Optimising therapy for insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus

Review: Combination treatment with insulin and oral agents in type 2 diabetes mellitus

The need to improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes has been reinforced by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Due to progressive deterioration of beta-cell function after diagnosis, oral hypoglycaemic agents often fail to maintain adequate glycaemic control after only a few years of treatment. This paper considers the treatment options available at this stage and reassures diabetologists that the combined use of insulin plus metformin with or without an added sulphonylurea is logical, is as effective as insulin alone, and provides superior weight regulation in many patients. A. combination of metformin with glargine insulin seems particularly effective and well tolerated. The long-term advantages of such treatments in terms of clinical outcomes have yet to be demonstrated in clinical trials.

Glucose-lowering effect of powder formulation of African black tea extract in KK-A(y)/TaJcl diabetic mouse

We observed the suppressive effect of a powder formulation of African black tea extract prepared from the leaves of Camellia sinensis on type 2 non-insulin dependent diabetic mice, KK-A(y)/TaJcl. Black tea extract significantly showed suppressive effect of the elevation of blood glucose on oral glucose tolerance test of 8 week-old KK-A(y)/TaJcl mice (P < 0.05). Long-term treatment with black tea extract showed significant suppression of post-prandial blood glucose and obesity (P < 0.05). The weight of the intestine of mice treated with black tea extract was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). From these results, African black tea used in this study showed a suppressive effect on the elevation of blood glucose during food intake and the body weight.

Exenatide: effect of injection time on postprandial glucose in patients with Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Exenatide is an incretin mimetic whose effect on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes is currently under investigation. This study assessed the effect of injection time relative to a standardized meal on postprandial pharmacodynamics of exenatide in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Eighteen patients participated in this single-centre, open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, six-way crossover study. Patients received subcutaneous injections of either placebo (-15 min) or 10 microg of exenatide at -60, -15, 0, +30 or +60 min relative to a standardized breakfast meal on six consecutive days. Serial blood samples were assayed for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations.

RESULTS

For all exenatide treatments, incremental postprandial glucose area under the postprandial plasma glucose curve from zero to 6 h (AUC0-6 h) was significantly reduced compared with placebo. When exenatide was administered before (-60, -15 min) or with the meal (0 min), peak postprandial glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (P < 0.0001 for all treatments) compared with placebo. Post-meal exenatide administration (+30, P < 0.05; +60 min, P = 0.21) resulted in smaller peak glucose reductions and in some patients transient low plasma glucose concentrations were reported. Peak plasma insulin concentrations in the pre-meal treatments were significantly lower than placebo (P < 0.05 for all treatments), while post-meal dosing groups exhibited a trend towards higher insulin peaks compared with placebo. The most common adverse events related to exenatide were headache, nausea, dyspepsia and vomiting, and were generally of mild-to-moderate intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, all exenatide treatments demonstrated reductions in postprandial plasma glucose excursions compared with placebo. Pre-meal and with meal administration of exenatide produced greater reduction of postprandial glucose excursions compared with post-meal administration. These data support flexible dosing of exenatide at any time within 60 min before a meal.

Combined thiazolidinedione-insulin therapy: should we be concerned about safety?

Thiazolidinediones, also called glitazones, are insulin sensitisers that act as agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma (PPARgamma). After the withdrawal of troglitazone due to hepatotoxicity, only pioglitazone and rosiglitazone can be used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as monotherapy or in combination with metformin or with sulphonylureas (or glinides). The combination of glitazones with insulin is also appealing, as it allows improvement of glycaemic control while decreasing the daily insulin requirement. Insulin dosage has to be adjusted regularly to avoid hypoglycaemic episodes. However, some concerns have been raised about such combined glitazone-insulin therapy because it may favour weight gain due to both enhanced adipogenesis and fluid retention. Such adverse effects are commonly observed in all diabetic individuals receiving glitazones, whatever the mode of use, but they appear to be exacerbated in insulin-treated patients. Body fat gain is a major drawback of treatment with adipogenic compounds such as glitazones. However, some evidence suggests that the fat is redistributed in a favourable direction, that is, from visceral to subcutaneous depots, although no long-term follow-up is yet available. An estimated 2-5% of patients receiving glitazone monotherapy and 5-15% receiving concomitant insulin therapy experience peripheral oedema. Some anecdotal cases of pulmonary oedema have also been reported, especially in insulin-treated patients, although the actual incidence of this complication is unknown. All glitazones increase the intravascular volume by approximately 6-7% in a dose-dependent manner. Rather than a direct effect on cardiac or renal function, fluid retention and tissue oedema seem to be part of a vascular 'leak' syndrome. Such a phenomenon may have greater consequences in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin because such patients are usually older, have had the disease long-term and have worse cardiac or renal function. Additionally, glitazones may potentiate the renal effects of insulin on sodium and water retention. Regardless of the mechanism, it is conceivable that additional fluid retention caused by glitazones may alter the already precarious volume status in patients with underlying cardiac or renal dysfunction, thus leading to oedema and congestive heart failure. Thus, it is prudent to either avoid glitazones or use them cautiously in individuals with impaired cardiac function. Further studies are clearly needed to define the mechanisms of fluid retention associated with glitazone use and to determine the safety of cautious use of these new insulin sensitisers in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

Current management strategies for coexisting diabetes mellitus and obesity

Besides genetic predisposition, obesity is the most important risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus. Weight reduction has been shown to markedly improve blood glucose control and vascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Therapeutic strategies for the obese diabetic patient include: (i) promoting weight loss, through lifestyle modifications (low-calorie diet and exercise) and antiobesity drugs (orlistat, sibutramine, etc.); (ii) improving blood glucose control, through agents decreasing insulin resistance (metformin or thiazolidinediones, e.g. pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) or insulin needs (alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, e.g. acarbose) in preference to agents stimulating defective insulin secretion (sulphonylureas, meglitinide analogues); and (iii) treating common associated risk factors, such as arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemias, to improve cardiovascular prognosis. Whenever insulin is required by the obese diabetic patient after failure to respond to oral drugs, it should be preferably prescribed in combination with an oral agent, more particularly metformin or acarbose, or possibly a thiazolidinedione. When morbid obesity is present, both restoring a good glycaemic control and correcting associated risk factors can only be obtained through a marked and sustained weight loss. This objective justifies more aggressive weight reduction programmes, including very-low-calorie diets and bariatric surgery, but only within a multidisciplinary approach and long-term strategy.