Moxifloxacin and glucose homeostasis: a pooled-analysis of the evidence from clinical and postmarketing studies

Insulinotropic Potential of Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin: An In Vivo Rabbits Model Study Followed by Randomized Phase I Clinical Trial

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been reported to cause dysglycemia in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. However, diabetic patients are usually on polypharmacy, so we cannot attribute the dysglycemia specifically to FQs. To answer the question as to whether Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin influence blood glucose levels and serum insulin levels or otherwise, rabbits were used as experimental animals in an in vivo model followed by a phase I randomized clinical trial in euglycemic healthy volunteers. The effects on the serum insulin and blood glucose levels in the Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin treated groups were, respectively, determined on the fifth day in both the in-vivo rabbits model and in the test subjects of the phase I clinical trial. The effects of these drugs were also checked on the histomorphology of the pancreas in the rabbits. The findings of our study suggest that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the blood glucose levels via a subsequent significant shift in the serum insulin levels both in the in vivo animal model and in the test subjects of the phase I clinical trial. No prominent effects on the beta cells histomorphology were noted in this study. Moxifloxacin showed a more significant effect than Gemifloxacin. The insulinotropic effect was comparable to the effect of Glibenclamide. It is concluded that Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin have a significant blood glucose lowering effect mediated through insulinotropic action. (Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT04692623).

Meta-analysis on Effectiveness and Safety of Moxifloxacin in Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis in Adults

BACKGROUND

Moxifloxacin, a fourth generation fluoroquinolone, which has good antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacteria. To date, there are no meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. This meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of the moxifloxacin in treatment of MDR-TB in adults.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, Embase, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases were investigated for eligible literatures from their establishments to August, 2019. Included studies were selected according to precise eligibility criteria: MDR-TB confirmed by the clinical diagnostic criteria (at least 2 or more first-line drugs resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin). Study design was limited to retrospective studies, randomized controlled trials, or prospective cohort studies; the control group was treated with other drugs or no moxifloxacin. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 1447 patients were finally eligible for the final systematic review and meta-analysis. Moxifloxacin regimen was related to a significantly elevated treatment success rate compared with levofloxacin or conventional therapy regimen (OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.16-3.25, P = .01). No significant difference of sputum culture conversion rate (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.82-1.60; P = 0.43) was found between 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in the increased risks of gastrointestinal trouble (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.98-1.68; P = .05), hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.64-1.30; P = .6), dermatologic abnormalities (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.74-1.67; P = .62), and vision change (OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 0.74-2.89; P = .27) between the moxifloxacin-containing regimens and control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed that the addition of moxifloxacin to the recommended regimen significantly improved the rate of treatment success in the treatment of MDR-TB, with no additional adverse moxifloxacin events.

Moxifloxacin-Induced Visual Hallucinations, Alterations in Mood and Behavior, and Hyperglycemia

Visual hallucinations are sensory perceptions that occur without external stimuli. Moxifloxacin-induced visual hallucinations are very rarely reported (<0.1%). We describe a 66-year-old woman, without any known neuropsychiatric disorder or illicit drug abuse, who experienced complex visual hallucinations, mood, and behavioral alterations secondary to peroral 1 dose of moxifloxacin treatment that persisted for approximately 36 hours. In addition, a sudden increase in her blood glucose level was noted which also improved a few days after discontinuation of moxifloxacin treatment. Although very rare, it should be kept in mind that moxifloxacin may coincidentally induce neuropsychiatric adverse effects and hyperglycemia. Clinicians should be alert to recognize such uncommon offending adverse drug reactions.

A Review of New Fluoroquinolones : Focus on their Use in Respiratory Tract Infections

The new respiratory fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and on the horizon, garenoxacin) offer many improved qualities over older agents such as ciprofloxacin. These include retaining excellent activity against Gram-negative bacilli, with improved Gram-positive activity (including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus). In addition, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and garenoxacin all demonstrate increased anaerobic activity (including activity against Bacteroides fragilis). The new fluoroquinolones possess greater bioavailability and longer serum half-lives compared with ciprofloxacin. The new fluoroquinolones allow for once-daily administration, which may improve patient adherence. The high bioavailability allows for rapid step down from intravenous administration to oral therapy, minimizing unnecessary hospitalization, which may decrease costs and improve quality of life of patients. Clinical trials involving the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections (acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and community-acquired pneumonia) demonstrate high bacterial eradication rates and clinical cure rates. In the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections, the various new fluoroquinolones appear to be comparable to each other, but may be more effective than macrolide or cephalosporin-based regimens. However, additional data are required before it can be emphatically stated that the new fluoroquinolones as a class are responsible for better outcomes than comparators in community-acquired respiratory infections. Gemifloxacin (except for higher rates of hypersensitivity), levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin have relatively mild adverse effects that are more or less comparable to ciprofloxacin. In our opinion, gatifloxacin should not be used, due to glucose alterations which may be serious. Although all new fluoroquinolones react with metal ion-containing drugs (antacids), other drug interactions are relatively mild compared with ciprofloxacin. The new fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin have much to offer in terms of bacterial eradication, including activity against resistant respiratory pathogens such as penicillin-resistant, macrolide-resistant, and multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae. However, ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms, including ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae, are becoming more prevalent, thus prudent use must be exercised when prescribing these valuable agents.

Hypoglycemia after antimicrobial drug prescription for older patients using sulfonylureas

IMPORTANCE

Certain antimicrobial drugs interact with sulfonylureas to increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of hypoglycemia and associated costs in older patients prescribed glipizide or glyburide who fill a prescription for an antimicrobial drug.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective cohort study of Texas Medicare claims from 2006 to 2009 for patients 66 years or older who were prescribed glipizide or glyburide and who also filled a prescription for 1 of the 16 antimicrobials most commonly prescribed for this population.

METHODS

We assessed hypoglycemia events and associated Medicare costs in patients prescribed 1 of 7 antimicrobial agents thought to interact with sulfonylureas, using noninteracting antimicrobials as a comparison. We used a repeated measure logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, Medicaid eligibility, comorbidity, prior emergency department visits for hypoglycemia, prior hospitalizations for any cause, nursing home residence, and indication for the antimicrobial. We estimated odds of hypoglycemia, number needed to harm, deaths during hospitalization for hypoglycemia, and Medicare costs for hypoglycemia treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Any hospitalization or emergency department visit owing to hypoglycemia within 14 days of antimicrobial exposure.

RESULTS

In multivariable analyses controlling for patient characteristics and indication for antimicrobial drug use, clarithromycin (odds ratio [OR], 3.96 [95% CI, 2.42-6.49]), levofloxacin (OR, 2.60 [95% CI, 2.18-3.10]), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (OR, 2.56 [95% CI, 2.12-3.10]), metronidazole (OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.28-3.47]), and ciprofloxacin (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.33-1.97]) were associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia compared with a panel of noninteracting antimicrobials. The number needed to harm ranged from 71 for clarithromycin to 334 for ciprofloxacin. Patient factors associated with hypoglycemia included older age, female sex, black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, higher comorbidity, and prior hypoglycemic episode. In 2009, 28.3% of patients prescribed a sulfonylurea filled a prescription for 1 of these 5 antimicrobials, which were associated with 13.2% of all hypoglycemia events in patients taking sulfonylureas. The treatment of subsequent hypoglycemia adds $30.54 in additional Medicare costs to each prescription of 1 of those 5 antimicrobials given to patients taking sulfonylureas.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Prescription of interacting antimicrobial drugs to patients on sulfonylureas is very common, and is associated with substantial morbidity and increased costs.

Effect of fluoroquinolones on mitochondrial function in pancreatic beta cells

Hyper- and hypoglycaemias are known side effects of fluoroquinolone antibiotics, resulting in a number of fatalities. Fluoroquinolone-induced hypoglycaemias are due to stimulated insulin release by the inhibition of the KATP channel activity of the beta cell. Recently, it was found that fluoroquinolones were much less effective on metabolically intact beta cells than on open cell preparations. Thus the intracellular effects of gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin were investigated by measuring NAD(P)H- and FAD-autofluorescence, the mitochondrial membrane potential, and the adenine nucleotide content of isolated pancreatic islets and beta cells. 100 μM of moxifloxacin abolished the NAD(P)H increase elicited by 20mM glucose, while gatifloxacin diminished it and ciprofloxacin had no significant effect. This pattern was also seen with islets from SUR1 Ko mice, which have no functional KATP channels. Moxifloxacin also diminished the glucose-induced decrease of FAD-fluorescence, which reflects the intramitochondrial production of reducing equivalents. Moxifloxacin, but not ciprofloxacin or gatifloxacin significantly reduced the effect of 20mM glucose on the ATP/ADP ratio. The mitochondrial hyperpolarization caused by 20mM glucose was partially antagonized by moxifloxacin, but not by ciprofloxacin or gatifloxacin. Ultrastructural analyses after 20 h tissue culture showed that all three compounds (at 10 and 100 μM) diminished the number of insulin secretory granules and that gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, but not moxifloxacin induced fission/fusion configurations of the beta cell mitochondria. In conclusion, fluoroquinolones affect the function of the mitochondria in pancreatic beta cells which may diminish the insulinotropic effect of KATP channel closure and contribute to the hyperglycaemic episodes.

Challenges in the development of drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis

Tuberculosis infection is a serious human health threat and the early 21st century has seen a remarkable increase in global tuberculosis activity. The pathogen responsible for tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which adopts diverse strategies in order to survive in a variety of host lesions. These survival mechanisms make the pathogen resistant to currently available drugs, a major contributing factor in the failure to control the spread of tuberculosis. Multiple drugs are available for clinical use and several potential compounds are being screened, synthesized, or evaluated in preclinical or clinical studies. Lasting and effective achievements in the development of anti-tuberculosis drugs will depend largely on the proper understanding of the complex interactions between the pathogen and its human host. Ample evidence exists to explain the characteristics of tuberculosis. In this study, we highlighted the challenges for the development of novel drugs with potent bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity, which reduce the minimum time required to cure tuberculosis infection.

Moxifloxacin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections

Moxifloxacin is a recent addition to the fluoroquinolone class, differing from ciprofloxacin and other older agents in having much better in vitro activity against Gram-positive aerobes while retaining potent activity against Gram-negative aerobes. It is also active against the pathogens of human and animal bite wounds and those species of atypical mycobacteria associated with dermatologic infections. Its activity against anaerobes is quite variable. Moxifloxacin penetrates well into inflammatory blister fluid and muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissues. Moxifloxacin should thus be a reasonable option for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs). In 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), oral moxifloxacin was as effective as cephalexin in the treatment of uncomplicated SSSIs in adults while in 2 RCTs, intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was as effective as intravenous/oral β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor therapy in the treatment of complicated SSSIs in adults. Moxifloxacin does not inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes and thus interact with warfarin or methylxanthines. However, multivalent cations can reduce its oral bioavailability substantially. Dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of renal or hepatic impairment. The clinical relevance of its electrophysiologic effects (QT_c prolongation) remains unresolved.

Drugs in development for tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) drug research and development efforts have resurged in the past 10 years to meet urgent medical needs, but enormous challenges remain. These urgent needs are largely driven by the current long and arduous multidrug regimens, which have significant safety, tolerability and compliance issues; rising and disturbing rates of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant TB; the existence of approximately 2 billion individuals already latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative pathogen of TB; and a global TB-HIV co-epidemic. Stakeholders in TB drug development are moving to enable and streamline development and registration of novel, multidrug treatment regimens, comprised of multiple new chemical entities with novel mechanisms of action that do not demonstrate cross-resistance to current first- and second-line TB drugs. Ideally, these new regimens will ultimately provide a short, simple treatment suitable for essentially all TB patients, whether sensitive or resistant to the current anti-TB agents, whether HIV-positive or -negative, and irrespective of patient age. This article reviews the challenges faced by those trying to develop these novel regimens and the key agents currently in clinical testing for TB; the latter are organized for discussion into three categories: (i) novel drugs (TMC207, SQ109, sudoterb [LL3858]); (ii) present first-line TB drugs being re-evaluated to optimize their efficacy (rifampicin, rifapentine); and (iii) currently licensed drugs for other indications and 'next-generation' compounds of the same chemical class being repurposed for TB (gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin; linezolid, PNU100480 and AZD5847; metronidazole, OPC-67683 and PA-824).

Drug-induced endocrine disorders in the intensive care unit

The neuroendocrine response to critical illness is key to the maintenance of homeostasis. Many of the drugs administered routinely in the intensive care unit significantly impact the neuroendocrine system. These agents can disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, cause thyroid abnormalities, and result in dysglycemia. Herein, we review major drug-induced endocrine disorders and highlight some of the controversies that remain in this area. We also discuss some of the more rare drug-induced syndromes that have been described in the intensive care unit. Drugs that may result in an intensive care unit admission secondary to an endocrine-related adverse event are also included. Unfortunately, very few studies have systematically addressed drug-induced endocrine disorders in the critically ill. Timely identification and appropriate management of drug-induced endocrine adverse events may potentially improve outcomes in the critically ill. However, more research is needed to fully understand the impact of medications on endocrine function in the intensive care unit.

Safety profile of the fluoroquinolones: focus on levofloxacin

The fluoroquinolone class of antibacterial agents are among the most frequently prescribed drugs, with utility in a broad range of bacterial infections. Although very useful agents, the fluoroquinolones as a class are associated with a number of adverse events, some with considerable clinical significance. In the past 15-20 years, tolerability concerns have led to restrictions on the use of the fluoroquinolones and, in some instances, the withdrawal of agents from the market. This review focuses on the safety and tolerability of levofloxacin, a third-generation fluoroquinolone, relative to other fluoroquinolones. A literature search was performed of the MEDLINE database encompassing the dates 1980-2009, using as keywords the drug names levofloxacin and concurrently marketed fluoroquinolones combined with the words 'safety', 'adverse effect' or 'adverse drug reaction', or the name of the specific adverse effect. Adverse events commonly associated with the fluoroquinolones include gastrointestinal and CNS toxicity (most frequently headache and dizziness), as well as other adverse events including ECG abnormalities (for example QT interval prolongation), disrupted glucose metabolism, phototoxicity, tendon and joint disorders, hypersensitivity and skin disorders, and hepatic toxicity. Package inserts for the fluoroquinolones in Europe and the US contain warnings regarding these risks. US package inserts also carry 'black-box' warnings regarding the risk of tendon rupture and joint disorders with these agents; however, there is a substantial body of evidence to indicate that there are marked differences in the tolerability profiles of the individual agents within the fluoroquinolone class. These differences may be explained, at least in part, by structural differences: all fluoroquinolones share a basic quinolone core, with differences in specific side chains underlying the adverse event relationships. Furthermore, many of the fluoroquinolone-associated adverse effects and toxicities occur more frequently in patients with pre-existing risk factors, or in certain subpopulations. Notably, package inserts for the fluoroquinolones carry warnings regarding use in the elderly, paediatric patients and patients with pre-existing, or factors predisposing to, seizure disorders. Because of this, many adverse reactions with these agents could be prevented by improving patient screening and education. The recent withdrawal of gatifloxacin due to dysglycaemia makes it timely to review the safety and tolerability of the individual agents in this class. Overall, it appears that levofloxacin is relatively well tolerated, with low rates of clinically important adverse events such as CNS toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity and dysglycaemia.

Moxifloxacin: update and perspectives after 8 years of usage

Moxifloxacin has a broad spectrum of activity, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, atypical respiratory pathogens, anaerobes and penicillin- and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. It achieves good tissue penetration and high concentrations in clinically relevant tissues and fluids. It is available in both an oral and intravenous formulation, has a once-daily administration and a good tolerance and safety profile. Moxifloxacin is used mainly for the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial sinusitis, complicated skin and skin-structure infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections, as well as pulmonary TB, although it is not approved in this indication. The most recent studies covering these clinical indications are discussed.

Moxifloxacin induced fatal hepatotoxicity in a 72-year-old man: a case report

Moxifloxacin is a newer-generation synthetic fluoroquinolone that is used for treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community acquired pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections and skin/skin structure infections. We describe a case of fatal hepatotoxicity caused by Moxifloxacin in a 72-year-old man. He presented with jaundice and epigastric tenderness that started one week after being treated for acute exacerbation of his chronic bronchitis with Moxifloxacin by his primary care physician. He was admitted to intensive care unit for close monitoring. His labs showed marked elevation in liver enzymes and bilirubin. His condition continued to deteriorate in intensive care unit despite supportive care. Acute hepatic failure which resulted in his death was attributed to idiosyncratic reaction to Moxifloxacin.

Substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis

RATIONALE

Moxifloxacin has potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro and in a mouse model of antituberculosis (TB) chemotherapy, but data regarding its activity in humans are limited.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare the antimicrobial activity and safety of moxifloxacin versus isoniazid during the first 8 weeks of combination therapy for pulmonary TB.

METHODS

Adults with sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB were randomly assigned to receive either moxifloxacin 400 mg plus isoniazid placebo, or isoniazid 300 mg plus moxifloxacin placebo, administered 5 days/week for 8 weeks, in addition to rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. All doses were directly observed. Sputum was collected for culture every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was negative sputum culture at completion of 8 weeks of treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 433 participants enrolled, 328 were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis. Of these, 35 (11%) were HIV positive, 248 (76%) had cavitation on baseline chest radiograph, and 213 (65%) were enrolled at African sites. Negative cultures at Week 8 were observed in 90/164 (54.9%) participants in the isoniazid arm, and 99/164 (60.4%) in the moxifloxacin arm (P = 0.37). In multivariate analysis, cavitation and enrollment at an African site were associated with lower likelihood of Week-8 culture negativity. The proportion of participants who discontinued assigned treatment was 31/214 (14.5%) for the moxifloxacin group versus 22/205 (10.7%) for the isoniazid group (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.81, 2.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid resulted in a small but statistically nonsignificant increase in Week-8 culture negativity.

Prevalence of and risk factors for dysglycemia in patients receiving gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in an outpatient setting

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of dysglycemia (hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia) associated with oral levofloxacin and gatifloxacin therapy in an outpatient setting, and to determine the characteristics of patients who developed dysglycemia while receiving either fluoroquinolone.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of a Veterans Affairs teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 1573 patients who received oral levofloxacin (343 patients), gatifloxacin (589 patients), or azithromycin (as a control, 641 patients) between June 1, 2004, and May 31, 2006.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Dysglycemia occurred in 33 patients: 13 (2.2%), 9 (2.6%), and 11 (1.7%), respectively, of those in the gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and azithromycin groups. Of 13 patients who experienced a hyperglycemic event, 11 (84.6%) had diabetes mellitus. After adjustment for confounding factors, neither levofloxacin nor gatifloxacin were associated with increased odds of developing a dysglycemic event compared with azithromycin. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lack of downward dosage adjustment based on creatinine clearance (odds ratio [OR] 10.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-27.6), presence of diabetes (OR 17.1, 95% CI 3.1-94.9), or treatment with insulin (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8-15.7) or sulfonylureas (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.4) independently increased dysglycemia risk. Obesity (body mass index > or = 30 kg/m(2)) was independently protective (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.55) against dysglycemic events.

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin and gatifloxacin were not significantly associated with increased dysglycemic events compared with azithromycin. Lack of downward fluoroquinolone dosage adjustment for renal function, presence of diabetes, and treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas each independently increased the risk of dysglycemia. Obesity was independently protective against dysglycemia. More data are needed on the contributing effects of diabetes, fluoroquinolone dosage, and concomitant drug therapy so that an appropriate risk-management strategy can be developed.

An evaluation of the effects of gatifloxacin on glucose homeostasis

INTRODUCTION

The United States labeling for gatifloxacin has been updated to include contradictions related to its reported association with dysglycemia. However, adequately controlled studies in acute care settings assessing the magnitude and clinical determinants of dysglycemia are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic effects of gatifloxacin with ceftriaxone in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adult (> or =18 years) patients admitted with Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) or Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis (AECB) in a US tertiary care hospital between 7/1/01 and 12/31/04 treated with gatifloxacin or ceftriaxone during hospital admission. Outcomes of interests were incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels <46 mg/dL) or hyperglycemia (>200 mg/dL) during up to 5 days of drug exposure. Risks for gatifloxacin and ceftriaxone were compared adjusting for variables previously reported to be independent predictors of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

1504 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Compared to ceftriaxone, gatifloxacin was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia: (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.0). The increased risk of hypoglycemia during exposure to gatifloxacin was similar in patients with and without a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Gatifloxacin was not associated with an increased risk for hyperglycemia (adjusted OR: 1.06 95% CI 0.8-1.4) considering the whole study cohort. However, stratification by diagnosis of diabetes, gatifloxacin treated patients appeared to have a reduced risk of hyperglycemia (adjusted OR: 0.4 95% CI 0.2-0.4) while non-diabetic gatifloxacin treated patients appeared to have an increased risk of hyperglycemia (adjusted OR: 1.64 95% CI 1.1-2.4).

CONCLUSION

The risk of dysglycemia with gatifloxacin in this population of hospitalized patients was not as high as previously reported in ambulatory patients. Although these results suggest gatifloxacin use is safer in acute care settings, we recommend that clinicians monitor blood glucose levels carefully or consider alternatives to gatifloxacin therapy whenever possible.

The safety profile of moxifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in special patient populations

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, represent a major advance in the development of antimicrobial agents. They offer significant activity against Gram-negative pathogens, while more advanced generation fluoroquinolones including levofloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin are significantly active against Gram-positive (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae for some members of the class), typical, atypical, and anaerobic pathogens. Fluoroquinolones have a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile that exhibits concentration-dependent killing and good oral absorption, allowing for once-daily dosing.

OBJECTIVE

Review of data from fluoroquinolone studies, with an emphasis on the associated rare, but potentially clinically important, adverse events in specific patient populations. Review of clinical efficacy is included where relevant to the topic under discussion.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using terms including fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, safety, adverse events, drug interactions, and pharmacokinetic parameters to identify literature providing information regarding the safety profile of specified fluoroquinolones in special patient populations (i.e., the elderly, patients with liver disease, kidney disease, glycemic disorder, those at risk for cardiovascular events). Although specific date criteria were not applied to the search, preference was given to more recent publications. Online databases searched include MEDLINE and EMBASE and relevant textbooks were utilized as well.

FINDINGS

Fluoroquinolones, when used either as monotherapy or as combination therapy depending on their individual indications, attain adequate concentrations for treating infections in different target sites, including epithelial lining fluid, alveolar macrophages, skin, and gastrointestinal tissues. Overall, fluoroquinolones have predictable and mild-to-moderate adverse-event profiles and are generally well tolerated. Findings of this review are limited by the availability of publications and case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones, are associated with rare, but clinically important, adverse events in special patient populations (including the elderly; those with hepatic, renal, or glycemic disorders; and those at risk for cardiovascular events). Recognition of differences in the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of fluoroquinolones in special patient populations should lead to better antimicrobial agent selection.

Antimicrobial safety: focus on fluoroquinolones

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Infrequent toxicities associated with certain drugs and drug classes have recently gained much attention from different health-care perspectives. To protect the patient, continued surveillance of safety and tolerability data is essential. Data from preclinical testing, phase 1-3 trials, and postmarketing surveillance may be used to objectively assess the risks associated with a specific drug or family of compounds. This review summarizes safety and tolerability data for the quinolones.

MAIN FINDINGS

The most common adverse events associated with the quinolone class involve the gastrointestinal tract (nausea and diarrhea) and central nervous system (CNS) (headache and dizziness). These adverse events are usually mild and do not require discontinuation of therapy. Uncommon and potentially serious quinolone-related adverse events involve the cardiovascular system (rate-corrected electrocardiographic QT interval prolongation), musculoskeletal system (tendinitis and tendon rupture), endocrine system (glucose homeostasis dysregulation), renal system (crystalluria, interstitial nephritis, and acute renal failure), and the CNS (seizures). Severe idiosyncratic adverse events are specific to individual agents that may share some structural congruity, such as the 1-(2,4)-difluorophenyl group shared by trovafloxacin (associated with hepatitis), temafloxacin (associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome), and tosufloxacin (associated with eosinophilic pneumonitis). Overall, discontinuation rates from clinical trials were <4% for the currently marketed quinolones. Quinolones with higher discontinuation rates, such as trovafloxacin (7.0%) and grepafloxacin (6.4%), are no longer available for general use.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently marketed quinolones are well tolerated, with safety profiles similar to those of other antimicrobial classes. Although adverse effects are unusual, some, including tendinitis and CNS-related effects, are more common with quinolones than with other antimicrobial classes. Rare adverse effects attributed to some members of the quinolone family (e.g., Torsades de Pointes, hepatotoxicity, and dysglycemias) are more likely to occur in select "susceptible" populations. These adverse events can often be circumvented by avoiding exposure to the specific quinolone. In some cases, the therapeutic value offered by a quinolone may outweigh its potential risks.

[Clinically significant toxicity and tolerance of the main antibiotics used in lower respiratory tract infections]

The purpose of this article was not to review all reported adverse reactions of antibiotics used in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections but rather to focus either on those which might have an impact on observance, efficacy, and resistance, or on rare but life-threatening adverse effects such as torsade de pointe. The latter are mostly predictable and prescribers should adhere to precautions and contraindications. For new antibiotics, the number of patients enrolled in phase I to III clinical trials is far to small to detect such rare adverse effects and large post registration tolerance surveys are mandatory. ss-lactams are well tolerated. The risk of anaphylactic reaction is magnified by patient reports and can be reduced by skin testing. Macrolides are well tolerated as well. The risk of cardiac toxicity should be reduced by assessing individual susceptibility and avoiding drug interactions. The tolerance to telithromycin, a new ketolide, is similar to that of macrolides. Serious toxic reactions such as convulsions, tendon rupture, torsade de pointe, and hypoglycemia are associated with the use of fluoroquinolones. Most of these adverse reactions can be often circumvented by avoiding exposure patients at risk. Quinupristin/dalfopristin can induce arthralgia and myalgia and the major adverse effects of linezolid are IMAO like reactions, reversible myelosuppression, and peripheral neuropathy. Most of the adverse antibiotic reactions are reported when precautions of use in susceptible patients are not taken into account. When they are, the safety/risk ratio is good.

Hypoglycemia in Inpatients After Gatifloxacin or Levofloxacin Therapy: Nested Case-Control Study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of hypoglycemic events in patients exposed to gatifloxacin or levofloxacin, and to measure the odds of experiencing a hypoglycemic event after receiving gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin while adjusting for confounders.

DESIGN

Nested case-control study within a historical cohort.

SETTING

A tertiary care, 730-bed, teaching hospital in central Illinois.

PATIENTS

Seven thousand two hundred eighty-seven hospitalized patients who received gatifloxacin or levofloxacin therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 113 patients (case patients) had blood glucose levels below 51 mg/dl; 113 control patients, matched for age and sex, had no hypoglycemia. Matched conditional logistic regression models adjusted the odds of having hypoglycemia for significant covariates. The 12-month incidence of hypoglycemia was 11/1000 patients after levofloxacin administration and 21/1000 patients after gatifloxacin (absolute risk increase 10/1000 patients, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4-16/1000). Renal failure, sepsis syndrome, and concomitant hypoglycemic drug therapy significantly predicted hypoglycemia. After adjustment for significant predictors, the odds of having hypoglycemia were 2.81 (95% CI 1.02-7.70) times higher after gatifloxacin than levofloxacin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Among inpatients, the incidence of hypoglycemic events is greater after treatment with gatifloxacin than levofloxacin. The odds of experiencing hypoglycemic events are greater with gatifloxacin even after adjusting for other hypoglycemia risk factors, such as concomitant hypoglycemic drugs, renal failure, and sepsis syndrome.

Retrospective analysis of the safety profile of oral moxifloxacin in elderly patients enrolled in clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As aging is associated with physiological changes, including renal and hepatic insufficiency, and a higher risk of drug interactions, special attention needs to be directed towards the safety of medications in the elderly. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety of oral moxifloxacin in elderly patients who were enrolled in clinical trials and to compare these results to those of other commonly used antibacterials.

METHODS

Safety data from 27 prospective, randomised, comparative phase II/III trials of oral moxifloxacin included in the Bayer clinical trial database were pooled and analysed by age group (<65 years of age, 65-74 years of age, > or = 75 years of age) and by treatment group (moxifloxacin vs comparator). The primary endpoints included rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (all adverse events regardless of causality), drug-related adverse events, drug-related serious adverse events, deaths and premature discontinuations because of a treatment-emergent adverse event. A treatment by age group interaction test was used to determine if the comparison between moxifloxacin and the comparator group in the incidence rates of any treatment-emergent or drug-related adverse events were affected by increasing age.

RESULTS

Of the 12 231 patients who had valid safety data, 6270 had been treated with oral moxifloxacin and 5961 with a comparator antibacterial. The most frequently used comparators were cefuroxime and clarithromycin. Most patients (n = 9671) were <65 years of age (4939 moxifloxacin, 4732 comparator); 1636 patients were 65-74 years of age (842 moxifloxacin, 794 comparator); and 924 patients were > or = 75 years of age (489 moxifloxacin, 435 comparator). The treatment by age group interaction test revealed that the comparison of drug-related adverse event rates between the moxifloxacin and comparator group were not affected by increasing age (p = 0.43). Rates of premature termination between the moxifloxacin and comparator treatment groups also did not increase with age (p = 0.552). No arrhythmias related to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation were reported following oral moxifloxacin or comparator treatment in this large group of young and elderly patients. Overall, the number of deaths was similar between the treatment groups (17 moxifloxacin, 19 comparator).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-related adverse event rates associated with oral moxifloxacin or the comparator therapy used in these studies did not significantly increase with advancing age. This pooled analysis suggests that oral moxifloxacin can be safely used in elderly patients with characteristics consistent with those enrolled into the clinical trials.

Penetration of moxifloxacin into the human aqueous humour after oral administration

AIMS

To determine the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin, a new generation fluoroquinolone, in the anterior chamber of the human uninflamed eye.

METHODS

35 patients undergoing cataract surgery received two doses of 400 mg of oral moxifloxacin with a 12 hour interval and were divided into six groups. Moxifloxacin levels in aqueous humour and serum were determined by a microbiological agar well diffusion technique at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after the second dose in each group respectively.

RESULTS

Mean moxifloxacin levels in the anterior chamber were 1.20 (SD 0.35) microg/ml at the 2 hours group, 1.22 (0.48) microg/ml at the 4 hours group, 1.20 (0.45) microg/ml at the 6 hours group, 1.58 (0.38) microg/ml at the 8 hours group, 1.37 (0.44) microg/ml at the 10 hours group, and 1.23 (0.55) microg/ml at the 12 hours group. The mean ratio of aqueous to serum moxifloxacin level was 38%.

CONCLUSION

Moxifloxacin penetrates well into the anterior chamber of the human uninflamed eye after oral administration, reaching early significant levels, which are maintained for at least 12 hours and are much higher than the MIC(90) values of Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens commonly implicated in intraocular infections with the exceptions of fluoroquinolone resistant staphylococci, MRSA, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections

Moxifloxacin (Avelox) is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial with a methoxy group in the C-8 position and a bulky C-7 side chain. Moxifloxacin is approved for use in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (approved indications may differ between countries). Moxifloxacin has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, including activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. It achieves good tissue penetration and has a convenient once-daily administration schedule, as well as being available in both intravenous and oral formulations in some markets. Moxifloxacin has good efficacy in the treatment of patients with AECB, CAP, acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and is generally well tolerated. Thus, moxifloxacin is an important option in the treatment of bacterial infections.