Clinical Characteristics and Treatment for Dupilumab-Related Ocular Complications in Atopic Dermatitis Patients

Conjunctivitis in Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab: An Observational Study of Clinical Characteristics, Symptomatology, and Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Conjunctivitis is more prevalent in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) than the general population, and is the most common adverse event during dupilumab treatment for AD. We aimed to characterize conjunctivitis diagnosed during AD dupilumab treatment and to assess effectiveness of ophthalmic treatments.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled adults with AD who received the approved dupilumab regimen in a real-world setting for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment. At baseline, we compared ophthalmic signs and symptoms in two cohorts of patients who had received dupilumab for similar duration: one with conjunctivitis (group 1) and one with no conjunctivitis (group 2). All patients continued treatment with dupilumab, and group 1 patients received treatment for conjunctivitis at the discretion of the investigator. We assessed effectiveness of prescribed treatments and the outcomes of conjunctivitis up to Week 60. All analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were assessed in group 1 and 11 in group 2. Mean AD duration was 22.9 ± 15.2 years (group 1) and 13.1 ± 16.9 years (group 2). In group 1, 91% of patients reported a history of facial lesions during AD flares and 54% had current AD facial lesions, compared with 64% and 9%, respectively, in group 2. Ongoing facial contact dermatitis and rosacea were only reported in group 1 (11% and 9%, respectively). Common physical findings at baseline in group 1 compared with group 2 included periocular eczematous rash (65% vs. 18%) and/or lichenification (47% vs. 27%), posterior blepharitis with meibomian gland dysfunction (83% vs. 55%), bulbar hyperemia (89% vs. 46%) and conjunctival papillary pattern (69% vs. 27%); 24% of patients in group 1 and none in group 2 had corneal neovascularization, mostly in a single peripheral quadrant. There was no evidence of tear volume insufficiency. One patient in group 1 (3%) and two in group 2 (18%) had eyelash mites. Three patients (9%) in group 1 and one in group 2 (9%) had Staphylococcus aureus-positive conjunctival swabs. Most patients (88%) received multiple ophthalmic treatments for the qualifying conjunctivitis event. Investigators assessed topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors administered either as eye drops or ointment as the most effective treatments. Most conjunctivitis events recovered/resolved (84%) or were resolving/recovering (12%) at study end. Mean ± SD time to recovery from the initial visit was 171.9 ± 54.6 days. No participants discontinued treatment with dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged history of AD and facial and/or eyelid AD lesions increased the likelihood of a conjunctivitis diagnosis during AD dupilumab treatment. Treatment of conjunctivitis with topical corticosteroids and/or calcineurin inhibitors resolved or controlled the event in most patients without need to discontinue dupilumab.

CLINICAL TRIAL

GOV: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04287608.

Dupilumab induced ocular surface diseases: an analysis of FAERS database, literature review and disease-gene interaction networks

BACKGROUND

Adverse events (AE) in dupilumab-induced ocular surface diseases (DIOSD) have raised concerns regarding its safety. The objective of this study was to evaluate DIOSD by employing database analysis and clinical case review, along with mechanism analysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Database AE data were extracted from FAERS from 2017 Quarter 1 (Q1) to 2023 Q1. Disproportionality analyses were performed to identify the risk signals associated with DIOSD. Case reports/case series reported on DIOSD from March 2017 to June 2023 were collected for a literature review. The mechanisms of DIOSD were investigated through disease-gene interaction network analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 85 signals related to DIOSD were detected from FAERS. The most reported AE was 'dry eye' (n = 3503, ROR 20.32, 95% CI: 19.53-21.14). There were 36 articles, including 201 cases showing the evidence of DIOSD, with an average age of 43 years. About 64.18% patients suffered from severe atopic dermatitis, and 48.26% were reported with a previous ocular history. The mechanisms study suggested that tumor necrosis factor plays an important role in DIOSD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support that dupilumab use is associated with exacerbation or new-onset OSD. Particular attention should be focused on eye symptoms during dupilumab use.

An expert consensus on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders in people with atopic dermatitis 2024

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin condition and affects people of all ages. New therapies, including the monoclonal antibody therapy dupilumab, offer excellent efficacy. However, in clinical trials, and emphasized in real-world observations, an unexpected increased frequency of ocular adverse effects has become apparent. The effectiveness of dupilumab and the unpredictability of ocular adverse effects mean that clinicians need guidance on counselling patients prior to treatment and on managing them if adverse effects arise. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and Royal College of Ophthalmologists collaborated on this consensus guidance on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders (DROSD). A multidisciplinary group was formed of adult and paediatric dermatologists and ophthalmologists with expertise in DROSD, patient representatives and the BAD Clinical Standards Unit. A literature search was conducted and the results reviewed. All recommendations were reviewed, discussed and voted on. The recommendations pertain to dermatology and ophthalmology management, and apply to people of all ages, unless otherwise stated. Importantly, initiation of dupilumab for AD should not be delayed for most eye disorders except acute new problems (e.g. infections) or potentially severe conditions (e.g. a history of corneal transplant; ophthalmology advice should be sought first). There is insufficient evidence to recommend lubricant drops prophylactically. Dermatologists should assess eye complaints to diagnose DROSD; a severity grading system is provided. DROSD management differs slightly in those aged < 7 years, as ocular complications may affect neuro-ocular development. Therefore, irrespectively of DROSD severity, this population should be referred for ophthalmology advice. In those aged ≥ 7 years, dermatologists should feel confident to trial treatment and reserve ophthalmology advice for severe or nonresponding cases. Discussion about dupilumab withdrawal should be prompted by a significant impact on quality of life, threat to sight, or other complications. Although dupilumab is a highly effective agent for treating AD, the risk of ocular adverse effects should not inhibit clinicians or patients from using it, but clinicians should be aware of them. If a patient develops DROSD, there are clear pathways to assess severity and offer initial management. Where this is ineffective, dermatologists should assess the urgency and seek advice from or initiate referral to ophthalmology. While the evidence reviewed for these guidelines reflects the extensive literature on dupilumab, we believe our advice has relevance for ocular surface disorders in patients with AD treated with tralokinumab and lebrikizumab.

Corneal Complications Related to Dupilumab Use

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this report is to describe atypical corneal complications associated with dupilumab use.

METHODS

This is a series of four cases of adult patients with infiltrative or ulcerative keratitis secondary to dupilumab use.

RESULTS

All four patients in this series were prescribed dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and developed infiltrative or ulcerative corneal lesions. In all cases, corneal disease was successfully managed with immediate discontinuation of dupilumab and topical steroid treatment. In two cases, the patient also received antibiotic eye drops for infection precautions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although dupilumab is most commonly associated with conjunctivitis, physicians should be aware of potential severe corneal complications for early identification and intervention.

Real-world reported adverse events related to systemic immunomodulating therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: Results from the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the (long-term) safety of systemic immunomodulating therapies in atopic dermatitis (AD) generated by real-world data is sparse.

OBJECTIVES

To describe real-world reported adverse drug reactions (AEs) related to systemic immunomodulating therapy in patients with AD and to compare the incidence rates of AEs with the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs).

METHODS

We conducted an observational prospective multi-centre cohort study, using the TREAT NL registry. All severe AEs, AEs of special interest and serious AEs in adult and paediatric patients on systemic immunomodulating treatment (ciclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, dupilumab, tralokinumab, baricitinib and upadacitinib) were assessed. Incidences rates of all (potentially) drug-related AEs were standardized in patient years and compared to the cumulative incidences in the associated SmPCs.

RESULTS

We collected 422 patient years of safety data from 266 patients, of whom 129 (48.5%) reported a total of 224 (potentially) drug-related AEs. Compared to dupilumab's SmPC, higher incidence rates were found for four AEs (reported ≥5 times): eosinophilia, blepharitis, dry eyes and head and neck erythema (i.e. dupilumab facial redness). A higher incidence rate of fatigue was found in patients on oral methotrexate in our cohort compared to the SmPC. Two new drug-related AEs (reported ≥5 times) were found in patients on dupilumab, including non-infectious conjunctivitis and meibomian gland dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world reported AEs captured in AD patient registries can add information on the estimated incidence of AEs and benefit clinical decision aids. Future studies using data derived from the TREAT NL registry combined with data from other registries within the TREAT Registry Taskforce will provide more information on (rare) AEs associated with immunomodulating therapy in AD patients.

Canalicular obstruction associated with dupilumab

PURPOSE

Dupilumab is a novel treatment for severe atopic dermatitis and is associated with a range of ocular complications such as blepharoconjunctivitis, keratitis, cicatricial ectropion and punctal stenosis.

METHODS

We report 4 patients with canalicular obstruction in association with dupilumab therapy, and we describe their treatment and outcomes in each case.

RESULTS

Canalicular obstruction was diagnosed by an oculoplastic consultant between 3 years and 3 months and 4 years and 9 months after the commencement of dupilumab therapy. Case 1 underwent nasolacrimal intubation, case 2 was treated conservatively, and case 4 underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and these patients' symptoms resolved. Unfortunately, in case 3 despite endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with stenting they remained symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

This case series adds to the growing number of ocular complications associated with dupilumab therapy, and there is yet an optimal treatment strategy to mitigate these complications. It is possible that simple conservative measures such as discontinuation of dupilumab and topical treatments with steroids can eventually lead to some form of recovery and recanalisation of the canalicular system. Early referral to an ophthalmologist prior to the development of canalicular obstruction to control the inflammatory ocular surface could reduce the risks of cicatricial sequelae from dupilumab, and temporary stenting of the canalicular system could be attempted as a method to keep the canalicular system patent, whilst the patient remained on treatment.

Association between Dupilumab and Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Conjunctivitis is commonly reported in dupilumab users with atopic dermatitis (AD), and few studies have compared the risk of conjunctivitis among patients with different indications. This study aimed to investigate the association between dupilumab and conjunctivitis in various diseases. The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023396204). The electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for the period from their inception to January 2023. Only placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The main outcome was the incidence of conjunctivitis during the study period. The subgroup analysis was performed for patients with AD and non-AD indications, which include asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and eosinophilic esophagitis. In total, 23 RCTs involving 9153 patients were included for meta-analysis. Dupilumab users exhibited significantly higher risk of conjunctivitis (risk ratio [RR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34–2.67) than placebo users. Notably, significantly increased incidence of conjunctivitis was observed in the dupilumab group relative to the placebo group among patients with AD (RR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.84–3.12) but not among patients with non-AD indications (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.43–1.13). In conclusion, only dupilumab users with AD but not those with non-AD indications reported an elevated incidence of conjunctivitis.

A Review of Adverse Reactions to Biologics Used in Allergy-Immunology Practice

Biologic agents have become an integral therapeutic option for practicing allergists-immunologists for the management of asthma, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and various immunologic conditions. As these agents vary considerably from traditional small-molecule drugs, various adverse reactions have been noted. A different approach must be used to classify these reactions beyond the classic Gell-Coombs classification system as it does not capture many of the adverse events seen with biologic therapy. This article addresses the available literature on proposed classification systems and diagnostic modalities for adverse events associated with biologics and reviews each approved agent used frequently in allergy-immunology practice.

Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients on Dupilumab

Dupilumab is a biologic approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. While it is an effective medication for eczema, ocular side effects are common in patients receiving dupilumab therapy. Greater consideration is needed when evaluating these individuals for corneal refractive surgery. Dupilumab patients may suffer from atopy, a condition that also merits consideration in those desiring refractive surgery. Additional testing and careful consideration are needed, as these patients have an increased risk of dry eye syndrome, keratoconus, cataracts, diffuse lamellar keratitis, viral keratitis, and perioperative infection. This commentary discusses the current understanding of dupilumab ocular side effects and investigates factors to consider when evaluating these patients for corneal refractive surgery.