Should a lower treatment line be used when treating paracetamol poisoning in patients with chronic alcoholism?: a case for

Deleterious effects of reactive metabolites

A number of drugs have been withdrawn from the market or severely restricted in their use because of unexpected toxicities that become apparent only after the launch of new drug entities. Circumstantial evidence suggests that, in most cases, reactive metabolites are responsible for these unexpected toxicities. In this review, a general overview of the types of reactive metabolites and the consequences of their formation are presented. The current approaches to evaluate bioactivation potential of new compounds with particular emphasis on the advantages and limitation of these procedures will be discussed. Reasonable reasons for the excellent safety record of certain drugs susceptible to bioactivation will also be explored and should provide valuable guidance in the use of reactive-metabolite assessments when nominating drug candidates for development. This will, in turn, help us to design and bring safer drugs to the market.

Treating acetaminophen overdose: thresholds, costs and uncertainties

The United Kingdom's Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) modified the indications for N-acetylcysteine therapy of acetaminophen (paracetamol) overdose in September 2012. The new treatment threshold line was lowered to 100 mg/L (662 μmol/L) for a 4 hours acetaminophen concentration from the previous 200 mg/L (1325 μmol/L). This decision has the potential to substantially increase overall costs associated with acetaminophen overdose with unclear benefits from a marginal increase in patients protected from hepatotoxicity, fulminant hepatic failure, death, or transplant. Changing the treatment threshold for acetaminophen overdose also implies that ingestion amounts previously thought not to require acetaminophen concentration measurements would need to be revised. As a result, more individuals will be sent to hospitals in order that everyone with a predicted 4 hours concentration above the 100 mg/L line will have concentrations measured and potentially be treated with N-acetylcysteine. Before others consider adopting this new treatment guideline, formal cost-effectiveness analyses need to be performed to define the appropriate thresholds for referral and treatment.

A New Predictor of Toxicity Following Acetaminophen Overdose Based on Pretreatment Exposure

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive clinical experience, no dose-response curve exists for acetaminophen toxicity in man. The absence of accurate toxicodynamics has hampered efforts to optimize patient therapy and to identify risk modifiers following overdose. We set out to parameterize both the degree and duration of pretreatment exposure into a single, continuous measure of exposure, which will serve as the x-axis of an eventual dose-response curve.

METHODS

The model was constructed from pharmacokinetic first principles, using as inputs the vertical distance above the Rumack-Matthew nomogram line (expressed as the equivalent serum acetaminophen concentration 4 h after ingestion) and the delay to antidote therapy (tNAC). A no-effect dose ([APAP]threshold) and lag time (ti) were assumed.

RESULTS

The area under the serum acetaminophen concentration vs. time curve bounded by [APAP]threshold, ti and tNAC represents our proposed time-weighted measure of exposure. We demonstrate that this non-negative area estimates the cellular burden of toxic adducts formed following overdose. This measure is also easily calculated at patient presentation using clinical data and allows for both declining serum acetaminophen concentrations and variable delays to antidote therapy.

DISCUSSION

We describe a new, pharmacokinetically based measure of exposure following acute acetaminophen overdose treated with N-acetylcysteine. Using this measure should enhance the analysis of nonexperimental clinical data and permit more accurate characterization of acetaminophen toxicodynamics. Ultimately, this approach may facilitate progress on many of the long-standing controversies regarding acetaminophen toxicity in man.

Guidelines for the management of paracetamol poisoning in Australia and New Zealand--explanation and elaboration. A consensus statement from clinical toxicologists consulting to the Australasian poisons information centres

Paracetamol is involved in a large proportion of accidental paediatric exposures and deliberate self-poisoning cases, although subsequent hepatic failure and death are both uncommon outcomes. The optimal management of most patients with paracetamol overdose is usually straightforward. However, several differing nomograms and varying recommendations regarding potential risk factors for hepatic injury introduce complexity. In order to reconcile management advice with current Australasian clinical toxicology practice, revised guidelines have been developed by a panel of clinical toxicologists consulting to the poisons information centres in Australia and New Zealand using a workshop and consultative process. This article summarises the rationale for the recommendations made in these new guidelines.

Estimated risk of hepatotoxicity after an acute acetaminophen overdose in alcoholics

A published logistic regression model based on the Canadian Acetaminophen Overdose Study registry was used to calculate the risk of hepatotoxicity after an acute acetaminophen overdose and to estimate a treatment threshold line for alcoholic patients who did not co-ingest alcohol (i.e., abstinent alcoholics) on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. The risk of hepatotoxicity in nonalcoholic and abstinent alcoholic patients was calculated at the acetaminophen concentration of 150 microg/ml at 4h (37.5 microg/ml at 12h) treatment threshold line. This corresponds to the "possible risk" line on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram and represents a 1.6% risk of hepatotoxicity for nonalcoholic patients at or below this line. At or below this same 150 microg/ml at 4-h line, abstinent alcoholic patients have a hepatotoxicity risk of 10.7%. The risk of hepatotoxicity in abstinent alcoholics' equivalent to that of nonalcoholics (i.e., 1.6%) occurs at a lower acetaminophen concentrations treatment threshold line, that is, 104 microg/ml at 4h (26 microg/ml at 12h). Because of difficulties plotting this new line on the familiar Rumack-Matthew semilogarithmic scale, a line connecting 100 microg/ml at 4h (25 microg/ml at 12h) is proposed. This line equates to a 1.1% risk of hepatotoxicity in abstinent alcoholic patients. The analysis supports the observation that based on the published model abstinent alcoholics might have a greater risk of hepatotoxicity after an acute acetaminophen overdose. This proposed new risk line can be used in hypothesis generation for future clinical studies in this alcohol related problem.

Acute ethanol coingestion confers a lower risk of hepatotoxicity after deliberate acetaminophen overdose

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the clinical significance of acute ethanol coingestion around the time of acetaminophen (paracetamol) overdose. This study prospectively examined the effect of acute ethanol coingestion on risk of hepatotoxicity among patients admitted to hospital for N-acetylcysteine (NAC) therapy after deliberate acetaminophen overdose.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study and included sequential patients who presented within 24 hours of acute acetaminophen ingestion and required NAC therapy. Significant hepatotoxicity was defined by alanine transaminase > 1,000 U/L or the international normalized ratio > 1.3 after a standardized intravenous administration of 300 mg/kg NAC.

RESULTS

There were 362 patients, including 178 (49.2%) who coingested ethanol acutely. The prevalence of hepatotoxicity was 5.1% (95% CI = 2.6% to 9.5%) in those who ingested ethanol, compared to 15.2% (95% CI = 10.7% to 21.2%) in those who did not (p = 0.0027 by chi-square proportional test). Acute ethanol intake conferred a lower risk of hepatotoxicity in patients who had acetaminophen concentrations above or below the "200-line" and was independent of the interval between ingestion and assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute ethanol intake is associated with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity after acetaminophen overdose. This apparent protective effect cannot be explained solely by lower exposure to acetaminophen in this group, nor differences in the interval between ingestion and initiation of treatment. Further work is required to establish mechanisms by which ethanol might confer protection against hepatotoxicity, so as to identify novel strategies for reducing risk after acute acetaminophen ingestion.

Pharmacokinetics and interactions of headache medications, part I: introduction, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and acute treatments

Recent progress in the treatment of primary headaches has made available specific, effective and safe medications for these disorders, which are widely spread among the general population. One of the negative consequences of this undoubtedly positive progress is the risk of drug-drug interactions. This review is the first in a two-part series on pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of headache medications. Part I addresses acute treatments. Part II focuses on prophylactic treatments. The overall aim of this series is to increase the awareness of physicians, either primary care providers or specialists, regarding this topic. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of major severity involving acute medications are a minority among those reported in literature. The main drug combinations to avoid are: i) NSAIDs plus drugs with a narrow therapeutic range (i.e., digoxin, methotrexate, etc.); ii) sumatriptan, rizatriptan or zolmitriptan plus monoamine oxidase inhibitors; iii) substrates and inhibitors of CYP2D6 (i.e., chlorpromazine, metoclopramide, etc.) and -3A4 (i.e., ergot derivatives, eletriptan, etc.), as well as other substrates or inhibitors of the same CYP isoenzymes. The risk of having clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions seems to be limited in patients with low frequency headaches, but could be higher in chronic headache sufferers with medication overuse.

A Risk Quantification Instrument for Acute Acetaminophen Overdose Patients Treated With N-Acetylcysteine

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The risk of hepatotoxicity after acute acetaminophen overdose varies with timed serum acetaminophen concentration and delay to treatment. The ability to accurately predict hepatotoxicity is needed to reduce confusion about the optimal treatment regimen for individual patients and the effects of risk modifiers such as ethanol. We quantitatively estimate the risk of hepatotoxicity based on the degree and duration of pretreatment exposure to supratherapeutic concentrations of acetaminophen.

METHODS

We examined all hospitalizations for acute acetaminophen overdose within a retrospective multicenter Canadian registry. We used a previously developed composite measure incorporating timed serum acetaminophen concentration and time to N-acetylcysteine treatment into a single parameter. We then modeled hepatotoxicity on this parameter, as well as age, sex, and ethanol use. Hepatotoxicity was defined as peak aminotransferase level of 1,000 IU/L or greater at 24 hours or longer.

RESULTS

Of 1,270 admitted patients treated mostly with intravenous N-acetylcysteine for less than 24 hours, our model accurately identified the 94 patients who developed hepatotoxicity (discriminatory index 0.93). Hepatotoxicity occurred in none of the 313 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 0% to 1.0%) above the traditional 150 mug/mL treatment line who were classified as low risk (<1%) using our instrument. After adjustment for severity of exposure, the risk of hepatotoxicity was considerably higher in the absence of coingested ethanol (median hepatotoxic dose 16.5 mmol/L x hour [95% CI 8.74 to 31.0 mmol/L x hour] versus 27.1 mmol/L x hour [95% CI 11.1 to 66.3 mmol/L x hour]), particularly among alcoholics (4.79 mmol/L x hour [95% CI 2.13 to 10.8 mmol/L x hour]).

CONCLUSION

Our risk prediction instrument identifies a large group of low-risk patients for whom 20-hour intravenous N-acetylcysteine therapy is sufficient. Our results suggest that acute and chronic ethanol use dramatically influences acetaminophen toxicity. This work may facilitate the evaluation of individualized treatment strategies for higher-risk patients.

Acute poisoning: understanding 90% of cases in a nutshell

The acutely poisoned patient remains a common problem facing doctors working in acute medicine in the United Kingdom and worldwide. This review examines the initial management of the acutely poisoned patient. Aspects of general management are reviewed including immediate interventions, investigations, gastrointestinal decontamination techniques, use of antidotes, methods to increase poison elimination, and psychological assessment. More common and serious poisonings caused by paracetamol, salicylates, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and cocaine are discussed in detail. Specific aspects of common paediatric poisonings are reviewed.

Tolerability of Paracetamol

The excellent tolerability of therapeutic doses of paracetamol (acetaminophen) is a major factor in the very wide use of the drug. The major problem in the use of paracetamol is its hepatotoxicity after an overdose. Hepatotoxicity has also been reported after therapeutic doses, but critical analysis indicates that most patients with alleged toxicity from therapeutic doses have taken overdoses. Importantly, prospective studies indicate that therapeutic doses of paracetamol are an unlikely cause of hepatotoxicity in patients who ingest moderate to large amounts of alcohol. Controlled clinical trials have found that paracetamol is very well tolerated by the gastrointestinal tract. While variable results have been found in case control studies, most studies have shown no change or a small increase in the relative risk of perforations, ulcer or bleeding in the upper gastrointestinal tract. However, associations between the use of paracetamol and gastrointestinal toxicity, as well as with chronic renal disease and asthma, are very likely to reflect biases in some case control studies. In particular, such biases may be caused by the perceived high tolerability of paracetamol in these diseases. The consequent use of paracetamol in these diseases states then leads to an apparent association between paracetamol and the disease. Despite metabolism of paracetamol to reactive compounds, hypersensitivity reactions are rare, although urticaria occurs in occasional patients. Paracetamol appears to be well tolerated during pregnancy although prospective studies are required.

Drug-induced liver disease

The year 2002 saw a warning from the US Food and Drug Administration not to use the diet agent, Lipokinetix, and brought to light a few new agents as potential hepatotoxins. Numerous other reports confirmed the hepatotoxicity of several previously described agents. Refinements in causality assessment remain an important aspect in defining drug-induced liver disease and proposed new upper limits of normal for alanine aminotransferase that are lower than most laboratories currently report may require rethinking our definition of "normal liver function tests." Chronic viral hepatitis B and C remain important risk factors for antiretroviral-induced liver injury in patients co-infected with the human immunodeficiency virus and in patients receiving antituberculosis therapy. Acetaminophen retains its status as the most common cause of acute drug-induced liver failure in the United States and in many other countries. Several papers addressed the issue of accidental versus intentional overdoses, the role of alcohol consumption as a risk factor, and newer aspects of treating and preventing acetaminophen injury to the liver. Finally, the use of potentially hepatotoxic medications in patients with underlying liver disease continues to be a controversial topic and a rational approach to the use of such drugs in this setting is provided.