The impact of age and severity of comorbid illness on outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Clinical and Functional Outcomes Associated with Age after Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via a transapical (TA) approach has been associated with high morbidity. The aim of this study is to investigate the association of age and clinical and functional outcomes after TA-TAVR.

METHODS

Patients who had TA-TAVR at a single center were divided into 3 age groups: <75 years (Group I), 75 to 85 years (Group II), and >85 years (Group III). Pre- and postoperative clinical, functional status, and procedure-related outcomes were compared among patient groups. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the impact of age on overall all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 183 TA-TAVR cases performed, 117 met the study criteria. These included 15 aged <75 years, 60 aged 75 to 85 years, and 42 aged >85 years. Short-term (30-day) clinical and functional status improved significantly for all age groups. The incidence of acute kidney injury, access site complications, and requirement for permanent pacemaker were similar for all age groups at 30 days. After a median follow-up of 26 months, overall all-cause survival rates were 86% for Group I, 88% for Group II, and 83% for Group III at 1 year. Cox proportional hazards model showed frailty status (HR: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.69; P = 0.003) but not age as an independent predictor of overall all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that both older and younger patients benefit from TA-TAVR with comparable operative outcomes. Age should not be an exclusion criterion for TA-TAVR.

Age-Related Differences in 1- and 12-Month Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from a Large Multicenter Data Repository)

Scarce data are available on the impact of age on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes. We therefore, analyzed 1,845 consecutive patients from 9 Italian centers who underwent TAVI with the Corevalve Revalving System from September 2007 to March 2014; patients were dichotomized according to their age in the date of the procedure, as follows: 75 to 85 years old and >85 years old. End points were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year clinical and echocardiographic data were available for 100% of the patients included. Propensity matching was performed. Procedural success rates were high (>94%) and comparable between groups. Although worse baseline renal function was observed in the older group, the incidence of acute kidney injury after procedure was comparable (17.1% and 17.4%, respectively for the 75- to 85- and >85-year-old group, p = 0.877); importantly, >99% of acute kidney injury episodes in both groups were grades 1 and 2. Procedural complications rates were low without between-group differences. In-hospital death (3.7% and 4.6%, p = 0.379) and stroke/transient ischemic attack (1.9% and 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.960) were comparable. The 1-year death rates were 14.9% and 17.2% (p = 0.197) in the 75- to 85- and >85-year-old group, respectively. Cardiovascular death was observed in 7.8% and 7% (p = 0.542), while stroke/transient ischemic attack was demonstrated in 5.2% and 4.4% (p = 0.496), respectively. Results were sustained after propensity matching. In conclusion, advanced age did not negatively impact the outcomes of TAVI through 1-year after procedure.

Influence of different approaches of aortic valve replacement on the incidence of post-operative delirium in intermediate risk patients - a matched pair analysis

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the risk for post-operative delirium (POD) after surgical or transfemoral aortic valve replacement (AVR) as an additional decision parameter for the choice of treatment in patients with an EuroScore (ES) between 10% and 20%.

BACKGROUND

POD is well known as a not infrequent side effect of cardiac surgery necessitating extracorporeal circulation. In Germany a tendency to treat patients with ES <20% with transfemoral AVR (TF) instead of surgical AVR (SAVR) was observed in 2013. The risk of POD may influence the decision of physician and patient as to which procedure would be appropriate in the individual case. Therefore we performed an analysis of the incidence of POD in patients with comparable risk treated either with surgical or transfemoral aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

Patients with elective or urgent need for AVR and EuroScore between 10% and 20% were extracted from the database of all isolated AVR procedures in Germany of 2013. As a result 3407 cases, 771 SAVR patients and 2636 TF patients with EuroScore 10-20%, were extracted from the complete data-base of the German quality insurance registry for heart surgery. Two homogeneous groups with regard to the risk predicted by ES were built by case-control matches and compared for available variables. In a second step two groups with identical risk/co-morbidity profile for 10 variables were identified and analyzed with respect to POD and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 763 pairs with EuroScore of 13.5% each could be determined. Mean age was 75.6 years (SAVR, 51.6% male) and 78.8 years (TF, 56.5% male). Incidence of POD with need for therapy (POD-T) was 12.8% after SAVR and 3.8% after TF, resulting in numbers needed to harm of 8 and 26 respectively. In-hospital death rate of patients with POD-T was 5.1% after SAVR and 3.3% after TF, and nearly identical compared with patients without POD-T. POD-T had a negative influence on the regular discharge procedure. Further matching resulted in two groups of 470 patients each with identical co-morbidities and an age difference of 1 year but POD-T rates of 14.5% (SAVR) and 4.9% (TF); in-hospital mortality was 6.2% (SAVR) and 2.3% (TF).

LIMITATIONS

The dataset contains valid data only for the period of hospital stay until discharge. Therefore conclusions about the duration and reversibility of POD, which are important parameters of quality of life and resource consumption as well as midterm consequences, cannot be estimated. The documentation of the German Federal Council asks only for POD and POD-T, a predefined definition of POD is not given; this may have some influence on the data. We therefore confined the analysis to only POD-T. In addition only a limited number of co-morbidities are documented.

CONCLUSION

In patients with intermediate risk according to EuroScore (10-20%) the risk of post-operative delirium and in-hospital mortality is significantly higher after surgical aortic valve replacement than after transfemoral procedure. This may be considered for patient guidance and the decision as to which procedure is able to achieve the best result including minimizing side effects.