1
|
Manchado Perero S, Rodríguez Lorente A, García-Pérez A, Isidro García G, Forcen-Muñoz LA, Ovejero García S, Sáez Povedano R, González-Galdámez AL, Mata Iturralde L, Ramirez Bonilla M, Fuentes-Pérez P, Ovejas-Catalán C, Suárez-Pinilla P, Fernández Abascal B, Omaña Colmenares M, Campos-Navarro MP, Baca-García E, Lara Fernández A, Benavente-López S, Raya Platero A, Barberán Navalón M, Sánchez-Alonso S, Vázquez-Bourgon J, Pappa S, García-Carmona JA. Long-term effectiveness, adherence and safety of twice-yearly paliperidone-palmitate long acting-injectable in patients with schizophrenia in Europe: 2-year mirror-image data from the paliperdone-2 per year study (P2Y). Front Psychiatry 2025; 16:1540213. [PMID: 40104335 PMCID: PMC11913845 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1540213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Background LAIs with longer dosing intervals appear to be associated with improved clinical outcomes and added real-world benefits in the management of schizophrenia. Paliperidone palmitate six-monthly (PP6M) LAI provides the longest dosing interval, twice-yearly dosing, among all currently available LAIs. In clinical trials PP6M was found to be non-inferior in preventing relapses in patients with schizophrenia compared to the three monthly formulation (PP3M) though real world data remain limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability, effectiveness, and safety of PP6M in patients with schizophrenia in real world practice. Methods Data were derived from a naturalistic cohort of patients enrolled in the international, multicenter, prospective Paliperidone-2-per Year (P2Y) study. In this 2-year mirror-image study we compare the number of hospital admissions 1 year pre- and post-PP6M initiation as well as the CGI scores at baseline and the point of each PP6M administration. Discontinuation rates and reasons were also collected. Results A total of 201 patients (107 outpatients and 94 chronic long-stay inpatients) were included. The majority of patients had switched to PP6M from either PP3M (76%) or PP1M (19%) while the 3% switched from aripiprazole 1-monthly and the 2% from risperidone-LAI and zuclopenthixol-LAI. The mean CGI-Severity score significantly reduced from baseline to the second and third PP6M administrations in the global cohort (2.31 ± 0.14 vs. 3.23, p=0.001) as well as in both subgroups. Moreover, the number of hospital admissions decreased from 0.2 ± 0.04 1-year period before to 0.07 ± 0.02 1 year after PP6M initiation (p=0.001). Only 6%, (12 patients, 10 out- and 2 inpatients) discontinued treatment at 1 year of follow-up; Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences in PP6M treatment discontinuation between out- and inpatients (p=0.012). The main reason for discontinuation was lack of adherence (5 patients) while only 1 patient stopped treatment due to tolerability issues (extrapyramidal side effects). Conclusions This is the first mirror-image study in patients with schizophrenia treated with PP6M in real-world settings showing very high treatment persistence, reduced hospital admissions compared to previous LAIs and no major safety concerns. Our findings suggest that six-monthly treatment with a long-acting antipsychotic may confer additional benefits in the management of schizophrenia. Nonetheless, we were unable to determine the precise changes in symptoms. Therefore, future studies are needed to truly establish the role of PP6M.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alba García-Pérez
- Centre of Mental Health Molina de Segura, Molina de Segura, Murcia, Spain
| | - Guillermo Isidro García
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Rocío Sáez Povedano
- Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital de Villarrobledo, Villarrobledo, Albacete, Spain
| | | | - Laura Mata Iturralde
- Department of Psychiatry, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariluz Ramirez Bonilla
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Paloma Fuentes-Pérez
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Claudia Ovejas-Catalán
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Paula Suárez-Pinilla
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Blanca Fernández Abascal
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Enrique Baca-García
- Department of Psychiatry, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Javier Vázquez-Bourgon
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Group, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Sofia Pappa
- West London National Health System (NHS) Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Antonio García-Carmona
- Department of Neurology, Santa Lucía University Hospital, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
- Group of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, San Antonio Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lhaglham P, Jiramonai L, Liang XJ, Liu B, Li F. The development of paliperidone nanocrystals for the treatment of schizophrenia. PROGRESS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2024; 7:012002. [PMID: 39655839 DOI: 10.1088/2516-1091/ad8fe7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a complex and chronic psychiatric disorder that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Ranking 12th among 310 diseases and injuries that result in disability, the number of patients suffering from schizophrenia continues to rise, emphasizing the urgent need for developing effective treatments. Despite the availability of effective antipsychotic drugs, over 80% of patients taking oral antipsychotics experience relapses, primarily caused by non-adherence as the high dosing frequency is required. In this review, we discuss about schizophrenia, its incidence, pathological causes, influencing factors, and the challenges of the current medications. Specifically, we explore nanocrystal technology and its application to paliperidone, making it one of the most successful long-acting antipsychotic drugs introduced to the market. We highlight the clinical advantages of paliperidone nanocrystals, including improved adherence, efficacy, long-term outcomes, patient satisfaction, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, we address the physicochemical factors influencing the drug's half-life, which crucially contribute to long-acting medications. Further studies on nanocrystal-based long-acting medications are crucial for enhancing their effectiveness and reliability. The successful development of paliperidone nanocrystals holds great promise as a significant approach for drug development, with potential applications for other chronic disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phattalapol Lhaglham
- CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, People's Republic of China
- Department of Manufacturing Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Sri-ayudhya road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Luksika Jiramonai
- CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing-Jie Liang
- CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, People's Republic of China
| | - Bingchuan Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Fangzhou Li
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiang CL, Chinen M, Daskiran M, Wakamatsu A, Turkoz I. Clinical effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly and 1-monthly as monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia: A retrospective cohort study based on the Medicaid claims database. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep 2024. [PMID: 39259889 DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM Real-world data (RWD) for paliperidone palmitate (PP) three-monthly (PP3M) is lacking based on Japan label requirements. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of PP3M versus PP once-monthly (PP1M) in patients with schizophrenia administered according to Japan label requirements. METHODS Retrospective analyses were conducted using RWD from Merative™ MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid (MDCD) claims database (June 2015-December 2022). Adult patients with schizophrenia switching from PP1M to PP3M were included. Patients transitioning to PP3M were matched with patients who continued with PP1M using propensity score matching (PSM) at 1:1 ratio. Primary hypothesis aimed to investigate non-inferiority of PP3M versus PP1M in terms of relapse-free status at 24 months from index PP injection. Outcome measures were proportions of relapse-free patients at 24 months, time to relapse, treatment persistence, and adherence. RESULTS Total 4252 eligible adult schizophrenia patients on PP (PP3M:582; PP1M:3670) were identified. After PSM, each PP cohort comprised 562 matched individuals. Estimated proportion of relapse-free patients was higher in PP3M (85.7%) versus PP1M (77.9%), per Japan PP label. PP3M demonstrated superiority to PP1M after testing for non-inferiority in terms of achieving relapse-free status at 24 months, with an estimated difference of 7.8% (95% CI: 1.7%-13.9%). PP3M cohort had lower risk of relapse (HR: 0.605; CI: 0.427-0.856), longer treatment persistence, and higher treatment adherence versus PP1M cohort. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggests that patients who switched to PP3M might be able to reduce risk of relapse compared to those who continued PP1M after aligning particularly with Japan's label requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Lin Chiang
- Medical Affairs, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Madoka Chinen
- Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehmet Daskiran
- US Statistics & Decision Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Ibrahim Turkoz
- US Statistics & Decision Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benson C, Patel C, Lee I, Shaikh NF, Wang Y, Zhao X, Near AM. Treatment patterns and hospitalizations following rejection, reversal, or payment of the initial once-monthly paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable antipsychotic claim among patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2024; 30:954-966. [PMID: 38831661 PMCID: PMC11365566 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.23252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (SCA) in adults. OBJECTIVE To assess treatment patterns and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization following payer rejection, patient reversal, or payment of an initial PP1M claim. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using the IQVIA Formulary Impact Analyzer database linked to the Medical Claims, Hospital Charge Detail Master, and Experian consumer databases. Patients with schizophrenia/SCA and ≥1 PP1M pharmacy claim from January 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022, were identified and stratified into 3 cohorts based on the transaction status of the initial PP1M claim (index date): rejected (payer not approved), reversed (payer approved, patient abandoned), and paid (payer approved, patient filled). Patient characteristics during the 12 months before the index date, subsequent treatment patterns, and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization for patients with >6 months of follow-up were assessed by cohort. RESULTS The rejected, reversed, and paid cohorts included 1,260, 1,046, and 1,686 patients, respectively. Across these cohorts, the mean ages ranged between 39.2 and 44.5 years; more than half were male (50.8%-51.6%) and White (50.6%-58.3%); 19.8%-24.6% of patients had a Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Rates of prior atypical oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic use ranged between 76.4%-80.3% and 7.8%-12.7%, respectively. Among patients with ≥6 months of follow-up, 52.2% in the rejected and 53.1% in the reversed cohorts had a subsequent paid PP1M claim during the study period; the median (quartile 1-quartile 3) time to the first paid PP1M claim was 22 (5-74) days for rejection and 11 (1-41) days for reversal. In the rejected and reversed cohorts, 10.2% (n = 111) and 9.8% (n = 90) of patients, respectively, did not receive any paid claim for an antipsychotic after the initial PP1M rejection/reversal. The prevalence of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization during follow-up was similar between patients with a paid (7.4%) and rejected PP1M claim (7.0%; P = 0.689) but higher among patients with a reversed claim (10.8%; P = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the reversed cohort were 39% more likely to have a schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization than those in the paid cohort (odds ratio = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.03-1.87). CONCLUSIONS Payer rejection and patient reversal of initial PP1M claims is a form of primary nonadherence and may influence patient trajectory. Data from this study suggest that patient reversal of PP1M may lead to an increased risk of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalizations, potentially caused by missed or delayed treatment. Policy initiatives that remove barriers to primary adherence or fulfillment may help improve patients' clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmela Benson
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Titusville, NJ
| | - Charmi Patel
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Titusville, NJ
| | - Inyoung Lee
- IQVIA Inc., Durham, NC
- IQVIA Inc., Durham, NC at the time the study was conducted
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Correll CU, Johnston K, Turkoz I, Gray J, Sun L, Doring M, Sajatovic M. Three-Year Outcomes of 6-Month Paliperidone Palmitate in Adults With Schizophrenia: An Open-Label Extension Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2421495. [PMID: 39018073 PMCID: PMC11255912 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have the potential to improve adherence and symptom control in patients with schizophrenia, promoting long-term recovery. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) once every 6 months is the first and currently only LAI antipsychotic with an extended dosing interval of 6 months. Objective To assess long-term outcomes of PP received once every 6 months in adults with schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants In a 2-year open-label extension (OLE) study of a 1-year randomized clinical trial (RCT), eligible adults with schizophrenia could choose to continue PP every 6 months if they had not experienced relapse after receiving PP once every 3 or 6 months in the 1-year, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized noninferiority trial. The present analysis focused on patients receiving PP every 6 months in the double-blind trial through the OLE study (November 20, 2017, to May 3, 2022). Intervention Patients received a dorsogluteal injection of PP on day 1 and once every 6 months up to month 30. Main Outcomes and Measures End points included assessment of relapse and change from the double-blind trial baseline to the OLE end point in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, and Personal Social Performance (PSP) Scale scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), injection site evaluations, and laboratory tests were also assessed. Results Among 121 patients (83 [68.6%] male), mean (SD) age at baseline was 38.6 (11.24) years and mean (SD) duration of illness was 11.0 (9.45) years. At screening of the double-blind study, 101 patients (83.5%) were taking an oral antipsychotic and 20 (16.5%) were taking an LAI antipsychotic. Altogether, 5 of 121 patients (4.1%) experienced relapse during the 3-year follow-up; reasons for relapse were psychiatric hospitalization (2 [1.7%]), suicidal or homicidal ideation (2 [1.7%]), and deliberate self-injury (1 [0.8%]). Patients treated with PP every 6 months were clinically and functionally stable, and outcomes were well maintained, evidenced by stable scores on the PANSS (mean [SD] change, -2.6 [9.96] points), CGI-S (mean [SD] change, -0.2 [0.57] points), and PSP (mean [SD] change, 3.1 [9.14] points) scales over the 3-year period. In total, 101 patients (83.5%) completed the 2-year OLE. At least 1 TEAE was reported in 97 of 121 patients (80.2%) overall; no new safety or tolerability concerns were identified. Conclusions and Relevance In a 2-year OLE study of a 1-year RCT, results supported favorable long-term outcomes of PP once every 6 months for up to 3 years in adults with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph U. Correll
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York
- Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karen Johnston
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - Ibrahim Turkoz
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - Jason Gray
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Titusville, New Jersey
| | | | - Monica Doring
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cirnigliaro G, Battini V, Castiglioni M, Renne M, Mosini G, Cheli S, Carnovale C, Dell'Osso B. Evaluating the 6-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate: a twice-yearly injectable treatment for schizophrenia in adults. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:325-332. [PMID: 38445396 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2325655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Paliperidone Palmitate is the only antipsychotic that has been developed in three different intramuscular long-acting injectable (LAI) dosing regimen: monthly (PP1M), quarterly (PP3M), and from 2020 also twice-yearly (PP6M). The latter was approved for the maintenance treatment of adults with schizophrenia and clinically stabilized with PP1M or PP3M. AREAS COVERED Data from studies evaluating efficacy in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia with PP6M are reviewed. Since no post-marketing safety studies are currently available, data from spontaneous reporting system databases, FAERS and Eudravigilance, are analyzed and the reported treatment-emergent adverse events of PP6M are discussed. EXPERT OPINION The efficacy of PP6M is comparable to that of PP3M in terms of relapses prevention in patients with schizophrenia previously stabilized on PP3M or PP1M. Also, the maintenance of clinical efficacy in the long term has been demonstrated. Data from pharmacovigilance analyses, as well as from phase 3 studies, show that PP6M is generally well tolerated, consistently with PP3M safety data. PP6M allows a longer dosing interval than any other LAI antipsychotics, potentially reducing nonadherence and disease relapses. In future, an increase in the prescription rates of PP6M is expected and real-world efficacy and tolerability studies will be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Cirnigliaro
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Department of Psychiatry, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vera Battini
- Pharmacovigilance & Clinical Research, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Castiglioni
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Department of Psychiatry, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marica Renne
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Department of Psychiatry, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Mosini
- Pharmacovigilance & Clinical Research, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Cheli
- Pharmacovigilance & Clinical Research, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carla Carnovale
- Pharmacovigilance & Clinical Research, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dell'Osso
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Department of Psychiatry, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford Medical School, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- CRC "Aldo Ravelli" for Neurotechnology & Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Centro per lo studio dei meccanismi molecolari alla base delle patologie neuro-psico-geriatriche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|