Stroke rates before and after ablation of atrial fibrillation and in propensity-matched controls in the UK

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and risk of neurologic disease

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proven to benefit patients with symptomatic AF and heart failure. However, the data on neurological outcomes including cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) and dementia remain controversial.

Objective

We aimed to determine the effect of CA on neurological events during long-term follow-up.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with AF who underwent CA of AF. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched from inception to January 2024. Studies that reported incidence of CVA and dementia in patients with AF were. Data from each study were combined by a random-effects model. The results were reported in risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 29 studies and 379,993 patients (mean age 58 ± 4 years, 30% women) were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 36 ± 23 months (range 12-120 months). Patients who underwent CA of AF had a lower risk of developing CVA compared with medical management (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0 69, I2 = 91%). Moreover, the risk of dementia was lower in the CA group compared with medical management (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.4-0.66, I2 = 74%). The incidence of CVA in the CA group was 1% (95% CI 1%-2%, I2 = 97%), and the incidence of dementia was 2% (95% CI 2%-8%, I2 = 97%).

Conclusion

CA of AF resulted in lower risk of CVA and dementia compared with medical management alone at long-term follow-up.

Two-year outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation and cava-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation vs pharmacological only antiarrhythmic therapy: a single center experience

The benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter patients is uncertain, but risk of death, arrhythmia recurrence and other post ablation complications remains high. Existing data on the impact of pulmonary vein isolation and cava-tricuspid isthmus RFA on long-term prognosis of patients with AF and flutter and its advantage over pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) are insufficient and contradictory. The aim: we sought to evaluate two-year outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation and cava-tricuspid isthmus RFA vs pharmacological only AAT according to a single center experience. Material and methods: we enrolled 174 patients after pulmonary vein isolation RFA, cava-tricuspid isthmus RFA and their combination and 122 patient who did not undergo RFA and got pharmacological AAT only. Results: there was no significant difference in mortality between the RFA and AAT only groups (5.8 % and 9.0 % respectively) with the same structure of causes of death. The Caplan-Meyer curve analysis demonstrated better survivance (p=0.031) after RFA just during first year of observation. RFA effectiveness in arrhythmia relapse prevention was the highest for cava-tricuspid isthmus RFA procedure and worst – in group of combined pulmonary vein isolation and cava-tricuspid isthmus procedures. RFA showed an advantage over AAT in smaller quantities of non-fatal cardiovascular events (p<0.001) and cardiovascular hospitalizations (p=0.0026). Conclusions: RFA of pulmonary vein isolation and cava-tricuspid isthmus RFA decrease arrhythmia episodes frequency, risk of non-fatal cardiovascular events and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Timely combined PVI and CTI procedure is associated with worsening of all outcomes.

Residual Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation

AF contributes to increased stroke risk via various mechanisms, including deranged blood constituents, vessel wall abnormalities and abnormal blood flow. This excess risk is frequently managed with anticoagulation therapy, aimed at preventing thromboembolic complications. Yet, a significant proportion of patients with AF remain at high residual stroke risk despite receiving appropriate dose-adjusted anticoagulation. This article explores the residual stroke risk in AF and potential therapeutic options for these patients.

Redefining the Standard for Atrial Fibrillation: A Patient-centric Report

A roundtable discussion with three European clinical experts in AF and one expert patient diagnosed and treated for AF was conducted in London in October 2019. The panel discussed the implications of AF for patients, current patient pathways, what treatment outcomes were relevant for patients and how the recommendations for the management of AF may change in the future, based on the outcomes of recently published and on-going clinical trials. This article summarises the discussion, and draws upon wider sources to detail best practice and optimal patient treatment pathways.

Opposite effect of ablation on early/late-phase thromboembolic incidence in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis on more than 100 000 individuals

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for thromboembolic events, for which catheter ablation represents an effective therapy for rhythm control. Intuitively, ablation may reduce the incidence of thromboembolism, but data is quite limited.

Hypothesis

Catheter ablation was associated with the fewer risk of thromboembolism compared with nonablation in patients with AF.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 2019. Random‐effects model was used to estimate the risk ratios (RR) for the thromboembolic events between the ablation and nonablation groups.

Results

Twenty‐five studies (12 randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies) with 104 687 participants were included. Pooled analysis suggested that ablation was associated with a 35% lower risk of total thromboembolic events compared to nonablation group (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51‐0.82; P = .0003). When separated into early‐phase (<30 days) and late‐phase (>30 days) events, ablation was associated with an increased early‐phase thromboembolism (RR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.35‐2.83; P = .0004) but a decreased late‐phase thromboembolism (RR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63‐0.90; P = .002). Subgroup analysis according to different study types found similar results were found in observation studies, but not in RCT studies because the sample size was too small to be conclusive.

Conclusions

In patients with AF, catheter ablation was associated with a fewer risk of overall and late‐phase thromboembolism in comparison with nonablation. However, over the early postoperative period, catheter ablation was associated with the double higher risk of thromboembolic events.

Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was to compare resource use and clinical outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort design using the Clinical Practice Research Data-Hospital Episode Statistics linkage data from England (2008-2013) was used. Patients undergoing catheter ablation treatment for AF were indexed to the date of first procedure. AAD patients with at least two different AAD drugs were indexed to the first fill of the second AAD. Patients were matched using 1:1 propensity matching. Primary endpoints including inpatient and outpatient visits were compared between ablation and AAD cohorts in the 4 months-1 year period after index. Secondary endpoints including heart failure, stroke, cardioversion, mortality, and a composite outcome were compared for the 4 months-3 years post-index period in the two groups. Cox-proportional hazards models were estimated for clinical outcomes comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients were matched in the two groups for resource utilization comparison. The average number of cardiovascular (CV)-related outpatient visits in the 4-12 months post-index period were significantly lower in the ablation group versus the AAD group (1.76 vs 3.57, p < .0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause and CV-related inpatient visits and all-cause outpatient visits among the two groups. For secondary endpoints comparison, 615 matched patients in each group emerged. Ablation patients had 38% lower risk of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p = 0.0318), 50% lower risk of mortality (HR 0.50, p = 0.0082), and 43% lower risk of experiencing a composite outcome (HR 0.57, p = 0.0009) as compared to AAD treatment cohort.

CONCLUSION

AF ablation was associated with significantly lower CV-related outpatient visits, and lower risk of heart failure and mortality versus AAD therapy.

Individualized ablation strategy guided by live simultaneous global mapping to treat persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia encountered. Catheter ablation has become the first-line therapy for symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent AF. Although pulmonary vein electrical isolation is still the cornerstone of the ablation strategy, the clinical outcome particularly in treating persistent AF is suboptimal. Significant efforts have been applied with live global chamber mapping of AF aimed to identify patient-specific drivers and/or maintainers located outside of the pulmonary veins to further improve the outcome of catheter ablation. Within this review, we present an overview of contemporary global chamber AF mapping technologies and characteristics, with a particular focus on global, noncontact, dipole density mapping illustrated with a clinical case of persistent AF ablation using this novel methodology.