Pharmacological treatment of elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation

Evaluating anticoagulation sensitivity among elderly patients managed with an institution’s heparin protocol using initial anti-factor Xa levels

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess an institution’s heparin protocols in elderly and nonelderly adult populations to see if a response difference was observed.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults who were prescribed unfractionated heparin due to surgery, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) from February 11, 2016, through August 1, 2017. Patients were divided into nonelderly adults 18 to 69 years of age and elderly patients 70 years of age or older. The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level after protocol initiation was compared to the institution’s goal range of 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL. Outcomes of each protocol in the elderly population were compared to outcomes in their nonelderly counterparts to determine if there was a difference in heparin response.

Results

A total of 325 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 150 elderly and 175 nonelderly adults. Elderly patients had a higher initial anti-Xa levels than did their nonelderly adult counterparts in the ACS, DVT/PE, and surgery protocols, with P values of 0.02, <0.001, and 0.01, respectively. Only the ACS protocol demonstrated increased frequency of above-target-level anti-Xa levels in the elderly (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Elderly patients had significantly higher initial anti-Xa levels than did nonelderly adult patients across all protocols. This study identifies the need to further study elderly patients’ increased heparin sensitivity to determine if a separate dosing protocol is needed.

Clopidogrel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is a selective inhibitor of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation. In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction], clopidogrel plus aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) for up to 1 year significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events relative to placebo plus aspirin in the well designed clinical trial CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events) and its substudy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [PCI-CURE]. In pharmacoeconomic evaluations based on data from these trials conducted in a number of countries that used a variety of models, methods and/or type of costs, clopidogrel plus aspirin was consistently predicted to be cost effective relative to aspirin alone in the management of patients with ACS, including those undergoing PCI. Clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with ACS reduced the incremental cost per cardiovascular event prevented and/or life-year gained (LYG) relative to aspirin alone in analyses using within-trial data (including longer-term analyses incorporating life-expectancy estimates) from the CURE or PCI-CURE studies. In Markov models of cost effectiveness with a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective based on the CURE trial, relative to aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year was predicted to have incremental costs per LYG of 8132Euro in Spain (2003 values) and 1365Euro in Sweden (2000 values). In similar Swedish analyses from a healthcare payer perspective, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year was predicted to have incremental costs per LYG of 10,993Euro (2004 values) relative to aspirin alone based on data from the PCI-CURE substudy. Broadly similar results have also been reported in modelled analyses from other countries. Cost-utility analyses based on the CURE trial suggest that, relative to lifelong aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year followed by aspirin alone is associated with incremental costs per QALY gained that are below the traditional threshold of cost utility in Spain, the UK and the US. In patients with ACS, including those undergoing PCI, the addition of clopidogrel to standard therapy with aspirin is clinically effective in preventing cardiovascular events. Available pharmacoeconomic data from several countries, despite some inherent limitations, support the use of clopidogrel plus aspirin for up to 1 year as a cost-effective treatment relative to aspirin alone in this patient population.

Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: treatment strategies and 30-day outcome

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the current care of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with particular regard to the rate of use of antiplatelet drugs and the type of strategy, aggressive or conservative, in a population of consecutive patients admitted to 76 Coronary Care Units in Italy.

METHODS

Prospective registry of patients admitted to Coronary Care Units with a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation ACS during a 2-month period. Thirty-day follow-up was available in all patients.

RESULTS

Of 1581 patients enrolled in the registry, 564 were 75 years or older. As compared with the 1017 younger patients, elderly patients had a greater prevalence of female sex (42% vs 27%, P <.001), hypertension (70% vs 59%, P <.001), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (41% vs 29%, P <.001), prior angina (18% vs 13%, P <.01), prior use of aspirin (49% vs 39%, P <.001), ST-segment depression (54% vs 43%, P <.001), and troponin positivity (66% vs 59%, P <.05). The higher-risk profile of elderly patients was confirmed by the greater number of patients with a high TIMI risk score (37% vs 22%, P <.001). GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors were less frequently used in elderly patients (P <.05). An aggressive strategy (coronary arteriography within 4 days of admission, followed by revascularization, if feasible) was adopted in 39% elderly patients and in 56% younger patients (P <.001). An interventional procedure within 30 days was performed in 30% of elderly patients and 48% of younger patients (P <.001). Elderly patients had a more unfavorable 30-day outcome compared with younger ones, as shown by the higher rates of death (6.4% vs 1.7%), acute myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 5%), and stroke (1.3% vs 0.5%). Multivariate analysis of the elderly group identified a conservative strategy (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.20 to 4.48) and a diagnosis of non-Q-wave MI (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.93) as independent predictors of 30-day events.

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly represent a very high-risk subgroup among patients with non-ST-elevation ACS, with a nearly 4-fold as high 30-day death rate as that of younger patients. These data call for a greater attention to such population, both in terms of an improved representation in clinical research and of the assessment of the outcome of different strategies in appropriately designed randomized trials.