 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-024-01146-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Based on shared decision-making (SDM) principles, a decision aid was previously developed to help patients, their caregivers, and physicians decide which peanut allergy management approach best suits them. This study refined the decision aid's content to better reflect patients' and caregivers' lived experience. RECENT FINDINGS Current standard of care for peanut allergy is avoidance, although peanut oral immunotherapy has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in patients 4-17 years old. An advisory board of allergy therapy experts (n = 3) and patient advocates (n = 3) informed modifications to the decision aid. The revised tool underwent cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs) among adolescents (12-17 years old) with peanut allergy and caregivers of patients 4-17 years old with peanut allergy to evaluate its relevance, understandability, and usefulness. The 20 CDI participants understood the information presented in the SDM tool and reported it was important and relevant. Some revisions were made based on participant feedback. Results support content validity of the Peanut Allergy Treatment SDM Tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Yaworsky
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Monica Brova
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Nazifa Ibrahim
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Siddharth Kakked
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Sasha Spite
- California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, USA
| | - Linette Duluc
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Alan L Shields
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Tricia Lee
- Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Arlington Heights, IL, USA
| | - Stephanie Leonard
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kathy Przywara
- Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Amelia Smith
- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Connection Team, Liberty Twp, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anagnostou A, Rodríguez Del Río P. Food Immunotherapy: Dissecting Current Guidelines and Navigating the Gray Zone. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3040-3046. [PMID: 37391019 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy is a common, chronic disease that is burdensome for patients and families, with multiple dietary and social limitations and a significant psychological impact stemming from the fear of accidental exposures and potentially severe, life-threatening reactions. Until recently, the only management option consisted of strict food avoidance. Food allergen immunotherapy (food AIT) has emerged as an alternative, active intervention to strict food avoidance, with a multitude of research studies supporting its efficacy and good safety profile. Food AIT results in a raise of allergenic threshold, which provides several benefits to food-allergic patients, including protection from accidental exposures, potentially decreased severity of allergic reactions on unintentional exposures, and improvement in quality of life. In the last few years, multiple independent reports have been published proposing strategies to implement food oral immunotherapy in U.S. clinics, although formal guidelines are currently lacking. Because food immunotherapy is gaining traction, popularity, and interest among both patients and health care providers, many physicians look for guidance on how to implement this intervention in their daily practice. In other parts of the world, use of this treatment has prompted the development of various guidelines from allergy societies. This rostrum discusses currently available guidelines on food AIT from different areas of the world, describes and comments on their similarities and differences, and highlights unmet needs in this area of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterini Anagnostou
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology, Allergy and Retrovirology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; Division of Allergy, Immunology & Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| | - Pablo Rodríguez Del Río
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain; IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lazizi S, Labrosse R, Graham F. Transitioning peanut oral immunotherapy to clinical practice. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:974250. [PMID: 36092278 PMCID: PMC9458956 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.974250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanut allergy is on the rise in industrialized countries, affecting 1%–4.5% of children and generally persisting into adulthood. It is associated with a risk of severe anaphylaxis and is one of the major causes of food allergy-induced deaths. Health-related quality of life is significantly impaired for patients and affected families due to food restrictions attributable to omnipresent precautionary allergen labeling, constant risk of potentially life-threatening reactions, and limitation of social activities. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as a valid treatment option for patients with IgE-mediated peanut allergy, with randomized controlled trials and real-life studies showing a high rate of desensitization and a favorable safety profile, especially in young children. Ultimately, the decision to initiate peanut OIT relies on a multidisciplinary shared decision-making process, involving open, personalized and evidence-based discussions with patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Lazizi
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - R. Labrosse
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - F. Graham
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Correspondence: François Graham
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haj Yahia S, Machnes-Maayan D, Frizinsky S, Maoz-Segal R, Offenganden I, Kenett RS, Agmon-Levin N, Hovav R, Kidon MI. Oral immunotherapy for children with a high-threshold peanut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2022; 129:347-353. [PMID: 35552009 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 25% and 30% of children with peanut allergy (PA) have a relatively high-threshold peanut allergy (HTPA), with a single maximal tolerated dose (SMTD) higher than 100 mg of peanut protein (PP). However, this threshold may decrease with time, age, exercise, illness, sleep deprivation, and other covariates. OBJECTIVE To explore the feasibility of a simplified oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol in a group of children with HTPA. METHODS Children with PA with an SMTD higher than 100 mg were placed on a 40-week OIT protocol of either 300 mg/d of PP or 100 mg/d for 20 weeks followed by 300 mg/d for 20 weeks. A repeat open peanut food challenge was performed after 40 weeks of treatment and at a 6-month follow-up visit. After the 40-week challenge, all children received a maintenance dosage of 2 gPP 3 times a week. RESULTS A total of 28 children with HTPA were enrolled, with 56% boys, 89% younger than 6 years old, and a mean SMTD of 304 mg (95% confidence interval 229-378). All were placed on the described OIT protocol. Overall, 2 children were not compliant and 3 had allergic reactions at home on the dose previously tolerated in clinic, 23 completed the 40-week protocol, and all were able to consume 2 g of PP. The mean tolerated dosage at the 6-month follow-up was 8 g. This enabled most children age-appropriate dietary inclusion of peanut-containing products. CONCLUSION In children with HTPA, a simple, fixed-dose OIT can be both safe and efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soad Haj Yahia
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Diti Machnes-Maayan
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shirly Frizinsky
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ramit Maoz-Segal
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Irena Offenganden
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ron S Kenett
- KPA Group and Samuel Neaman Institute, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Nancy Agmon-Levin
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ran Hovav
- Plant Sciences Institute, Volcani Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Rishon LeTsiyon, Israel
| | - Mona I Kidon
- Clinical Immunology, Angioedema and Allergy Unit, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perrett KP, Sindher SB, Begin P, Shanks J, Elizur A. Advances, Practical Implementation, and Unmet Needs Regarding Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:19-33. [PMID: 34785391 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of food allergy is a rapidly changing landscape, with arguably, the most significant advancement in recent years, the transition of oral immunotherapy (OIT) to clinical practice. As an innovation, OIT is a phase of rapidly increasing demand, particularly for some allergens such as peanut, egg, and milk, which have substantial evidence of efficacy. However, significant questions remain about how to best treat multiple food allergies and less common food allergies and how to optimize long-term safety and efficacy. This review summarizes the currently available resources for integrating food allergy OIT into clinical practice and focuses on the multiple remaining unmet needs such as providing an approach for OIT to food allergens for which there is no or limited evidence; practical issues related to food allergy treatment particularly when it is not going well; long-term outcomes and follow-up after OIT; and strategies to help meet the impending increase in demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten P Perrett
- Population Allergy, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Sayantani B Sindher
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Philippe Begin
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada
| | - Josiah Shanks
- Population Allergy, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Arnon Elizur
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|