Comparison of antihypertensive effect and pharmacokinetics of conventional and extended release felodipine tablets in patients with arterial hypertension

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model of the CYP3A4 Substrate Felodipine for Drug-Drug Interaction Modeling

The antihypertensive felodipine is a calcium channel blocker of the dihydropyridine type, and its pharmacodynamic effect directly correlates with its plasma concentration. As a sensitive substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 with high first-pass metabolism, felodipine shows low oral bioavailability and is susceptible to drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with CYP3A4 perpetrators. This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) parent–metabolite model of felodipine and its metabolite dehydrofelodipine for DDI predictions. The model was developed in PK-Sim^® and MoBi^® using 49 clinical studies (94 plasma concentration–time profiles in total) that investigated different doses (1–40 mg) of the intravenous and oral administration of felodipine. The final model describes the metabolism of felodipine to dehydrofelodipine by CYP3A4, sufficiently capturing the first-pass metabolism and the subsequent metabolism of dehydrofelodipine by CYP3A4. Diastolic blood pressure and heart rate PD models were included, using an E_max function to describe the felodipine concentration–effect relationship. The model was tested in DDI predictions with itraconazole, erythromycin, carbamazepine, and phenytoin as CYP3A4 perpetrators, with all predicted DDI AUC_last and C_max ratios within two-fold of the observed values. The model will be freely available in the Open Systems Pharmacology model repository and can be applied in DDI predictions as a CYP3A4 victim drug.

A number of marketed dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers have mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist activity

Calcium channel blockers are widely used antihypertensives. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are also used to treat hypertension and heart failure. We report here that a number of widely used dihydropyridine class calcium channel blockers are able to inhibit aldosterone-induced activation of mineralocorticoid receptor. These dihydropyridines varied in the extent of their effect on mineralocorticoid receptor, with nimodipine and felodipine the most potent and amlodipine the least. In contrast, both diltiazem and verapamil, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, had no effect on mineralocorticoid receptor. These dihydropyridines compete with aldosterone for binding and block aldosterone-induced coactivator recruitment to mineralocorticoid receptor. The mineralocorticoid receptor S810L mutant, which is activated by steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist such as eplerenone, is inhibited by these drugs. Furthermore, nimodipine decreased aldosterone-induced expression of the mineralocorticoid receptor target gene epithelial sodium channel gamma subunit in adrenalectomized rats, demonstrating that dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers can function as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in vivo. Molecular modeling indicates that dihydropyridines dock into the ligand binding domain of mineralocorticoid receptor in a consensus pose that partially overlaps with steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Together, our data suggest that, in addition to their calcium channel blocking activity, a number of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers also have mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist activity at high doses, a finding which may thus prove useful for the design of novel antihypertensive drugs in the future.

Bioequivalence study of nicardipine solution versus nicardipine tablets

The bioequivalence of a solution (investigational product) and a tablet (reference product) formulation of the dihydropyridine-type derivative Ca2+ antagonist nicardipine were investigated by measuring plasma levels of the compound after single randomized administration of 20 mg of the two formulations. Drugs were given orally in a single dose to 24 healthy volunteers (12 males and 12 females) at the beginning of the experiment and after a two weeks wash-out. Nicardipine is available in oral and intravenous formulations, the second being used for the short-term treatment of hypertensive crises. Oral formulations of nicardipine most diffused include immediate release (20 or 30 mg, three times a day administration), sustained release (30 mg, 45 mg or 60 mg, twice a day administration) and modified release (80 mg, once a day administration) tablets. A nicardipine solution is available only in Spain, but no published studies on the kinetics of this formulation are available. In the last 15 years, the main efforts were aimed to develop sustained or controlled release formulations of nicardipine to improve patient compliance by reducing the number of doses required each day. However, the use of twice a day or once a day administration of Ca2+ antagonists should be not overemphasized in particular situations like those of possible risk of cerebrovascular and/or coronary steal effect primarily in the elderly. The oral formulation of nicardipine investigated with a bioequivalence range > 70% compared to nicardipine immediate release tablets may represent an additional resource for treating elderly patients with concomitant cerebrovascular or coronary heart disease.

Effects of felodipine ER, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, on blood pressure and serum lipids

In an open trial, the antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine and its effects on lipid metabolism were investigated in 117 Nordic patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. In the intent-to-treat analysis (n = 106) a significant (p < 0.01) drop in the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure values was observed between baseline and 24 weeks' treatment from 157/100 mmHg to 145/92 (supine) and from 155/103 to 145/96 mmHg (erect). No relevant differences were seen in the pulse rate. Median total cholesterol and triglycerides remained unchanged, whereas HDL-cholesterol increased significantly from 1.30 mmol/l to 1.33 mmol/l (p < 0.02); LDL- and VLDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1 and apolipoprotein B remained unchanged during the 24-week treatment period. In the per protocol analysis (n = 76), blood pressure values changed significantly from 158/100 mmHg to 144/91 mmHg (supine) and from 157/104 mmHg to 143/95 mmHg (erect) (p < 0.01 for both). HDL-cholesterol increased significantly (p = 0.03), whereas LDL- and VLDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as the apolipoproteins, remained unchanged during the trial. Felodipine thus proved to possess positive effects on lipid parameters in hypertensive patients.

Novel drug-delivery systems for hypertension

Although novel controlled-release drug-delivery systems have been used in other areas of medicine, their application in the treatment of hypertension has been relatively recent. Biotechnical use of chemical-dispensing systems has been applied to propranolol, clonidine (the transdermal therapeutic system), nifedipine (the gastrointestinal therapeutic system), verapamil (the sodium alginate and spheroidal oral-delivery absorption system), felodipine (the hydrophilic gel principle), metoprolol succinate (the multiple-unit pellet system), and diltiazem (one system comprising sustained-release beads and the other utilizing the patented Geomatrix extended-release system). Oral drug-delivery systems allow antihypertensive agents that previously had to be administered two to four times daily to be administered once each day. Potential disadvantages of the oral controlled-release products include delayed attainment of pharmacodynamic effect, unpredictable or reduced bioavailability, enhanced first-pass hepatic metabolism, dose dumping, sustained toxicity, dosing inflexibility, and increased cost. Potential advantages include reduced dosing frequency, enhanced compliance and convenience, reduced toxicity, stable drug levels, uniform drug effect, and decreased total dose. Although skin reactions are common, the transdermal drug delivery of clonidine provides another innovative approach to supplying transcutaneous, controlled, continuous delivery of drug for 7 days. It is possible that future research will prove that the agents that provide complete 24-hour control may reduce the cardiovascular events associated with the early-morning blood pressure surge. This evolution in antihypertensive therapy to achieve once-daily dosing may prove to be of great value to both physicians and patients in the 1990s.

Felodipine clinical pharmacokinetics

Absorption of felodipine is rapid and complete. A pronounced first-pass metabolism results in a bioavailability of 15%, irrespective of the oral formulation used. The peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve are linearly related to the dose. The variability in plasma concentrations is wide, and individualization of the dosage is recommended. Plasma felodipine concentrations are increased in the elderly, and in patients with congestive heart failure or liver cirrhosis; in these patients felodipine should be started at a low dosage. Food intake has no clinically significant effect on felodipine absorption. Serum digoxin concentrations are increased by felodipine in plain tablet form, but not when it is administered as extended release tablets. Activators, inducers and inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 system affect the plasma concentrations of felodipine. No displacement reactions with high affinity protein binding drugs have been observed. There is a significant correlation between plasma concentration and haemodynamic effect. The mean elimination half-life of 24h together with the extended release formulation of felodipine favours once-daily dosage in patients with hypertension.

Felodipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist

Felodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist, significantly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and has been associated with beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris or congestive heart failure (CHF). In hypertensive patients, felodipine does not appear to significantly affect glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, glucose tolerance, or plasma lipoprotein concentrations. Studies comparing felodipine with other agents as monotherapy in mild to moderate hypertension have demonstrated felodipine to be at least as efficacious as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and HCTZ plus amiloride hydrochloride in combination. Comparisons of felodipine with other agents as adjuncts to beta-blocker or diuretic therapy have shown felodipine to be at least as effective as HCTZ, propranolol hydrochloride, prazosin hydrochloride, and nifedipine. Evaluations of patients with chronic stable angina are limited, and additional studies are needed before felodipine can be recommended for the routine management of angina pectoris. Similarly, additional studies are essential to delineate the role of felodipine, if any, in the management of CHF. In the management of hypertension, felodipine 5-40 mg/d significantly reduces systolic and diastolic BP. Although some patients may be controlled throughout the entire dosing interval when felodipine is administered bid, many patients will require more frequent dosing to obtain adequate BP control. Adverse effects associated with felodipine are similar to those of other dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonists and include peripheral edema, headache, dizziness, flushing, and fatigue. A potentially clinically important drug interaction was observed when felodipine was administered concomitantly with theophylline aminopropanol; significant decreases in theophylline concentrations were noted. In summary, felodipine appears to be safe and effective for the management of hypertension when used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. The efficacy of felodipine in the management of chronic stable angina pectoris and CHF requires further investigation.

Comparison of once daily felodipine 10 mg ER and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension

The efficacy of extended release felodipine 10 mg (ER) o.d., a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, and 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) o.d. have been compared in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in 28 mildly to moderately hypertensive subjects (supine diastolic blood pressure, BP, greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg and less than or equal to 110 mm Hg on three separate occasions). Both drugs significantly reduced systolic and diastolic BP in the sitting position felodipine from 157.1/93.8 mm Hg at baseline to 133/78.9 mm Hg 2.5 h after medication and to 138/82.7 mm Hg after 2 weeks of treatment, and HCTZ from 156/95.6 mm Hg to 147/88.4 mm Hg 2.5 h after medication and to 149/89.5 mm Hg also after 2 weeks. A decrease of the same magnitude in standing systolic and diastolic BP was observed after both treatment regimens with the exception of diastolic BP 2.5 h after dosing with HCTZ, which was not significantly lower. At all times (2.5 h and 2 weeks), the reduction in systolic and diastolic BP was greater after felodipine compared to HCTZ. Heart rate was significantly increased after felodipine in both the sitting and standing positions, and both 2.5 h following medication and after 2 weeks of treatment. The difference between the regimens was significant only 2.5 h after dosing. Overall, felodipine 10 mg ER o.d. was superior to 25 mg HCTZ o.d. in lowering BP.

Felodipine extended release in mild to moderate hypertension

A multi-centre study was carried out to examine the antihypertensive effect and adverse event profile of felodipine in an extended-release (ER) formulation given once daily as monotherapy. Doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg felodipine ER were compared with placebo in 183 patients with mild or moderate hypertension. All antihypertensive medication was discontinued on entering a 4-week placebo run-in period. If, at the end of the run-in period, supine diastolic blood pressure was in the range greater than 95 less than 120 mmHg, patients were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with felodipine, 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg, or placebo, to be taken once daily for 4 weeks. Supine and standing blood pressure, heart rate and body weight were measured every 2 weeks during the trial. Assessments were made 24 hours after intake of the study drug. Adverse events were recorded at each review. Over the 4-week treatment period, a dose-related decrease in supine diastolic blood pressure was observed, this reduction occurring already during the first 2 weeks of active treatment. In the placebo group and the felodipine 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg groups, supine blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) decreased by 7/6 mmHg, 9/8 mmHg, 12/10 mmHg and 14/11 mmHg, respectively. Supine diastolic blood pressure reduction in the felodipine 10 mg group and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions in the 20 mg group were significantly greater than with placebo. Standing diastolic blood pressure reduction was significantly greater in all three dose groups on felodipine compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Felodipine ER formulation in the treatment of mild hypertension: efficacy and tolerability vs placebo

1. Felodipine is a new calcium-antagonist dihydropyridine derivative with a high degree of selectivity for smooth muscle of arteriolar resistance vessels, as opposed to cardiac cells. 2. In this double-blind, cross-over study the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new extended release (ER) formulation of felodipine 10 mg, once daily, in patients with mild essential hypertension was evaluated. After a 4-week single-blind placebo period 28 patients (15 males; mean age 48 +/- 12 years) were randomized to receive felodipine 10 mg ER once daily or placebo for 4 weeks and the alternative treatment for a further 4 weeks. Supine blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the out-patients department every 2 weeks, 22-24 h after the last drug administration. 3. Felodipine 10 mg ER induced a significant reduction in blood pressure in comparison with placebo (from 149 +/- 16/97 +/- 6 to 140 +/- 12/89 +/- 6 mm Hg). Heart rate remained unchanged. Seven patients dropped-out; five during felodipine ER administration and two during placebo. 4. A once daily dose of felodipine ER significantly reduces blood pressure in mild hypertensive patients 22-24 h after administration. It is well tolerated and the adverse events are related to its pharmacodynamic effects.

Hemodynamic interactions between diuretics and calcium antagonists in the treatment of hypertensive patients

To investigate the hypotensive and hemodynamic effects of plain and extended-release (ER) formulations of felodipine added to a diuretic in the treatment of moderate essential hypertension, we studied 18 patients in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), hemodynamics (bioimpedance), foot volume (Archimedes' principle), and symptoms were evaluated after a 1-month placebo washout, after 1-month's treatment with a fixed combination of hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg plus amiloride 5 mg (HA), and then after felodipine 5 mg twice daily (F) or felodipine ER 10 mg daily (FER) (double-blind phase), each given for 2 weeks in a randomized sequence together with the diuretic. All measurements were performed at the end of the dosing interval. At baseline, supine SBP/DBP was 175.6 +/- 12.9/113.4 +/- 8.1 mmHg; HR was 77.3 +/- 7.0 beats/min; CO was 5.3 +/- 1.4 l/min; SVR was 2166 +/- 707 dynes sec. cm5, and foot volume was 433 +/- 195 ml (FV). HA induced a reduction (p less than 0.05) in BP; one patient had a DBP = 90 mmHg and was excluded from the combination study; eight patients had a DBP reduction of greater than or equal to 10 mmHg (responders), and their blood pressure was mainly reduced by a fall in SVR. HR, CO, and FV were unchanged. The addition of felodipine to a diuretic induced a further significant (p less than 0.001) reduction in BP with respect to HA alone, with no differences between F and FER. All patients had a DBP fall greater than 10 mmHg, which had no relationship to their response to the diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Felodipine in the treatment of patients with severe hypertension and impaired renal function

Twenty-three patients with severe hypertension and impaired renal function were included in an open study of the efficacy and tolerance of felodipine treatment over 6 months. All patients were previously treated with a diuretic, a beta blocker, and a vasodilator, and eight of them also received an ACE inhibitor. At the start of felodipine treatment the previously used vasodilator was withdrawn. In nine patients the concomitant antihypertensive treatment was reduced during the study. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as 51Cr EDTA clearance, was determined before and at the end of the study. The blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at all clinical visits in the morning 12 hours after the evening dose of felodipine and 2 hours after the morning dose. Plasma concentrations of felodipine were measured at every visit before the morning dose and 2 hours after dose. The BP was reduced after felodipine was substituted for the previously used vasodilator. A significant additional anti-hypertensive effect was recorded 2 hours after the dose and amounted to -37 +/- 22/-15 +/- 12 mmHg (p = 0.0001/p = 0.0002) at 6 months. The effect measured 12 hours after the dose was less pronounced and was -11 +/- 28/-6 +/- 10 mmHg (p = 0.15/p = 0.03). Mean GFR was unchanged during the study, 38 +/- 19 versus 38 +/- 19 ml/min (n = 16). There was a sixfold interindividual variation in the trough plasma concentrations at steady state at the same drug dosage. Higher plasma concentrations seemed to be required to achieve the same antihypertensive effects as in patients with less severe hypertension and normal renal function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during sustained treatment with conventional and extended-release felodipine in mild-to-moderate hypertension

To assess the duration of the antihypertensive effect of the dihydropiridine calcium antagonist felodipine in conventional (C-F) and slow-release (ER-F) formulations, 12 patients with essential hypertension underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at the end of a 2-week treatment period with C-F 5 mg b.d., ER-F 10 mg once daily (o.d.) and placebo. C-F, ER-F and placebo were given in a double-blind 3 x 3 latin square design 4 times replicated. There was no systematic change in the ABP profile over the three study periods regardless of the treatment. In comparison to placebo, the mean 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed a significant and similar reduction after both formulations of F. Compared to placebo, C-F and ER-F induced a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure for 15 and 21 h, respectively, and of diastolic blood pressure for 16 and 21 h, respectively. Three patients complained of headache (mild in 2, moderately severe in 1), and two patients of nocturia, with either formulation of F.

Effects of cardiovascular disease on pharmacokinetics

The pathophysiologic changes occurring in cardiovascular disease can affect the kinetics of drugs in several different ways. The present review examines these modifications and the underlying mechanisms. The kinetics of specific agents, such as antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive, cardiotonic, and other drugs are considered, and the clinical implications are outlined. The clinician should be aware of these modifications, because they require an adjustment of the dosage regimen. A rational basis for a correct therapeutic choice can be provided by adequate knowledge of these modifications.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of felodipine. A summary

Felodipine is completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. However, the amount reaching the systemic circulation is reduced to about 15% because of first-pass degradation. The bioavailability is constant within the dose interval of 5 to 40mg orally. The frequency histogram of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) seems to be normally distributed. The disposition of felodipine is independent of the administered dose over the intravenous dose interval (1-3 mg). The plasma concentration-time curve declines in 3 distinct phases. The mean elimination half-life of felodipine is approximately 25h. Felodipine is extensively distributed to extravascular tissues. The volume of distribution of felodipine is about 10 L/kg, implying that less than 1% of the amount of drug in the body is localised in the blood. Felodipine is more than 99% bound to plasma proteins. Mean total clearance from the blood is 1 to 1.5 L/min and, therefore, felodipine is considered a high clearance drug. Felodipine is metabolised completely and no unchanged drug is eliminated in the urine. The first step in the metabolism involves oxidation to the corresponding pyridine derivative by the cytochrome P-450 system. Identified metabolites in plasma and urine are devoid of vasodilating activity. Long term treatment, and the presence of hypertension and impaired renal function do not affect the disposition of felodipine. Elderly people may have higher plasma levels than the young and middle-aged. Impaired liver function significantly decreases systemic clearance. Cimetidine and food affect felodipine kinetics, but with negligible clinical implications. Therapeutic concentrations of felodipine do not interact with highly protein-bound drugs and these drugs have no effect on the binding of felodipine to human plasma proteins in vitro. Plasma levels of digoxin and metoprolol tended to increase during felodipine treatment. There is a significant correlation between plasma concentrations of felodipine and haemodynamic effects in both healthy subjects and hypertensive patients during short term as well as during long term treatment.