Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Molecular subtyping combined with multiomics analysis to study correlation between TACE refractoriness and tumor stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness is a significant challenge in treating intermediate to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A few studies suggest that liver cancer stem cells (LCSCs) may be associated with TACE refractoriness. This study aims to explore the potential correlation between TACE refractoriness and HCC stemness, highlighting its clinical significance.

METHODS

This research encompassed the analysis of diverse HCC datasets, including RNA-sequencing, microarray, single-cell RNA-sequencing, and clinical cohorts. We identified common genes between TACE refractoriness and tumor stemness (TSGs). Unsupervised clustering was employed to classify HCC patients into different clusters based on TSGs (TRS clusters). The study explored the differences in clinical prognosis, biological characteristics, genomic variations, immune landscapes, and treatment responses among the TRS clusters.

RESULTS

Patients with TACE-refractoriness demonstrated significantly higher tumor stemness. Our study identified 33 TSGs and established two TRS clusters, including C1 and C2. C1 was associated with TACE refractoriness, elevated tumor stemness, and poorer prognosis. Genomic alterations were found to be significantly different between the TRS clusters. The C1 exhibited signs of immunosuppression and lower activity of immune effector cells, while the C2 had a more robust immune response and higher level of immune cell presence. Single-cell RNA-seq revealed distinct cell type characteristics in each subtypes, with the C1 showing a higher proportion of stem cells and malignant cells.

CONCLUSION

Our findings establish a connection between TACE refractoriness and tumor stemness in HCC, proposing a novel subtype classification to guide personalized treatment. Insights gained may facilitate overcoming TACE refractoriness and the development of innovative therapies.

Disparities in Access to Care in the Multimodal Treatment of Primary Nonmetastatic Liver Cancers and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Liver cancer incidence and mortality have been shown to differ by race, ethnicity, and geography. This study aims to analyze disparities in the multimodal treatment of liver cancers in Louisiana.

METHODS

Cases of nonmetastatic liver cancer in Louisiana from 2010 to 2020 were obtained from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Generalized linear mixed models were used to model the receipt of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 2948 patients met inclusion criteria where 30.5% received no therapy. Multivariable models identified patients with increased odds of pursuing no treatment which include those 70 and older, no domestic partner, uninsured, high poverty, and rural residence (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Available therapeutic modalities are underutilized in Louisiana with a considerable number of patients receiving no treatment for liver cancer. Older age, no domestic partner, uninsured, rural residence, and high poverty are risk factors for not receiving treatment. Allocating resources to these patients is an important step in reversing inequities.

Liver resection and transplantation in the era of checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised the treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated efficacy, establishing a new standard of care for advanced HCC. Neoadjuvant studies have shown promising results with high response rates, increasing research into ICIs' role. In the peri-operative setting, in addition to adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies, strategies for "downstaging" and "bridging" patients to liver transplantation (LT) are being investigated, broadening the eligible candidate pool. Furthermore, therapeutic advances have reshaped conversion strategies for hepatic resection, with emerging evidence indicating a role for adjuvant immunotherapy in patients at high risk of postoperative recurrence. In LT, concerns have arisen over the potential conflict between immunosuppression needs and the immune-enhancing effects of ICIs, with reports of severe rejection. However, liver-specific factors may lessen rejection risks, prompting exploration into the safety of pre-transplant ICI administration. Moreover, ongoing trials must prioritise patient selection and vigilant management protocols. Despite the remarkable progress in immunotherapy, the intricate molecular interactions within the tumour microenvironment and their implications on oncogenic pathways remain incompletely understood. This highlights the need for specialised expertise to effectively integrate immunotherapy into the surgical management of HCC. Key challenges include ensuring safety, optimising oncological outcomes, managing the risk of graft rejection in transplant recipients, and refining patient selection criteria. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving role of immunotherapy in the surgical management of HCC, discussing the rationale for its application in both pre- and post-surgical contexts, leveraging current clinical experience, identifying potential limitations, and envisioning future applications. By integrating existing knowledge and highlighting areas for further investigation, this review seeks to inform clinical practice and guide future research endeavours.

Decoding the Prognostic Significance and Therapeutic Implications of Inflammation-Based Scores in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, posing a significant global health challenge with an increasing incidence. In recent years, multiple staging systems and scores have been proposed, emphasising the necessity for the development of precise prognostic tools. The well-documented etiological relationship between chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis has prompted researchers to explore novel prognostic markers associated with the inflammatory status of HCC patients. This review summarises the current data about inflammation-based scores in the context of HCC. We discuss established scores like the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and others not as extensively studied, examining their utility in predicting survival outcomes and treatment response in HCC patients. Furthermore, we explore emerging scores, including the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and other lymphocyte-based scores, assessing their potential in refining risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions in the era of precision medicine. As research progresses and these scores undergo further refinement and integration into the evolving landscape of HCC management, they carry significant potential for improving patient outcomes.

Advances in Immunotherapy for Transplant Oncology

The increasing incidence of global cancer rates has created an entirely new demand for curative treatment modalities to improve patient outcomes [...].

Pathologic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has achieved impressive success in various cancer types. Several ICIs have been unprecedentedly approved as the treatment regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent decade. Meanwhile, numerous clinical trials are being performed to exploit more ICIs into initially unresectable HCC and postoperative HCC to expectantly induce adequate tumor downstaging for further resection or implement adjuvant treatment for relapse-free survival, respectively. In this review, we aim to summarize some pragmatic histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pathologic parameters which promisingly indicate the response of neoadjuvant/conversion ICI-related therapy and predict the efficacy of adjuvant/therapeutic ICI-related therapy for HCC.

Methods

We searched PubMed using the terms hepatocellular carcinoma, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor, immune checkpoint blockade, conversion therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, biomarker, pathologic evaluation, pathologic assessment till February 2023.

Key Content and Findings

Although there is no consensus regarding the pathologic evaluation of relevant HCC specimens, it is encouraging that a few of studies have concentrated on this field, and moreover, the methods and parameters noted on other cancer types are also worthy of reference. For the pathologic assessment of HCC specimens underwent immunotherapy, a suitable sampling scheme, identifying immunotherapy-related pathologic response, and quantification of pathologic response rate should be emphasized. For the patients of HCC who are scheduled to receive immunotherapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte, intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structure, programmed cell death ligand 1, Wnt/β-catenin, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair, tumor mutational burden and tumor neoantigen, as well as some other signaling pathways are the potential predictive biomarkers of treatment response of ICI.

Conclusions

The management of HCC in the era of immunotherapy arises a brand-new pathological challenge that is to provide an immunotherapy-related diagnostic report. Albeit many related researches are preclinical or insufficient, they may tremendously alter the immunotherapy strategy of HCC in future.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on PD-1/L1 inhibitors for gastrointestinal tumors: a review of the rationale and clinical advances

The landscape of current tumor treatment has been revolutionized by the advent of immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Leveraging its capacity to mobilize systemic antitumor immunity, which is primarily mediated by T cells, there is growing exploration and expansion of its potential value in various stages of clinical tumor treatment. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy induces a robust immune response against tumors prior to surgery, effectively facilitating tumor volume reduction, early eradication or suppression of tumor cell activity, and control of potential metastatic spread, to improve curative surgical resection rates, and prevent tumor recurrence. This review delineates the theoretical basis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from preclinical research evidence, discusses specific challenges in clinical application, and provides a comprehensive overview of clinical research progress in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors. These findings suggest that neoadjuvant immunotherapy has the potential to ameliorate immunosuppressive states and enhance cytotoxic T cell function while preserving lymphatic drainage in the preoperative period. However, further investigations are needed on specific treatment regimens, suitable patient populations, and measurable endpoints. Despite numerous studies demonstrating the promising efficacy and manageable adverse events of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in gastrointestinal tumors, the availability of high-quality randomized controlled trials is limited, which highlights the necessity for further research.

Case report: Massive hepatocellular carcinoma with complete response to the non-surgical systematic treatment strategy

Background

The five-year recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains as high as 70%. A complete clinical response has not been observed without surgical resection. Here, we report a rare case of clinical complete response and long-term survival in a patient with massive HCC receiving treatment with immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, and radiotherapy.

Case description

A 38-year-old woman presented to our hospital for abdominal pain that persisted for 3 months. She was diagnosed as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage A, with a Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score of 3, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging systems stage IB. She refused surgical resection and trans-arterial chemoembolization and accepted a non-invasive systematic treatment strategy involving immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, and radiotherapy. Her tumor burden decreased, and she experienced partial response before radiotherapy. Following radiotherapy, she experienced a complete clinical response and has been alive for more than 36 months after her initial presentation. She is currently alive.

Conclusion

A non-invasive systematic treatment strategy is a potential radical treatment option for patients with massive HCC.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has demonstrated beneficial outcomes in various cancer types; however, standardized protocols for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are currently lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the reliability of neoadjuvant immunotherapy's efficacy and safety in the context of HCC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings to identify clinical trials involving resectable HCC and neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Single-arm meta-analyses were employed to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity analysis, data quality assessment, and subgroup analyses based on the type of immunotherapy drugs and combination therapies were performed. This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (identifier CRD42023474276).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 255 patients from 11 studies. Among resectable HCC patients, neoadjuvant immunotherapy exhibited an overall major pathological response (MPR) rate of 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.70) and a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 0.22 (95% CI 0.14-0.36). The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 0.37 (95% CI 0.20-0.69), with a grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) incidence rate of 0.35 (95% CI 0.24-0.51). Furthermore, the combined surgical resection rate was 3.08 (95% CI 1.66-5.72). Subgroup analysis shows no significant differences in the efficacy and safety of different single-agent immunotherapies; the efficacy of dual ICIs (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors) combination therapy is superior to targeted combined immunotherapy and monotherapy, while the reverse is observed in terms of safety.

DISCUSSION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy presents beneficial outcomes in the treatment of resectable HCC. However, large-scale, high-quality experiments are warranted in the future to provide robust data support.

Immunotherapy and Liver Transplantation: The Future or the Failure?

A quarter century has passed since the milestone study by Mazzaferro and colleagues on liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The increasing demand for LT for HCC has led to the continued efforts to expand LT indications. Downstaging to within Milan criteria has been incorporated into the organ allocation policy for HCC in the United States in 2017 and provides acceptable long-term survival. The present review focuses on the rationale of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in HCC, the experience of ICI in the pre- and posttransplant setting.

Evolution of Systemic Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The recognition that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rising problem globally dates back decades; however, the development of effective medical treatment for the disease has only led to robust improvements in patient outcomes in the recent past. As knowledge evolves and regimens are proven to be more active, the importance of multidisciplinary management in patients with all stages of HCC will become more important to optimize patient outcomes. Key to optimizing patient outcomes is an understanding of the evolution and current role of these therapies in the HCC landscape.

Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy Prior to Curative Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the standard of care in multiple aspects of oncology. Given successes in the setting of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the advantages of neoadjuvant therapy, many trials are demonstrating the safety and feasibility of combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)/tyrosine kinases in patients with resectable HCC. Numerous clinical trials are currently investigating the role of different immune modulators either as monotherapy or as combination therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Key questions that remain to be addressed include efficacy, safety, predictive biomarkers, and length of treatment.

AHSA1 Regulates Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression via the TGF-β/Akt-Cyclin D1/CDK6 Pathway

Background

Activator of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) ATPase Activity 1 (AHSA1) regulates proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of osteosarcoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the novel mechanism of AHSA1 in the tumor biology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed AHSA1 expression in 85 pairs of clinical samples of HCC and the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The role of AHSA1 in HCC was proved by cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, cell cycle analysis in vitro, xenograft models and tumor metastasis assay in vivo, and bioinformatics.

Results

High AHSA1 expression was demonstrated in HCC and associated with invasive depth, clinical stage, and poor overall survival of patients. Univariate Cox analysis confirmed that AHSA1 was an independent prognostic factor for patients with HCC. Meanwhile, AHSA1 upregulation promoted cell proliferation, colony formation, and cell migration in vitro and tumor cell proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells in vivo. AHSA1 upregulation increased the cell cycle transition from G1 to S phase by increasing the expression of cyclinD1, cyclinD3, and cyclin-dependent kinase 6(CD). Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1)-induced protein kinase B (Akt) signaling regulated the expression of downstream targets, including cyclinD1. AHSA1 expression was closely correlated with the expression of TGF-β, Akt, cyclinD1, cyclinD3, and CDK6 using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database. AHSA1 upregulation participated in HCC progression by regulating TGF-β/Akt-cyclinD1/CDK6 signaling.

Conclusion

AHSA1 might serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome of patients with HCC. It is vital in tumor metastasis and disease progression of HCC and may facilitate the development of clinical intervention strategies against HCC.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has poor prognosis because of its high recurrence rate. Immunotherapy has been tried for neoadjuvant therapy as it has shown excellent performance in the treatment of advanced HCC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the reported efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for resectable HCC. Electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify published and ongoing studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs for resectable HCC up to October 2022. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were performed, and data quality was assessed. The study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022371495). A total of 193 patients from 9 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 12.9% (95%CI, 6.7-19.1%), and major pathological response (MPR) rate was 27.3% (95%CI, 15.1-39.4%), indicating a favorable association with neoadjuvant ICIs (pCR: OR = 0.17, p < 0.00001; MPR: OR = 0.38, p = 0.001). The pooled OR values for the incidence of grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events and surgical delay rate were 0.26 and 0.05, respectively, which were significantly in favor of neoadjuvant ICIs (p < 0.0001; p < 0.00001, respectively). The subgroup analyses did not demonstrate superiority of one ICI over another ICI or combination therapy. The present study found that neoadjuvant ICIs were well tolerated by patients with resectable HCC and conferred therapeutic benefits in view of histopathological response results.

Immune-related gene signature to predict TACE refractoriness in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on artificial neural network

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment option for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while response varies among patients. This study aimed to identify novel immune-related genes (IRGs) and establish a prediction model for TACE refractoriness in HCC patients based on machine learning methods. Methods: Gene expression data were downloaded from GSE104580 dataset of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, differential analysis was first performed to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to further select significant DEGs. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was utilized to build a gene co-expression network and filter the hub genes. Final signature genes were determined by the intersection of LASSO analysis results, WGCNA results and IRGs list. Based on the above results, the artificial neural network (ANN) model was constructed in the training cohort and verified in the validation cohort. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to assess the prediction accuracy. Correlation of signature genes with tumor microenvironment scores, immune cells and immune checkpoint molecules were further analyzed. The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score was used to evaluate the response to immunotherapy. Results: One hundred and forty-seven samples were included in this study, which was randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 103) and validation cohort (n = 44). In total, 224 genes were identified as DEGs. Further LASSO regression analysis screened out 25 genes from all DEGs. Through the intersection of LASSO results, WGCNA results and IRGs list, S100A9, TREM1, COLEC12, and IFIT1 were integrated to construct the ANN model. The areas under the curves (AUCs) of the model were .887 in training cohort and .765 in validation cohort. The four IRGs also correlated with tumor microenvironment scores, infiltrated immune cells and immune checkpoint genes in various degrees. Patients with TACE-Response, lower expression of COLEC12, S100A9, TREM1 and higher expression of IFIT1 had better response to immunotherapy. Conclusion: This study constructed and validated an IRG signature to predict the refractoriness to TACE in patients with HCC, which may have the potential to provide insights into the TACE refractoriness in HCC and become the immunotherapeutic targets for HCC patients with TACE refractoriness.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Chemoprevention with Generic Agents

Liver cancer, mainly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remains a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. With the global epidemic of obesity, the major HCC etiologies have been dynamically shifting from viral to metabolic liver diseases. This change has made HCC prevention difficult with increasingly elusive at-risk populations as rational target for preventive interventions. Besides ongoing efforts to reduce obesity and metabolic disorders, chemoprevention in patients who already have metabolic liver diseases may have a significant impact on the poor HCC prognosis. Hepatitis B- and hepatitis C-related HCC incidences have been substantially reduced by the new antivirals, but HCC risk can persist over a decade even after successful viral treatment, highlighting the need for HCC-preventive measures also in these patients. Experimental and retrospective studies have suggested potential utility of generic agents such as lipophilic statins and aspirin for HCC chemoprevention given their well-characterized safety profile, although anticipated efficacy may be modest. In this review, we overview recent clinical and translational studies of generic agents in the context of HCC chemoprevention under the contemporary HCC etiologies. We also discuss newly emerging approaches to overcome the challenges in clinical testing of the agents to facilitate their clinical translation.