Treatment satisfaction in cystic fibrosis: early patient experience with tobramycin inhalation powder

Efficacy and Safety of Dry Powder Antibiotics: A Narrative Review

The use of inhaled antibiotics was initially almost exclusively confined to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it has been extended in recent decades to patients with non-CF bronchiectasis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who present with chronic bronchial infection by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. Inhaled antibiotics reach high concentrations in the area of infection, which enhances their effect and enables their long-term administration to defeat the most resistant infections, while minimizing possible adverse effects. New formulations of inhaled dry powder antibiotics have been developed, providing, among other advantages, faster preparation and administration of the drug, as well as avoiding the requirement to clean nebulization equipment. In this review, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of devices that allow the inhalation of antibiotics, especially dry powder inhalers. We describe their general characteristics, the different inhalers on the market and the proper way to use them. We analyze the factors that influence the way in which the dry powder drug reaches the lower airways, as well as aspects of microbiological effectiveness and risks of resistance development. We review the scientific evidence on the use of colistin and tobramycin with this type of device, both in patients with CF and with non-CF bronchiectasis. Finally, we discuss the literature on the development of new dry powder antibiotics.

The Use of Tobramycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Review

INTRODUCTION

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common respiratory pathogen that contributes to chronic pulmonary infection in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Guidelines recommend early intervention upon positive P. aeruginosa culture. Tobramycin has in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including P. aeruginosa, and TOBI Podhaler is indicated for the management of individuals with cystic fibrosis with P. aeruginosa infection. The dry powder inhaler formulation decreases the time required for treatment compared with nebulized solution and therefore may improve quality of life and adherence, which have a positive impact on disease progression.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the safety and efficacy of tobramycin inhaled powder and provide insights into appropriate individuals who might benefit from a dry powder inhaler, keeping in mind that patient preference is an important consideration for therapy selection.

EXPERT OPINION

Providing a less burdensome alternative to delivering inhaled antibiotics that is more portable with a significantly shorter administration time may help improve adherence, and therefore improve outcomes. Continued development of new antibiotics to add to current regimens for eradication and control of airway microbiology, combined with more efficient delivery systems such as tobramycin inhaled powder, will help evolve the treatment of patients with CF.

Post-inhalation cough with therapeutic aerosols: Formulation considerations

This review provides an assessment of post-inhalation cough with therapeutic aerosols. Factors that increase cough may be mitigated through design of the drug, formulation, and device. The incidence of cough is typically less than 5% for drugs with a nominal dose less than 1 mg, including asthma and COPD therapeutics. Cough increases markedly as the dose approaches 100 mg. This is due to changes in the composition of epithelial lining fluid (e.g., increases in osmolality, proton concentration). Whether an individual exhibits cough depends on their degree of sensitization to mechanical and chemical stimuli. Hypersensitivity is increased when the drug, formulation or disease result in increases in lung inflammation. Cough related to changes in epithelial lining fluid composition can be limited by using insoluble neutral forms of drugs and excipients.

Treatment needs and expectations for Fabry disease in France: development of a new Patient Needs Questionnaire

Background

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare, X-linked, inherited lysosomal disease caused by absent or reduced α-galactosidase A activity. Due to the heterogeneity of disease presentation and progression, generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools do not provide accurate insight into patients’ daily lives and impact of disease specific treatments. Also, the French National Health Authority, (HAS) actively encourages a patient-centric approach to improve the quality of care throughout the patient journey. In response to this initiative, we aimed to develop and validate a specific, self-reported, Patient Needs Questionnaire for people living with Fabry disease to appraise patient needs and expectations towards their treatment (PNQ Fabry). This endeavour was led with the help of French patient associations (APMF & VML) and dedicated expert centres. PNQ Fabry was developed according to the FDA/EMA methodologies and best practices for the development of PRO tools in rare diseases. Our approach comprised of three steps, as follows: concept elicitation and item generation, item reduction, and final validation of the questionnaire through a two-stage survey.

Results

Intrinsic and extrinsic reliability was established, using a validated benchmark questionnaire. With the invaluable help of patient associations, we recruited a satisfactory population in this rare disease setting, to ensure robust participation to validate our PNQ (final number of questionnaires: 76). At the end of the process, a 26-item patient-reported questionnaire was obtained with excellent psychometric properties, exhibiting very satisfactory measurement outcomes for reliability and validity. The results of this initiative demonstrate that the PNQ Fabry is accurate, suitable and tailored to FD patients, as it addresses themes identified during patient interviews, that were further validated through statistical analyses of quantitative surveys. An ongoing phase IV study is using this tool.

Conclusion

We believe the PNQ Fabry will be a reliable and insightful tool in clinical practice, to improve patient management in FD.

The intratracheal administration of locked nucleic acid containing antisense oligonucleotides induced gene silencing and an immune-stimulatory effect in the murine lung

Locked nucleic acid containing antisense oligonucleotides (LNA-ASOs) have the potential to modulate the disease-related gene expression by the RNaseH-dependent degradation of mRNAs. Pulmonary drug delivery has been widely used for the treatment of lung disease. Thus, the inhalation of LNA-ASOs is expected to be an efficient therapy that can be applied to several types of lung disease. Because the lung has a distinct immune system against pathogens, the immune-stimulatory effect of LNA-ASOs should be considered for the development of novel inhaled LNA-ASOs therapies. However, there have been no reports on the relationship between knock-down (KD) and the immune-stimulatory effects of inhaled LNA-ASOs in the lung. In this report, LNA-ASOs targeting Scarb1 (Scarb1-ASOs) or negative control LNA-ASOs targeting ApoB (ApoB-ASOs) were intratracheally administered to mice to investigate the KD of the gene expression and the immune-stimulatory effects in the lung. We confirmed that the intratracheal administration of Scarb1-ASOs exerted a KD effect in the lung without a drug delivery system. On the other hand, both Scarb1-ASOs and ApoB-ASOs induced neutrophilic infiltration in the alveoli and increased the expression levels of G-CSF and CXCL1 in the lung. The dose required for KD was the same as the dose that induced the neutrophilic immune response. In addition, in our in vitro experiments, Scarb1-ASOs did not increase the G-CSF or CXCL1 expression in primary lung cells, even though Scarb1-ASOs exerted a strong KD effect. Hence, we hypothesize that inhaled LNA-ASOs have the potential to exert a KD effect in the lung, but that they may be associated with a risk of immune stimulation. Further studies about the mechanism underlying the immune-stimulatory effect of LNA-ASOs is necessary for the development of novel inhaled LNA-ASO therapies.

Tobramycin inhalation powder for the treatment of pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: a review based on clinical evidence

Chronic airway infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The development and widespread use of nebulized antibacterial therapies, including tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS), has led to improvements in lung function and quality of life. However, the use of nebulizers is associated with various challenges, including extended administration times and the need for frequent device cleaning and disinfection. Multiple therapies are required for patients with CF, which poses a considerable burden to patients, and adherence to the recommended treatments remains a challenge. Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP), delivered via the T-326 Inhaler, has been shown to have similar clinical efficacy and safety as compared to TIS, with improved patient convenience, satisfaction, and treatment adherence. Long-term safety studies have shown that TIP was well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events in patients with CF. This review of the TIP pivotal and postmarketing studies reinforces the well-established efficacy and safety profile of TIP and its ease of use.

Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data

PURPOSE

Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP), the first dry-powder inhaled antibiotic for pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, is associated with reduced treatment burden, increased patient satisfaction, and higher self-reported adherence for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We compared adherence in CF patients newly treated with TIP with those newly treated with the traditional tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS), using US insurance claims data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the Truven MarketScan^® database, we identified CF patients chronically infected with P. aeruginosa who had been prescribed TIP between May 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014, or TIS between September 1, 2010 to April 30, 2012 with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy benefits prior to and following prescription. TIP and TIS adherence levels were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 145 eligible patients were identified for the TIP cohort and 306 for the TIS cohort. Significant differences in age distribution (25.0 vs 21.9 years for TIP vs TIS, respectively, P=0.017), type of health plan (P=0.014), employment status (72.4% vs 63.4% of TIP vs TIS patients in full-time employment, P=0.008), and some comorbidities were observed between the two cohorts. Although a univariate analysis found no significant differences between TIP and TIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.411, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.949-2.098), TIP was moderately associated with higher adherence levels compared with TIS in a multivariable analysis, once various demographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted for. These included geographic location (OR: 1.566, CI: 1.016-2.413) and certain comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

This study of US patient data supports previous findings that TIP is associated with better adherence compared with TIS; however, further studies will be required to fully elucidate differences in adherence between TIP and TIS.