Role of rivaroxaban in the management of atrial fibrillation: insights from clinical practice

Effects of the theory of planned behavior and nudge strategy-based intervention on the adherence to anticoagulation treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation is associated with the incidence of thromboembolism. Current guidelines recommend preferential use of novel oral anticoagulants(NOAC) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation medication adherence rate was relatively low among discharged patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

AIM

To investigate the effects of the anticoagulation programs based on the theory of planned behavior and nudge strategy among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

130 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to the intervention group or control group, 72 patients in the intervention group, and 58 patients in the control group with a 6-month follow-up. Medication adherence,intention,attitude, perceived behavioral control and subjective norm and quality of life were assessed.

RESULTS

There were significantly differences in the attitude and subjective norm between the two groups at one month,three months and six months follow-up(P <0.01).There were significantly differences in the perceived behavioral control between the two groups at six months follow-up(P <0.01).There were significantly differences in the intention scale between the two groups at three months follow-up(P <0.01). The medication adherence scale score was higher in the intervention group than in the control group at six months follow-up.However, there were no differences in quality of life between the two groups at six months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The program based on the theory of planned behavior and nudge strategy can improve medication adherence in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in an Omani Tertiary Care Hospital

Objective:

The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin as well as to determine the appropriateness of dosing and prescribing of rivaroxaban in Omani patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Royal Hospital data registry. The study included all adults newly diagnosed with NVAF and treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. The outcomes measured include ischaemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), non-gastrointestinal bleeding (NGIB), as well as appropriateness of dosing and prescribing of rivaroxaban.

Results:

The analysis included 96 rivaroxaban users and 183 warfarin users; 51% of the cohort included males. There were no significant differences observed in the risk of ischaemic stroke between the two groups (hazard ratio (HR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-3.4; p=0.8). However, those on rivaroxaban exhibited a significantly higher rate of GIB compared to those on warfarin (HR, 5.9; 95% CI: 2.9-11.7; p=0.001). There were no differences observed with regards to NGIB between the two groups (HR, 0.9; 95% CI: 0.4-1.9; p=0.8). Dosing and prescribing of rivaroxaban were found to be appropriate in 89% of the patients, with only 6% being prescribed an inappropriately lower dose.

Conclusion:

The study demonstrated no significant differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke or NGIB between rivaroxaban and warfarin groups in newly diagnosed NVAF patients. However, rivaroxaban users were found to have a significantly higher risk of GIB. Rivaroxaban was appropriately prescribed to the majority of the patients, and only a small proportion of the group received an inappropriately lower dose of rivaroxaban.

Dabigatran in cardiovascular disease management: A comprehensive review

Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has robust data for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after knee and hip replacement. Recent studies have evaluated dabigatran to determine its safety and efficacy in such conditions as VTE in malignancy, coronary artery disease, mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, and antiphospholipid syndrome. This article provides a comprehensive review on the role of dabigatran in various cardiovascular diseases.

Rivaroxaban: Expanded Role in Cardiovascular Disease Management-A Literature Review

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and as prophylaxis after hip and knee surgery after approval by the Food and Drug Administration. In the last decade, DOACs were studied for various indications; this review is focused on rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, which is used in an expanded evidence-based fashion for coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, malignancy, and prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in acute medical illnesses.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Associated With Warfarin and Rivaroxaban Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Cases with Concomitant Coagulopathy

BACKGROUND

There is inadequate information on the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients who are under rivaroxaban and warfarin therapy in Iran. Determining the risk of GI bleeding in patients receiving these two drugs can help to select a more appropriate anti-coagulation prophylaxis in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of GI bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant bleeding risk factors receiving either warfarin or rivaroxaban.

METHODS

In this observational study, 200 patients with AF and bleeding risk factors who referred to Imam Hossein Hospital (Tehran, Iran) were included. The patients were under treatment with either warfarin or rivaroxaban. The incidence of GI bleeding was compared between the two groups monthly for one year.

RESULTS

GI bleedings were observed in 61% and 34% of patients treated with warfarin and rivaroxaban, respectively (P = 0.001).Melena was the most common type of GI bleeding in both groups. History of hypertension, history of stroke, consumption of anti-platelet drugs, NSAID consumption, and history of alcohol consumption were associated with more frequent GI bleeding only in warfarin group.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of GI bleeding was lower in AF patients who received rivaroxaban compared to those treated with warfarin. Also, GI bleeding risk does not change according to the consumption of other anti-coagulant drugs and underlying history of hypertension or stroke in patients received rivaroxaban. Therefore, rivaroxaban is suggested as the choice of prophylaxisin patients with AF and concomitant coagulopathy.

Protective Effect of RIVA Against Sunitinib-Induced Cardiotoxicity by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress-Mediated Inflammation: Probable Role of TGF-β and Smad Signaling

Sunitinib (SUN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in 2006 as a first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer. However, weak selectivity to kinase receptors and cardiotoxicity have limited the use of sunitinib. Rivaroxaban (RIVA) is a Factor Xa inhibitor with cardioprotective action. It inhibits atherosclerosis and numerous inflammatory cascades. The present study was designed to investigate the cardioprotective effects of RIVA in sunitinib-induced cardiotoxicity. Thirty male Wistar rats were divided into five groups. Group 1 was the normal control (control). Group 2 was administered i.p. SUN 25 mg kg^-1 thrice weekly for 3 weeks. Groups 3 and 4 received the same treatment as Group 2 followed by the administration of RIVA 5 mg kg^-1 day^-1 and 10 mg kg^-1 day^-1, respectively, for 3 weeks. Group 5 received only 10 mg kg^-1 day^-1 RIVA for 3 weeks. Serum levels of Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺, lipid profiles, and cardiac enzymes were measured. Cardiac tissues were isolated for the measurements of oxidant/antioxidant balance gene and protein expressions. Relative to the controls, the administration of SUN significantly altered serum levels of (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺, lipid profiles, and cardiac enzymes), intracellular antioxidant enzymes, and the expression levels of the genes encoding certain proteins. RIVA treatment significantly restored these parameters to near-normal levels. RIVA treatment significantly mitigated SUN-induced cardiac injuries by restoring antioxidant enzyme levels and attenuating the proinflammatory cascades resulting from SUN-induced cardiac injuries.

Direct oral anticoagulants: A new chapter in anticoagulation therapy

Thromboembolic events are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. From the second half of the 20th century, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), warfarin and acenocoumarol, were the only anticoagulants taken orally. The major reform in anticoagulation therapy was made by the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), about 10 years ago. Direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and direct inhibitors of factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) have demonstrated favorable risk/benefit ratio. Compared to warfarin, DOACs are associated with a predictable pharmacokinetic profile, lower severe bleeding complications, particularly intracranial hemorrhages, and minimal drug interactions. Moreover, DOACs achieve a rapid onset of action and have shown comparable efficacy with warfarin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in clinical trials. As a result, DOACs are now replacing VKAs and LMWH for many indications including stroke and systemic embolism prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism and thromboprophylaxis following total knee/hip replacement surgery. In addition, rivaroxaban (in combination with aspirin alone or aspirin and clopidogrel) is used in the prevention of atherothrombotic events following acute coronary syndrome with elevated cardiac biomarkers. In case of severe bleeding complications under DOACs treatment, antidotes are available; idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa for rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Pharmacogenomics of Novel Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Newly Identified Genes and Genetic Variants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have shown an upward prescribing trend in recent years due to favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics without requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. However, recent studies have documented inter-individual variability in plasma drug levels of DOACs. Pharmacogenomics of DOACs is a relatively new area of research. There is a need to understand the role of pharmacogenomics in the interpatient variability of the four most commonly prescribed DOACs, namely dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. We performed an extensive search of recently published research articles including clinical trials and in-vitro studies in PubMed, particularly those focusing on genetic loci, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and DNA polymorphisms, and their effect on inter-individual variation of DOACs. Additionally, we also focused on commonly associated drug-drug interactions of DOACs. CES1 and ABCB1 SNPs are the most common documented genetic variants that contribute to alteration in peak and trough levels of dabigatran with demonstrated clinical impact. ABCB1 SNPs are implicated in alteration of plasma drug levels of rivaroxaban and apixaban. Studies conducted with factor Xa, ABCB1, SLCOB1, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 genetic variants did not reveal any significant association with plasma drug levels of edoxaban. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of dabigatran are mainly mediated by p-glycoprotein. Strong inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A4 and p-glycoprotein should be avoided in patients treated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. We conclude that some of the inter-individual variability of DOACs can be attributed to alteration of genetic variants of gene loci and drug-drug interactions. Future research should be focused on exploring new genetic variants, their effect, and molecular mechanisms that contribute to alteration of plasma levels of DOACs.

Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin in moderate-to-advanced CKD: real world data

BACKGROUND

In recent years, novel anticoagulant drugs have been introduced in the clinical armamentarium and have progressively gained momentum. Although their use is increasing among CKD patients, some skepticism about their risk-benefit ratio still persists. We sought to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in a cohort of moderate-to-advanced CKD patients.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, longitudinal study involved 347 consecutive CKD stage 3b-4 (according to NKF-KDOQI guidelines) patients enrolled from 8 cardiac outpatient clinics between March 2015 and October 2017. All patients received anticoagulation (100 warfarin vs. 247 rivaroxaban) as part of their non-valvular atrial fibrillation management at the attending physician's discretion. Clinical effectiveness (defined as the occurrence of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, or transient ischemic attack) and safety (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal or other bleeding) were assessed separately.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 16 ± 0.3 months, 25 stroke episodes (15 hemorrhagic, and 10 ischemic) occurred in 24 warfarin treated patients vs. none in the rivaroxaban arm. There were 5 vs. 0 episodes of deep venous thrombosis and 8 vs. 2 major episodes of bleeding in the warfarin and rivaroxaban groups, respectively. In contrast, the proportion of minor episodes of bleeding was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban seems a safe and effective therapeutic option in CKD stage 3b-4 patients. However, future randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively establish the role of rivaroxaban in CKD patients.