Long-Term Safety of Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteoporosis

Nanoplatforms for Promoting Osteogenesis in Ovariectomy-Induced Osteoporosis in the Experimental Model

Background:

Osteoporosis is a debilitating bone ailment characterized by the obvious loss of bone mass and bone microarchitecture impairment.

Objective:

This study aimed to illuminate the in vivo usefulness of nanotechnology as a treatment for osteoporosis via analyzing the effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHa), nano-hydroxy- apatite/chitosan (nHa/C), and nano-hydroxyapatite/silver (nHa/S) in mitigation of osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats.

Method:

The characterization of the nHa, nHa/C, and nHa/S was carried out using TEM, SEM, FTIR, and Zeta potential measurements. This in vivo study included 48 adult female rats that were randomized into six groups (8 rats/group): (1) Sham-operated control, (2) osteoporotic, (3) nHa, (4) nHa/C, (5) nHa/S, and (6) Fosamax®. Serum osterix level was quantified using ELISA. Femur bone morphogenetic protein 2 and SMAD1 mRNA levels were evaluated by qPCR. The femur bones were scanned by DEXA for measurement of bone mineral density and bone mineral content. In ad-dition, a histopathological examination of femur bones was performed.

Results:

The present approach denoted that the treatment with nHa, nHa/C, or nHa/S yields a signif-icant rise in serum level of osterix and mRNA levels of bone morphogenetic protein 2 and SMAD1 as well as significant enhancements of bone tissue minerals.

Conclusion:

The findings affirmed the potency of nHa, nHa/C, and nHa/S as auspicious nanoplat-forms for repairing bone defects in the osteoporotic rat model. The positive effect of the inspected nanoformulations arose from bone formation indicators in serum and tissue, and additionally, the reinforcement of bone density and content, which were verified by the histopathological description of bone tissue sections.

Bisphosphonate-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Objective:

To review the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with bisphosphonates.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1966–January 2007) and a search of international Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–January 2007) were conducted to identify relevant literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles related to bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw were reviewed and summarized. Inclusion criteria required that articles be either case studies or case series that were reporting actual cases linking osteonecrosis of the jaw with bisphosphonate use. Articles that addressed sites of osteonecrosis not involving the jaw, teaching cases (fictitious patients), and a retrospective claims analysis paper were excluded from consideration.

Data Synthesis:

Bisphosphonates have recently been linked to osteonecrosis of the jaw, with the greatest incidence seen with the intravenous preparations zoledronic acid and pamidronate. Osteonecrosis refers to death of a part of the bone, resulting in decreased bone density. Although the majority of occurrences have been associated with the intravenous bisphosphonates, oral bisphosphonates have also been implicated. Other risk factors noted from reported cases include dental extraction or trauma to the jaw exposing part of the bone. It is difficult to determine an exact incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the general population of patients prescribed bisphosphonates; however, the incidence in cancer patients is approximately 6–7%.

Conclusions:

Although discontinuation of intravenous bisphosphonates in cancer patients has been recommended, stopping oral bisphosphonates prior to dental work cannot be universally endorsed at this time, since it is unknown whether this is effective in reducing the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Treatment of this condition is not well established; therefore, efforts should be directed toward prevention. Pharmacists may further counsel patients to practice good oral hygiene and regularly follow up with their dentist during therapy. Current evidence suggests limited surgical debridement with systemic and local antibiotics as treatments.

The effects of zoledronate on the survival and function of human osteoblast-like cells

Background

Prolonged bisphosphonate treatment might suppress bone remodeling to the extent that normal bone repair is impaired. While this adverse side effect is usually ascribed to the negative effects of bisphosphonates on osteoclast survival and function, these effects on osteoblasts are still unclear.

Methods

In the current study, we hypothesized that zoledronate (ZOL) at the μM level might present negative effects on osteoblast survival and function. In vitro analyses of proliferation, migration and differentiation were performed on human osteoblast-like cells.

Results

Our results revealed that ZOL treatment dose- and time-dependently induced apoptosis of osteoblasts after concentrations had reached 10 μM (p < 0.001). The concentrations at which ZOL inhibited osteoblast migration by 50 % were between 10 and 15 μM. Moreover, there was a dose-dependent reduction in the extent of matrix mineralization, but without a concomitant inhibition of osteogenic differentiation in terms of secreted type I collagen and osteocalcin and of alkaline phosphatase activity per viable cell. Analyses of the expression of osteogenic genes confirmed that ZOL at the μM level had no effects on osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts.

Conclusion

We concluded that ZOL at the μM level affected osteoblast survival and migration, but did not affect differentiation. The pathophysiological implications of ZOL at the μM level on skeletal disorders need to be investigated and clarified in the future researches.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0818-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association between gastrointestinal events and compliance with osteoporosis therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) events, and association between GI events and compliance with osteoporosis therapy among osteoporotic women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using a large administrative claims database in the United States from 2001 through 2010 was conducted. We studied women ≥ 55 years old who were continuously enrolled in a health plan for at least 2 years, a baseline year before and a follow-up year after the date of the first prescription of oral bisphosphonate as the first oral osteoporosis treatment. Compliance with osteoporosis therapy was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), with compliance defined as MPR ≥ 0.8. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between occurrence of GI events and compliance with osteoporosis therapy after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A sample consisting of 75,593 women taking at least one oral bisphosphonate with mean (SD) age of 64 (8) years was identified. A total of 21,142 (28%) patients experienced at least one GI event during the follow-up period. Only 31,306 (41%) patients were compliant with osteoporosis therapy. Patients who experienced GI events after initiation of oral bisphosphonates were 29% less likely to adhere to osteoporosis therapy as compared to patients who did not experience GI events (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.71 [0.69-0.74]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of the patients were compliant with osteoporosis therapy within one year after initiating oral bisphosphonates, and the likelihood of compliance was significantly lower by 29% among women with GI events.

Challenges in implementing and maintaining osteoporosis therapy

In the United States, an estimated 19% of older men and 30% of older women are at elevated risk of osteoporotic fracture and considered to be eligible for treatment. The burden of osteoporosis is similar in Europe and is projected to rise worldwide, with aging populations and increasing fracture rates accompanying urbanization. Notwithstanding its high prevalence, osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Moreover, even when the diagnosis is made and the decision is taken to treat, there are remaining challenges in implementing therapy for osteoporosis. Several patient populations are particularly challenging for clinicians to treat and require further study with regard to osteoporosis therapy. These include the very elderly, who face challenges relating to adherence; men, in whom osteoporosis remains under-recognized; patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis or renal impairment, who are at increased risk of fracture; patients with preexisting gastrointestinal problems who cannot tolerate existing orally administered osteoporosis therapies; and high-risk patients who show inadequate response to therapy. Moreover, poor adherence and poor persistence with osteoporosis medications are common and result in an increased risk of fracture, higher medical costs, and increased hospitalizations. Once the decision to institute therapy is made, patient education about osteoporosis and fracture risk should be provided. This is particularly important for men, who may not be aware that osteoporosis can be a concern. Secondary prevention programs, including fracture liaison services and bone therapy groups, can help to improve adherence to therapy. Further study is needed to guide the treatment of men, the very elderly, patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and renal impairment, high-risk patients not well-controlled despite therapy, and patients with preexisting gastrointestinal conditions. Moreover, therapies are needed that are viewed as effective and safe by both physicians and patients, and as convenient to take by patients.

Antiosteoporotic effects of Lactobacillus -fermented soy skim milk on bone mineral density and the microstructure of femoral bone in ovariectomized mice

Osteoporosis is a major skeletal disease associated with loss of estrogen in postmenopausal women. In this study, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 (NTU 101F) and Lactobacillus plantarum NTU 102 (NTU 102F) were used as starters to ferment soy skim milk. This was then used as a nutritional supplement for 8 weeks to ovariectomized (OVX) mice. This study reveals that soy skim milk fermented with lactobacilli can increase the contents of aglycone isoflavones, soluble calcium, and vitamin D(3). The trabecular bone volumes and trabecular number of the distal femur in mice fed NTU 101F increased by a factor of 1.48 and 1.74 compared with the OVX group. The bone network density and thickness of the distal metaphyseal trabecular in mice fed NTU 101F and Fosamax was significantly greater than that of OVX mice. These results suggest that fermented soy skim milk can attenuate bone loss in OVX mice and lower the risk of osteoporosis.

[Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis and other skeletal diseases]

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are antiresorptive drugs widely used to treat osteoporosis. They are also used to treat hereditary skeletal diseases with systemic or local defects, and as a supplement in treatment of cancer. This paper provides an overview of pharmacokinetics, mode of action, and clinical effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature was retrieved through a non-systematic search in Pubmed/Medline.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonates are derivates of pyrophosphate which bind to hydroxyapatite with high affinity. Aminobisphosphonates inhibit an enzyme in the mevalonate pathway, thereby inducing apoptosis and inhibiting osteoclast activity. A reduced incidence of vertebral and hip fractures has been shown for alendronate, risedronate and zoledronate, while ibandronate has been shown to only reduce vertebral fracture. Reduced mortality was observed in a study where patients with recent hip fracture were treated with zoledronic acid. Intravenous bisphosphonates improve compliance and are relatively simple to use. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk for skeletal complications and bone pain in breast cancer, myelomatosis and prostate cancer. They are also effective in the treatment of Paget's disease and bone marrow edema. Gastrointestinal adverse effects are relatively frequent with peroral bisphosphonates, while acute phase reactions with influenza-like symptoms are common with intravenous bisphosphonates.

INTERPRETATION

Aminobisphoshonates are effective in the treatment of osteoporosis and in other bone diseases, and as an adjuvance in the treatment of cancer.

Control of bone formation by the serpentine receptor Frizzled-9

Although Wnt signaling in osteoblasts is of critical importance for the regulation of bone remodeling, it is not yet known which specific Wnt receptors of the Frizzled family are functionally relevant in this process. In this paper, we show that Fzd9 is induced upon osteoblast differentiation and that Fzd9(-/-) mice display low bone mass caused by impaired bone formation. Our analysis of Fzd9(-/-) primary osteoblasts demonstrated defects in matrix mineralization in spite of normal expression of established differentiation markers. In contrast, we observed a reduced expression of chemokines and interferon-regulated genes in Fzd9(-/-) osteoblasts. We also identified the ubiquitin-like modifier Isg15 as one potential downstream mediator of Fzd9 in these cells. Importantly, our molecular analysis further revealed that canonical Wnt signaling is not impaired in the absence of Fzd9, thus explaining the absence of a bone resorption phenotype. Collectively, our results reveal a previously unknown function of Fzd9 in osteoblasts, a finding that may have therapeutic implications for bone loss disorders.

Reference intervals of biochemical bone turnover markers for Saudi Arabian women: a cross-sectional study

Biochemical bone turnover markers (BTMs) provide important information on the diagnosis, therapy and monitoring of metabolic bone diseases including osteoporosis. One goal of antiresorptive therapy in women is to decrease biochemical BTMs to the lower half of reference intervals for healthy pre-menopausal counterparts, using newly developed automated assays of such markers. The main objectives of the present study were to: (1) establish reference interval values for the following biochemical BTMs: serum osteocalcine (s-OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (s-bone ALP), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (s-PINP), crosslinked C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 collagen (s-CTX), tartarate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (s-TRACP-5b) and urinary: CTX (u-CTX), N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (u-NTX), pyridinoline (u-PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (u-DPD) in randomly selected Saudi healthy pre-menopausal women; (2) study the changes in biochemical BTMs in relation to age in pre- and post-menopausal women and the factors reported to influence bone turnover and (3) determine the effect of menopausal status on BTMs. A total of 2125 women were studied [including (n=1557) pre-, and (n=568) post-menopausal women, respectively, aged 20-79 years]. A total of 765 healthy pre-menopausal women (aged 35-45 years) were used to establish reference intervals for biochemical BTMs. All women studied were medically examined and had their bone mineral density (BMD) values obtained for the lumbar spine (L(1)-L(4)) and femoral neck according to detailed inclusion criteria. In all women, values of biochemical BTMs, decreased with increasing age up to the age of 45 years, increased steeply among women in their 50s and remained increased in post-menopausal women. Significant increases were evident in all biochemical BTMs in post-menopausal women with >5 years since menopause with the exception of s-OC, u-DPD, and u-PYD. Using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, several variables were identified (depending on the BTM) as determinants of BTMs including age, BMI, parity, FSH, LH, PTH, s-Ca, s-Mg, s-PO(4) and 25(OH)D. In the reference intervals group, there are no significant correlations between any of the biochemical BTMs and age of menarche, day of menstrual cycle, physical activity, total daily dietary calcium and caffeine intakes and parity. It is recommended that the age range 35-45 years should be used when establishing biochemical BTMs reference intervals in Saudi Arabian pre-menopausal women.

Central dislocation of the hip secondary to insufficiency fracture

We present a case report of a 45-year old man who sustained a central dislocation of the hip secondary to an insufficiency fracture of the acetabulum. At the time of presentation he was on alendronate therapy for osteoporosis which had been previously investigated. CT scanning of the pelvis was useful for pre-operative planning which confirmed collapse of the femoral head but no discontinuity of the pelvis. The femoral head was morcellized and used as bone graft for the acetabular defect and an uncemented total hip replacement was performed.

In vitro determination of the release of alendronic acid from alendronate tablets of different brands during deglutition

Alendronic acid, a frequently applied compound for the treatment of different forms of diseases of bone metabolism, is a strong acid with a high solubility in water. In connection with the oral administration this exhibits a potential health risk for the upper gastrointestinal tract. The in vitro release of tablets containing alendronic acid of different brands (Stada, ratiopharm, interpharm, Fosamax) was determined by dissolution tests for the time period required for oral intake. The effect of rotation speed, temperature, and solvent volume on the release rate of alendronic acid was determined for the used dissolution apparatus. Analysis of alendronic acid was performed by a validated HPLC method. The highest rate of release was found for the original brand. The dissolution rate of the generic formulations was significantly lower in the early stage of dissolution. Over the complete range of dissolution, more than 85% of the claimed amount was dissolved within 4 min. Dissolution profiles were compared by calculation of the similarity factor f(2) showing equal products with the exception of one generic product, whose dissolution rate was lower.

Dental management of patients at risk of osteochemonecrosis of the jaws: a critical review

Osteonecrosis of the jaw bones is a complication of bisphosphonate (BP) drug usage characterised by trans-mucosal exposure of necrotic bone, often followed by infection and pain. Osteonecrosis is observed in cancer patients on high-potency intravenous BP more frequently than in osteoporotic individuals using low-potency oral BP. The management of osteonecrosis caused by BP is often unsatisfactory and control of risk factors is considered the most effective means of prevention. Surgical manipulation and dental infection of the jawbone are the major risk factors, hence it is suggested that careful management of oral health and relevant dental procedures may decrease the risk of osteonecrosis in individuals on BP. Recommendations for dentists and oral surgeons have been suggested by different groups of clinicians but they are often controversial and there is no clear evidence for their efficacy in reducing the likelihood of osteonecrosis development. This report critically reviews current dental recommendations for individuals using BP with the aim of helping the reader to transfer them into practice as part of pragmatic and non-detrimental clinical decisions making.

Pulse treatment with zoledronic acid causes sustained commitment of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenic differentiation

The aminobisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) is a bone seeking specific inhibitor of protein farnesylation and geranylgeranylation, which causes inhibition of osteoclast function and apoptosis. It is widely used as an osteoclast targeted antiresorptive treatment of metastatic bone disease, Paget's disease and osteoporosis. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and osteoblast precursors can also be targets of bisphosphonates, but the clinical relevance of these effects is under debate. We show here that ZA in vitro causes inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in hMSC, when applied in concentrations of 20 and 50 microM for more than 24 h which can be rescued by treatment with 10 microM geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). However, pulse stimulation for 3 and 6 h with these concentrations and subsequent culture for up to 2 weeks under osteogenic conditions exerts sustained regulation of osteogenic marker genes in hMSC. The effect on gene regulation translates into marked enhancement of mineralization, as shown by alizarin red and alkaline phosphatase staining after 4 weeks of osteogenic culture. ZA, when applied as a pulse stimulus, might therefore also stimulate osteogenic differentiation in vivo, since muM plasma concentrations can be achieved by intravenous application of 5 mg in patients. These data set the stage for the future dissection of the effects of ZA and other aminobisphosphonates on cells beyond osteoclasts, with respect to cell differentiation in benign metabolic and to antitumor efficacy in metastatic bone diseases, as well as adverse events due to putative substance accumulation in bone during long-term treatment.

Bisphosphonate-associated osteomyelitis of the jaw: guidelines for practicing clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature and discuss the risk factors, mechanisms, pathophysiologic aspects, and recommended management of bisphosphonate-associated osteomyelitis of the jaw (BAOMJ).

METHODS

More than 350 published articles, case reports mentioning BAOMJ, and independent histology slides from BAOMJ lesions were reviewed critically. The most pertinent publications are cited and discussed.

RESULTS

The incidence of BAOMJ increases after extraction of teeth, dentoalveolar surgical procedures, or recent oral trauma leading to exposed maxillary or mandibular bone. Contributory factors include poor oral hygiene, oral infections, periodontal disease; recent or ongoing corticosteroid administration or chemotherapy; compromised immune status; diabetes or vascular insufficiency; old age; chronic diseases; and malignancies. On average, 1 of every 100,000 patients treated with bisphosphonates orally for osteoporosis or Paget disease of bone may develop BAOMJ-like lesions. Patients with cancer often receive bisphosphonate doses 10 times or higher, and also more frequently, than those used in patients with osteoporosis or Paget disease of bone. Therefore, greater frequency of administration of bisphosphonates, higher dosages, and prolonged use (that is, for more than 2 years) are likely to be factors triggering BAOMJ.

CONCLUSION

The association of bisphosphonate therapy with BAOMJ is rare in noncancer patients and is likely to be a class effect that may occur with use of any bisphosphonate. Whether patients with cancer require such a high frequency of intravenously administered bisphosphonates needs to be investigated. Following established guidelines can decrease the risks of BAOMJ in vulnerable patients. Rather than necrotic bone, current evidence supports an infectious and perhaps immunologic underlying cause for BAOMJ. The estimated incidence of BAOMJ among noncancer patients receiving bisphosphonates is about 0.001%, whereas among patients with cancer receiving intravenous bisphosphonate therapy the incidence is between 0.5% and 4%, depending on the dose, frequency, and duration of therapy (on average, approximately 2%). Nevertheless, the benefits of bisphosphonates far outweigh the risks.

Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures

In this study, we offered osteoporosis investigation and treatment directly to patients at out-patient fracture clinics shortly after they sustained minimal trauma fractures. We achieved long-term compliance to the recommended investigation and treatment in 80% of patients. This approach is much more successful than previous interventions.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis remains under-treated in minimal-trauma fracture subjects. The aim of this study was to determine if direct intervention at orthopaedic fracture clinics would improve post-fracture management in these subjects.

METHODS

From March 2004 to March 2006, 155 consecutive minimal-trauma fracture subjects (mean age 64.0 +/- 17.6) attending fracture clinics at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, had a specific medical assessment, following which they were recommended BMD and laboratory testing. Treatment recommendations were given after review of investigations with further follow-up at a median of 8.6 months following therapy. Comparison of outcomes was made with a similar group of patients given written information 2 years prior.

RESULTS

At baseline, 47% of patients had prior fractures, but only 26% had had BMD screening. Twenty-one percent were on anti-resorptive therapy, and 15% were on calcium/vitamin D. Following intervention, 83% had a BMD and of these, 68% had a T-score < -1.0. Of treatment naïve patients, 44% were recommended anti-resorptive therapy and 56% were recommended calcium/vitamin D. Compliance was 80% for anti-resorptive and 76% for calcium/vitamin D. Female gender and lower BMD were predictors of compliance.

CONCLUSION

Compared with information-based intervention, direct intervention improved management two to fivefold, maintaining long-term treatment in 90% of osteoporotic and 73% of osteopenic subjects requiring therapy.

Bisphosphonates

Osteoporosis is the result of bone loss due to an imbalance in bone turnover such that bone resorption exceeds bone formation. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast activity that reduce bone turnover and re-establish the balance between bone resorption and formation. In clinical studies, several bisphosphonates prevent bone loss, preserve bone structure, improve bone strength and, in patients with osteoporosis, substantially reduce fracture risk. They are effective in multiple clinical settings including postmenopausal osteoporosis, low bone mass in men and drug-induced bone loss. Intermittent oral dosing and intravenous administration are more convenient than the original daily dosing regimen. These drugs are generally well tolerated and have an excellent safety profile in that serious side effects are uncommon. Potent bisphosphonates are generally the preferred treatment option for most patients with or at risk for osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis in young haemophiliacs from western India

Arthropathies and joint deformities in patients with severe hemophilia result in prolonged immobilization, reduced physical activity, and predispose them for osteoporosis. This can lead to an increasing tendency of bone fragility and fractures in patients after trivial trauma. The aim of this study was to find out (i) the prevalence of osteoporosis in hemophilia patients and (ii) the association of osteoporosis with hemophilic arthropathy and related restricted physical activity. In this case-control study, 50 consecutive severe hemophilia patients aged between 20 and 50 years were evaluated for osteoporosis with measurement of bone mass density (BMD) by a DEXA scan and values were compared with that of 50 sex matched normal healthy controls. Major joints of the limbs were evaluated to determine the extent of joint damage and related disability. Forty-two patients had severe hemophilia A and 8 patients severe hemophilia B (efficient factor activity < 0.01 U/ml). BMD values (gms/cm(2)) of lumbar spine and left hip of the patients were significantly lower than that of controls (0.825 vs. 0.939; P < 0.0001 and 0.725 vs. 0.938; P < 0.0001, respectively). The incidence of osteoporosis (T score: -2.5 or more) was significantly higher in hemophiliacs. Incidence of fractures in adult life was also significantly higher in hemophiliacs compared to controls (12% vs. 0%). There was statistically significant correlation between joint evaluation scores and BMD of hip, but not with that of the lumbar spine. There was no correlation between Hepatitis-C virus status and BMD of any site. This shows that development of osteoporosis is a significant problem in patients with severe hemophilia in this country. Hence appropriate preventive measures such as early treatment and adequate mobilization, exercises, encouragement to participate in sporting activities, early assessment of bone density, and administration of anti-osteoporotic therapy is recommended.

[Antiosteoporosis medication: useful monitoring, and how long should such treatment be continued?]

The improved options for effective treatment of osteoporosis and the shift to treatment strategies based on each patient's absolute fracture risk raise new questions in daily clinical care. Which patient should have what osteoprotective therapy and when and for how long? What techniques can be used to assess the individual effects of novel therapeuties? Are the results yielded by these techniques affected by concomitant factors? What specific characteristics need to be taken account of in rheumatological clinics and how should we deal with these? What is the impact of patient compliance on the assessment of therapeutic effects? This review is intended to shed some light on these questions and on the new DVO guidelines in daily practice with reference to the ambulatory setting.

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of osteoporosis

Fractures that occur as a result of osteoporosis are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. A treatment regimen consisting of both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions can be used to decrease the risk of fracture. Nonpharmacologic interventions include calcium and vitamin D supplementation, weight-bearing exercise, muscle strengthening, and fall prevention. Pharmacologic options include: the bisphosphonates, estrogen therapy, raloxifene, salmon calcitonin, and the anabolic agent teriparatide. Although bone mineral density is used clinically to diagnose osteoporosis, it is of limited value when evaluating pharmacologic treatment; the primary indicator of treatment efficacy is fracture risk reduction. The bisphosphonates are the preferred therapy for osteoporosis. Studies have demonstrated that in postmenopausal women, both risedronate and alendronate are associated with reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. The newest approved bisphosphonate, ibandronate, reduces vertebral fracture risk. Studies also support a reduction in fracture risk when alendronate and risedronate are used in men with osteoporosis and patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. When used appropriately, the bisphosphonates are well tolerated. Estrogen and raloxifene decrease fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis but are associated with thromboembolic events. Use of estrogen therapy is also limited by concerns about the safety of this type of therapy. Although the anabolic agent teriparatide is associated with reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, its use has been limited by the necessity of subcutaneous administration and its cost relative to other agents. Regardless of which treatment regimen is selected, health care providers need to emphasize the importance of compliance and adherence to improve persistence with therapy, and subsequent fracture reduction efficacy.