Psychiatric Patients' Perceived Health Control and Reactance: Implications for Medication Adherence

Effects of Social Support on Medication Adherence Among Patients with Schizophrenia: Serial Multiple Mediation Model

Purpose

This study aims to explore the serial mediating effect of stigma and depression on the association between social support and medication adherence.

Patients and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was undertaken in the Changning District of Shanghai using a five-part questionnaire from August to December 2023. A convenient sampling method was employed, and 35 patients with schizophrenia were invited from each of the 9 streets in Changning District to participate in the survey, resulting in a total of 305 valid questionnaires collected. The questionnaire measured social support, stigma, depression, medication adherence, and demographic characteristics. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and the bootstrap method.

Results

There was a direct and significantly positive association between social support and medication adherence (β = 0.69, p < 0.001). Moreover, increased levels of stigma (β = - 0.45, p = 0.013) and depression (β = - 0.09, p = 0.017) were both associated with a decline in medication adherence. Bootstrapping analysis revealed that the association between social support and medication adherence operated indirectly through stigma (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.18). Additionally, social support was indirectly associated with medication adherence through depression (β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.30). Further analysis indicated that social support had an indirect association with medication adherence through both stigma and depression (β = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.07).

Conclusion

Stigma and depression serially mediate the association between social support and medication adherence among patients with schizophrenia. This serial multiple mediation model underscores the importance of integrating social support interventions with psychological interventions aimed at reducing stigma and depression, thereby effectively enhancing medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia.

Illness perception profile among cancer patients and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore latent profiles of illness perception among cancer patients and its influencing factors.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional study adopting convenience sampling to select cancer patients from two hospitals in China. A total of 286 patients completed Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, Post-traumatic Growth Inventory, Fear of Disease Progression Questionnaire and Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale. Latent profile analysis and multiple linear regression were performed to explore the subgroups and factors influencing classification.

RESULTS

Three subgroups were identified, which were labelled as "Moderate Illness Perception Group" (16.8%; C1), "High Illness Perception with Heightened Concerns Group" (68.5%; C2) and "High Resilience and Low Symptomatic Impact Group" (14.7%; C3). Specifically, "Normal", "Mild symptom" and "Bed time during the day <50%" of "Functional Status" were more associated with C3. "Worker", "Farmer" and "Self-employed" were more associated with C1 and C2. Patients who had more "knowledge of the disease" were more associated with C2 and C3, who had less "post-traumatic growth" were more associated with C1, and who had less "fear of disease progression" and more "psychosocial adjustment" were more associated with C3 (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variability of illness perception among three subgroups of cancer patients, which emphasized the complexity of psychological condition. The insights derived from these distinct profiles enables tailored interventions and patient-centered communication strategies. However, integrating objective measures or biomarkers is needed to complement self-reported data.

"Here, I am More than Just Symptoms Combined": Mental Health Services from the Perspective of Community Rehabilitation Groups

In response to the rise in mental disorders, psychosocial and community approaches have been proposed, complementing traditional clinical services. The present research aimed to understand the perception of individuals attending community-based strategies regarding mental health services as part of the approach to mental disorders in Colombia. Two workshops were conducted with 30 individuals with mental disorders (depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder), who were members of community strategies. A thematic analysis was conducted. The theme resulting from the analysis shows Community mental health within the healthcare system, which consisted of categories such as Group Amplifying Actions for Health and Groups as Complementary to Other Forms of Care. It is emphasized that the healthcare system should establish bridges with community mental health strategies and actively engage in their strengthening processes to enhance the outcomes of pharmacological interventions and even psychotherapeutic interventions. Bidirectional learning approach is proposed between community-based mental health services and clinical settings within the healthcare system. Community strategies can make an important contribution to complex processes in the health system.

Design and validation of a scale of core components of community interventions in mental health

AIMS

To develop and validate an instrument to identify the core components of community strategies for mental health, especially mutual aid groups: The Mutual Aid Scale .

METHODS

135 community strategies leaders participated in the study. The core components are active agency, coping strategies, recognition, and management of emotions, problem-solving strategies, supportive interaction, trust, self-identity construction, and strengthening of social networks. With these components a scale was designed. Content validity was carried out in addition to an exploratory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Two dimensions resulted, strengthening of agency capacity and Coping strategies, and the internal consistency of both factors was acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.722 and 0.727, respectively. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) statistic was used with a score of 0.831 and the Barlett Sphericity Test, with a significant value of 265.175.

CONCLUSION

This scale identifies the components of community interventions for mental health and can contribute to a better implementation of these strategies. It also articulates autonomous community processes with strategies developed in health services.