Comparable efficacy and less toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus epirubicin for neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a case-control study

Antitumor Assessment of Liposomal Beta-Carotene with Tamoxifen Against Breast Carcinoma Cell Line: An In Vitro Study

The present study was designed to characterize the interactions between lecithin liposomes, a model membrane, and either β-carotene or tamoxifen. In addition, the cytotoxicity of liposomal beta-carotene with tamoxifen was screened in vitro in human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 in addition to the normal WI38 cell line. All liposomes were nearly spherical and evenly distributed and had fewer aggregates for encapsulated and empty vesicles. Measurements using dynamic light scattering verified that each sample was monodisperse. When tamoxifen is incorporated into liposomal membranes, the zeta potential values tend to decrease. In the test for cytotoxicity using MCF-7 treated cells, the liposomal β-carotene IC50 value was at least 0.45 μg/mL, whereas the IC50 of free β-carotene treated cells was 7.8 μg/mL. For MCF-7 treated cells treated with free tamoxifen, the IC50 was 9.92 μg/mL, but for its liposomal form, it was 20.88 μg/mL. According to the cytotoxicity test using MDA-MB-231 treated cells, the IC50 values for free tamoxifen, free β-carotene, liposomal β-carotene, liposomal tamoxifen, and liposomal tamoxifen β-carotene were 15.5 μg/mL, 38.1 μg/mL, 12.1 μg/mL, 21.2 μg/mL, and 11.4 μg/mL, respectively. This investigation demonstrated that free β-carotene has a more potent cytotoxic impact than tamoxifen. The findings showed that each comet assay variable for the liposomal β-carotene was significantly (p < 0.05) elevated in comparison with tamoxifen and control values. Analysis using flow cytometry revealed that the MCF-7 cells displayed a greater degree of cell apoptosis than the control cells following a 48 h exposure to liposomal β-carotene. Based on available data, a novel treatment plan that includes liposomal β-carotene may boost antitumor activity toward the MCF-7 cancer cell line. The current findings demonstrated that preparations of natural products might be a good substitute for pharmaceutical interventions in the treatment of breast cancer.

Doxorubicin or Epirubicin Versus Liposomal Doxorubicin Therapy-Differences in Cardiotoxicity

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an important drug used in the treatment of many malignancies. Unfortunately DOX causes various side effects, with cardiotoxicity being the most characteristic. Risk factors for DOX induced cardiotoxicity (DIC) include cumulative dose of DOX, preexisting cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, along with the use of other cardiotoxic agents. Development of DIC is associated with many pathological phenomena - increased oxidative stress, as well as upregulation of ferroptosis, apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy. In DIC expression of many microRNAs is also deregulated. In order to avoid cardiotoxicity and still use DOX effectively DOX derivatives such as epirubicin were synthesized. Nowadays a new liposomal form of DOX (L-DOX) appeared as an alternative to conventional treatment with greatly reduced cardiotoxicity. L-DOX can be divided into two groups of substances - pegylated (PLD) with increased solubility and stability, and non-pegylated (NLPD). Many metaanalyses, clinical along with preclinical studies have shown L-DOX treatment is associated with a smaller decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other heart functions, but efficacy of this treatment is comparable to the use of convenctional DOX.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis among pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and pirarubicin in HR ⩽ 10%/HER2-negative breast cancer: an exploratory real-world multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), epirubicin and pirarubicin are the main anthracyclines widely used in China. PLD demonstrates therapeutic response comparable to epirubicin and pirarubicin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of our study were to retrospectively assess the real-world effectiveness and prognostic characteristics of PLD as NAC for HR ⩽ 10%/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

METHODS

Our study enrolled patients with HR ⩽ 10%/HER2-negative breast cancer who received PLD-, epirubicin- or pirarubicin-based NAC from three centres in Hunan Province, China, between 2015 and 2022. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the differences in patients' characteristics among the PLD, epirubicin, and pirarubicin groups. The endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients were included. After NAC, the pCR rates in PLD group were superior to epirubicin group (PLD, 34.1%; epirubicin, 20.8%, p = 0.038). The differences in EFS (log-rank p = 0.99) and OS (log-rank p = 0.33) among the three groups were not statistically significant. Among the three groups, non-pCR patients had worse EFS than pCR patients (log-rank p = 0.014). For patients with pCR, the differences in EFS (log-rank p = 0.47) and OS (log-rank p = 0.38) were not statistically significant among the three groups, and the EFS (log-rank p = 0.59) and OS (log-rank p = 0.14) of non-pCR patients in the PLD group were similar to those in the epirubicin and pirarubicin groups.

CONCLUSION

PLD had a similar therapeutic response and prognosis compared to epirubicin or pirarubicin in NAC for patients with HR ⩽ 10%/HER2 negative breast cancer, which means that PLD represents a potential NAC option.

Exploring contemporary breakthroughs in utilizing vesicular nanocarriers for breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with various morphological features, clinicopathological conditions and responses to different therapeutic options, which is responsible for high mortality and morbidity in women. The heterogeneity of BC necessitates new strategies for diagnosis and treatment, which is possible only by cautious harmonization of the advanced nanomaterials. Recent developments in vesicular nanocarrier therapy indicate a paradigm shift in breast cancer treatment by providing an integrated approach to address current issues. This review provides a detailed classification of various nanovesicles in the treatment of BC with a special emphasis on recent advances, challenges in translating nanomaterials and future potentials.

Sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes with complete trastuzumab and pertuzumab treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: A phase II single-arm study

Objective

Despite cardiotoxicity overlap, the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and anthracycline combination remains crucial due to significant benefits. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a less cardiotoxic anthracycline, was evaluated for efficacy and cardiac safety when combined with cyclophosphamide and followed by taxanes with trastuzumab/pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (BC).

Methods

In this multicenter, phase II study, patients with confirmed HER2-positive early BC received four cycles of PLD (30-35 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), followed by four cycles of taxanes (docetaxel, 90-100 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel, 260 mg/m2), concomitant with eight cycles of trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg) and pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints included breast pCR (bpCR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and safety (with a focus on cardiotoxicity).

Results

Between May 27, 2020 and May 11, 2022, 78 patients were treated with surgery, 42 (53.8%) of whom had BCS. After neoadjuvant therapy, 47 [60.3%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 48.5%-71.2%] patients achieved tpCR, and 49 (62.8%) achieved bpCR. ORRs were 76.9% (95% CI, 66.0%-85.7%) and 93.6% (95% CI, 85.7%-97.9%) after 4-cycle and 8-cycle neoadjuvant therapy, respectively. Nine (11.5%) patients experienced asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reductions of ≥10% from baseline, all with a minimum value of >55%. No treatment-related abnormal cardiac function changes were observed in mean N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), troponin I, or high-sensitivity troponin.

Conclusions

This dual HER2-blockade with sequential polychemotherapy showed promising activity with rapid tumor regression in HER2-positive BC. Importantly, this regimen showed an acceptable safety profile, especially a low risk of cardiac events, suggesting it as an attractive treatment approach with a favorable risk-benefit balance.

Recent advances and clinical translation of liposomal delivery systems in cancer therapy

The limitations of conventional cancer treatment are driving the emergence and development of nanomedicines. Research in liposomal nanomedicine for cancer therapy is rapidly increasing, opening up new horizons for cancer treatment. Liposomal nanomedicine, which focuses on targeted drug delivery to improve the therapeutic effect of cancer while reducing damage to normal tissues and cells, has great potential in the field of cancer therapy. This review aims to clarify the advantages of liposomal delivery systems in cancer therapy. We describe the recent understanding of spatiotemporal fate of liposomes in the organism after different routes of drug administration. Meanwhile, various types of liposome-based drug delivery systems that exert their respective advantages in cancer therapy while reducing side effects were discussed. Moreover, the combination of liposomal agents with other therapies (such as photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy) has demonstrated enhanced tumor-targeting efficiency and therapeutic efficacy. Finally, the opportunities and challenges faced by the field of liposome nanoformulations for entering the clinical treatment of cancer are highlighted.

Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in older adjuvant early breast cancer patients: cardiac safety analysis and final results of the COLTONE study

AIMS

To explore the cardiac safety of adjuvant Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (NPL-DOX) plus Cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by weekly Paclitaxel, in elderly women (≥ 65 years) with high-risk breast cancer. Previously, we described no symptomatic cardiac events within the first 12 months from starting treatment. We now reported the updated results after a median follow-up 76 months.

METHODS

The cardiac activity was evaluated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) echocardiograms assessments, before starting chemotherapy and every 6 months, until 30 months from baseline, then yearly for at least 5 years.

RESULTS

Forty-seven women were recruited by two Units of Medical Oncology (Ethics Committee authorization CESM-AOUP, 3203/2011; EudraCT identification number: 2010-024067-41, for Pisa and Pontedera Hospitals). An episode of grade 3 CHF (NCI-CTCAE, version 3.0) occurred after 18 months the beginning of chemotherapy. The echocardiograms assessments were performed comparing the LVEF values of each patient evaluated at fixed period of time, compared to baseline. We observed a slight changed in terms of mean values at 48, 60, 72 and 84 months. At these time points, a statistically significant reduction of - 3.2%, - 4.6%, - 6.4% and - 7.1%, respectively, was observed. However, LVEF remained above 50% without translation in any relevant clinical signs. No other cardiac significant episodes were reported. To this analysis, in 13 patients (28%) occurred disease relapse and,  of them, 11 (23%) died due to metastatic disease. Eight patients died of cancer-unrelated causes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination including NPL-DOX in elderly patients revealed low rate of cardiac toxic effects. Comparative trials are encouraged.

Tarin-Loaded Nanoliposomes Activate Apoptosis and Autophagy and Inhibit the Migration of Human Mammary Adenocarcinoma Cells

Background

Tarin, a lectin purified from Colocasia esculenta, promotes in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory effects allied to promising anticancer and antimetastatic effects against human adenocarcinoma mammary cells. This makes this 47 kDa-protein a natural candidate against human breast cancer, a leading cause of death among women. Tarin encapsulated in pegylated nanoliposomes displays increased effectiveness in controlling the proliferation of a mammary adenocarcinoma lineage comprising MDA-MB-231 cells.

Methods

The mechanisms enrolled in anticancer and antimetastatic responses were investigated by treating MDA-MB-231 cells with nano-encapsulated tarin at 72 μg/mL for up to 48h through flow cytometry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The safety of nano-encapsulated tarin towards healthy tissue was also assessed by the resazurin viability assay, and the effect of nanoencapsulated tarin on cell migration was evaluated by scratch assays.

Results

Ultrastructural analyses of MDA-MB-231 cells exposed to nanoencapsulated tarin revealed the accumulation of autophagosomes and damaged organelles, compatible with autophagy-dependent cell death. On the other hand, the flow cytometry investigation detected the increased occurrence of acidic vacuolar organelles, a late autophagosome trait, along with the enhanced presence of apoptotic cells, activated caspase-3/7, and cell cycle arrest at G0/G1. No deleterious effects were observed in healthy fibroblast cells following tarin nanoencapsulated exposition, in contrast to reduced viability in cells exposed to free tarin. The migration of MDA-MB-231 cells was inhibited by nano-encapsulated tarin, with delayed movement by 24 h compared to free tarin.

Conclusion

The nanoliposome formulation delivers tarin in a delayed and sustained manner, as evidenced by the belated and potent antitumoral and anti-migration effects on adenocarcinoma cells, with no toxicity to healthy cells. Although further investigations are required to fully understand antitumorigenic tarin mechanisms, the activation of both apoptotic and autophagic machineries along with the caspase-3/7 pathway, and cell cycle arrest may comprise a part of these mechanisms.

Effect of different chemotherapy schemes on early-stage breast cancer patients with Low HER-2 expression

Objective

To explore the effect of different chemotherapy schemes on the prognosis, immune function and adverse reactions of breast cancer patients with low HER-2 expression after surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data of 60 breast cancer patients with low HER-2 expression in Wuxi No.2 people's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the different chemotherapy schemes. Patients in the DC group were treated with polyethylene glycol-coated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide, and those in the TC group were treated with TC (docetaxel+cyclophosphamide). Further comparison was performed on the difference in prognosis, immune function and adverse reaction between the two groups after different chemotherapy schemes.

Results

After four courses of treatment, the IgG, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ values in the DC group after treatment were higher than those before treatment, while the IgG, CD3+ and CD4+values in the TC group after treatment were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05). Meanwhile, the IgG, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ values in the DC group were better than those in the TC group after treatment(P<0.05). During the treatment, the adverse reactions of leukopenia, alopecia, nausea and vomiting in the DC group were significantly lower than those in the TC group(P<0.05).

Conclusion

The chemotherapy combination of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide can significantly improve immune function and greatly reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions in early-stage breast cancer patients with low HER-2 expression after surgery. It has the same effect as docetaxel+cyclophosphamide in improving the prognosis of patients.

Cancer nanomedicine in preoperative therapeutics: Nanotechnology-enabled neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and phototherapy

Surgical resection remains a mainstay in the treatment of malignant solid tumors. However, the use of neoadjuvant treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, phototherapy, and immunotherapy, either alone or in combination, as a preoperative intervention regimen, have attracted increasing attention in the last decade. Early randomized, controlled trials in some tumor settings have not shown a significant difference between the survival rates in long-term neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant therapy. However, this has not hampered the increasing use of neoadjuvant treatments in clinical practice, due to its evident downstaging of primary tumors to delineate the surgical margin, tailoring systemic therapy response as a clinical tool to optimize subsequent therapeutic regimens, and decreasing the need for surgery, with its potential for increased morbidity. The recent expansion of nanotechnology-based nanomedicine and related medical technologies provides a new approach to address the current challenges of neoadjuvant therapy for preoperative therapeutics. This review not only summarizes how nanomedicine plays an important role in a range of neoadjuvant therapeutic modalities, but also highlights the potential use of nanomedicine as neoadjuvant therapy in preclinical and clinic settings for tumor management.

Neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin- and epirubicin-based combination therapy regimens for early breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)-based and epirubicin-based combination therapy regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery between January 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary outcome was radiologic complete response (rCR) rate. Outcomes were compared between treatment groups PLD-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (LC-T group) or epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T group), using both propensity-score matched (matched) and unmatched data.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from patients who received neoadjuvant LC-T (n = 178) or EC-T (n = 181) treatment. The overall pCR rate and rCR rate were higher in the LC-T group compared with the EC-T group (unmatched pCR: 25.3% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.026; rCR: 14.7% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.016; matched pCR: 26.9% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.034; rCR: 15.5% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.044). Analysis by molecular subtype showed that compared with EC-T treatment, LC-T treatment achieved significantly greater pCR rate in triple-negative subtype and greater rCR rate in Her2 (+) subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant PLD-based therapy may be a potential option for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The current results warrant further investigation.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, Docetaxel, and Trastuzumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase II and Biomarker Study

Background

Combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is the standard regimen for human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). However, pertuzumab is not available because it is not on the market or covered by medicare in some regions or poor economy. Anthracyclines and taxanes are cornerstones in BC chemotherapy, and their combination contributes to satisfactory efficiency in neoadjuvant settings. Nonetheless, concomitant administration of trastuzumab and an anthracycline is generally avoided clinically due to cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is less cardiotoxic compared with traditional anthracyclines. Here, we conducted this prospective study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and potential biomarkers for PLD plus trastuzumab and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in HER2-positive BC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with stage II or III HER2-positive BC were recruited in this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible patients were given 6 cycles of PLD plus docetaxel and trastuzumab. Primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints were breast pathological complete response (bpCR, ypT0/is), objective response rate (ORR), operation rate, breast-conserving surgery rate, and safety. Metadherin (MTDH), glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase (QPCT), topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated in BC tissues pre-neoadjuvant for potential biomarkers.

Results

Between March 2019 and February 2021, 54 patients were enrolled, 50 were included in the analysis, and 35 (70.0%) completed 6 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment. Forty-nine (98.0%) patients underwent surgery with a breast-conserving rate of 44.0%. The tpCR rate, bpCR rate, and ORR were 48.0% (95% CI, 33.7%–62.6%), 60.0% (95% CI, 45.2%–73.6%), and 84.0% (95% CI, 70.9%–92.8%), respectively. tpCR was associated with MTDH (p = 0.002) and QPCT (p = 0.036) expression but not with TOP2A (p = 0.75), PD-L1 (p = 0.155), or TILs (p = 0.76). Patients with HR-negative status were more likely to achieve bpCR compared with those with HR-positive status (76.2% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.047). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 38.0% of patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction decline by ≥10% was reported in 18.0% of patients, and no patient experienced congestive heart failure.

Conclusions

PLD plus docetaxel and trastuzumab might be a potential neoadjuvant regimen for HER2-positive BC with a high tpCR rate and manageable tolerability. MTDH and QPCT are potential predictive markers for tpCR.

Actively Targeted Nanomedicines in Breast Cancer: From Pre-Clinal Investigation to Clinic

Simple Summary

Despite all the efforts and advances made in the treatment of breast cancer, this pathology continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in women, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and, although to a lesser degree, HER-2 receptor-positive tumors. Chemotherapy is one of the main treatments available. However, it shows numerous limitations due to its lack of selectivity. In this sense, the selective delivery of antineoplastics to cancer cells can reduce their adverse effects and increase their efficacy. The use of active targeted nanomedicine is a good strategy to achieve this selective chemotherapy. In fact, in recent decades, several active targeted nanoformulations have been approved or reached clinical investigation with excellent results. Among all nanomedicines, antibody-drug conjugates are the most promising.

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed tumors and the second leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. The use of nanosystems specifically targeted to tumor cells (active targeting) can be an excellent therapeutic tool to improve and optimize current chemotherapy for this type of neoplasm, since they make it possible to reduce the toxicity and, in some cases, increase the efficacy of antineoplastic drugs. Currently, there are 14 nanomedicines that have reached the clinic for the treatment of breast cancer, 4 of which are already approved (Kadcyla^®, Enhertu^®, Trodelvy^®, and Abraxane^®). Most of these nanomedicines are antibody–drug conjugates. In the case of HER-2-positive breast cancer, these conjugates (Kadcyla^®, Enhertu^®, Trastuzumab-duocarmycin, RC48, and HT19-MMAF) target HER-2 receptors, and incorporate maytansinoid, deruxtecan, duocarmicyn, or auristatins as antineoplastics. In TNBC these conjugates (Trodelvy^®, Glembatumumab-Vedotin, Ladiratuzumab-vedotin, Cofetuzumab-pelidotin, and PF-06647263) are directed against various targets, in particular Trop-2 glycoprotein, NMB glycoprotein, Zinc transporter LIV-1, and Ephrin receptor-4, to achieve this selective accumulation, and include campthotecins, calicheamins, or auristatins as drugs. Apart from the antibody–drug conjugates, there are other active targeted nanosystems that have reached the clinic for the treatment of these tumors such as Abraxane^® and Nab-rapamicyn (albumin nanoparticles entrapping placlitaxel and rapamycin respectively) and various liposomes (MM-302, C225-ILS-Dox, and MM-310) loaded with doxorubicin or docetaxel and coated with ligands targeted to Ephrin A2, EPGF, or HER-2 receptors. In this work, all these active targeted nanomedicines are discussed, analyzing their advantages and disadvantages over conventional chemotherapy as well as the challenges involved in their lab to clinical translation. In addition, examples of formulations developed and evaluated at the preclinical level are also discussed.

Effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus epirubicin as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an improved formulation of doxorubicin with comparable effectiveness but significantly lower cardiotoxicity than conventional anthracycline. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of PLD versus epirubicin as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

METHODS

Clinical data of invasive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with PLD or epirubicin were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the risk of selection bias. The molecular typing of these patients included Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, and basal-like/triple-negative. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR) rate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for adjuvant chemotherapy. Noninferiority was suggested if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the 3-year DFS rate difference was greater than - 10%. The secondary outcome was adverse reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 1213 patients were included (neoadjuvant, n = 274; adjuvant, n = 939). pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) rates of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 11.6% for the PLD group and 7.0% for the epirubicin group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.4578). The 3-year DFS rate of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was 94.9% [95%CI, 91.1-98.6%] for the PLD group and 95.4% [95%CI, 93.0-97.9%] for the epirubicin group (P = 0.5684). Rate difference between the two groups and its 95% CI was - 0.55 [- 5.02, 3.92]. The lower limit of the 95% CI was - 5.0% > - 10.0%, suggesting that PLD is not be inferior to epirubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The incidences of myelosuppression, decreased appetite, alopecia, gastrointestinal reactions, and cardiotoxicity were lower in the PLD group than in the epirubicin group, while the incidence of nausea was higher in the PLD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, effectiveness is similar but toxicities are different between the PLD-containing regimen and epirubicin-containing regimen. Therefore, further study is warranted to explore PLD-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Long-Term Cardiac Safety and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Elderly Patients or Prone to Cardiotoxicity and Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Final Results of the Multicentre Phase II CAPRICE Study

Background

The CAPRICE trial was designed to specifically evaluate neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in elderly patients or in those with other cardiovascular risk factors in whom conventional doxorubicin was contraindicated. The primary analysis of the study showed a pathological complete response (pCR) of 32% and no significant decreases in LVEF during chemotherapy. Here, we report important secondary study objectives: 5-year cardiac safety, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS).

Methods

In this multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial, elderly patients or those prone to cardiotoxicity and high risk stage II-IIIB breast cancer received PLD (35 mg/m²) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²) every 4 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by paclitaxel for 12 weeks as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) monitorization, electrocardiograms and cardiac questionnaires were performed at baseline, during treatment and at 9, 16, 28 and 40 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was pCR and 5-year cardiac safety, DFS, BCSS and OS were also analyzed.

Results

Between Oct 2007, and Jun 2010, 50 eligible patients were included. Median age was 73 (35-84) years, 84% were older than 65; 64% of patients suffered from hypertension, and 10% had prior cardiac disease. Most of tumors (88%) were triple negative. No significant decreases in LVEF were observed. The mean baseline LVEF was 66.6% (52-86) and after a median follow-up of 5 years, mean LVEF was 66 (54.5-73). For intention to treat population, 5-year DFS was 50% (95% CI 40.2-68.1) and 5-year OS was 56% (95%CI 41.2-68.4). There were 8 non-cancer related deaths, achieving a 5 years BCSS of 67.74% (CI 95%:54.31%- 81.18%).

Conclusion

At 5-year follow-up, this PLD-based NAC regimen continued to be cardiac-safe and effective in a population of very high-risk breast cancer patients. This scheme should be considered as an option in elderly patients or in those with other risks of developing cardiotoxicity.

Trial Registration Number

ClinicalTrials.gov reference NCT00563953.

Recent advances in liposome formulations for breast cancer therapeutics

Among many nanoparticle-based delivery platforms, liposomes have been particularly successful with many formulations passed into clinical applications. They are well-established and effective gene and/or drug delivery systems, widely used in cancer therapy including breast cancer. In this review we discuss liposome design with the targeting feature and triggering functions. We also summarise the recent progress (since 2014) in liposome-based therapeutics for breast cancer including chemotherapy and gene therapy. We finally identify some challenges on the liposome technology development for the future clinical translation.

The Efficacy of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Case-Control Study in Taiwan

Breast cancer is a global issue regarding women's health, and high incident rates remain in the Taiwanese female population. Chemotherapy, using anthracycline-based chemotherapeutic agents in neoadjuvant settings, has been introduced as a promising new therapeutic option for treatment of invasive breast cancer. Set apart from conventional anthracycline regimens such as epirubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Lipo-Dox®, PLD) was introduced for providing a justifiable treatment effect, while offering a favorable toxicity profile for breast cancer patients in a metastatic setting. However, the efficacy of PLD in neoadjuvant settings for breast cancer patients has not yet been sufficiently reported. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of PLD-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using a retrospective matched case-control study. A total of 183 PLD cases and 183 epirubicin-based controls were included after a 1 : 1 ratio case-control matching procedure was held, according to the matching criteria. These criteria included the patient's preoperative clinical stage, molecular subtype, chemotherapy regimen with taxanes prior to surgery, and histological grade. All data were collected according to an institutional review board approved protocol. The study results reported that the PLD and epirubicin groups both obtained similar outcomes in pathologic complete response (pCR), recurrence, and overall survival rate with no statistically significant differences. Overall, the study results demonstrate that PLD-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers a similar effect of treatment with a favorable toxicity profile within the study follow-up duration, when compared with conventional epirubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Nanomedicine: A Promising Avenue for the Development of Effective Therapy for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is the most probable cancer among women. However, the available treatment is based on targeting different stages of breast cancer viz., radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and surgical interventions, which have some limitations. The available chemotherapeutics are associated with problems like low solubility, low permeability, high first-pass metabolism, and P-glycoprotein efflux. Hence, the aforementioned restrictions lead to ineffective treatment. Multiple chemotherapeutics can also cause resistance in tumors. So, the purpose is to develop an effective therapeutic regimen for the treatment of breast cancer by applying a nanomedicinal approach.

METHODS

This review has been conducted on a systematic search strategy, based on relevant literature available on Pub Med, MedlinePlus, Google Scholar, and Sciencedirect up to November 2019 using keywords present in abstract and title of the review. As per our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 226 articles were screened. Among 226, a total of 40 articles were selected for this review.

RESULTS

The significant findings with the currently available treatment is that the drug, besides its distribution to the target-specific site, also distributes to healthy cells, which results in severe side effects. Moreover, the drug is less bioavailable at the site of action; therefore, to overcome this, a high dose is required, which again causes side effects and lower the benefits. Nanomedicinal approaches give an alternative approach to avoid the associated problems of available chemotherapeutics treatment of breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The nanomedicinal strategies are useful over the conventional treatment of breast cancer and deliver a target-specific drug-using different novel drug delivery approaches.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (registration number: ChiCTR1900023052)

Anthracyclines have a profound effect on breast cancer. However, at higher dosages, there are many toxic side effects associated with their use; these include bone marrow suppression, alopecia, gastrointestinal reactions and cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LG) has been demonstrated to achieve equivalent efficacy to conventional doxorubicin, with significantly lower cardiotoxicity. We conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-armed clinical trial useing an NAC regimen based on four cycles of PEG-LD 40 mg/m² plus cyclophosphamide (CPM) 600 mg/m² on day 1 of a 21 day schedule, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (DTX) 85 mg/m² on day 1 of a 21 day schedule. The primary endpoint analysed was the pathological complete response rate (pCR) in the breast, while treatment toxicities and safety were also assessed. The results showed that the breast pCR rate was 18.75% (95% CI 11.5-26.0%). Among the different molecular cancer types, the triple negative breast cancer patients had the highest pCR, at 43.75%. No significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed. Our data tends to draw the conclusion that this regimen is a viable option for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with LABC, especially in the triple-negative subtype and patients with heart abnormalities. We believe the efficacy and the safety of this regimen is likely to be the same based on published data from other studies but that this cannot be certain without a randomized trial.

Doxorubicin and its proarrhythmic effects: A comprehensive review of the evidence from experimental and clinical studies

The cancer burden on health and socioeconomics remains exceedingly high, with more than ten million new cases reported worldwide in 2018. The financial cost of managing cancer patients has great economic impact on both an individual and societal levels. Currently, many chemotherapeutic agents are available to treat various malignancies. One of these agents is doxorubicin, which was isolated from Streptomyces peucetius in the 1960s. Doxorubicin is frequently administered in combination with other agents as a mainstay chemotherapeutic regimen in many settings, since there is well-documented evidence that it is effective in eliminating malignant cells. Doxorubicin exerts its anti-tumor properties through DNA intercalation and topoisomerase inhibition. It also contains a quinone moiety which is susceptible to redox reactions with certain intracellular molecules, thereby leading to the production of reactive oxygen species. The oxidative stress following doxorubicin exposure is responsible for its well-documented cardiotoxicity, impairing cardiac contractility, ultimately resulting in congestive heart failure. Despite the cumulative evidence noting its adverse effects on the heart, limited information is available regarding the mechanistic association between doxorubicin and cardiac arrhythmias. There is compelling evidence to suggest that doxorubicin also causes proarrhythmic effects. Several case reports and studies in cancer patients have attributed many arrhythmic events to doxorubicin, some of which are life-threatening such as complete heart block and ventricular fibrillation. In this review, reports regarding the potential arrhythmic complications associated with doxorubicin from previous studies investigating the effects of doxorubicin on cardiac electrophysiological properties are comprehensively summarized and discussed. Consistencies and controversial findings from in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, and clinical studies are presented and mechanistic insights regarding the effects of doxorubicin are also discussed.

Co-delivery of everolimus and vinorelbine via a tumor-targeted liposomal formulation inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in RCC

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is notorious for its resistance towards chemotherapy and radiation therapy in general. Combination therapy is often helpful in alleviating the resistance mechanisms by targeting multiple signaling pathways but is usually more toxic than monotherapy. Co-encapsulation of multiple therapeutic agents in a tumor-targeted drug delivery platform is a promising strategy to mitigate these limitations.

Methods

A tumor-targeted liposomal formulation was prepared using phospholipids, cholesterol, DSPE-(PEG)₂₀₀₀-OMe and a proprietary tumor-targeting-peptide (TTP)-conjugated lipopeptide. An efficient method was optimized to encapsulate everolimus and vinorelbine in this liposomal formulation. Single drug-loaded liposomes were also prepared for comparison. Finally, the drug-loaded liposomes were tested in vitro and in vivo in two different RCC cell lines.

Results

The tumor-targeted liposomal formulation demonstrated excellent tumor-specific uptake. The dual drug-loaded liposomes exhibited significantly higher growth inhibition in vitro compared to the single drug-loaded liposomes in two different RCC cell lines. Similarly, the dual drug-loaded liposomes demonstrated significantly higher suppression of tumor growth compared to the single drug-loaded liposomes in two different subcutaneous RCC xenografts. In addition, the dual drug-loaded liposomes instigated significant reduction in lung metastasis in those experiments.

Conclusion

Taken together, this study demonstrates that co-delivery of everolimus and vinorelbine with a tumor-targeted liposomal formulation is an effective approach to achieve improved therapeutic outcome in RCC.