Ranitidine versus cimetidine. A comparison of their potential to cause clinically important drug interactions

Single and mixture toxicity of four pharmaceuticals of environmental concern to aquatic organisms, including a behavioral assessment

Pharmaceuticals are frequently detected in aquatic environments as mixtures and can cause toxic effects to non-target organisms. We aimed to evaluate the single and mixture effects of the pharmaceuticals metformin, bisoprolol, ranitidine and sotalol using Daphnia similis and Danio rerio. In addition, we aimed to test the predictive accuracy of the mathematical models concentration addition and independent action and to evaluate the nature of the possible toxicological interactions among these pharmaceuticals using the combination index-isobologram model. The acute toxicity of these four pharmaceuticals individually and of their binary mixtures were evaluated using the D. similis tests. Developmental and behavioral effects induced by the pharmaceuticals in quaternary mixtures were evaluated using D. rerio embryos. We observed that most of the binary mixture effects were in the zone between the effects predicted by the concentration addition and the independent action model. The combination index-isobologram model showed to be adequate to describe the nature of possible interactions occurring between the combined pharmaceuticals. Developmental and behavioral acute adverse effects seem not to be induced by the joint action of the quaternary mixture of the evaluated pharmaceuticals on D. rerio embryos, at the concentrations at which they are usually found in surface fresh waters. However, from the results obtained with D. similis, we can conclude that assessing the ecological risk based on the effects of individual pharmaceuticals can underestimate the risk level posed by these environmental contaminants.

Differential substrate and inhibitory activities of ranitidine and famotidine toward human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1; SLC22A1), hOCT2 (SLC22A2), and hOCT3 (SLC22A3)

Human organic cation transporters (hOCTs) are expressed in organs of drug absorption and elimination and play an important role in the uptake and elimination of xenobiotics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the substrate and inhibitory activity of the H2-receptor antagonists ranitidine and famotidine toward hOCTs and to determine the hOCT isoforms involved in the absorption and elimination of these compounds in humans. Inhibition and substrate specificity of hOCT1, hOCT2, and hOCT3 for ranitidine and famotidine were elucidated in cRNA-injected Xenopus laevis oocytes. Ranitidine and famotidine exhibited similarly potent inhibition of [3H]1-methyl-4-phenyl pyridinium uptake into hOCT1-expressing (IC50= 33 and 28 microM, respectively) and hOCT2-expressing oocytes (IC50= 76 and 114 microM, respectively). Famotidine exhibited potent inhibition of hOCT3; in contrast, ranitidine was a moderately weak inhibitor (IC50= 6.7 and 290 microM, respectively). [3H]Ranitidine uptake was stimulated by hOCT1 (Km= 70 +/- 9 microM) and to a much smaller extent by hOCT2. No stimulation of [3H]ranitidine uptake was observed in hOCT3-expressing oocytes. trans-Stimulation and electrophysiology studies suggested that famotidine also is an hOCT1 substrate and exhibits poor or no substrate activity toward hOCT2 and hOCT3. Thus, hOCT1, which is expressed in the intestine and liver, is likely to play a major role in the intestinal absorption and hepatic disposition of ranitidine and famotidine in humans, whereas hOCT2, the major isoform present in the kidney, may play only a minor role in their renal elimination. Famotidine seems to be one of the most potent inhibitors of hOCT3 yet identified.

Inhibition of zaleplon metabolism by cimetidine in the human liver: in vitro studies with subcellular fractions and precision-cut liver slices

1. The effect of cimetidine on the metabolism of zaleplon (ZAL) in human liver subcellular fractions and precision-cut liver slices was investigated. 2. ZAL was metabolized to a number of products including 5-oxo-ZAL (M2), which is known to be formed by aldehyde oxidase, N-desethyl-ZAL (DZAL), which is known to be formed by CYP3A forms, and N-desethyl-5-oxo-ZAL (M1). 3. Human liver microsomes catalysed the NADPH-dependent metabolism of ZAL to DZAL. Kinetic analysis of three microsomal preparations revealed mean (+/-SEM) S(50) and V(max) of 310 +/- 24 micro M and 920 +/- 274 pmol/min/mg protein, respectively. 4. Human liver cytosol preparations catalysed the metabolism of ZAL to M2. Kinetic analysis of three cytosol preparations revealed mean (+/-SEM), K(m) and V(max) of 124 +/- 14 micro M and 564 +/- 143 pmol/min/mg protein, respectively. 5. Cimetidine inhibited ZAL metabolism to DZAL in liver microsomes and to M2 in the liver cytosol. With a ZAL substrate concentration of 62 micro M, the calculated mean (+/-SEM, n = 3) IC50 were 596 +/- 103 and 231 +/- 23 micro M for DZAL and M2 formation, respectively. Kinetic analysis revealed that cimetidine was a competitive inhibitor of M2 formation in liver cytosol with a mean (+/-SEM, n = 3) K(i) of 155 +/- 16 micro M. 6. Freshly cut human liver slices metabolized ZAL to a number of products including 1, M2 and DZAL. 7. Cimetidine inhibited ZAL metabolism in liver slices to M1 and M2, but not to DZAL. Kinetic analysis revealed that cimetidine was a competitive inhibitor of M2 formation in liver slices with an average (n = 2 preparations) K(i) of 506 micro M. 8. The results demonstrate that cimetidine can inhibit both the CYP3A and aldehyde oxidase pathways of ZAL metabolism in the human liver. Cimetidine appears to be a more potent inhibitor of aldehyde oxidase than of CYP3A forms and hence in vivo is likely to have a more marked effect on ZAL metabolism to M2 than on DZAL formation. 9. The results also demonstrate that precision-cut liver slices may be a useful model system for in vitro drug-interaction studies.

The effect of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone in healthy adult male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Rosiglitazone is an insulin-sensitizing oral agent in the thiazolidinedione class used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It binds to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue. Ranitidine, a histamine2-receptor antagonist, may be prescribed for patients with type 2 diabetes and esophageal symptoms such as heartburn. By raising gastrointestinal pH levels, ranitidine may affect the bioavailability of coadministered drugs.

OBJECTIVES

This article presents the absolute bioavailability of rosiglitazone, as well as the effects of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone.

METHODS

Healthy men were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, 4-period, period-balanced crossover study of rosiglitazone and ranitidine. All individuals received each of 4 regimens successively, separated by a 4-day washout period: a single IV dose of rosiglitazone 2 mg administered alone over 1 hour; a single IV dose of rosiglitazone 2 mg administered over 1 hour on the fourth day of treatment with oral ranitidine 150 mg given every 12 hours; a single oral dose of rosiglitazone 4 mg alone; and a single oral dose of rosiglitazone 4 mg on the fourth day of treatment with oral ranitidine 150 mg given every 12 hours. The primary end point was dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)). Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), the time at which Cmax occurred (Tmax), plasma clearance (CL), steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), and terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Twelve individuals were enrolled. The absolute bioavailability of rosiglitazone was 99%. For AUC(0-infinity), the point estimate and the associated 95% CI for the ratio of ranitidine + IV rosiglitazone to IV rosiglitazone alone was 1.02 (range, 0.88-1.20). With oral rosiglitazone, the AUC(0-infinity) point estimate (95% CI) for the ratio of ranitidine + rosiglitazone to rosiglitazone alone was 0.99 (range, 0.85-1.16). Cmax, Tmax, t 1/2, Vss and CL of rosiglitazone, whether administered orally or intravenously, were unaffected by ranitidine. Oral and IV rosiglitazone were associated with a favorable safety profile and were well tolerated with or without concurrent ranitidine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of 12 healthy adult male volunteers, the absolute bioavailability of rosiglitazone was 99%, and the oral and IV single-dose pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone were unaltered by concurrent treatment with ranitidine.

The effect of cimetidine on the pharmacodynamics of theophylline-induced seizures and ethanol hypnotic activity

Due to its availability as an over-the-counter drug, the use of cimetidine is increasing, thus adverse interactions with other commonly used agents may also increase. The aim of this study was to investigate whether acute administration of cimetidine could alter the pharmacodynamics of theophylline neurotoxicity and the hypnotic action of ethanol. To examine these questions, rats received a dose of 77 mg/kg cimetidine followed by a constant infusion of either theophylline (1.2 mg/min.) or ethanol (16.3 mg/min.) until the onset of the pharmacological end point, maximal seizure or loss of righting reflex, where samples of blood and brain were obtained and assayed for either theophylline or ethanol. We report that cimetidine in doses that may cause pharmacokinetic interactions did not affect the concentration-effect relationship of either the stimulating action of theophylline or the depressant activity of ethanol. These outcomes emphasize the relative safety which patients using cimetidine in self-medication rely on.

Review article: drug interactions with agents used to treat acid-related diseases

Patients with acid-related diseases often need to take multiple medications. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection often includes either a histamine type 2 (H2)-receptor antagonist or a proton pump (H+,K(+)-ATPase) inhibitor (proton pump inhibitor), administered in conjunction with one or more antimicrobials. Also, treatment for acid-related diseases often requires extended therapy during which many concomitant medications may be administered for concurrent disease states. Polypharmacy may be the result, particularly in elderly patients, who are at increased risk for both acid-related and many other diseases. Thus, it is important to understand the potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions in this setting. H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors can influence the pharmacokinetic profiles of other commonly administered medications by elevating intragastric pH, which can alter drug absorption, and by interacting with the cytochrome P (CYP) 450 enzyme system, which can affect drug metabolism and clearance. Such interactions are particularly important when they affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges (e.g. warfarin, digoxin). In these cases, drug-drug interactions can result in significant toxicity and even death. There are marked differences among H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in their potential for such interactions. The oldest drugs in each class, cimetidine and omeprazole, respectively, have the greatest potential to alter CYP activity and change the pharmacokinetics of other drugs. The most recently developed H2-receptor antagonist, famotidine, and the newer proton pump inhibitors, rabeprazole and pantoprazole, are much less likely to induce or inhibit CYP and thereby change the metabolism of other medications. These differences are important when choosing medications for the safe treatment of patients with acid-related diseases.

Identification of cytochrome P450 isozymes involved in metabolism of the alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker tamsulosin in human liver microsomes

1. The in vitro human liver metabolism of the alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker tamsulosin was investigated. When 14C-tamsulosin was incubated with human liver microsomes, it was converted to five known urinary metabolites and at least three unknown metabolites. Of the former group, the predominant metabolite was the O-deethylated metabolite (M-1), followed by the o-ethoxyphenoxy acetic acid (AM-1) and the m-hydroxylated metabolite (M-3). 2. There was a good linear relationship between AM-1 formation and testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase activity in microsomes from each of 10 individual donors. The rate of M-1 formation also correlated with the same activity, albeit the correlation curve did not pass through the origin. By contrast, the rates of M-3 and the O-demethylated metabolite (M-4) formation correlated with dextromethorphan O-demethylase activity. 3. Ketoconazole strongly inhibited AM-1 formation and reduced that of M-1 by c. 60%. Immunoinhibition studies using anti-rat antibodies supported these results. The formation of M-3 and M-4 was inhibited by quinidine and sparteine. 4. It is concluded that formation of tamsulosin metabolites, AM-1 and M-1, is catalysed by CYP3A4 whereas that of M-3 and M-4 is catalysed by CYP2D6. However, minor contributions from other CYPs cannot be excluded.

Influence of ranitidine on the morphine-3-glucuronide to morphine-6-glucuronide ratio after oral administration of morphine in humans

1. In humans morphine is metabolised to morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) which possess no opioid activity, and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) which is a potent opioid receptor agonist that probably contribute to the desired as well as toxic effects of morphine. 2. In order to investigate the possible effect of ranitidine on morphine glucuronidation indicated by clinical studies and later confirmed in vitro, a double blind cross-over study on eight human volunteers administered oral morphine plus ranitidine or placebo was conducted. 3. Urine was collected in fractions for 24 h. Serum and urine samples were prepared by solid phase extraction and morphine, M3G and M6G were quantified by HPLC. 4. Ranitidine significantly reduced the individual serum M3G/M6G ratio, and tended to increase the serum AUC(0-90) of morphine. In contrast, ranitidine had no significant effect on the urinary M3G/M6G ratio. The urinary recovery of morphine or morphine glucuronides was unaffected by ranitidine. 5 Possible explanations to the apparent incongruity between the serum and urine data are discussed.

Shifting physician prescribing to a preferred histamine-2-receptor antagonist. Effects of a multifactorial intervention in a mixed-model health maintenance organization

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to determine whether a program of education, therapeutic reevaluation of eligible patients, and performance feedback could shift prescribing to cimetidine from other histamine-2 receptor antagonists, which commonly are used in the management of ulcers and reflux, and reduce costs without increasing rates of ulcer-related hospital admissions.

METHODS

This study used an interrupted monthly time series with comparison series in a large mixed-model health maintenance organization. Physicians employed in health centers (staff model) and physicians in independent medical groups contracting to provide health maintenance organization services (group model) participated. The comparative percentage prescribed of specific histamine-2 receptor antagonists (market share), total histamine-2 receptor antagonist prescribing, cost per histamine-2 receptor antagonist prescription, and the rate of hospitalization for gastrointestinal illness were assessed.

RESULTS

In the staff model, therapeutic reevaluation resulted in a sudden increase in market share of the preferred histamine-2 receptor antagonist cimetidine (+53.8%) and a sudden decrease in ranitidine (-44.7%) and famotidine (-4.8%); subsequently, cimetidine market share grew by 1.1% per month. In the group model, therapeutic reevaluation resulted in increased cimetidine market share (+9.7%) and decreased prescribing of other histamine-2 receptor antagonists (ranitidine -11.6%; famotidine -1.2%). Performance feedback did not result in further changes in prescribing in either setting. Use of omeprazole, an expensive alternative, essentially was unchanged by the interventions, as were overall histamine-2 receptor antagonist prescribing and hospital admissions for gastrointestinal illnesses. This intervention, which cost approximately $60,000 to implement, resulted in estimated annual savings in histamine-2 receptor antagonist expenditures of $1.06 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual savings in histamine-2 receptor antagonist expenditures after this multifaceted intervention were more than implementation costs, with no discernible effects on numbers of hospitalizations. The magnitude of effect and cost savings were much greater in the staff model; organizational factors and economic incentives may have contributed to these differences. More research is needed to determine the generalizability of this approach to other technologies and managed care settings.

Comparison of the effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of disopyramide in man

The widely prescribed antiulcer agents cimetidine and ranitidine have the potential to affect the absorption, metabolism or renal excretion of disopyramide. This study investigated the effect of a single oral dose of cimetidine or ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide in six healthy volunteers. The treatment was conducted in a randomized cross-over design. Serum levels and urinary recoveries of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide were assayed by HPLC. Cimetidine significantly elevated the maximum plasma concentration of disopyramide, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and the total amount of disopyramide excreted unchanged in the urine, but the serum profile of mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide was not significantly affected. The effects of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide were not significant. The interaction between cimetidine and disopyramide occurred mainly at the site of absorption. The results indicate that cimetidine, but not ranitidine, significantly increased the absorption of orally administered disopyramide.

Effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine in rabbits

PURPOSE

The effects of concomitant administration of the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-receptor antagonists chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine were studied in rabbits.

METHOD

A single dose of chlorpheniramine 10 mg (Group A) or diphenhydramine 10 mg (Group B) was given intravenously on three different study days as follows: 2 weeks before cimetidine administration, after giving cimetidine 100 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours for one week, and two weeks after discontinuing the cimetidine. Serum chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine concentrations were measured by HPLC. Histamine H1-blockade was assessed by measuring suppression of the histamine-induced wheals in the skin.

RESULTS

The chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine terminal elimination half-life values and area under the curve values were significantly increased, and the systemic clearance rates were significantly decreased, during concomitant administration of cimetidine. For each H1-receptor antagonist, pharmacokinetic parameters were similar before cimetidine was co-administered and two weeks after cimetidine was discontinued. Wheal suppression produced by chlorpheniramine or diphenhydramine was increased and prolonged when cimetidine was administered concomitantly.

CONCLUSION

Any enhanced peripheral H1-blockade observed could be attributed, at least in part, to a pharmacokinetic interaction.

Comparative role of omeprazole in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To review gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its treatment, with emphasis on the use and place of omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor.

DATA SOURCES

A compilation prepared by the National Library of Medicine's Interactive Retrieval Services (Medlars II) for the period 1987 to 1994 was used as the data source.

STUDY SELECTION

Focus was placed on human comparative clinical studies with well-accepted measures of esophageal healing (endoscopy) and symptom resolution. Safety data were compiled from the clinical trials literature and large postmarketing data studies. Pharmacoeconomic studies selected were judged to meet the criteria of good design, presence of sensitivity testing, and statement of perspective.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were obtained from double-blind, controlled clinical studies. Other data were extracted from pertinent literature of good design and significant results.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Overall, the clinical trials of omeprazole for the treatment of patients with erosive GERD demonstrate that omeprazole provides superior therapy in terms of esophageal healing symptom resolution and patient compliance when compared with histamine2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and antacids. In addition, studies also indicate that omeprazole is the most effective agent for the treatment of patients with GERD refractory to other treatments. Dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function or in the elderly. Finally, although the acquisition drug cost for daily treatment of patients with GERD is highest with the use of omeprazole, pharmacoeconomic studies indicate that treatment is more cost-effective with the use of omeprazole than with H2RA or antacid treatment alone or combined with nonpharmacologic approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, omeprazole is the drug of choice for the treatment of patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive GERD.

Safety of acid-suppressing drugs

There is an extensive literature on the adverse effects of drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion. This study presents a critical examination of interactions between antisecretory drugs and other compounds, the frequency of serious adverse effects relating to various body systems, the safety of antisecretory drugs in pregnancy, and longer-term safety data from postmarketing surveillance studies. While interactions with some other drugs, alcohol, and certain carcinogens are of potential concern, in practice clinically significant reactions appear to be rare if they occur at all. A small number of major side-effects have been documented, but they occur rarely, and postmarketing surveillance has not detected other longer-term sequelae. Safety of these drugs in pregnancy is not established, as data are so few. It is concluded that antisecretory agents, by comparison with most other classes of drugs, are remarkably well tolerated.

Pharmacological attempts to improve the bioavailability of oral etoposide

Etoposide demonstrates incomplete and variable bioavailability after oral dosing, which may be due to its concentration and pH-dependent stability in artificial gastric and intestinal fluids. The use of agents that may influence etoposide stability and, thereby, bioavailability, was investigated in a number of clinical studies. Drugs that influence the rate of gastric emptying, while modulating the time of drug absorption, did not significantly alter the etoposide area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or bioavailability. Specifically, metoclopramide had little effect on the etoposide absorption profile and did not significantly alter the AUC (AUC with etoposide alone, 68.4 +/- 20.3 micrograms ml-1 h, versus 74.3 +/- 25.9 micrograms ml-1 h with metoclopramide), suggesting that in most patients the drug is already emptied rapidly from the stomach. In contrast, propantheline produced a dramatic effect on etoposide absorption, delaying the time of maximal concentration tmax from 1.1 to 3.5 h (P < 0.01), but again without a significant improvement in drug AUC or bioavailability across the 24-h study period (AUC with etoposide alone 78.3 +/- 19.1 micrograms ml-1 h, versus 88.1 +/- 23.6 micrograms ml-1 h with propantheline). The effect of these drugs on the absorption of oral paracetamol, a drug included in the study as a marker of gastric emptying, was exactly the same as that found for etoposide, with no change in AUC being observed after metoclopramide or propantheline administration but a significant delay in tmax being seen on co-administration with etoposide and propantheline. The co-administration of ethanol or bile salts (agents that significantly improved the stability of etoposide in artificial intestinal fluid) with oral etoposide similarly had no effect on improving the etoposide AUC or reducing the variability in AUC, suggesting that drug stability in vivo was not affected by these agents. In the third study the co-administration of cimetidine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of oral or i.v. etoposide, despite the previous observation that etoposide stability was markedly improved at pH 3-5 as compared with pH 1 in artificial gastric fluid. This series of studies, designed to investigate factors that improved etoposide stability in laboratory studies, failed to demonstrate any potentially useful improvement in AUC or bioavailability in the clinical setting.

Effect of the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-receptor antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine in rabbits

The effects of coadministration of the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-receptor antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine were studied in rabbits. A single dose of hydroxyzine, 10 mg (Experiment A), or cetirizine, 10 mg (Experiment B), was given intravenously on three occasions: 2 weeks before cimetidine administration, after cimetidine, 100 mg/kg, had been given every 12 hr for 1 week, and 2 weeks after the cimetidine was discontinued. Serum concentrations of hydroxyzine and cetirizine, the active metabolite of hydroxyzine arising in vivo (Experiment A), or cetirizine (Experiment B) were measured by HPLC. The pharmacologic effects of hydroxyzine and cetirizine were monitored by measuring the suppression of histamine-induced wheals, using an IBM-PC and digitizer. The hydroxyzine and cetirizine half-life and AUC0-->infinity values were significantly increased and the systemic clearance rates were significantly decreased in the presence of cimetidine. Similar results were obtained when cetirizine was administered de novo. Wheal suppression produced by hydroxyzine or cetirizine was increased and prolonged in the presence of cimetidine. The synergism observed between hydroxyzine or cetirizine and cimetidine in suppression of the histamine-induced cutaneous response may be due to a pharmacokinetic interaction.

Effect of concomitantly administered cimetidine or ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of the 5-HT2-receptor antagonist ritanserin

The effects of concurrent administration of either cimetidine 800 mg once daily or ranitidine 300 mg once daily on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ritanserin 10 mg were investigated in an open, randomized three-way cross-over, controlled investigation in 9 healthy volunteers. Concurrent administration of cimetidine had no significant effect on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of ritanserin compared with control experiments. The maximum plasma concentration of ritanserin was decreased significantly (105.0 +/- 9.2 versus 125.0 +/- 13.8 ng/mL; P = .0039), whereas time to reach maximal concentration (tmax) of ritanserin was only slightly but not significantly increased, if the subjects were pretreated with cimetidine. After concurrent ingestion of ranitidine, only a trend to a decrease in the maximum plasma concentration of ritanserin was observed. Time to achieve the maximum plasma concentration, terminal half-life of elimination, and the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve of ritanserin were not altered in comparison with control experiments. The results of the study show that concurrent treatment with cimetidine 800 mg once daily or ranitidine 300 mg once daily has no apparent effect on the systemically available amount of ritanserin after a single oral dose of 10 mg. Both H2-antagonists cause a significant (cimetidine) or borderline significant (ranitidine) decrease of the maximum plasma concentration of ritanserin and a slight but not significant increase in tmax (cimetidine). These effects are of minor clinical importance and seem most likely be due to a decrease of the rate of absorption of ritanserin during concurrent administration of cimetidine/ranitidine.

Potentiation of the hypoglycaemic response to glipizide in diabetic patients by histamine H2-receptor antagonists

In a randomised placebo controlled study, two groups of six maturity onset diabetic patients stabilised on glipizide were given cimetidine (400 mg) or ranitidine (150 mg) 3 h before a standardised meal. In comparison with placebo, both cimetidine and ranitidine significantly reduced the post-prandial rise in blood glucose by a mean of 40% and 25% respectively producing glucose levels of less than 3 mmol l-1 (lowest 1.5 mmol l-1) in four patients. Both drugs also significantly increased plasma glipizide AUC by approximately 20%. Caution should be exercised when initiating treatment with H2-receptor antagonists in diabetics receiving sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents.

Pharmacology of gastric acid inhibition

Gastric acid secretion is precisely regulated by neural (acetylcholine), hormonal (gastrin), and paracrine (histamine; somatostatin) mechanisms. The stimulatory effect of acetylcholine and gastrin is mediated via increase in cytosolic calcium, whereas that of histamine is mediated via activation of adenylate cyclase and generation of cAMP. Potentiation between histamine and either gastrin or acetylcholine may reflect postreceptor interaction between the distinct pathways and/or the ability of gastrin and acetylcholine to release histamine from mucosal ECL cells. The prime inhibitor of acid secretion is somatostatin. Its inhibitory paracrine effect is mediated predominantly by receptors coupled via guanine nucleotide binding proteins to inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity. All the pathways converge on and modulate the activity of the luminal enzyme, H+,K(+)-ATPase, the proton pump of the parietal cell. Precise information on the mechanisms involved in gastric acid secretion and the identification of specific receptor subtypes has led to the development of potent drugs capable of inhibiting acid secretion. These include competitive antagonists that interact with stimulatory receptors (e.g. muscarinic M1-receptor antagonists and histamine H2-receptor antagonists) as well as non-competitive inhibitors of H+,K(+)-ATPase (e.g. omeprazole). The histamine H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine and roxatidine acetate) continue as first-line therapy for peptic ulcer disease and are effective in preventing relapse. Although they are generally well tolerated, histamine H2-receptor antagonists may cause untoward CNS, cardiac and endocrine effects, as well as interfering with the absorption, metabolism and elimination of various drugs. The dominance of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists is now being challenged by omeprazole. Omeprazole reaches the parietal cell via the bloodstream, diffuses through the cytoplasm and becomes activated and trapped as a sulfenamide in the acidic canaliculus of the parietal cell. Here, it covalently binds to H+,K(+)-ATPase, the hydrogen pump of the parietal cell, thereby irreversibly blocking acid secretion in response to all modes of stimulation. The main potential drawback to its use is its extreme potency which sometimes leads to virtual anacidity, gastrin cell hyperplasia, hypergastrinaemia and, in rats, to the development of carcinoid tumours. The cholinergic receptor on the parietal cell has recently been identified as an M3 subtype and that on postganglionic intramural neurones of the submucosal plexus as an M1 subtype.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Change in prescribing patterns of intravenous histamine2-receptor antagonists results in significant cost savings without adversely affecting patient care

OBJECTIVE

The cooperative efforts and educational activities associated with a major histamine2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) formulary change and the clinical and financial results are described. EVALUATION PROCESS: An extensive financial and clinical evaluation was conducted. Sources included primary literature, reference texts, institution-specific financial data, and reports of other hospitals' experiences.

INTERVENTIONS

Through cooperative efforts with key members of the medical staff, several interventions were adopted: maintain only one parenteral H2RA on the formulary; develop guidelines for H2RA use and stress ulcer prophylaxis; investigate a target drug-reminder system to promote oral H2RA use.

RESULTS

Within a month after implementing the formulary change and educational process, prescribing of parenteral H2RAs changed from 80 percent ranitidine to 99 percent cimetidine. Monitoring of nonformulary ranitidine use revealed only three cases of possible or probable association of adverse central nervous system effects with cimetidine in an eight-month period. Elevations of theophylline, lidocaine, or phenytoin serum concentrations; or prothrombin time above the therapeutic range during warfarin therapy occurred in only 5 of 142 monitored patients who received concomitant therapy with an H2RA. No change in serum theophylline concentrations above the therapeutic range was noted to the hospital before and after the conversion. Savings have been estimated at $250,000 in the first year and $775,000 over four years, mostly from the conversion from intravenous ranitidine to intravenous cimetidine therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful intervention can be accomplished by cooperation between the pharmacy and the medical staff to achieve cost savings without sacrificing the quality of care.

Clinical relevance of cimetidine drug interactions

The excellent efficacy and tolerability profiles of H2-antagonists have established these agents as the leading class of antiulcer drugs. Attention has been focused on drug interactions with H2-antagonists as a means of product differentiation and because many patients are receiving multiple drug therapy. The main mechanism of most drug interactions involving cimetidine appears to be inhibition of the hepatic microsomal enzyme cytochrome P450, an effect which may be related to the different structures of H2-antagonists. Ranitidine appears to have less affinity than cimetidine for this system. There have been many published case reports and studies of drug interactions with cimetidine, but many of these have provided pharmacokinetic data only, with little information concerning the clinical significance of these findings. Nevertheless, the coadministration of cimetidine with drugs that have a narrow therapeutic margin (such as theophylline) may potentially result in clinically significant adverse effects. The monitoring of serum concentrations of drugs coadministered with cimetidine may reduce the risk of adverse events but does not abolish the problem. However, for most patients, concomitant administration of cimetidine with drugs possessing a wide therapeutic margin is unlikely to pose a significant problem.

Ranitidine treatment and cortisol metabolism in man

Experimental evidence suggested that H2-receptor antagonists may inhibit not only hepatic but also adrenal cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenases. Therefore, the effects of ranitidine (150 mg b.i.d. over 14 days) on cortisol metabolism and antipyrine clearance have been investigated in nine healthy volunteers. Urinary excretion of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol (6 beta-OHC) and 17-hydroxycorticosteroids (17-OHCS) remained unaffected by ranitidine pretreatment, as did the calculated 6 beta-OHC/17-OHCS ratio. Only marginal effects were observed on antipyrine kinetics and metabolite formation. We conclude that neither adrenal production of corticosteroids nor their hepatic metabolism is affected by ranitidine administration.

The effect of raising gastric pH with ranitidine on the absorption and elimination of theophylline from a sustained-release theophylline tablet

Prior to evaluating the effect of ranitidine on theophylline absorption from a sustained-release theophylline tablet, the effect of ranitidine on the time course of gastric pH in 12 healthy subjects was evaluated with an encapsulated radio-telemetry device (Heidelberg capsule). Gastric pH was measured hourly from 7 AM to 1 PM prior to beginning ranitidine treatment at 2 PM (150 mg every 4 hr for eight doses). The next day, pH was again measured hourly from 7 AM to 7 PM. Subjects fasted overnight and remained fasted until lunch at 11 AM. Prior to ranitidine treatment, the mean morning gastric pH remained between 1.5 and 2.2. After lunch, the pH increased to 2.2-2.3. During ranitidine treatment the mean morning gastric pH measurements were 5.5 to 5.8, decreasing after lunch to 3.1 by 4 PM and increasing to 3.9 at 7 PM. One week later the subjects participated in a three-way crossover theophylline bioavailability study receiving at weekly intervals, single doses at 7 AM of (a) 5 x 100-mg immediate-release tablets, (b) 2 x 300-mg sustained-release theophylline tablets, and (c) 2 x 300-mg sustained-release theophylline tablets after ranitidine pretreatment of 150 mg every 4 hr beginning at 2 PM the previous day. The increase in gastric pH with ranitidine had no effect (P greater than 0.05) on the rate and extent of absorption or on the elimination rate of theophylline.

Omeprazole drug interaction studies

This review examines the literature on drug interactions with omeprazole. Different mechanisms have been proposed as potential causes for such interactions. First, the absorption of some drugs might be altered due to the decreased intragastric acidity resulting from omeprazole treatment. There was no effect of omeprazole on the absorption of amoxycillin, bacampicillin and alcohol, while the amount of digoxin and nifedipine absorbed was increased by 10 and 21%, respectively, both increases probably being of no clinical significance. Secondly, the metabolism of high clearance drugs might be altered by changes in liver blood flow, although that is not affected by omeprazole, as indicated by the unchanged elimination of indocyanine green. In addition, the clearance of intravenously administered lidocaine (lignocaine) [a high clearance drug] was unaffected by omeprazole, further indicating that the latter does not alter liver blood flow. Thirdly, since omeprazole is a substituted benzimidazole, it might have the potential to interfere with the metabolism of other drugs by altering the activity of drug metabolising enzymes in the cytochrome P450 system, through either induction or inhibition. There is no indication of induction of this enzyme system in any interaction study with omeprazole. As regards inhibition, on the other hand, there is now considerable information available which indicates that omeprazole has the potential to partly inhibit the metabolism of drugs metabolised to a great extent by the cytochrome P450 enzyme subfamily IIC (diazepam, phenytoin), but not of those metabolised by subfamilies IA (caffeine, theophylline), IID (metoprolol, propranolol) and IIIA (cyclosporin, lidocaine, quinidine). Since relatively few drugs are metabolised mainly by IIC compared with IID and IIIA, the potential for omeprazole to interfere with the metabolism of other drugs appears to be limited.

Side effects of ranitidine

Ranitidine was first marketed in 1981; since then many patients have been treated such that much experience has been accumulated on the safety of this histamine H2-receptor antagonist in the treatment of gastroduodenal disease. A wide array of ranitidine-associated side effects has been described, but infrequently. As so much information is now available, the aim of this review is to assess the weight of evidence for a causal link between ranitidine and the reported side effects. Overall, ranitidine is well tolerated. The incidence of general side effects at less than 2% is very similar to placebo. Headaches, tiredness, dizziness and mild gastrointestinal disturbance (e.g. diarrhoea, constipation and nausea) are among the most frequent complaints, but have very seldom resulted in stopping treatment. Cardiovascular side effects are extremely rare and unpredictable with the usual doses of oral ranitidine (at most 1 in 1 million patients). They mostly comprise sinusal bradycardia and atrioventricular blockade, especially after rapid intravenous administration, receding after cessation of the drug. Clinical studies, however, have not shown a significant pharmacological effect of ranitidine on the cardiovascular system via H2-receptors, even though individual sensitivities cannot be ruled out in a few isolated reports. Ranitidine is unlikely to be directly hepatotoxic: a transient change in liver function tests has been noted in only 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000 patients. Several cases of mixed hepatitis have been reported, but very few were fully documented. The incidence of ranitidine-associated acute hepatitis has been estimated to be less than 1 in 100,000 patients. Neuropsychiatric complications may be less common and clinically quite similar to those reported with cimetidine, i.e. confusion, disorientation, hallucinations, delirium. These side effects have occurred especially in critically ill and multiple-therapy patients, or patients with chronic renal or hepatic failure, so that the direct causal link with ranitidine treatment was often difficult to ascertain. Even though an H2-receptor-mediated effect is an attractive hypothesis (since similar complications were noted with other H2-receptor antagonists), other mechanisms have been suggested to play a role, e.g. cholinergic or histaminic effects. The overall incidence of neuropsychiatric complications is probably markedly less than 1%. White cell injury (i.e. agranulocytosis) appears to be the most frequent haematological complication, even though case reports are very few and poorly documented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The drug interaction potential of ranitidine: an update

Ranitidine is a H2-receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders. Since cimetidine--the predecessor drug of ranitidine--interacts with a variety of other agents and moreover ranitidine is often administered in combination with other drugs the interaction potential of ranitidine has been subject to extensive investigations. This review updates the information available from 1988 to present. Pharmacokinetic interactions of ranitidine with other drugs may occur at the site of absorption, metabolism and renal excretion. Most of the interactions reported at each of the three levels are minor and of low clinical significance. In view of some uncontrolled anecdotal reports, one cannot completely rule out the possibility that ranitidine might have some limited interaction potential in special patient populations under certain clinical conditions. However, it must be emphasized that numerous controlled studies have proven that ranitidine can be safely coadministered with other drugs.

Interaction of tertatolol with rifampicin and ranitidine pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive activity

The interaction of the new beta-receptor antagonist tertatolol with rifampicin and ranitidine was investigated in ten patients with arterial hypertension (WHO stages I-II). They were treated orally with a single dose of tertatolol 5 mg alone and, after randomized allocation, with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 1 week each (tertatolol 5 mg was concurrently administered on the seventh day of the treatment phases). Following each therapeutic phase, circadian blood pressure values as well as kinetic parameters were obtained. On treatment with tertatolol alone, maximum plasma concentrations were 123.7 +/- 32.4 ng/ml (mean +/- SD) and were reached after 1.95 +/- 1.77 hours. The tertatolol elimination half-life was 9.0 +/- 7.1 hours. Coadministration of ranitidine did not significantly alter the kinetic parameters and antihypertensive effect of tertatolol. Rifampicin, however, decreased the maximum plasma levels of tertatolol to 80.6 +/- 18.5 ng/ml and markedly shortened the elimination half-life to 3.4 +/- 2.6 hours (p less than 0.01 compared with tertatolol alone). Urinary excretion of parent tertatolol and unchanged 4-hydroxy tertatolol was decreased under rifampicin, and a tendency to a reduction in the effect of tertatolol on circadian blood pressure values was observed. Twenty-four hours after administration, the heart rate in those patients on tertatolol alone (68 +/- 6 beats/min) was lower than in those on tertatolol plus rifampicin (74 +/- 7 beats/min). In conclusion, a pronounced pharmacokinetic interaction, with a limited consequence in terms of pharmacodynamic effects, was found in the present study when tertatolol was administered with rifampicin, but not with ranitidine.

Enzyme induction and inhibition

The rate and extent of drug metabolism significantly influences drug effect. Enzyme induction by increasing the metabolism of drugs may result in important drug interactions. Other implications of enzyme induction include alterations in the metabolism of endogenous substrates, vitamins and activity of extrahepatic enzyme systems. Similarly a wide range of drugs may produce clinically significant drug interactions following enzyme inhibition. Assessment of enzyme induction and inhibition in man involves diverse methods including the use of model drugs.

Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the elderly. An update

There are numerous studies of drug handling in the elderly, but it is difficult to assess the significance of changes seen in vitro, or after single-dose administration, because they are often compensated by other mechanisms at steady-state. However, a knowledge of these studies is important as the results alert the investigator to possible treatment problems. The high incidence of adverse drug reaction in the elderly population leaves no doubt that improvements in therapy are needed. Research has been directed at seeking patterns of abnormality in the elderly on which to base recommendations for alterations in dosage regimens. The major shortcoming of this approach has been the failure to distinguish between the effect of chronological age on drug pharmacokinetics, and drug kinetics in elderly people with multiple pathology. The latter concern appreciates the variety of factors involved and the importance of treating each patient as an individual: presentation of mean data is confusing and misleading. The objective of drug treatment in any age group, but particularly in the elderly, is to administer the smallest possible dose which gives adequate therapeutic benefit throughout the entire dosage interval with the minimum of side effects. For most drugs the safe starting dose in the elderly is one-third to half that recommended in the young. Vigilance for potential side effects with plasma concentration monitoring, if available, should help keep toxicity to a minimum. When other medications are added or changed, the possibility of interaction should be anticipated. Methods for individualisation of dosage regimens and the use of sustained-release formulations in the elderly are discussed. Dosage alteration in the elderly in terms of reduced dose frequency, rather than dose size, may help improve compliance. A knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of a drug helps determine which approach will be most beneficial.

Histamine inhibition of mixed function oxidase activity in rat and human liver microsomes and in the isolated perfused rat liver

The imidazole ring is a common structural feature of some xenobiotics that inhibit cytochrome P-450-catalysed reactions. Histamine is a 4-substituted imidazole and a preliminary study has shown it to be an inhibitor of rat liver microsomal drug oxidation. This work has now been extended. Histamine appears to be a competitive inhibitor of the alpha-hydroxylation (HM) (Ki = 164 microM; IC50 at 20 microM = 308 microM) and O-demethylation (ODM) (Ki = 243 microns; IC50 at 20 microM = 400 microM) of metoprolol in rat liver microsomes. Of the metabolites of histamine only N-acetylhistamine showed comparable inhibitory potency to that of the parent compound. Histamine impaired the disappearance of lignocaine when incubated with rat liver microsomes. This was accompanied by a corresponding inhibition of 3-hydroxy-lignocaine appearance. Histamine produced a type II spectral interaction with rat liver microsomes (lambda max = 432 nm, lambda min = 408 nm; Ks = 0.11 mM). When histamine was incubated alone with rat liver microsomes no loss of substrate was observed. The oxidation of metoprolol by human liver microsomes was impaired by histamine (IC50 values for ODM appearance at 25 microM: liver HL1 greater than 10, HL3 = 3.8 and HL4 = 3.7 mM). In comparison, cimetidine had an IC50 value of 1.5 mM using microsomes from liver HL3. Addition of histamine impaired the elimination of metoprolol by the isolated perfused rat liver in a dose-dependent manner (P less than 0.001, one-way analysis of variance). These data demonstrate that histamine can enter hepatocytes, interact with cytochrome P-450 and inhibit some drug oxidation reactions. The physiological relevance of inhibition of drug metabolism by histamine remains to be determined.

The effect of roxatidine acetate and cimetidine on hepatic drug clearance assessed by simultaneous administration of three model substrates

The effect of pretreatment for 7 days with either roxatidine acetate 75 mg twice daily or cimetidine 200 mg four times daily on the kinetics of antipyrine (AP), trimethadione (TMO) and indocyanine green (ICG) was studied in seven healthy, male, nonsmoking subjects. After pretreatment with cimetidine, the plasma clearances (CL) of AP and TMO were significantly lower and the elimination half-life (t1/2) of AP was significantly increased. The volumes of distribution (V) of AP and TMO were not affected. After roxatidine acetate, the pharmacokinetics of AP and TMO were unchanged. The cumulative renal excretion (% dose) and formation clearance of 3-hydroxymethyl-3-nor-antipyrine (NORA) were lowered by cimetidine treatment, but not following the administration of roxatidine acetate. ICG clearance was not changed significantly by either pretreatment. The results of this study show that roxatidine acetate does not impair the metabolism of three model substrates used to assess hepatic drug clearance.

Haematological adverse effects of histamine H2-receptor antagonists

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases related to gastric acid hypersecretion. Cimetidine was introduced into medical practice in 1976 and ranitidine, famotidine and nizatidine in 1981, 1985 and 1987, respectively. Haematological adverse effects are relatively uncommon and most have been reported in cases of cimetidine administration. These adverse effects are reviewed under 4 main headings: (a) blood cytopenias and leucocytosis; (b) coagulation disorders related to drug interactions with oral anticoagulants; (c) reduction of dietary iron absorption; and (d) reduction of dietary cobalamin absorption. 85 reported cases of blood cytopenias attributed to these drugs are reviewed, of which 75 (88%) were associated with cimetidine therapy. In postmarketing surveillance studies, the incidence of cimetidine-associated blood cytopenia has been evaluated at about 2.3 per 100,000 patients. Neutropenia and agranulocytosis are by far the most frequently encountered. Whatever the drug or the type of cytopenia, this adverse effect is almost always rapidly reversible when treatment is stopped. Moreover, in several cases other factors such as underlying diseases or additional drugs could have been responsible, at least partly, for the cytopenia. The pathophysiological basis of these adverse effects remains poorly explained. Various mechanisms have been proposed, which in some cases are probably associated: (a) direct toxicity for haemopoietic stem cells; (b) drug-induced immune reactions leading to blood or bone marrow cell damage, and (c) drug interactions, with increased and prolonged action of potentially haematotoxic drugs. Mechanisms (a) and (c) appear to be of particular clinical importance in cases of impaired renal elimination of H2-receptor antagonists. Cimetidine and probably to a lesser extent ranitidine potentiate the action of oral anticoagulants of both coumarin and indanedione structure. This may result in haemorrhagic complications. Such action is a consequence of the reduced hepatic metabolism of oral anticoagulants through a dose-dependent, reversible inhibition of cytochrome P450. Malabsorption of dietary iron and cobalamin appears to result from inhibition of gastric secretion by the H2-receptor antagonists. This is of no clinical importance in short term treatment, but long term use of H2-receptor antagonists may theoretically contribute to the occurrence of iron or cobalamin deficiency anaemia.