Clinical Implications of Vertebral Endplate Disruptions After Lumbar Discectomy: 3-Year Results from a Randomized Trial of a Bone-Anchored Annular Closure Device

Biomechanical and clinical studies on lumbar spine fusion surgery: a review

Low back pain is associated with degenerative disc diseases of the spine. Surgical treatment includes fusion and non-fusion types. The gold standard is fusion surgery, wherein the affected vertebral segment is fused. The common complication of fusion surgery is adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The ASD often leads to revision surgery, calling for a further fusion of adjacent segments. The existing designs of nonfusion type implants are associated with clinical problems such as subsidence, difficulty in implantation, and the requirement of revision surgeries. Various surgical approaches have been adopted by the surgeons to insert the spinal implants into the affected segment. Over the years, extensive biomechanical investigations have been reported on various surgical approaches and prostheses to predict the outcomes of lumbar spine implantations. Computer models have been proven to be very effective in identifying the best prosthesis and surgical procedure. The objective of the study was to review the literature on biomechanical studies for the treatment of lumbar spinal degenerative diseases. A critical review of the clinical and biomechanical studies on fusion spine surgeries was undertaken. The important modeling parameters, challenges, and limitations of the current studies were identified, showing the future research directions.

Effectiveness of an Annular Closure Device to Prevent Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Secondary Analysis With 5 Years of Follow-up

IMPORTANCE

Patients with large annular defects following lumbar microdiscectomy for disc herniation are at increased risk for symptomatic recurrence and reoperation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a bone-anchored annular closure device in addition to lumbar microdiscectomy resulted in lower reherniation and reoperation rates vs lumbar microdiscectomy alone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial reports 5-year follow-up for enrolled patients between December 2010 and October 2014 at 21 clinical sites. Patients in this study had a large annular defect (6-10 mm width) following lumbar microdiscectomy for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Statistical analysis was performed from November to December 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Lumbar microdiscectomy with additional bone-anchored annular closure device (device group) or lumbar microdiscectomy only (control group).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The incidence of symptomatic reherniation, reoperation, and adverse events as well as changes in leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and health-related quality of life when comparing the device and control groups over 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 554 randomized participants (mean [SD] age: 43 [11] years; 327 [59%] were men), 550 were included in the modified intent-to-treat efficacy population (device group: n = 272; 270 [99%] were White); control group: n = 278; 273 [98%] were White) and 550 were included in the as-treated safety population (device group: n = 267; control group: n = 283). The risk of symptomatic reherniation (18.8% [SE, 2.5%] vs 31.6% [SE, 2.9%]; P < .001) and reoperation (16.0% [SE, 2.3%] vs 22.6% [SE, 2.6%]; P = .03) was lower in the device group. There were 53 reoperations in 40 patients in the device group and 82 reoperations in 58 patients in the control group. Scores for leg pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index, and health-related quality of life significantly improved over 5 years of follow-up with no clinically relevant differences between groups. The frequency of serious adverse events was comparable between the treatment groups. Serious adverse events associated with the device or procedure were less frequent in the device group (12.0% vs 20.5%; difference, -8.5%; 95% CI, -14.6% to -2.3%; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients who are at high risk of recurrent herniation following lumbar microdiscectomy owing to a large defect in the annulus fibrosus, this study's findings suggest that annular closure with a bone-anchored implant lowers the risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation over 5 years of follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01283438.

Ex-vivo biomechanics of repaired rat intervertebral discs using genipin crosslinked fibrin adhesive hydrogel

Microdiscectomy is the current standard surgical treatment for intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation, however annulus fibrosus (AF) defects remain unrepaired which can alter IVD biomechanical properties and lead to reherniation, IVD degeneration and recurrent back pain. Genipin-crosslinked fibrin (FibGen) hydrogel is an injectable AF sealant previously shown to partially restore IVD motion segment biomechanical properties. A small animal model of herniation and repair is needed to evaluate repair potential for early-stage screening of IVD repair strategies prior to more costly large animal and eventual human studies. This study developed an ex-vivo rat caudal IVD herniation model and characterized torsional, axial tension-compression and stress relaxation biomechanical properties before and after herniation injury with or without repair using FibGen. Injury group involved an annular defect followed by removal of nucleus pulposus tissue to simulate a severe herniation while Repaired group involved FibGen injection. Injury significantly altered axial range of motion, neutral zone, torsional stiffness, torque range and stress-relaxation biomechanical parameters compared to Intact. FibGen repair restored the stress-relaxation parameters including effective hydraulic permeability indicating it effectively sealed the IVD defect, and there was a trend for improved tensile stiffness and axial neutral zone length. This study demonstrated a model for studying IVD herniation injury and repair strategies using rat caudal IVDs ex-vivo and demonstrated FibGen sealed IVDs to restore water retention and IVD pressurization. This ex-vivo small animal model may be modified for future in-vivo studies to screen IVD repair strategies using FibGen and other IVD repair biomaterials as an augment to additional large animal and human IVD testing.