Prevalence of pain-related diagnoses in patients with dementia: a nationwide study

Conversational Agents to Support Pain Management: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Pain-related conditions are the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. Managing pain presents significant challenges, including the need to address multiple biopsychosocial factors and the difficulty in delivering evidence-based treatments. Digital health technologies, such as conversational agents, offer the potential for personalised and accessible pain management. However, the characteristics and effectiveness of these interventions are not yet fully understood. This scoping review aims to comprehensively evaluate the applications and effectiveness of conversational agents in supporting pain management in adults (i.e., healthy individuals at risk of developing pain, individuals currently experiencing pain and healthcare providers or students involved in managing pain conditions).

METHODS

Searches were systematically conducted across six databases-MEDLINE PubMed, ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL-and five trial registries from inception.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included, focusing on capturing health information (n = 8), providing emotional support (n = 7), facilitating adherence to self-management exercises (n = 6), delivering psychological treatment (n = 5), offering organisational support (n = 1) and educating healthcare providers (n = 1). These studies addressed conditions with pain as a central or common symptom, including dementia (n = 7), cancer (n = 5) and musculoskeletal disorders (n = 4), among others. None of the conversational agents on the market covered all four stages recommended for translational research (development, feasibility, effectiveness and implementation).

CONCLUSION

The use of conversational agents in pain management is relatively new and involves diverse and promising appllications. However, evidence supporting their effectiveness in improving pain-related outcomes remains limited and heterogeneous. Future reseacrh should prioritise feasibility, reliability, and user experience studies to inform the design of robust randomised controlled trials.

SIGNIFICANCE

This scoping review comprehensively examines the use of conversational agents (CAs) in adult pain management. The study identified six applications of CAs to support pain management and highlights a lack of high-quality randomised controlled trials, particularly those preceded by development and feasibility studies. Clinicians and researchers can use these insights to guide future studies and improve applications of CAs in pain management.

Dyadic Comparison of Pain and Stress in Alzheimer's Disease and Caregivers

BACKGROUND

Millions of people live with dementia worldwide, relying heavily on family caregivers. Pain is common in both people living with Alzheimer's disease (PLWAD) and their caregivers, contributing to stress and burden. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between pain, stress, hair cortisol, and mental health in PLWAD and their caregivers and how these factors are linked to caregiver burden.

METHODS

This exploratory pilot study included five PLWAD-caregiver dyads. Participants completed questionnaires on pain, mental health, and demographics. Hair samples were collected for cortisol analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess relationships between various factors of PLWAD and their caregivers.

RESULTS

Contrary to expectations, pain and mental health measures for PLWAD displayed a trend toward negative correlation with their hair cortisol levels. Conversely, caregiver pain and mental health measures had a trend toward positive correlation with their hair cortisol levels. There was also a trend that higher pain in PLWAD was associated with higher caregiver burden.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory pilot study showed associational trends suggesting a complex relationship between pain, mental health, and stress in PLWAD-caregiver dyads. This preliminary work will inform future studies that can help advance targeted, tailored interventions.

Is headache a risk factor for dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we critically evaluate available evidence regarding the association between primary headaches and subsequent decline of cognitive function and dementia.

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggested that headache disorders may increase the risk for dementia. However, available studies are conflicting.

METHODS

To identify qualifying studies, we searched scientific databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct and BMC, screening for relevant papers. In order to reduce the heterogeneity between different studies, the analyses were further subdivided according to the clinical diagnoses and the study methodologies.

RESULTS

We identified 23 studies investigating the association between primary headaches and the risk of dementia. Of these, 18 met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis (covering 924.140 individuals). Overall effect-size shows that primary headaches were associated with a small increase in dementia risk (OR = 1,15; CI 95%: 1,03-1,28; p = 0,02). Analyzing subgroups, we found that migraine was associated with both a moderate increased risk of all-cause dementia (OR = 1,26; p = 0,00; 95% CI: 1,13-1,40) as well as a moderate increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (OR = 2,00; p = 0,00; 95% CI: 1,46-2,75). This association was significant in both case-control and retrospective cohort studies but not in prospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the presence of a link between primary headaches and dementia. However, in the subgroup analysis, only patients with migraine showed a moderate increase risk for all-cause dementia and for Alzheimer's disease. Additional rigorous studies are needed to elucidate the possible role of primary headaches on the risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia.

Prevalence of Chronic Pain Among People with Dementia: A Nationwide Study Using French Administrative Data

OBJECTIVE

Alzheimer's disease or Related Dementia (ADRD) is known to disturb pain perception and reduce the ability to report it, resulting in underestimation by practitioners and sub-optimal medical management. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of all types of CP among people with ADRD.

DESIGN

Nationwide cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

French community-dwelling and nursing home residents.

PARTICIPANTS

People with ADRD, >40 years old, treated with cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, or with a diagnosis/long-term illness of ADRD and matched with a comparison sample.

SETTINGS

French community-dwelling and nursing home residents.

PARTICIPANTS

People with ADRD, >40 years old, treated with cognitive stimulants (cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) or with a diagnosis/long-term illness of ADRD and matched with a comparison sample (non-ADRD).

MEASUREMENTS

The capture-recapture method was performed to provide estimates of the prevalence of CP. People treated with analgesic drugs for ≥6 months consecutively or with a medical diagnosis of CP (ICD-10 codes) or referred to a pain center were considered as having CP.

RESULTS

A total of 48,288 individuals were included, of which 16,096 had ADRD and 32,192 without ADRD. The estimated prevalence of CP in people with ADRD was from 57.7% [52.9;63.3] to 57.9%[53.0;63.9], and slightly higher than the non-ADRD sample (from 49.9%[47.0;53.2] to 50.4%[47.3;53.9], p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CP among people living with ADRD was at least the same as or better than individuals without ADRD. This result should alert practitioners' attention to the need for effective pain assessment and management in this population who has difficulties to express and feel pain.

Nonpharmacological approaches for pain and symptoms of depression in people with osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analyses

People with osteoarthritis often experience pain and depression. These meta-analyses examined and compared nonpharmacological randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for pain and symptoms of depression in people living with osteoarthritis. RCTs published up until April 2022 were sourced by searching electronic databases EMBASE, PUBMED & MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL and PEDro. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pain and depression. Subgroup analyses examined intervention subtypes. For pain, 29 interventions (n = 4382; 65 ± 6.9 years; 70% female), revealed a significant effect on reducing pain (ES = 0.43, 95% CI [0.25, 0.61], p < 0.001). Effect sizes were significant (p < 0.001) for movement meditation (ES = 0.52; 95% CI [0.35, 0.69]), multimodal approaches (ES = 0.37; 95% CI [0.22, 0.51]), and psychological therapy (ES = 0.21; 95% CI [0.11, 0.31]), and significant (p = 0.046) for resistance exercise (ES = 0.43, 95% CI [- 0.07, 0.94]. Aerobic exercise alone did not improve pain. For depression, 28 interventions (n = 3377; 63 ± 7.0 years; 69% female), revealed a significant effect on reducing depressive symptoms (ES = 0.29, 95% CI [0.08, 0.49], p < 0.001). Effect sizes were significant for movement meditation (ES = 0.30; 95% CI [0.06, 0.55], p = 0.008) and multimodal interventions (ES = 0.12; 95% CI [0.07, 0.18], p < 0.001). Resistance/aerobic exercise or therapy alone did not improve depressive symptoms. Mind-body approaches were more effective than aerobic/resistance exercise or therapy alone for reducing pain and depression in people with osteoarthritis.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022338051.

Association Between Pain with Disability in the Elderly with Dementia

Background: Elderly is one of the most important and critical periods of life, and paying attention to the issues and problems of this period is very important. Objectives: The present study was performed to investigate the relationship between pain and disability in the elderly with dementia in 2021. Methods: In the present cross-sectional descriptive study, 120 elderly people with dementia were included. The instruments used in the four sections were the demographic profile form, the P-APS pain observation tool, and Stanford Disability Questionnaire questions. the researcher identified the elderly with dementia by available sampling method and if the elderly with dementia were eligible and written informed consent was obtained from the elderly and their primary caregivers, the questionnaires were completed. Conditions of pain and disability were described by descriptive tests, and then the relationship between pain and the degree of disability in patients was analyzed by statistical analysis using SPSS16 software. Results: The results showed mean (SD) pain score was 14.45 (4.23), disability score was 12.75 (3.09), and fall score was 37 (30.8%). According to pain score status classification, 4 (3.3%) of the elderly had no pain, 8 (6.7%) had mild pain, 27 (22.5%) had moderate pain, and 81 (67.5%) had severe pain. There is a significant relationship between pain status and disability in the elderly with dementia. By increase in pain, the patients had more disability (P = 0.000, F = 79.971). Conclusions: As the pain increased, the disability of the elderly with dementia decreased. For this reason, preventive interventions are explained in this field.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Pain Sensitivity and Unpleasantness in People with Vascular Dementia

OBJECTIVE

Advanced age holds higher risk of both pain and dementia, with many studies finding dementia often heightens sensitivity to pain. VaD is the second most common type of dementia. Only a few observational or retrospective studies have examined pain responsiveness in VaD, suggesting it may increase pain unpleasantness (i.e., pain affect). This study compared thermal pain psychophysics between a cohort of vascular dementia (VaD) patients and healthy control (HC) subjects.

DESIGN

Single center, cross-sectional, between-subjects design.

SUBJECTS

Verbally communicative, probable VaD patients (N = 23) and age- and sex-matched HC (N = 23).

METHODS

A thermal psychophysics protocol assessed "mild pain" and "moderate pain" thresholds (oC temperature) and associated unpleasantness ratings (0-20 scale) in both VaD and HC groups. Psychophysics were compared between groups by way of a mixed-effects analysis, controlling for depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups for pain thresholds (main effect p = 0.086, Cohen's d: mild = 0.55, moderate = 0.27). However, unpleasantness ratings were higher in the VaD group compared to HC (main effect p = 0.003; mild pain p = 0.022, Cohen's d = 0.79; moderate pain p = 0.057, Cohen's d = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

These results are consistent with prior observational findings suggesting VaD may make patients more susceptible to pain, particularly its affective component.

Is there a link between headache and cognitive disorders? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The overall prevalence of headaches decreases with age; however headaches remain frequent in aged individuals who are also affected by other disorders such as cognitive decline. Despite the high frequency of both conditions in these persons, the association between headaches and cognitive decline is underexplored, underdiagnosed and poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

In the present article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of existing data concerning the link between headache and cognitive decline.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic literature review to report articles that focus on headaches (including all types of headaches) and neurocognitive disorders of degenerative causes.

RESULTS

Only 9 studies have explored the association between headaches and neurocognitive decline. Methods were highly variable from population-based study to short series of patients using either database or questionnaire during consultation. Studies focusing on Familial Alzheimer's Disease revealed a very high prevalence of headaches in mutation carrier patients compared to non-carrier patients.

CONCLUSION

The association between headaches and cognitive decline is underexplored. Future studies are needed to address the pathophysiological mechanisms to improve the treatment of these underestimated headaches.

Use of antipsychotic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors and risk of falls and fractures: self-controlled case series

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between the use of antipsychotic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors and the risk of falls and fractures in elderly patients with major neurocognitive disorders.

DESIGN

Self-controlled case series.

SETTING

Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database.

PARTICIPANTS

15 278 adults, aged ≥65, with newly prescribed antipsychotic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors, who had an incident fall or fracture between 2006 and 2017. Prescription records of cholinesterase inhibitors confirmed the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders; all use of cholinesterase inhibitors was reviewed by experts.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Conditional Poisson regression was used to derive incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for evaluating the risk of falls and fractures for different treatment periods: use of cholinesterase inhibitors alone, antipsychotic drugs alone, and a combination of cholinesterase inhibitors and antipsychotic drugs, compared with the non-treatment period in the same individual. A 14 day pretreatment period was defined before starting the study drugs because of concerns about confounding by indication.

RESULTS

The incidence of falls and fractures per 100 person years was 8.30 (95% confidence interval 8.14 to 8.46) for the non-treatment period, 52.35 (48.46 to 56.47) for the pretreatment period, and 10.55 (9.98 to 11.14), 10.34 (9.80 to 10.89), and 9.41 (8.98 to 9.86) for use of a combination of cholinesterase inhibitors and antipsychotic drugs, antipsychotic drugs alone, and cholinesterase inhibitors alone, respectively. Compared with the non-treatment period, the highest risk of falls and fractures was during the pretreatment period (adjusted incidence rate ratio 6.17, 95% confidence interval 5.69 to 6.69), followed by treatment with the combination of cholinesterase inhibitors and antipsychotic drugs (1.35, 1.26 to 1.45), antipsychotic drugs alone (1.33, 1.24 to 1.43), and cholinesterase inhibitors alone (1.17, 1.10 to 1.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of falls and fractures was high in the pretreatment period, suggesting that factors other than the study drugs, such as underlying diseases, should be taken into consideration when evaluating the association between the risk of falls and fractures and use of cholinesterase inhibitors and antipsychotic drugs. The treatment periods were also associated with a higher risk of falls and fractures compared with the non-treatment period, although the magnitude was much lower than during the pretreatment period. Strategies for prevention and close monitoring of the risk of falls are still necessary until patients regain a more stable physical and mental state.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Knowledge and Beliefs About Pain in Elderly Patients With Dementia Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The quality of pain management in hospitalized older adult patients with dementia is a crucial issue in healthcare. The knowledge and beliefs of nurses are known to predict their pain management intentions toward this particularly vulnerable patient population.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Knowledge and Beliefs About Pain in Elderly Patients With Dementia (KBPED-C) questionnaire using a sample of hospital nurses.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. The 17-item KBPED-C was distributed between September 2013 and August 2014 to 350 nurses working at a hospital in northern Taiwan. Consistency assessment was conducted using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity was examined using principal component analysis. Three hundred five nurses (19 men and 286 women) were enrolled using convenience sampling.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 30.8 ± 5.8 years. The Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was .86. The item-total correlation was acceptable. The observed content validity was strong, with a content validity index of .86. Construct validity testing revealed a four-factor structure that accounted for 55.2% of the total variance. The four factors of the KBPED-C questionnaire were "general beliefs about pain and aging," "pain management in the workplace," "knowledge about pain management in older adult patients with dementia," and "beliefs about pain in older people."

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This preliminary validation study showed the high acceptability, reliability, and validity of the KBPED-C for hospital nurses. Future studies may use this questionnaire to explore the beliefs and knowledge of nurses regarding pain in older adult patients with dementia.

Pain-Reducing Effects of Physical Therapist-Delivered Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Among Older Adults With Dementia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pain is common among older adults with dementia. There are nonpharmacological options for managing pain in this population. However, the effects of physical therapist-delivered interventions have not been summarized. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the literature on physical therapist-delivered interventions in randomized trials for reducing pain among older adults with dementia.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted for randomized trials of pain management in individuals 60 years or older with medically diagnosed dementia of any severity. Included studies addressed the effects of nonpharmacological physical therapist-delivered interventions on pain outcomes. Pain outcomes included patient or caregiver self-report, observational or interactive measures. Independent reviewers extracted relevant data and assessed methodological quality using the PEDro scale.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Three studies (total = 222 participants; mean age range = 82.2-84.0 years; 178 [80.2%] females) met inclusion criteria. PEDro scores ranged from 4 to 8/10. Interventions included passive movement and massage. Pain outcomes included the observational measures Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC), Pain in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD), and Doloplus-2 Scale. Passive movement did not show better results when compared with no treatment, while massage showed pain-reducing effects in 1 study compared with no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence supporting pain-reducing physical therapy interventions for patients with dementia is limited. There is a clear gap in knowledge related to evidence-based physical therapy for managing pain in this population. Future studies should examine active physical therapist-delivered interventions and utilize interactive pain measures.

End-of-life care in cancer and dementia: a nationwide population-based study of palliative care policy changes

OBJECTIVES

The National Health Insurance programme started providing coverage for inpatient care in palliative care (PC) units of acute care hospitals in 2000; however, initially, only PC provided to patients with terminal cancer was covered. A PC policy that enabled PC reimbursement for patients with dementia was implemented in 2009. However, the association of this PC policy with end-of-life care remains unclear. The study aims to compare the association of the PC policy with end-of-life care between patients with dementia and patients with cancer during the last 6 months of their lives.

METHODS

We analysed the claims data of 7396 patients dying with dementia (PDD) and 24 319 patients dying with cancer (PDC) during 1997-2013.

RESULTS

Among PDC, while the percentage of receiving PC increased from 3.6% in 1999 to 14.2% by the end of 2000 (adjusted OR (aOR)=4.07, 95% CI 2.70 to 6.13) and from 20.9% in 2010 to 41.0% in 2013 (aOR=1.40, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.47), vasopressor use decreased from 71.6% in 1999 to 35.5% in 2001 (aOR=0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98). Among PDD, PC use increased from 0.2% in 2009 to 4.9% in 2013 (aOR=2.05, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.63) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation use decreased from 17.6% in 2009 to 10.0% in 2013 (aOR=0.83, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the PC policy in Taiwan was associated with improved PC utilisation among patients with cancer and dementia, which may reduce unnecessary medical care procedures.