Twelve-month treatment of overactive bladder: efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine

Resource use and healthcare costs in patients with overactive bladder who initiate treatment with mirabegron or antimuscarinic monotherapy in Catalonia: the MIRACAT study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Overactive bladder (OAB) negatively impacts patient quality of life and may be associated with high resource use. Our aim was to describe the resource use, costs and persistence associated with mirabegron (MB) or antimuscarinic (AM) treatment in patients with OAB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational retrospective study of medical records in adult patients initiating OAB treatment with MB or AM in Catalonia. Healthcare resource use (visits, hospital stays, tests, medication, absorbent pads) in the first year after treatment initiation was collected. Associated costs were estimated (є, reference year 2019), as well as treatment persistence. Treatment discontinuation was defined as the absence of prescription for at least 45 days or treatment change.

RESULTS

The mean cost per patient (SD) was є 1,640.20 (є 1,227.60) with MB and є 2,159.20 (є 2,264.40) with AM; the associated healthcare resource use cost was lower with MB compared to AM, except for OAB drug costs. Persistence after 12 months of treatment initiation was higher in MB (42.1%) compared to AM (33.0%), as was the median time until treatment discontinuation: 299 (95% CI: 270-328) vs 240 days (95% CI: 230-250).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower healthcare resource use was observed with MB compared to AM in the first year of index treatment, resulting in a lower mean direct cost per patient and year, despite its higher acquisition cost. Increased treatment persistence, as well as rational use of available treatments improves OAB management and, in return, patients' quality of life.

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Efficacy Using the Nuro Percutaneous Tibial Neuromodulation System in Drug-Naïve Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes from baseline in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, urinary frequency and quality of life through 12 weeks of percutaneous tibial neuromodulation (PTNM) therapy using NURO in drug-naïve overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) subjects.

METHODS

Eligible subjects underwent 12 weekly PTNM sessions with the NURO system. Changes in voiding symptoms were evaluated with bladder diaries from baseline through 12 weeks. Analyses were conducted for subjects with data at baseline and follow-up visits (sessions 1, 4, 8, and 12). Safety was evaluated through adverse events (AE) related to the device, procedure, and therapy.

RESULTS

Of 154 subjects enrolled in the study,120 subjects met study criteria and received PTNM. The mean age was 64.8 years, mean duration of OAB diagnosis was 3.4 years and 86% female subjects. No subjects tried OAB medication prior to enrollment. At baseline, patients had 3.5 ± 2.5 (mean ± SD) UUI episodes/day. Statistically significant improvement in urgency urinary incontinence episodes from baseline was observed at each follow-up visit (P < .0001), with a reduction of 2.4 ± 2.1 episodes after session 12 from baseline. Subjects with urinary frequency at baseline had 11.5 ± 2.9 voids/day. After session 12, a statistically significant reduction of 1.7 ± 2.5 voids/day was observed (P < .0001). Ninety-six percent (116/120) of subjects completed the study with diary data for the primary objective with an average of 11.6 sessions. There were no serious or unanticipated AEs. The most common AEs were medical device site pain (3.3%, 4/121) and extremity pain (3.3%, 4/121).

CONCLUSION

PTNM using NURO is an effective and safe treatment for drug-naïve patients with OAB.

Persistence and compliance with medication management in the treatment of overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common and chronic condition that impacts patients' daily activities and quality of life. Pharmaco-therapy for OAB is a mainstay of treatment. Antimuscarinics and β3-adrenoceptor agonists are the two major classes of oral pharmacotherapy and have similar efficacy for treating the symptoms of OAB. Owing to the chronic nature of OAB, long-term use of medication is essential for OAB symptom control and positive health outcomes. However, many patients elect to stop their medications during the treatment period. Unmet expectations of treatment and side effects seem to be the major factors for discontinuing OAB pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, the short- and long-term persistence and compliance with medication management are markedly worse in OAB than in other chronic medical conditions. Improvement in persistence and compliance with OAB pharmacotherapy is a hot topic in OAB treatment and should be an important goal in the treatment of OAB. Effective strategies should be identified to improve persistence and compliance. In this review, we outline what is known about persistence and compliance and the factors affecting persistence with pharmacotherapy in patients with OAB.

Considering the prominent complaint as a guide in medical therapy for overactive bladder syndrome in women over 45 years

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of women over 45 years with overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity to a 12-week course of oxybutynin or tolterodine treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 301 eligible Iranian women were studied. In this double-blinded trial, data were analyzed from 3-day urinary diaries from before and after 12 weeks of treatment in which patients were randomly assigned to receive oxybutynin or tolterodine in recommended doses. Patients' convenience and the drugs' side-effects were assessed by a monthly clinical appointment. End-points were changed from baseline to week 12 in bladder-diary variables and all observed or reported adverse events. The effectiveness of each drug was studied using the paired t-test and improvement after treatment between the two groups was compared by independent t-test.

RESULTS

Mean improvements in the terms of urgency (P = 0.64) and urge incontinence (P = 0.75) showed an insignificantly larger score in patients who were treated by oxybutynin. Improvement in night-time urinary urgency and nocturia (41.2% and 54.3% vs 39.7% and 40.1% in oxybutynin vs tolterodine groups, respectively) were shown to be more improved by tolterodine in comparison to oxybutynin (P = 0.72 and 0.04 for night-time urinary urgency and nocturia, respectively). Discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events was not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxybutynin and tolterodine showed similar efficacy on daytime symptoms of overactive bladder and similar side-effects in perimenopausal patients. For patients with the chief complaint of nocturnal frequency, prescription of tolterodine is preferably suggested.

Cost effectiveness of fesoterodine and tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder with urge urinary incontinence in Spain and Finland

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder is a prevalent condition worldwide that is associated with a considerable burden, both on the patient and on society.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the economic value of fesoterodine compared with tolterodine extended release (ER) for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) with urge urinary incontinence (UUI) in Spain and Finland.

METHODS

A decision-tree economic model estimated the 52-week costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of OAB/UUI patients initiating treatment with fesoterodine 4 mg/day or tolterodine ER. Individuals were evaluated for treatment response (UUI fewer than one episode/day) and persistence at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Titration from fesoterodine 4 mg/day to 8 mg/day was permitted at week 4. At week 12, non-responders discontinued treatment permanently. Efficacy, discontinuation, and utility data were derived from four clinical trials of fesoterodine. OAB-related costs, including physician visits, laboratory tests, incontinence pads, and comorbidities (fracture, skin infection, urinary tract infections, depression, and nursing home) were also included.

RESULTS

A total of 19.5 % and 18.0 % of fesoterodine and tolterodine ER patients remained on treatment until week 52, respectively. QALYs were higher with fesoterodine than tolterodine ER (0.762 vs. 0.760). In Spain, fesoterodine treatment had higher total costs than (generic) tolterodine ER (€6,697 vs. 6,597), resulting in a cost of €15,633/QALY gained. In Finland, fesoterodine was cost saving relative to (non-generic) tolterodine ER (€7,885 vs. 8,024). Sensitivity analysis confirmed that these findings were robust to the expected price decrease for generic tolterodine ER in Finland.

CONCLUSION

Fesoterodine is cost effective or cost saving relative to tolterodine ER for the treatment of OAB with UUI in two European countries. Payers and prescribers should consider a broad scope of costs to make informed cost-conscious choices of antimuscarinic treatment.

Darifenacin for the treatment of overactive bladder

Overactive bladder is a debilitating disorder affecting 16.5% of adults and increasing in prevalence with age. Symptoms, including urgency, urge incontinence and frequency can result from detrusor overactivity with contraction of the bladder mediated primarily by activation of muscarinic M(3) receptors. Antimuscarinic agents are therefore an important approach to treating overactive bladder, but a lack of M(3) receptor subtype selectivity with these agents can generate a range of side effects that limits their effectiveness. This review describes an alternative approach to treating overactive bladder using the selective muscarinic M(3) receptor antagonist darifenacin. The M(3) receptor selectivity of darifenacin improves the symptoms of overactive bladder while reducing the potential for deleterious effects of non-M(3) muscarinic receptor antagonism in the brain or heart. The pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of darifenacin are summarized, and the its clinical efficacy and demonstrated safety profile are described.

Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a chronic condition that has an impact on patients' daily activities and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Anticholinergic therapy is often prescribed following insufficient results with behaviour modification alone; however, rates of treatment discontinuation are consistently high. This study systematically reviewed persistence and adherence data in patients with OAB treated with anticholinergic therapy. A search focused on the intersection of OAB, persistence/adherence, and anticholinergic therapy was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles published after 1998 were reviewed and selected for inclusion based on prespecified criteria. A total of 147 articles and two abstracts were included in the review. Results from 12-week clinical trials showed high rates of discontinuation, ranging from 4% to 31% and 5% to 20% in treatment and placebo groups, respectively. Unsurprisingly, rates of discontinuation found in medical claims studies were substantially higher, with 43% to 83% of patients discontinuing medication within the first 30 days and rates continuing to rise over time. Findings from medical claims studies also suggest that over half of patients never refill their initial prescription and that adherence levels tend to be low, with mean/median medication possession ratio (MPR) values ranging from 0.30 to 0.83. The low levels of persistence and adherence documented in this review reveal cause for concern about the balance between the efficacy and tolerability of anticholinergic agents. Strategies should be identified to increase persistence and adherence. New agents and non-pharmacologic alternatives with good efficacy and minimal side effects should be explored.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in men and women with overactive bladder symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine for men and women with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of data pooled from two open-label extensions (NCT00220402, NCT00220376) of double-blind studies. All subjects began open-label treatment with fesoterodine 8 mg once daily, with voluntary dose reduction to 4 mg and re-escalation to 8 mg each permitted once annually. Maximum allowable duration of open-label treatment ranged from 24 to 36 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety and discontinuations were assessed throughout treatment; subject-reported treatment tolerability and 3-day bladder diaries were evaluated at open-label baseline and months 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24.

RESULTS

A total of 185 men and 705 women enrolled; 83 men (45%) and 356 women (50%) continued open-label treatment for ≥ 24 months. Most men (84%) and women (75%) remained on fesoterodine 8 mg throughout open-label treatment. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. Dry mouth was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (men, 24%; women, 32%), rates of discontinuation due to dry mouth were low (men, 1%; women, 2%). Most men and women (≥ 91%) reported at least 'good' tolerance. For men and women, statistically significant improvements in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, micturitions, urgency episodes, and mean voided volume per micturition achieved between double-blind baseline and open-label baseline were sustained or further improved through month 24; significant improvements in most OAB symptoms were observed between double-blind baseline and month 24 when subjects were stratified by double-blind treatment (placebo, tolterodine extended release 4 mg, fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg). Limitations include the lack of a placebo control and that subjects completing double-blind treatment may have been more likely to tolerate or respond to long-term fesoterodine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term fesoterodine treatment was well tolerated and associated with sustained improvements in OAB symptoms in men and women.

Trospium chloride once-daily extended release is efficacious and tolerated in elderly subjects (aged ≥ 75 years) with overactive bladder syndrome

OBJECTIVE

• To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily trospium chloride extended release (ER) in overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) in subjects aged ≥ 75 years.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

• The analysis included subjects ≥ 75 years of age with OAB. • A subgroup analysis of pooled data was performed for subjects aged ≥ 75 years from two randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies of subjects with OAB receiving once-daily trospium 60 mg extended release (ER) or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by 9-month open-label extension periods during which all subjects received trospium ER. A total of 143 of the 1165 subjects from two phase III registration trials who were aged ≥ 75 years (85 trospium ER, 58 placebo; mean age 79 years and ranging up to 90 years; 73% female) were evaluated. • Dual primary efficacy variables were the changes from baseline in the average number of toilet voids per day and urge urinary incontinence episodes per day.

RESULTS

• At week 12 of the double-blind period, trospium ER produced greater improvements from baseline than placebo in voiding diary parameters, OAB Patient Global Assessment, and quality of life. • Efficacy and tolerability persisted among subjects receiving open-label trospium ER for up to 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

• Once-daily trospium chloride 60 mg ER demonstrated efficacy vs placebo and was tolerated in subjects aged ≥ 75 years with OAB. • For subjects who continued into the open-label treatment period, efficacy and tolerability were observed for up to 1 year.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of solifenacin

The succinate salt of solifenacin, a tertiary amine with anticholinergic properties, is used for symptomatic treatment of overactive bladder. Solifenacin peak plasma concentrations of 24.0 and 40.6 ng/mL are reached 3-8 hours after long-term oral administration of a 5 or 10 mg solifenacin dose, respectively. Studies in healthy adults have shown that the drug has high absolute bioavailability of about 90%, which does not decrease with concomitant food intake. Solifenacin has an apparent volume of distribution of 600 L, is 93-96% plasma protein bound, and probably crosses the blood-brain barrier. Solifenacin is eliminated mainly through hepatic metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, with about only 7% (3-13%) of the dose being excreted unchanged in the urine. Solifenacin metabolites are unlikely to contribute to clinical solifenacin effects. In healthy adults, total clearance of solifenacin amounts to 7-14 L/h. The terminal elimination half-life ranges from 33 to 85 hours, permitting once-daily administration. Urinary excretion plays a minor role in the elimination of solifenacin, resulting in renal clearance of 0.67-1.51 L/h. Solifenacin does not influence the activity of CYP1A1/2, 2C9, 2D6 and 3A4, and shows a weak inhibitory potential for CYP2C19 and P-glycoprotein in vitro; however, clinical drug-drug interactions with CYP2C19 and P-glycoprotein substrates are very unlikely. Exposure to solifenacin is increased about 1.2-fold in elderly subjects and about 2-fold in subjects with moderate hepatic and severe renal impairment, as well as by coadministration of the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole 200 mg/day. The full therapeutic effects of solifenacin occur after 2-4 weeks of treatment and are maintained upon long-term therapy. Although solifenacin pharmacokinetics display linearity at doses of 5-40 mg, no obvious dose dependency was observed in efficacy and tolerability studies. The efficacy of solifenacin (5 or 10 mg/day) is at least equal to that of extended-release (ER) tolterodine (4 mg/day) in reducing the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours and urgency episodes, and in increasing the volume voided per micturition. Solifenacin (5 mg/day) appears to be superior to ER tolterodine (4 mg/day) in reducing incontinence episodes (mean -1.30 vs -0.90, p = 0.018) and is superior to propiverine (20 mg/day) at the dose of 10 mg/day in reducing urgency (-2.30 vs -2.78, p = 0.012) and nocturia episodes. Based on withdrawal rates due to adverse effects during the 52-week treatment period, solifenacin appears to have better tolerability than immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin 10-15 mg/day and IR tolterodine 4 mg/day. With regard to the pharmacokinetics of solifenacin, and for safety reasons, doses exceeding 5 mg/day are not recommended for patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7-9), patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) and subjects undergoing concomitant therapy with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

A review of adherence to drug therapy in patients with overactive bladder

Drug therapy for overactive bladder (OAB) is associated with improvements in symptoms and quality of life, but the short- and long-term adherence and persistence is suboptimal. In this review we outline methods of measuring, and factors affecting, adherence to pharmacotherapy in patients with OAB. Clinical practice suggests that adherence rates reported in clinical trials are much greater than in real practice. Factors affecting adherence include psychological and social variables that might alter patients' perception of the benefits of taking medication, and the effect of comorbidity and polypharmacy. Whilst there is some evidence that lack of efficacy and side-effects are contributory, these additional factors are also important.

Survey assessment of continuation of and satisfaction with pharmacological treatment for urinary incontinence

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment satisfaction and compliance with pharmacologic therapy in urinary incontinence patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was returned by 1447 individuals from a nationwide panel of adults who had previously reported treatment for incontinence symptoms and agreed to participate in survey research. Data on demographics, incontinence severity, treatment compliance, and satisfaction were obtained. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for characteristics associated with pharmacologic treatment dissatisfaction and discontinuation.

RESULTS

The sample was predominantly female (87%) and white (93%) with a mean age of 56 years. On average, patients urinated 10 times/day and experienced 16 wetting accidents in the week preceding survey. Overall, 25% reported being somewhat or very dissatisfied with treatment. Those who reported a severe effect of incontinence on their lives were most likely to be dissatisfied (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.89-4.23). Discontinuation of drug treatment was reported by 45% of study subjects, with major reasons being poor efficacy (in 41.3% of discontinuations), side effects (22.4%), and cost (18.7%). Predictors for discontinuation included young age (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2-2.8), experiencing symptoms for 10 or more years (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0), and experiencing more than 16 wetting accidents in the last week (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3-2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

This online survey of self-selected incontinence patients indicated that almost half of those who have received drug treatment for incontinence had discontinued primarily because of lack of efficacy, side effects, and cost concerns. Our findings suggest a substantial degree of unmet need from current therapy among those with incontinence.

Long-term darifenacin treatment for overactive bladder in patients aged 65 years and older: analysis of results from a 2-year, open-label extension study

OBJECTIVES

This analysis evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of darifenacin, a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist, in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in patients > or = 65 years of age.

METHODS

Patients who completed one of two 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, feeder studies received once-daily (o.d.) treatment with darifenacin 7.5 mg for the first 2 weeks of the 2-year, open-label extension study. The dose could be subsequently adjusted (7.5 or 15 mg o.d.) according to need. Safety and tolerability were assessed, and efficacy variables/endpoints were evaluated from patient diary data.

RESULTS

214 patients (65-89 years) entered and 137 (64.0%) completed the 2-year extension study, amounting to 308 patient-years' drug exposure. Darifenacin was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. The most common adverse events (AEs) were dry mouth and constipation, which infrequently resulted in discontinuation (2.3% and 4.2%, respectively). Darifenacin produced significant improvements in OAB symptoms that were maintained over the 2-year period (median reduction from feeder-study baseline to 2 years: -11.0 [-83.7%] for incontinence episodes/week and -1.2 [-12.4%] for micturitions/day, both p < 0.05), with 44.4% patients achieving > or = 90% reduction in incontinence episodes at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Darifenacin demonstrated good tolerability and safety in older patients with OAB. The improvement in OAB symptoms was sustained throughout the 2-year extension, resulting in high treatment persistence rates. Results were comparable with those in the overall OAB population from this study, indicating that darifenacin treatment is effective and well tolerated irrespective of age.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of various antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

A decision-analysis model was developed and included clinical outcomes (i.e., therapy continued or discontinued, treatment success or failure, OAB-induced comorbidities) and costs for drugs and treatment of OAB-induced comorbidities (i.e., urinary tract infections, fractures, depression, and skin infections). Treatment success was defined as complete continence. A systematic MEDLINE literature search from January 1990-January 2006 identified English-language articles concerning the eight antimuscarinic drugs: darifenacin, solifenacin, trospium, immediate-release oxybutynin, extended-release oxybutynin, transdermal oxybutynin, immediate-release tolterodine, and extended-release tolterodine. Probabilities and cost data for these drugs were retrieved from the literature, and drug costs were based on 2005 average wholesale prices. The analysis was constructed from a payer's perspective. The time frame for the model was 3 months.

RESULTS

Expected costs for each patient with OAB ranged from $3373 when treated with solifenacin to $3769 when treated with immediate-release oxybutynin. The average cost/patient with continued and successful treatment was lowest for solifenacin ($6863). Solifenacin dominated all other antimuscarinic agents because they were associated with high costs and low effectiveness. Success rates were the key parameters driving the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

Among various antimuscarinic agents, solifenacin 5 mg had the lowest costs and highest effectiveness in the treatment of OAB.

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin succinate with or without previous use of trospium chloride

Overactive bladder syndrome (OBS) is described as urinary urgency with or without incontinence, usually with increased daytime frequency and nocturia in the absence of another identifiable pathological process. Nowadays and despite other alternative therapies, the mainstay of OBS is still the pharmacological approach, mainly with anti-muscarinic drugs. To compare the efficacy of a 30-day solifenacin succinate (5 mg OD) treatment with or without previous medication with trospium chloride, a prostective open, two-arm, parallel group study was conducted for 5 weeks in 40 patients with OBS. The primary endpoint was patient self-assessment of improvement after 30 days of medication. Secondary endpoints included the reduction of the daily number of voids and urgency or involuntary leakage episodes. Adverse reactions and therapeutic stoppage were also evaluated. To be included in the trospium chloride treatment group, patients were required to have been treated with such drug for 1 to 6 months before the present study. Evaluation and efficacy assessment were accomplished using a 3-day bladder diary and an urgency severity scale (USS). Safety assessment was done by recording all the patients' complaints after starting medication. A total of 40 patients were enrolled for this study, 19 without previous medication and 21 who had already tried trospium chloride. Two patients from the non-previous medication group were excluded. Globally, there was a statistically significant reduction for the USS (2.73-->1.73), the daily number of voids (9.5-->7.0), of urgency episodes (9.1-->4.0) and of involuntary leakage episodes (3.6-->1.0) over the 24 h. Six patients had no improvement, four from the previous trospium chloride group and two from the non-previous medication group. Three patients reported side effects, two cases of dry mouth and one case of constipation. One patient dropped out of the treatment due to an unspecified intolerance. Solifenacin succinate 5 mg seems to be effective concerning patients' self-assessment of improvement and decrease in the mean number of daily voids, urgency episodes and incontinence episodes. This was reported both in patients who have already been medicated with trospium chloride and those who have never taken any kind of medication. Regarding side effects, solifenacin is quite well-tolerated in both groups.

Solifenacin succinate for the treatment of symptoms of overactive bladder

BACKGROUND

Overactivity of the bladder detrusor muscle can result in urinary urgency, frequency, and incontinence. Antimuscarinic agents are the treatment of choice, as they reduce the contractility of this muscle. Solifenacin succinate (SOL) is a competitive muscarinic-receptor antagonist approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in late 2004 for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence, urgency, and urinary frequency.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the current primary literature concerning the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of SOL in the treatment of OAB.

METHODS

Pertinent English-language articles were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-week 4, 2006), EMBASE (1991-first quarter of 2006), Current Contents/Clinical Medicine (week 10, 2005-week 9, 2006), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MICROMEDEX Healthcare Series, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-present). The search terms were overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, solifenacin, YM905, pharmacokinetics, and cost.

RESULTS

SOL is highly lipophilic (50:1 octanol:water distribution at pH 7.0), completely orally bioavailable, and 98% protein bound. It is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A isozyme, and approximately 50% of a dose is eliminated renally as parent compound, with 1 active and 3 inactive metabolites. In two 12-week Phase III studies, patients receiving SOL 5 or 10 mg had significant reductions compared with placebo in the numbers of voids (P < or = 0.01), incontinence episodes (P < or = 0.05), and urgency episodes (P < or = 0.01) per 24 hours; the volume voided per micturition was significantly increased (P < or = 0.01). In a study that compared SOL 5 and 10 mg with tolterodine extended release 4 mg, both agents were associated with significant reductions in the number of voids per 24 hours (-2.45 and -2.24 episodes, respectively; P = 0.004 for noninferiority). In a study of pooled data from two 12-week studies, patients who received SOL 5 or 10 mg reported significant improvements in a number of quality-of-life domains (P < or = 0.05). In a pooled analysis of 4 studies, the most common adverse effects (occurring in > or =3% of any group) in patients receiving SOL 5 mg (n = 266) and 10 mg (n = 612) were dry mouth (10.9% and 27.1%, respectively), constipation (5.3% and 12.9%), and blurred vision (4.5% and 4.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the studies reviewed, SOL was effective in the treatment of OAB with urge incontinence. Adverse effects included dry mouth, constipation, and blurred vision. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of SOL in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

A meta-analysis comparing trials of antimuscarinic medications funded by industry or not

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a significant difference in outcomes of clinical trials funded by industry or not of antimuscarinic medications used to treat overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and detrusor overactivity (DOA).

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted from January 1966 to June 2003 to identify human clinical trials of oxybutynin and tolterodine published in English. Randomized controlled trials on subjects aged > or = 16 years who were being treated with oxybutynin or tolterodine for OAB symptoms or DOA; 24 studies were identified. The endpoints assessed were OAB symptoms or changes in uninhibited detrusor contractions on cystometrography. The outcome variables were dichotomized as 'improvement' or 'no improvement'. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each study based on data derived or extracted from tables and figures.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the outcomes trails funded by industry or not. Trials were then reviewed to determine their adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines for randomized trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials are important for clinicians when selecting medical therapies. In this analysis we found no difference in outcomes when comparing studies funded by industry or not for tolterodine and oxybutynin. The quality of all trials would be improved by close adherence to the CONSORT guidelines for randomized clinical trials.

Long-term treatment with darifenacin for overactive bladder: results of a 2-year, open-label extension study

OBJECTIVE

To examine, in a 2-year, non-comparative, open-label extension study, the safety, tolerability and efficacy of darifenacin controlled-release (CR) 7.5/15 mg once daily in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) who completed two 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 'feeder' studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients entering the extension received darifenacin 7.5 mg once daily for 2 weeks, after which a voluntary increase in dose to 15 mg was permitted. Thereafter, patients could adjust the dose (either 7.5 or 15 mg). Safety and tolerability were assessed from adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations. Efficacy was determined using various endpoints.

RESULTS

In all, 716 patients entered the extension (mean age 57.3 years; 85.1% women) and 475 (66.3%) completed it (1089.9 patient-years of exposure). Darifenacin was well tolerated with no significant safety concerns. The most commonly reported AEs were dry mouth and constipation (all-causality rates 23.3% and 20.9%, respectively), leading to discontinuation in 1.3% and 2.4% of patients, respectively. Constipation infrequently required intervention, and analysis of bowel-habit questionnaires revealed that the reporting of constipation was related to minor changes in bowel habit rather than true constipation. The efficacy of darifenacin was maintained, including significant improvements in the number of incontinence episodes/week (median change -84.4% at 2 years, P < 0.001 vs feeder-study baseline). After 2 years, > 40% of patients achieved a > or = 90% reduction in incontinence episodes/week.

CONCLUSION

In the first published 2-year, open-label study of a CR antimuscarinic agent, darifenacin 7.5/15 mg once daily had a favourable safety, tolerability and efficacy profile during the long-term treatment of OAB. As such, darifenacin represents a valuable therapeutic option for OAB.

Safety and Tolerability of Tolterodine for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Men With Bladder Outlet Obstruction

PURPOSE

Antimuscarinic therapy for men with OAB and BOO is perceived as a potential risk for urinary retention. Using pressure flow urodynamics, we evaluated the safety of tolterodine vs placebo in men with OAB and BOO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men (older than 40 years) with BOO and confirmed detrusor overactivity were randomized to tolterodine (2 mg twice daily in 149) or placebo (in 72) for 12 weeks. Primary end points were Qmax and pdetQmax.

RESULTS

Median treatment differences in Qmax (-0.7 ml per second, 95% CI -1.6 to 0.4) and pdetQmax (-7 cm H2O, 95% CI -3 to 11) were comparable. Tolterodine significantly reduced the BOOI vs placebo (-9 vs 0, p < 0.02). There were significant treatment differences in volume to first detrusor contraction (+59 ml, 95% CI 19-100) and maximum cystometric capacity (+67 ml, 95% CI 35-103), favoring tolterodine over placebo (p < 0.003). Change in PVR was significantly greater among patients treated with tolterodine (+25 ml) than placebo (0 ml, p < 0.004). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of adverse events. Urinary retention was reported by 1 patient treated with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolterodine did not adversely affect urinary function in men with OAB and BOO. Urinary flow rate was unaltered, and there was no evidence of clinically meaningful changes in voiding pressure and PVR or urinary retention. Tolterodine was well tolerated. These results suggest that antimuscarinics can be safely administered in men with BOO.

Overactive bladder

The overactive bladder is a common condition, which has significant effects on quality of life. The aetiology in most cases is unknown, and treatment outcomes have until recently been unsatisfactory. Management includes excluding pathology and implementing behavioural changes such as caffeine reduction, bladder and pelvic floor training, as well as antimuscarinic drug therapy. Compliance is often problematic, and this can be improved with some of the newer antimuscarinics with fewer side-effects, and a good therapist/patient relationship. In the majority of cases this 'treatment package' is successful, but in those where it is not, intravesical therapies have been introduced, e.g. neuromodulation, alternative drug therapies (e.g. vanilloids, botox) and surgery. With a better understanding of the aetiology and identification of risk factors better outcomes from treatment are likely.

Persistence with antimuscarinic therapy in patients with overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition, which impacts patients' health and quality of life. The primary symptoms of OAB are distressing and may interfere with work, psychosocial and sexual functioning. OAB also is associated with increased risk of urinary tract infections, fractures from falls, skin infections and depression. Patient's concerns about the effects of incontinence on lifestyle highlight the need to restore continence. The mainstay of treatment is antimuscarinic drug therapy, which may often produce only modest reductions in OAB symptoms and may be accompanied by bothersome adverse effects, leading to poor adherence to prescribed medications. Successful treatment of OAB depends on persistence with the prescribed medication, and efficacy and tolerability are key influencers of persistence. New antimuscarinic agents are now available for treating OAB that significantly improve symptoms of incontinence, urgency and frequency with few adverse effects. An improved efficacy and tolerability profile should result in greater patient satisfaction and persistence with therapy during long-term therapy.

Persistence and adherence of medications for chronic overactive bladder/urinary incontinence in the california medicaid program

OBJECTIVES

To investigate persistence and adherence of medication treatment in chronic overactive bladder/urinary incontinence (OAB/UI) patients, and to evaluate OAB/UI-related comorbidity events associated with persistence.

METHODS

Pharmaceutical outcomes research with a health-care provider perspective was conducted on a California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) chronic OAB/UI population. The primary end point was medication possession ratio (MPR), which was used to measure refill adherence. Secondary end points measuring persistence patterns included discontinuation of OAB drug therapy (medication-uncovered interval > 30 days) and time to discontinuation (period from the index date until the first discontinuation date). Significant factors on nonpersistence were found by using a Cox Proportional Hazards model. Factors contributing to nonadherence (MPR < 0.8) and the relationship between OAB/UI comorbidity events and persistence were examined by logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of 2496 eligible patients, 36.9% had only one OAB/UI prescription. The mean MPR was 0.34 (SD 0.21) and the median was 0.3, indicating that on average only about one-third of period of time since medication initiation was covered by the therapy. Only 122 patients exhibited > 80% adherence during the 6-month follow-up-period. Significant predictors of higher persistence included: white ethnicity, previous hospitalization length, starting with tolterodine or oxybutynin extended-release, and previous use of topical drugs or antipsychotics. Nevertheless, previous depression or urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis, polypharmacy, significantly increased the odds of early discontinuation. Treatment discontinuation increased the risk of UTI diagnosis by 37% in the post-treatment period (P = 0.03; OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.84), but had no significant effect on other OAB/UI-related comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

For chronic OAB/UI patients identified in this study, both persistence and adherence with medication treatment were suboptimal. These results suggest that persistence and treatment discontinuation remains problematic for the OAB/UI population.

The Effects of Antimuscarinic Treatments in Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic drugs used to treat overactive bladder and to identify any differences between individual antimuscarinics.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, CCTR and Cinahl databases were searched for published RCTs including an antimuscarinic agent from 1966 to August 2004. Data from included trials were extracted and meta-analysed where possible.

RESULTS

Fifty-six trials were included. The antimuscarinics were found to be safe and efficacious. All antimuscarinics apart from oxybutynin IR were found to be well tolerated. Dry mouth was the most commonly reported adverse event and no drug was associated with an increase in any serious adverse event. There were significant differences between the antimuscarinics in rates of withdrawal and rates and range of adverse events and efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The antimuscarinics have different tolerability and safety profiles, which are clinically significant.

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of extended-release tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder in Japanese patients

AIM

To evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of extended-release (ER) tolterodine in Japanese patients completing 12-week treatment in a randomized, double-blind trial comparing tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin 3 mg three times daily or placebo in patients with overactive bladder.

METHODS

Of 293 Japanese patients completing the 12-week study, 188 continued in the open-label trial and received tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily for 12 months, irrespective of previous treatment. The primary objective was to assess the safety of tolterodine ER for up to 52 weeks of treatment and at post-treatment follow-up. Secondary endpoints included changes in micturition diary variables, patient perception of bladder condition and urgency and treatment benefit.

RESULTS

Overall, 77% of patients completed 12 months of open-label treatment. Tolterodine ER was well tolerated and the most common adverse event was dry mouth (33.5%). In general, there was no increase in adverse event frequency with long-term treatment compared with short-term treatment. The efficacy of tolterodine ER was maintained over the 12-month period. The complete analysis showed a median reduction in incontinence episodes/week (-92.9%; mean reduction, -77.2%), a mean reduction in micturitions/24 h (-21.3%) and a mean increase in volume voided per micturition (19.6%). Of patients completing the 12-month study, 78.6% reported improvement in patient perception of bladder condition, 52.4% reported improvement in perception of urgency and 89.7% reported treatment benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable safety, tolerability and efficacy of once-daily tolterodine ER was maintained over 12 months in a Japanese overactive bladder patient population.

Tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder: a review

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent condition. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of immediate release tolterodine in the treatment of OAB in different patient populations. This review details the characteristics, clinical efficacy and safety of extended release (ER) tolterodine. This formulation yields a flatter serum concentration profile and provides clinically meaningful symptom improvement as early as week 1 of treatment. Tolterodine ER is effective in diverse patient populations with varying levels of symptom severity, and efficacy is maintained with long-term treatment. Tolterodine is an effective, safe, and convenient treatment option for long-term relief of OAB symptoms.

Long-term open-label solifenacin treatment associated with persistence with therapy in patients with overactive bladder syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To examine safety and tolerability findings as primary endpoints, and efficacy outcomes as secondary endpoints, of solifenacin treatment over a period of up to 1 year. Long-term efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome depends in part on the patient's persistence with pharmacologic therapy. Agents with a favourable therapeutic index supporting high levels of patient satisfaction and persistence are needed.

METHODS

The present study was a 40-week open-label extension of two 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of solifenacin treatment in patients with OAB. Patients who completed the 12-week studies were offered participation in the open-label extension study. All patients who entered the open-label extension study initially received solifenacin 5 mg daily for 4 weeks, after which a flexible dosing regimen allowed patients to individualise their treatment (5 mg or 10 mg) at each of the 3 study visits. Safety and tolerability assessments (the primary variable) included adverse event reporting. Efficacy data were collected from micturition diaries completed at weeks 16, 28, 40, and 52.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent (1637/1802) of patients who completed the two 12-week randomised studies chose to participate in the long-term open-label extension study. A total of 81% of patients completed 40 weeks of open-label treatment. Solifenacin treatment was safe and well tolerated, and rates of anticholinergic side effects were relatively low. Only 4.7% of patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. Improvements in major symptoms of OAB were noted for all patients for up to 52 weeks of treatment. In patients randomised to solifenacin in the double-blind studies, there were small incremental improvements in all efficacy parameters (reductions in episodes per 24 hours of urgency, reductions in frequency and urge incontinence, and increases in volume voided per micturition) over the course of the extension study. Efficacy was confirmed when outcomes were assessed as a function of total solifenacin exposure. Patient satisfaction with solifenacin tolerability (85%) and efficacy (74%) were high. These results indicate that long-term treatment with solifenacin was well tolerated and associated with improvements in efficacy parameters based on patient diary data recorded over the 12-month treatment period. Moreover, the high level of patient satisfaction reported appeared to correlate well with the quantified improvements in key symptoms demonstrated in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term therapy with solifenacin resulted in a favourable tolerability profile, and was associated with improvements in efficacy parameters based on diary data recorded over a 12-month period. This balance of tolerability and efficacy with solifenacin was associated with excellent persistence with therapy. These results suggest that solifenacin may be useful for the long-term treatment of the chronic symptoms associated with OAB.

Canadian economic comparison of extended-release oxybutynin and immediate-release tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a condition characterized by urgency, increased frequency of micturition, or urge incontinence. It affects a considerable segment of the population, particularly with increasing age. Pharmacotherapy is one of the most common approaches to the treatment of OAB.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the development and results of a model comparing health-economic outcomes for the new extended-release (XL) formulation of oxybutynin and immediate-release (IR) tolterodine in a population of community-dwelling Canadian adults with OAB.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to compare health-economic outcomes over the course of 1 year. Effectiveness and treatment-persistence data were derived from the OBJECT (Overactive Bladder: Judging Effective Control and Treatment) trial, a 3-month comparison of oxybutynin XL 10 mg and tolterodine IR 4 mg, and were used, together with data from the literature (identified through a MEDLINE search of articles published between 1990 and 2003), to project outcomes beyond the trial period. Severity-specific cost profiles for incontinence were developed. In the principal analyses, cost items were limited to drug therapy, physician visits, use of pads or other protection, and laundry costs. Costs are reported in 2002 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

Costs after 1 year were estimated to be an average of $32 less per patient for oxybutynin XL compared with tolterodine IR, and 3.1 additional patients in every 100 who received oxybutynin XL were expected to attain complete continence compared with those who received tolterodine. During the course of 1 year, patients receiving oxybutynin XL were expected to have a mean 16.5 additional incontinence-free days compared with those receiving tolterodine IR. The results were sensitive to relative drug prices. In the other sensitivity analyses, however, oxybutyrin XL maintained its advantage over a wide range of inputs.

CONCLUSION

The results of these analyses suggest that when priced equivalently, oxybutynin XL would reduce costs and provide better results than tolterodine IR over 1 year of treatment.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Tolterodine in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Adults

Overactive bladder is associated with symptoms of urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with daytime frequency and nocturia in the absence of local pathological factors. Muscarinic receptor antagonists (antimuscarinics) are the first-line pharmacotherapy. Tolterodine, a competitive, nonselective antimuscarinic specifically developed for the treatment of overactive bladder, demonstrated tissue selectivity for the bladder over the parotid gland in an animal model. As of March 5, 2003, the immediate-release (IR) formulation had been approved in 72 countries and the extended-release (ER) formulation had been approved in 28 countries, and tolterodine had been administered to 5 million patients. This review evaluates the benefit-risk profile of tolterodine in the treatment of adults with overactive bladder, summarising clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance data. Tolterodine has been found to significantly reduce micturition frequency, urgency perception and the number of episodes of urge incontinence and increase the volume voided per micturition. Dry mouth, an antimuscarinic class effect, is the most commonly reported adverse effect but is mostly mild to moderate in severity. Serious adverse effects are reported infrequently. Based on summary and review of postmarketing surveillance and clinical trial safety data received by the market authorization holder and contained in the Periodic Safety Update Reports for tolterodine, several monitored serious events of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. ileus or haemorrhage), nervous system (e.g. syncope, convulsions and memory disorders) and cardiovascular system (e.g. ventricular arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, palpitations, bradycardia, transient ischaemic attacks and hypertension) were not considered related to tolterodine. QT or corrected QT (QTc) prolongation was not observed in any of the five cases of verified ventricular arrhythmia in patients administered tolterodine; there is insufficient evidence to indicate that tolterodine causes ventricular arrhythmia or extrasystoles or any specific type of cardiac rhythm abnormality. The safety profile of tolterodine is similar in patients aged > or =65 years and in younger adults. Clinically relevant drug interactions are limited to cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, and co-administration with such agents warrants a tolterodine dosage decrease. In addition, tolterodine IR 2mg twice daily is similar in efficacy to oxybutynin IR 5mg three times daily, and tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily is similar in efficacy to oxybutynin ER 10mg once daily. Dry mouth occurred less frequently with tolterodine than oxybutynin, and moderate to severe dry mouth occurred more than three times less frequently. Based on the low frequency of adverse events, the absence of unexpected adverse events and the very low frequency of serious adverse events, we conclude that tolterodine is a well tolerated treatment for overactive bladder in adults, in whom it should be considered as first-line therapy.

Oxybutynin Extended Release and Tolterodine Immediate Release

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a new extended-release (XL) formulation of oxybutynin relative to tolterodine immediate release (IR), currently the most prescribed treatment for overactive bladder in the UK.

METHODS

A state-transition model was developed to compare outcomes over 1 year. Effectiveness and treatment persistence data were derived from the OBJECT (Overactive Bladder: Judging Effective Control and Treatment) study, a 3-month clinical trial comparing oxybutynin XL 10 mg/day with tolterodine IR 4 mg/day. The daily costs of oxybutynin XL and tolterodine IR were pound0.82 and pound1.04, respectively. These data and information from the literature were used to project outcomes beyond the trial time. Severity-specific incontinence cost profiles were developed for the UK (2002 costings).

RESULTS

After 1 year, 3.1 more patients per 100 treated attained complete continence with oxybutynin XL compared with tolterodine IR, and 5.6% more had less than seven incontinent episodes per week. Over 1 year, patients receiving oxybutynin XL had almost 17 additional incontinence-free days and 95 fewer incontinent episodes. Estimated costs were pound86 lower per patient with oxybutynin XL. If drugs are priced equally, savings decrease to pound21 per patient. Oxybutynin XL maintains its advantage over wide ranges of inputs, and outcomes are similar if analyses are limited to 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Base-case analyses suggest that oxybutynin XL provides better effectiveness than tolterodine IR and reduces costs. Results indicate that oxybutynin XL is the dominant therapeutic option under a wide range of alternative inputs and assumptions.

Neurological disorders cerebrovascular disease and parkinsonism

To store and expel urine at appropriate intervals, the lower urinary tract requires extensive input and control from the peripheral autonomic, somatic, and central nervous systems. Neurological disorders, such as cerebrovascular disease and Parkinson's disease, often cause functional disturbances of the lower urinary tract.

Simplified bladder training augments the effectiveness of tolterodine in patients with an overactive bladder

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of tolterodine plus simplified bladder training (BT) with tolterodine alone in patients with an overactive bladder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a multicentre, single-blind study at 51 Scandinavian centres, 505 patients aged >or= 18 years with symptoms of urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h) and urgency, with or without urge incontinence, were randomized to oral treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily plus simplified BT or tolterodine alone. Changes in voiding diary variables were evaluated after 2, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. The patients' perceptions of their bladder symptoms and tolerability (adverse events) were also determined.

RESULTS

In all, 501 patients (75% women) were evaluable on an intention-to-treat basis (244 on tolterodine + BT and 257 on tolterodine alone). Tolterodine significantly reduced the voiding frequency and increased the volume voided per void at all sample times; these effects were significantly increased by adding BT. At the end of the study the median percentage reduction in voiding frequency was greater with tolterodine + BT than with tolterodine alone (33% vs 25%, P < 0.001), while the median percentage increase in volume voided per void was 31% with tolterodine + BT and 20% with tolterodine alone (P < 0.001). There was a median of 81% fewer incontinence episodes than at baseline with tolterodine alone, which was not significantly different from that with tolterodine + BT (- 87%). The two groups had comparable median percentage reductions in urgency episodes. Some 76% of patients on tolterodine + BT reported an improvement in their bladder symptoms relative to baseline, compared with 71% on tolterodine alone. Tolterodine was well tolerated; the most common adverse event was mild dry mouth.

CONCLUSION

Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily is an effective and well tolerated treatment for an overactive bladder, the effectiveness of which can be augmented by a simplified BT regimen.

Clinical efficacy of tolterodine with or without a simplified pelvic floor exercise regimen

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the combination of tolterodine plus (Tp) a simple pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) program would provide improved treatment benefits compared with tolterodine alone (Ta) in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

After a 1-2 week run-in period, 480 patients with symptoms of urinary frequency (> or =8 micturitions/24 hr), urgency, and urge incontinence (> or =1 episode/24 hr), were randomized to receive tolterodine 2 mg bid with or without a simple PFME program for 24 weeks in this multinational study. Treatment efficacy was assessed by comparing the change from baseline in 3-day micturition diary recordings.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks' treatment, in the Ta group the urgency episodes reduced from mean of 4.1 to 1.5 (83% reduction) while in the Tp group the urgency episodes reduced from 4.2 to 2.1 (78.7% reduction). Mean incontinence episodes per day decreased from 3.21 (standard deviation (SD) 3.4) to 0.95 (SD 1.9) in Ta group and from 3.44 (SD 3.4) to 1.25 (SD 2.7) in the Tp group. Similarly, the number of micturition/24 hr were significantly reduced, from 12.78 to 9.20 (27.3% reduction) in the Ta group and from 11.87 to 9.29 (23% reduction) in the Tp group. There was an improvement in the patients' perception of urinary symptoms in 85.9% of patients on Ta and 81.7% patients on Tp PFME. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to any of the outcome parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolterodine therapy for 24 weeks results in significant improvement in urgency, frequency, and incontinence, however, no additional benefit was demonstrated for a simple PFME program.

Pharmacologic treatment for detrusor overactivity

Recent pharmacologic treatment for detrusor overactivity has resulted in more favorable side effect profiles, not only because of the use of different drug delivery systems for older drugs but perhaps also due to the improved bladder selectivity of newer antimuscarinic agents. These developments translate into higher patient compliance and better long-term results with the newer agents over generic immediate-release oxybutynin for the treatment of the overactive bladder.

Current pharmacotherapeutic strategies for overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic, distressing condition characterised by symptoms of urgency (sudden overwhelming urge to urinate) and frequency (urinating more than eight times daily), with or without urge urinary incontinence (sudden involuntary loss of urine). It affects millions of people of all ages and both sexes world wide, with greater prevalence in women and the elderly. The treatment of OAB is aimed at reducing debilitating symptoms, which have a significant effect on all aspects of an individual's quality of life, including social, domestic, psychological, occupational, physical and sexual functioning. Anticholinergic agents are currently recommended as first-line therapy for OAB. Their use results in significant clinical improvement in patients, although a lack of selectivity for receptors in the bladder may lead to troublesome side effects, including dry mouth, blurred vision, somnolence, dizziness and constipation. Recent research efforts have focused on developing drugs with a reduced propensity for causing these problems. Of the available anticholinergic agents, oxybutynin and tolterodine are the most widely used to treat OAB. Studies directly comparing tolterodine immediate-release (IR) with oxybutynin IR have shown that the two agents have similar efficacy. However, tolterodine IR is significantly better tolerated, particularly with respect to the incidence and severity of dry mouth. An extended-release formulation of tolterodine (4 mg capsules) has recently been developed to allow for once-daily dosing. In addition to greater convenience, tolterodine extended-release has shown enhanced efficacy and tolerability compared with tolterodine IR.

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of extended-release tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to examine the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of tolterodine extended-release (ER) in patients who had completed 12 weeks' treatment in a randomised, double-blind study comparing tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (qd), tolterodine immediate-release (IR) 2mg twice daily and placebo.

METHODS

Of the 1377 patients completing the 12-week study, a total of 1077 (78%) chose to continue with 12 months' open-label treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, irrespective of their previous treatment. Safety was assessed after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months' treatment in the study. Efficacy was evaluated from micturition diary variables and patients' perception of bladder condition and urgency following 3 and 12 months' treatment.

RESULTS

71% of patients completed the 12-month study. Tolterodine ER was safe and well tolerated. Adverse events of the general (14.5%), autonomic (13.2%), gastrointestinal (11.4%), respiratory (9.8%) and urinary (9.1%) systems were the most frequently reported. Dry mouth was the most common event, occurring in 12.9% of patients, and was generally mild in severity. Other adverse events occurred in less than 5% of patients. There was no increase in the frequency of adverse events with long-term relative to short-term treatment. The efficacy of tolterodine was maintained over the 12-month treatment period; relative to baseline there were reductions in the number of incontinence episodes per week (median change -83%) and micturitions per 24 hours (median change -21%) and an increase in volume voided (median change +25%) after 12 months' treatment. An improvement in patient perception of their bladder condition was found in 75% of patients completing the study, and 51% had an improvement in patient perception of urgency.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolterodine ER 4mg qd displayed a favourable safety, tolerability and efficacy profile during 12 months' treatment of patients with overactive bladder.

Tolterodine: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in Asian patients with symptoms of overactive bladder

BACKGROUND

This double-blind, multicenter study compared the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine (Pharmacia, Los Angeles, USA) with that of oxybutynin (Alza, Palo Alto, USA) in Asian patients with overactive bladder.

METHODS

Two-hundred-and-twenty-eight adults with overactive bladder symptoms were randomized to receive tolterodine 2 mg twice daily (bid) (n = 112) or oxybutynin 5 mg bid (n = 116). After 8 weeks' treatment, changes in micturition diary variables, patients' perception of treatment benefit, and tolerability endpoints were determined.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SD) number of micturitions/24 h decreased by 2.6 +/- 2.9 (-21%) with tolterodine and 1.8 +/- 4.2 (-15%) with oxybutynin (both P = 0.0001 vs baseline). The mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h decreased by 2.2 +/- 2.3 (-85%) in the tolterodine group and by 1.4 +/- 1.8 (-58%) in the oxybutynin group (both P = 0.0001 vs baseline). Patient perception of treatment benefit was over 70% in each treatment group. Adverse events were significantly lower in the tolterodine group compared with oxybutynin-treated patients (55% vs 82%; P = 0.001). Dry mouth was reported by significantly fewer patients on tolterodine, compared with oxybutynin (35% vs 63%; P = 0.001) and withdrawals due to adverse events were lower in the tolterodine group than with those treated with oxybutynin (10% vs 16%). There were no safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolterodine 2 mg bid is equally or more effective than oxybutynin 5 mg bid in the treatment of Asian patients with overactive bladder, and shows significantly better tolerability. This may enhance compliance during long-term treatment.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of extended-release once-daily tolterodine treatment for overactive bladder in older versus younger patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a new, once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation of tolterodine in treating overactive bladder in older (> or =65) and younger (<65) patients.

DESIGN

A 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

An international study conducted at 167 medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand fifteen patients (43.1% aged > or =65) with urge incontinence and urinary frequency.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (qd) (n = 507) or placebo (n = 508) for 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Efficacy, measured with micturition charts (incontinence episodes, micturitions, volume voided per micturition) and subjective patient assessments, safety, and tolerability endpoints were evaluated, relative to placebo, according to two age cohorts: younger than 65 and 65 and older.

RESULTS

Mean age in the older and younger patient cohorts was 74 (range 65-93) and 51 (range 20-64), respectively. Compared with placebo, significant improvements in micturition chart variables with tolterodine ER showed no age-related differences. Irrespective of age, significantly more tolterodine ER recipients than placebo recipients reported an improvement in urgency symptoms. After 12 weeks of treatment with tolterodine ER, a fivefold increase in the percentage of patients able to finish tasks before voiding in response to urgency was noted in both age groups (<65: from 6.5-32.8%, > or =65: from 5.1-26.2%). Tolterodine ER recipients, irrespective of age, also had significant improvements in their bladder condition than did placebo recipients. Overall, a greater percentage of patients, irrespective of age, perceived any benefit with tolterodine ER than with placebo (P <.001). Dry mouth (of any severity) was the most common adverse event in both the tolterodine ER and placebo treatment arms, irrespective of age (<65: ER 22.7%, placebo 8.1%; > or =65: ER 24.3%, placebo 7.2%). Few patients (<2%) experienced severe dry mouth. No central nervous system, visual, cardiac (per electrocardiogram), or laboratory safety concerns were noted. Withdrawal rates due to adverse events on tolterodine ER 4 mg qd were comparable in the two age cohorts (<65: 5.5%; > or =65: 5.1%; P =.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The new, once-daily ER formulation of tolterodine is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with symptoms of overactive bladder, irrespective of age.

Treatment of overactive bladder with once-daily extended-release tolterodine or oxybutynin: the antimuscarinic clinical effectiveness trial (ACET)

Treatment with the antimuscarinic agents tolterodine and oxybutynin is the mainstay of therapy for overactive bladder, a chronic and debilitating condition characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually in combination with urinary frequency and nocturia. This study consisted of two trials; in one, patients with overactive bladder were randomized to 8 weeks of open-label treatment with either 2 mg or 4 mg of once-daily extended-release tolterodine (TER), and in the other to 5 mg or 10 mg of extended-release oxybutynin (OER). The study protocol and design were identical for the two trials and site selection ensured that there was no bias in either trial for the tendency of investigators to prescribe one drug rather than the other, or for geographical location. A total of 1289 patients were enrolled, 669 in the tolterodine trial (TER 2 mg, n = 333; TER 4 mg, n = 336) and 620 in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg, n = 313; OER 10 mg, n = 307). Fewer patients prematurely withdrew from the trial in the TER 4 mg group (12%) than either the OER 5 mg (19%; p = 0.01) or OER 10 mg groups (21%; p = 0.002). More patients in the OER 10 mg group than the TER 4 mg group withdrew because of poor tolerability (13% vs 6%; p = 0.001). After 8 weeks, 70% of patients in the TER 4 mg group perceived an improved bladder condition, compared with 60% in the TER 2 mg group, 59% in the OER 5 mg group and 60% in the OER 10 mg group (all p < 0.01 vs TER 4 mg). Response to therapy was greater in a subgroup of patients whose perception of bladder condition was moderate to severe at baseline (TER 4 mg 77% vs OER 10 mg 65%; p < 0.01). Dry mouth was dose-dependent with both agents, although differences between doses only reached statistical significance in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg vs OER 10 mg; p = 0.05). Patients treated with TER 4 mg reported a significantly lower severity of dry mouth compared with OER 10 mg. In conclusion, the greater efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine ER 4 mg suggests improved clinical effectiveness compared with oxybutynin ER 10 mg.

Tolterodine: a review of its use in the treatment of overactive bladder

Tolterodine is a competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist that shows in vivo selectivity for the bladder over the salivary glands compared with oxybutinin. Results of randomised double-blind placebo-controlled studies indicate that tolterodine 4 mg/day (administered as immediate-release tablets 2mg twice daily or extended-release capsules 4mg daily) is superior to placebo in improving micturition diary variables in patients with overactive bladder. Moreover, tolterodine 2mg twice daily is as effective as oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily. Maximum treatment effects with both drugs occurred after 5 to 8 weeks of treatment and improvements were maintained during long term treatment for up to 24 months. In a pooled analysis of four 12-week studies, equivalent and significant reductions in micturition frequency (-2.3 and -2.0 vs -1.4, p < 0.001) and the incidence of urge incontinence episodes (-1.6 and -1.8 vs -1.1, p < 0.05) were reported for tolterodine 2mg twice daily and oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily compared with placebo. Functional bladder capacity was also significantly increased. Improvements in patient perceptions of their urgency symptoms and of problems caused by their bladder condition were significantly greater during treatment with tolterodine than with placebo. Tolterodine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials of up to 24 months' duration. Dry mouth was the most frequent adverse event. The incidence (40 vs 78%, p < 0.001) and intensity of this event was lower with tolterodine 2mg twice daily than oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily. Additionally, a 23% lower incidence of dry mouth was reported with once daily extended-release tolterodine capsules than with twice daily immediate-release tablets (p < 0.02). The incidence of adverse CNS events with tolterodine was low and similar to that of placebo. Tolterodine was well tolerated in elderly patients and no serious tolerability concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

Tolterodine is the first antimuscarinic agent to specifically developed for the treatment of overactive bladder. The functional selectivity of tolterodine for the bladder translates into good efficacy and tolerability in patients, including the elderly, with overactive bladder. Tolterodine is as effective as oxybutynin in improving micturition diary variables but is associated with a significantly lower incidence and intensity of dry mouth. This favourable tolerability profile, together with sustained clinical efficacy during long term treatment, places tolterodine as valuable treatment for the symptoms of overactive bladder.

Evidence for the efficacy and safety of tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic and prevalent condition, the symptoms of which (urinary frequency and urgency, with or without urge incontinence) can exert a profound negative effect on a person's daily life activities. Tolterodine (Detrol in North America and Detrusitol in the rest of the world, Pharmacia), a competitive muscarinic antagonist, is the first agent of this class to be specifically developed for the treatment of OAB. This agent displays in vivo functional selectivity for the bladder over other tissues that contain muscarinic receptors (e.g., salivary glands, eye), which translates into good efficacy and tolerability in patients with OAB (including the elderly). Comparative, randomised, double-blind studies show that tolterodine (administered as immediate-release [IR] tablets 2 mg b.i.d.) is as effective as oxybutynin (5 mg t.i.d.) in improving all of the troublesome symptoms of OAB but with a significantly lower incidence and severity of dry mouth. The advent of a new extended-release (ER) capsule formulation of tolterodine (4 mg) for convenient once-daily treatment builds upon these findings, with significantly improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth relative to the existing IR tablet (2 mg b.i.d.). Tolterodine can therefore be considered a valuable, well-tolerated treatment option for patients with OAB, providing improvements in symptoms that are both clinically meaningful to patients and sustained during long-term treatment.