Management of critically ill patients receiving noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department

Performance of newly developed add-on devices on aerosol delivery in noninvasive ventilated subjects

Background: Several techniques had been developed to generate aerosolized medications during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) using variable inhalation methods. This study hypothesized that large spacers were more efficient significantly than small spacers and adapters during NIV. Objective: The main objective of this study was to compare the performance of newly developed spacers with standard T-piece in NIV chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects. Methods: Sixty COPD subjects requiring NIV were included in this study. A dual-limb circuit was used, and the mode of ventilator was set in spontaneous volume-controlled mode. Dual-limb ventilation circuit, consists of inspiratory-limb and expiratory-limb, is pressure and volume controlled in response to subject expiration providing relatively high resistance to expiratory flow. Two experimental sets were evaluated: the first was introducing two preliminary pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) puffs before the nebulization of 1 ml of a respirable solution of salbutamol by vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) using Minimhal and Combihaler. The second was to only nebulize 1 ml of salbutamol respirable solution by VMN using Combihaler, Minimhal, and standard T-piece. Two urine samples were collected after aerosol delivery: urine sample after 30 min. (USAL0.5) as an indicator of lung deposition and all urine pooled 24 h (USAL24) post-inhalation as an indicator of systemic absorption. The amount of salbutamol extracted from urine samples was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: Minimhal + pMDI + VMN delivered a higher percentage of salbutamol 30 min post-inhalation than Minimhal + VMN (p < 0.001). Also, Combihaler + pMDI + VMN delivered a higher percentage of salbutamol 30 min post-inhalation than Combihaler + VMN (p < 0.001). Combihaler + VMN delivered a higher percentage of salbutamol 30 min and 24 h post-inhalation than both Minimhal + VMN and T-piece + VMN (p < 0.001). Standard T-piece delivered the lowest aerosol amount delivered to the lung compared to both spacers (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Introducing two pMDI puffs significantly improved aerosol delivery by both spacers. Combihaler significantly improves aerosol delivery more than Minimhal.

The use of non-invasive ventilation by emergency doctors in Johannesburg Academic Hospitals, South Africa - assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices

Introduction

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an alternative ventilatory method to endotracheal intubation and invasive ventilation in patients presenting in acute respiratory failure. Appropriate and timely application of NIV has shown benefits over invasive ventilation. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of NIV for varying pathologies in response to limited resources.Emergency department doctors' knowledge of NIV, as well as their attitude towards its use can have significant effects on the success of NIV. The aim of this study was to assess emergency doctors' use of NIV in the South African setting.

Methods

This was a multi-centre prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted across three academic emergency departments in Johannesburg, South Africa. Doctors of various grades were included in the study and their responses were analysed according to their level of experience and their job description.

Results

The mean knowledge score of the participants was shown to increase with an increase in job designation (p < 0.001). The doctors' attitude towards NIV was more positive in those with higher knowledge scores (p < 0.001). Participants with previous critical care experience versus those without was associated with a higher average knowledge score (77% vs. 69 %, p = 0.009) as was formal NIV training versus those without (77% vs. 69 %, p = 0.01). The COVID-19 pandemic increased confidence in the use of NIV in 61 % of participants. The majority (69 %) of participants did not use a checklist when administering NIV. Only 53 % used a guideline when initiating a patient on NIV and just 26 % used a locally produced protocol.

Conclusion

Increased clinical experience, critical care exposure and formal NIV training corresponded with higher knowledge scores. Formal NIV training programs, the implementation of a checklist and the development of locally produced protocols are recommended to improve knowledge, attitudes and NIV practice that is in-keeping with international standards.

Reported adverse events during out-of-hospital mechanical ventilation and ventilatory support in emergency medical services and critical care transport crews: a systematic review

Background

Emergency medical services (EMS) and critical care transport crews constantly face critically-ill patients who need ventilatory support in scenarios where correct interventions can be the difference between life and death; furthermore, challenges like limited staff working on the patient and restricted spaces are often present. Due to these, mechanical ventilation (MV) can be a support by liberating staff from managing the airway and allowing them to focus on other areas; however, these patients face many complications that personnel must be aware of.

Aims

To establish the main complications related to out-of-hospital MV and ventilatory support through a systematic review.

Methodology

PubMed, BVS and Scopus were searched from inception to July 2021, following the PRISMA guidelines; search strategy and protocol were registered in PROSPERO. Two authors carried out an independent analysis of the articles; any disagreement was solved by mutual consensus, and data was extracted on a pre-determined spreadsheet. Only original articles were included, and risk of bias was assessed with quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health.

Results

The literature search yielded a total of 2,260 articles, of which 26 were included in the systematic review, with a total of 9,418 patients with out-of-hospital MV; 56.1% were male, and the age ranged from 18 to 82 years. In general terms of aetiology, 12.2% of ventilatory problems were traumatic in origin, and 64.8% were non-traumatic, with slight changes between out-of-hospital settings. Mechanical ventilation was performed 49.2% of the time in prehospital settings and 50.8% of the time in interfacility transport settings (IFTS). Invasive mechanical ventilation was used 98.8% of the time in IFTS while non-invasive ventilation was used 96.7% of the time in prehospital settings. Reporting of adverse events occurred in 9.1% of cases, of which 94.4% were critical events, mainly pneumothorax in 33.1% of cases and hypotension in 27.6% of cases, with important considerations between type of out-of-hospital setting and ventilatory mode; total mortality was 8.4%.

Conclusion

Reported adverse events of out-of-hospital mechanical ventilation vary between settings and ventilatory modes; this knowledge could aid EMS providers in promptly recognizing and resolving such clinical situations, depending on the type of scenario being faced.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients to predict invasive mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Diaphragm dysfunction is common in critically ill patients and associated with poorer outcomes. The function of the diaphragm can be evaluated at the bedside by measuring diaphragmatic excursion using ultrasonography. In this study, we investigated the ability of right-sided diaphragmatic excursion (RDE) to predict the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

METHODS

Critically ill patients aged 18 years and older who presented to our emergency department between May 20, 2021 and May 19, 2022 and underwent measurement of RDE within 10 min of arrival were enrolled in this prospective study. The ability of RDE to predict the need for IMV was assessed by multivariable logistic regression and analysis of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

A total of 314 patients were enrolled in the study; 113 (35.9%) of these patients required IMV. An increase of RDE value per each 0.1 cm was identified to be an independent predictor of IMV (adjusted odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.17, p < 0.001; AUROC 0.850, 95% CI 0.807-0.894). The RDE cutoff value was 1.2 cm (sensitivity 82.3%, 95% CI 74.0-88.8; specificity 78.1%, 95% CI 71.7-83.6). Time on a ventilator was significantly longer when the RDE was ≤ 1.2 cm (13 days [interquartile range 5, 27] versus 5 days [interquartile range 3, 8], p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, RDE had a good ability to predict the need for IMV in critically ill patients. The optimal RDE cutoff value was 1.2 cm. Its benefit in patient management requires further investigation.

The Effectiveness of NIV and CPAP Training on the Job in COVID-19 Acute Care Wards: A Nurses' Self-Assessment of Skills

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in COVID-19 patients outside of intensive care unit (ICU) settings was a feasible support during the pandemic outbreak. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an “on the job” NIV training program provided to 66 nurses working in 3 COVID-19 wards in an Italian university hospital. Methods: A quasi-experimental longitudinal before−after study was designed. The NIV Team education program, provided by expert ICU nurses, included: 3 h sessions of training on the job during work-shifts about the management of helmet-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Venturi systems, and NIV with oronasal and full-face masks. An eleven-item “brief skills self-report tool” was administered before and after the program to explore the perception of NIV education program attendees about their level of skills. Results: In total, 59 nurses responded to the questionnaire. There was an improvement in the skill levels of the management of Helmet-CPAP (median before training 2, inter-quartile range (IQR) 0−6; median after training 8, IQR 3−9; p < 0.0001), and mask-NIV (median before training 2, IQR 0−6; median after training 8, IQR 3−9; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Training on the job performed by expert ICU nurses can be a valuable and fast means to implement new Helmet-CPAP and mask-NIV skills outside of ICUs.

Research Progress on the Mechanism of Right Heart-Related Pulmonary Edema

Objective. To investigate the mechanisms underlying the development of right heart-associated PE. Background. Right heart-related pulmonary edema (PE) refers to PE resulting from impaired right heart function caused by primary or secondary factors, which is common in critically ill patients. Although the clinical manifestations of different types of right heart-related PE are similar, the pathophysiological changes and treatment methods are significantly different. According to the hemodynamic mechanism, right heart-related PE is primarily classified into two types. One is the increase of right heart flow, including extravascular compression, intravascular compression, cardiac compression, and cardiac decompression. The other type is the abnormal distribution of pulmonary circulation, including obstruction, resistance, pleural decompression, or negative pressure. With the development of hemodynamic monitoring, hemodynamic data not only help us understand the specific pathogenesis of right heart-related PE but also assist us in determining the direction of therapy and enabling individualized treatment. Summary. This article presents a review on right heart-associated PE, with a perspective of hemodynamic analysis, and emphasizes the importance of right heart function in the management of circulation. Understanding the mechanism of right heart-associated PE will not only aid in better monitoring right heart function but also help intensivists make a more accurate identification of various types of PE in the clinic.

Vibrating Mesh Nebulisers – Can Greater Drug Delivery to the Airways and Lungs Improve Respiratory Outcomes?

Aerosols are an increasingly important mode of delivery of drugs, particularly bronchodilators, for the treatment of respiratory diseases, notably asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most common type of nebuliser is the jet nebuliser (JN); they have been in use for more than a century but these devices can be cumbersome to use and may sometimes deliver insufficient amounts of drug. A more recent development in aerosol therapy is the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) which is very user friendly and is more efficient than the JNs due to an extremely low residual volume. Scintigraphy images from studies of volunteer subjects using radio-labelled aerosol treatment show that VMN-generated aerosols deliver more drug to patients in a shorter period of time than JN-generated aerosols. Various bench, animal model and small clinical studies have shown that VMNs are more efficient than JNs in drug delivery, potentially improving clinical outcomes. These studies have included various breathing circuits used in mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula systems and devices for spontaneously breathing patients. The efficiency of drug delivery was affected by factors including the position of the nebuliser in the circuit and humidity. Some studies have shown potential substantial savings by hospitals in the cost of MV treatments after switching from metered dose inhalers to VMNs. VMNs have also been shown to be effective for the administration of inhaled antibiotics, corticosteroids and other drugs. Larger studies of the effects of VMNs on patient outcomes are needed but they are likely to be an increasingly important means of administering therapies to a burgeoning population with respiratory disease.

Mechanically Ventilating the Severe Asthmatic

The management of the critically ill patients with asthma can be rather challenging. Potentially devastating complications relating to this presentation include hypoxemia, worsening bronchospasm, pulmonary aspiration, tension pneumothorax, dynamic hyperinflation, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and seizures. In contrast to various other pathologies requiring mechanical ventilation, acute asthma is generally associated with better outcomes. This review serves as a practical guide to the physician managing patients with severe acute asthma requiring mechanical ventilation. In addition to specifics relating to endotracheal intubation, we also discuss the interpretation of ventilator graphics, the recommended mode of ventilation, dynamic hyperinflation, permissive hypercapnia, as well as the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and noninvasive mechanical ventilation.