Ambulatory thyroidectomy: an anesthesiologist's perspective

Ambulatory thyroidectomy. Recommendations of the Association francophone de chirurgie endocrinienne (AFCE), with the Société française d'endocrinologie (SFE) and the Société française de médecine nucléaire (SFMN)

Before ambulatory thyroidectomy is proposed, the patient and his family and/or friends will need to be informed by the surgeon of the specificity of this procedure, the normal postoperative effects of a thyroidectomy, and potential complications. Also known as outpatient thyroid surgery, it can only be proposed by an experienced surgeon supported by an adequately trained medical and paramedical team. The healthcare establishment must be in possession of all the resources needed in ambulatory management, with continuity of care guaranteed 24h/24 7d/7 in the event of possible emergency rehospitalization. In all cases, contact the day after the operation between the healthcare facility and the patient is imperative. Ambulatory management can be proposed for lobo-isthmectomy or isthmectomy, possibly involving lymph node dissection. It is also possible for secondary totalization of thyroidectomy (following lobectomy). On the other hand, indications for single-stage total thyroidectomy must be limited and ensure proximity between the patient's home and a healthcare structure with a platform adapted to the pathology necessitating surgical intervention (non-plunging euthyroid goiter). A precise clinical pathway must be set out, including pre-, peri- and postoperative protocols having been formalized for surgery (hemostasis procedures) and for anesthesia (prevention of pain, of vomiting and of hypertension). We recommend at least 6hours of postoperative surveillance in outpatient care. When outpatient treatment is not possible or not recommended, hospitalization stay after thyroidectomy can be limited to 24hours, except in the event of postoperative complications, or a need for effectively dosed anticoagulant treatment.

The safety, benefits and future development of overnight and outpatient thyroidectomy

With the development of medical care, the safety of thyroidectomy is improving year by year. Due to economic benefits and other advantages of the overnight and outpatient thyroidectomy, more and more patients and medical institutions have favored overnight and outpatient thyroidectomy, and its proportion in thyroidectomy has increased year by year. However, overnight and outpatient thyroidectomy still faces many challenges and remains to be improved. In this review, we focused on the recent progress and the relevant clinical features of overnight and outpatient thyroidectomy, including its safety, economic benefits, etc., which may bring valuable clues and information for further improvements of patient benefits and promotions of overnight or outpatient thyroidectomy in the future.

High-Suspicion Subcentimeter Thyroid Nodules: Cost Effectiveness of Active Surveillance versus Fine Needle Aspiration

PURPOSE

To compare the cost-benefit of active surveillance (AS) against immediate fine needle aspiration (FNA) of sonographically suspicious subcentimeter thyroid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-benefit of 3 strategies from the point of discovery until death: (a) Surveillance of all nodules, (b) Surveillance of nodules with positive cytology, and (c) Surgery of nodules with positive cytology. The reference case was a 40-year-old woman with a sonographically suspicious subcentimeter thyroid nodule. Transition probabilities, costs, and health state utilities were derived from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model uncertainty. Willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life year.

RESULTS

Surveillance of nodules with positive cytology dominated in the reference scenario and was cost-beneficial over Surveillance of all nodules, independent of the utility of AS. Surveillance of all nodules was cost-beneficial only at a life expectancy of <2.6 years or surveillance duration of <4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

While current guidelines recommend AS of sonographically suspicious subcentimeter nodules, the results of this study suggest that immediate FNA (Surveillance of nodules with positive cytology) is more cost-beneficial than AS (Surveillance of all nodules). Patients with positive cytology on FNA may subsequently opt for AS (Surveillance of nodules with positive cytology) or surgery (Surgery of nodules with positive cytology) according to their level of comfort (ie, utility) with AS.

The ambulatory transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach is safe and economical for patients with thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory thyroid surgery has been increasingly performed in recent years. However, the feasibility of the ambulatory transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has not been evaluated. We aimed to evaluate the safety, economy, and mental health outcomes of ambulatory TOETVA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent TOETVA between March 2019 and August 2022. The procedure was performed by a skilled surgical team from the Department of Thyroid Surgery of the affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University. Patients were enrolled in the ambulatory (n=166) and conventional (n=290) groups, based on their chosen procedure. We analyzed patients' clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) scores, and hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Of 456 patients, 166 underwent ambulatory TOETVA and 290 underwent conventional TOETVA. No significant differences were found in clinical and surgical characteristics between the groups, including sex (P=0.363), age (P=0.077), body mass index (P=0.351), presence of internal diseases (P=0.613), presence of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (P=0.429), pathology (P=0.362), maximum tumor diameter (P=0.520), scope of surgery (P=0.850), or operative time (P=0.351). There were no significant differences in maximum tumor diameter (P=0.349), extrathyroidal tissue invasion (P=0.516), number of retrieved central lymph nodes (P=0.069), or metastatic central lymph nodes (P=0.897) between the groups. No significant differences were found in complications, including transient hypoparathyroidism (P=0.438), transient vocal cord palsy (P=0.876), transient mental nerve injury (P=0.749), permanent mental nerve injury (P=0.926), and other complications (P=1.000). Ambulatory patients had shorter hospital stays (P<0.001) and reduced hospitalization costs (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in HAM-A scores between the groups (P=0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory TOETVA is a safe, feasible, and cost-effective procedure for selected patients. This procedure resulted in shorter hospital stays, decreased medical costs, and did not increase patient anxiety. To ensure patient safety, surgical teams must inform patients of the indications, when to seek help, and how to receive the fastest medical attention.

Introducing day case thyroid lobectomy at a tertiary head and neck centre

BACKGROUND

Thyroid lobectomy is considered to be a safe day case procedure by the British Association of Day Surgery. However, currently only 5.5% of thyroid surgeries in the UK are undertaken as day cases. We determine if and how thyroid lobectomy with same-day discharge could safely be introduced in our centre.

METHODS

We analysed all thyroid lobectomy surgeries performed between April 2015 and May 2019. Exclusion criteria included completion surgery, revision surgery, additional procedures and disseminated disease. Outcomes were benchmarked against surgeon-reported complications from the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery's 5^th National Audit. Additionally, we reviewed the number of patients who met day case criteria currently in use at our hospital to determine accessibility to the service.

RESULTS

In total, 259 thyroid lobectomy surgeries were undertaken and of these 173 met the inclusion criteria. There was no mortality, return to theatre for evacuation of postoperative haematoma or readmission. There was one postoperative haematoma which was drained at the bedside. Some 47 of the 173 (27.2%) patients met day case criteria currently in use at our centre.

CONCLUSIONS

Day case surgery provides a cost-effective solution to rising bed pressures and a coherent protocol can optimise patient safety and experience.

To admit or not to admit? Experience with outpatient thyroidectomy for Graves' disease in a high-volume tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Outpatient thyroidectomy is increasingly performed. Thyroidectomy for Graves' disease, however, has greater risk of periprocedural complications, limiting use of same-day procedures. We sought to demonstrate that these patients may be managed with ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

The experience of one endocrine surgeon with thyroidectomy for Graves' was examined from January 2016-November 2017. Forty-one patients met criteria. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes including emergency department utilization and readmission were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age was 31.5 ± 17.0 years, with 80% females. Mode ASA score was 3, and median operative time was 77 minutes (43-132). Complications included transient hypocalcaemia in 12%, and temporary laryngeal nerve palsy in 9.7%, with no permanent complications. Two patients were admitted immediately postoperatively for non-medical reasons. Thirty-day emergency rdepartment visits were noted in 9.7%, with subsequent readmission of 7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient total thyroidectomy is safe and effective with acceptable morbidity in the Graves' patient.