Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Comparison of health care resource utilization and costs among patients with GERD on once-daily or twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess differences in health care resource utilization and costs associated with once-daily and twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Most patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) achieve symptom control on once-daily PPI therapy, but approximately 20%-30% require twice-daily dosing.

METHODS

Patients were ≥18 years of age with at least one medical claim for GERD and at least two PPI claims from HealthCore's Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) during 2004-2009. Patients were continuously eligible for 12 months before and after the index date (date of first PPI claim). Based on PPI dosing throughout the post-index period (quantity of medication dispensed/number of days supply), patients were classified as once-daily (dose ≤ 1.5 pills per day) or twice-daily (≥1.5) PPI users.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 248,386 patients with GERD (mean age 52.8 ± 13.93 years, 56% females) of whom 90% were once-daily and 10% were twice-daily PPI users. The Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index for once-daily and twice-daily PPI users was 0.70 ± 1.37 and 0.89 ± 1.54, respectively (P < 0.05). More once-daily patients had claims for Barrett's esophagus (5% versus 2%, P < 0.0001) than twice-daily patients. Post-index, higher proportions of twice-daily patients had at least one GERD-related inpatient visit (7% versus 5%), outpatient visit (60% versus 49%), and office visit (48% versus 38%) versus once-daily patients (P < 0.0001). Mean total GERD-related health care costs were $2065 ± $6636 versus $3749 ± $11,081 for once-daily and twice-daily PPI users, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving twice-daily PPI therapy were likely to have more comorbid conditions and greater health care utilization and overall costs compared with patients using once-daily PPI therapy.

Safety of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors

The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as a class are remarkably safe and effective for persons with peptic ulcer disorders. Serious adverse events are extremely rare for PPIs, with case reports of interstitial nephritis with omeprazole, hepatitis with omeprazole and lansoprazole, and disputed visual disturbances with pantoprazole and omeprazole. PPI use is associated with the development of fundic gland polyps (FGP); stopping PPIs is associated with regression of FGP. In the absence of Helicobacter pylori infection, the long-term use of PPIs has not been convincingly proven to cause or be associated with the progression of pre-existing chronic gastritis or gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia. Mild/modest hypergastrinemia is a physiological response to the reduction in gastric acid secretion due to any cause. The long-term use of PPIs has not been convincingly proven to cause enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia or carcinoid tumors. PPIs increase the risk of community acquired pneumonia, but not of hospital acquired (nosocomial) pneumonia. There is no data to support particular care in prescribing PPI therapy due to concerns about risk of hip fracture with the long-term use of PPIs. Long-term use of PPIs does not lead to vitamin B12 deficiencies, except possibly in the elderly, or in persons with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome who are on high doses of PPI for prolonged periods of time. There is no convincingly proven data that PPIs increase the risk of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in persons in the community. The discontinuation of PPIs may result in rebound symptoms requiring further and even continuous PPI use for suppression of symptoms. As with all medications, the key is to use PPIs only when clearly indicated, and to reassess continued use so that long-term therapy is used judiciously. Thus, in summary, the PPIs are a safe class of medications to use long-term in persons in whom there is a clear need for the maintenance of extensive acid inhibition.

Evaluating outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness plication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with impedance monitoring

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness plication allows transmural suturing at the gastroesophageal junction to recreate the antireflux barrier. Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring (MII) can be used to detect nonacid or weakly acidic reflux, acidic swallows, and esophageal clearance time. This study used MII to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic full-thickness plication.

METHODS

In this study, 12 subsequent patients requiring maintenance proton pump inhibitor therapy underwent endoscopic full-thickness plication for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. With patients off medication, MII was performed before and 6-months after endoscopic full-thickness plication.

RESULTS

The total median number of reflux episodes was significantly reduced from 105 to 64 (p = 0.016). The median number of acid reflux episodes decreased from 73 to 43 (p = 0.016). Nonacid reflux episodes decreased from 23 to 21 (p = 0.306). The median bolus clearance time was 12 s before treatment and 11 s at 6 months (p = 0.798). The median acid exposure time was reduced from 6.8% to 3.4% (p = 0.008), and the DeMeester scores were reduced from 19 to 12 (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic full-thickness plication significantly reduced total reflux episodes, acid reflux episodes, and total reflux exposure time. The DeMeester scores and total acid exposure time for the distal esophagus were significantly improved. No significant changes in nonacid reflux episodes and median bolus clearance time were encountered.

Proton pump inhibitors in the management of GERD

INTRODUCTION

Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is based on the concept that gastric contents, principally acid and pepsin, are responsible for symptoms of reflux and esophageal injury. Pharmacologic treatment is based on the principle that controlling intragastric pH will affect esophageal healing and subsequently symptom relief.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Control of pH can be accomplished with antisecretory agents, principally proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The majority of patients respond to a single daily dose of a PPI; however, some will require higher doses, and a small percentage are "refractory" to twice daily dosing of these drugs. The success of these agents, and in fact the reasons for "failure," is elucidated by understanding the mechanism of action of PPIs and the effect of dose timing and meals on their efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of new concerns regarding potential side effects of PPIs when used long-term require careful thought as GERD is a chronic disease with most needing some form of medical treatment over time. This article reviews the pharmacologic properties of PPIs and the impact on the treatment of GERD.

Rabeprazole 20 mg for erosive esophagitis-associated symptoms in a large, community-based study: additional results

PURPOSE

To provide additional efficacy data in patients treated with rabeprazole through week 4, and to validate sustained relief of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms through week 8 as well as to further analyze rabeprazole safety in patients with wide-ranging demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients in this study (N = 2,449) demonstrated significant overall improvement versus baseline (P < 0.001). Substantial symptom relief was seen throughout 8 weeks of treatment. By week 4, complete relief of daytime and nighttime heartburn, belching, regurgitation, and dysphagia was observed in 87.5, 90.7, 50.7, 77.6, and 75.1% of patients, respectively. Improvements were seen in rabeprazole-treated patients (<65 or >or=65 years) with a range of baseline symptom severities and across different racial groups. Rabeprazole was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with endoscopy-confirmed erosive esophagitis treated with once-daily rabeprazole 20 mg, prompt and continuing improvements were seen in daytime and nighttime heartburn, belching, regurgitation, and dysphagia.

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD by application of multiple Plicator implants: a multicenter study (with video)

BACKGROUND

The full-thickness Plicator allows transmural suturing at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction to restructure the antireflux barrier. Studies of the Plicator procedure to date have been limited to placement of a single transmural suture to create the endoscopic gastroplication.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of placing multiple transmural sutures for the treatment of GERD.

DESIGN

Open-label, prospective, multicenter study.

SETTING

Four tertiary-referral centers.

PATIENTS

Subjects with symptomatic GERD who require daily maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Study exclusions were hiatal hernia >3 cm, grades III and IV esophagitis, Barrett's epithelium, and esophageal dysmotility.

INTERVENTIONS

Forty-one patients received two or more transmural sutures placed linearly in the anterior gastric cardia approximately 1 cm below the GE junction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Six months after the procedure, median GERD-health-related quality of life (HRQL) improved 76% compared with off-medication baseline (6.0 vs 25.0, P < .001), with 75% of patients (32/40) achieving >50% improvement in their baseline GERD-HRQL score. Six months after the procedure, daily PPI therapy was eliminated in 70% of patients (28/40). Heartburn symptoms improved 80% compared with off-medication baseline (16.0 vs 84.0, P < .001). Median esophagitis grade improved 75% compared with baseline (0.0 vs 1.0, P = .005). Esophageal pH assessed as median distal esophageal-acid exposure (percentage time pH < 4.0) improved 38% compared with baseline (9.0 vs 11.0, P < .020; nominal P value for a single statistical test: significance removed upon the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing of data) and manometric outcomes were also improved compared with baseline (median lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure improved 25% [10.0 vs 6.0, P < .017; nominal P value for a single statistical test: significance removed upon the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing of data]) and median amplitude of contraction improved 11% (70.0 vs 62.0, P < .037; nominal P value for a single statistical test: significance removed upon the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing of data).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size. No randomized comparison with a single implant group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic full-thickness plication with multiple serially placed implants was safe and effective in reducing GERD symptoms, medication use, esophageal-acid exposure, and esophagitis.

Review article: The endoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years a number of endoscopic procedures for treating gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) have been developed (suturing, injections, implants and radiofrequency ablation), thus obviating the need for long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and the potential morbidity of laparoscopic fundoplication.

AIM

To present an update of the literature studying the clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux procedures, and to discuss further developments.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for endoscopic suturing, antireflux treatment, endoscopic gastroplication, polymer injection, radiofrequency ablation of GORD. Own recent research was compared with existing data. Information concerning GORD endotherapy were gathered.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled studies have reported promising clinical results on the short to intermediate term for most endoscopic GORD procedures, but the placebo effect remained unknown. It is, therefore, commendable that the three main procedures (Endocinch, Stretta and Enteryx) have now all been tested against a sham procedure. Although all three techniques were able to improve symptoms, quality of life and PPI use, oesophageal acid reduction was unremarkable. Endocinch and Stretta are safe outpatient procedures. Concerns about the durability of Endocinch have risen. Polymer injection (Enteryx) and gel prosthesis implantation (Gatekeeper) were recalled for severe complications and lack of efficacy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endotherapy has shown the potential to treat (uncomplicated) GORD. However, some early procedures have failed or proven unsafe. Further developments and studies are necessary to determine what modifications to these techniques are required to produce optimal efficacy and durability. Until then, widespread clinical use of endotherapy for GORD should probably be avoided.

Pantoprazole on-demand effectively treats symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of pantoprazole as on-demand therapy for the long-term management of patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has been demonstrated in clinical studies. In this study, the efficacy of pantoprazole 20mg and esomeprazole 20mg as on-demand therapy for relief of symptoms of mild GORD was compared.

METHODS

Patients with reflux oesophagitis grade A or B (Los Angeles classification) or endoscopy-negative reflux disease (enGORD) were treated with pantoprazole 20mg once daily for 28 days during the acute phase (AP, n = 236). Patients without heartburn during the final 3 days of the AP entered the long-term phase (LTP, n = 199) and were randomised to either pantoprazole 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg as on-demand treatment for 6 months. Antacids were provided as rescue medication during this phase. The mean intensities of the symptoms of heartburn, acid eructation and pain on swallowing, both separately and as a combined symptom score, together with the mean duration of these symptoms during on-demand treatment, were compared between the two treatment groups. The number of tablets taken was also compared.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment with pantoprazole, 87.3% of patients had relief from heartburn, 74.1% from epigastric pain and 80.8% from acid eructation, according to the investigator assessment. A total of 236 patients were eligible for the on-demand phase. Based on patient diary data, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole resulted in significantly lower mean intensity of heartburn compared with that in the esomeprazole group (1.12 for pantoprazole and 1.32 for esomeprazole, respectively [p = 0.012], in the intention-to-treat [ITT] population). The mean symptom intensities of acid eructation and pain on swallowing, together with the duration of these symptoms, were comparable in the two treatment groups. The combined symptom score of the three symptoms heartburn, acid eructation and pain on swallowing was numerically lower in the pantoprazole group compared with the esomeprazole group (1.72 vs 1.99, respectively, in the ITT population). Tablet intake was comparable in both groups. Relief of symptoms in Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative patients was also similar in both treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated with a good safety profile.

CONCLUSION

On-demand therapy with either pantoprazole 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg is a comparably effective treatment strategy for the long-term treatment of non-erosive and mild GORD. However, the mean intensity of heartburn was significantly lower with pantoprazole treatment.

Acid control with esomeprazole and lansoprazole: a comparative dose-response study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the level of acid control and the dose-response relationships achieved with esomeprazole and lansoprazole. These data are relevant in helping clinicians to decide on whether to increase a proton-pump inhibitor dose, or whether to switch to an alterative drug for increased acid control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In an open-label, single-centre, randomized, six-way crossover study, 40 healthy subjects received esomeprazole 20, 40 and 80 mg, and lansoprazole 15, 30 and 60 mg once daily for 5 days. The mean time with intragastric pH >4 and mean 24-h median intragastric pH on day 5 were analyzed using a mixed-model ANOVA. Post-hoc analyses were completed for 0-12-h (daytime) and 12-24-h (night-time) post-dose intervals.

RESULTS

Increasing the dose of esomeprazole from 20 mg to 40 mg resulted in significantly improved acid control over 0-12, 12-24 and 0-24 h post-dose (p<0.001), but no significant improvement in acid control for either period was seen when further increasing the dose to 80 mg. Increasing the dose of lansoprazole from 15 mg to 30 mg or from 30 mg to 60 mg significantly improved acid control over 0-12 and 0-24 h (p<0.01) but not over 12-24 h. With the exception of the esomeprazole 20 mg versus lansoprazole 30 mg comparisons, and the esomeprazole 20 mg versus lansoprazole 15 mg during 12-24 h post-dose comparison, esomeprazole provided significantly greater acid control than lansoprazole at each dose level over 0-12, 12-24 and 0-24 h (p<0.05). Mean 24-h median intragastric pH was higher following esomeprazole dosing compared with lansoprazole at each dose level.

CONCLUSIONS

For low-, standard- and double-dose comparisons, esomeprazole achieved greater elevation of gastric pH and better acid control in more subjects than lansoprazole. Use of esomeprazole may therefore reduce the need for dose adaptations or drug switching.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical features

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease affecting up to 40% of people in the Western world. Risk factors associated with GERD include age and lifestyle habits, although the clinically relevant contribution of many of these factors is unclear. In GERD, refluxed gastric acid damages the oesophageal mucosa, generally when the pH falls below 4. GERD patients present a variety of symptoms, most commonly heartburn and regurgitation. Oesophageal complications associated with GERD include erosions, ulcers, peptic strictures, and Barrett's oesophagus which is implicated in the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis of GERD is problematic due to the range of symptoms which may be presented to the physician and symptom severity is frequently unrelated to disease severity. While endoscopic monitoring may be used to assess the presence and severity of GERD, a lack of visible damage does not necessarily indicate an absence of GERD. Techniques used to diagnose GERD include addition of an acid solution into the oesophagus in order to replicate symptoms (Bernstein test) or 24-hour intra-oesophageal pH monitoring. Proton pump inhibitors are effective in the treatment of GERD, acting to reduce the acidity of the gastric juice and hence reduce oesophageal damage and symptoms associated with GERD. Symptoms most indicative of GERD are those associated with erosive oesophagitis, including heartburn and acid regurgitation. Less common GERD-associated symptoms include chest pain, a range of ear, nose and throat conditions, and asthma. In contrast to perceptions of the disease as 'merely' heartburn, the impact on patients' quality of life can be profound. Increasing awareness of GERD by health care professionals has led to improved diagnosis and a greater appreciation of the need for maintenance therapy.

Pantoprazole 20 mg on demand is effective in the long-term management of patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

A total of 536 patients with endoscopically confirmed GORD grade 0/I were included in this multicentre study. In the acute phase, patients were treated with pantoprazole 20 mg o.d. for 4 weeks to obtain symptom relief. Symptom-free patients were included in the subsequent long-term phase, and were randomly treated on demand with either pantoprazole 20 mg or placebo for 6 months (antacids as rescue medication). After the 4 weeks acute phase, 439 symptom-free patients entered the long-term phase. The perceived average daily symptom load remained significantly lower during the 6-month on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg as compared to placebo. Both the rates for unwillingness to continue and number of additional antacids taken were also significantly lower with pantoprazole 20 mg than with placebo. Hence, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg is safe and effective in maintaining control of the symptoms heartburn, acid regurgitation and pain on swallowing symptoms in patients with GORD grade 0/I with superiority to placebo.

Les nouveaux inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons, un progrès dans la prise en charge des maladies acido-peptiques ?

EFFECTS AND INCONVENIENCIES OF THE OLDER PRODUCTS: The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are now universally considered the treatment of choice for management of gastric-acid-related diseases, mainly gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These drugs share similar properties: general structure, acid-activation step, covalent binding to the proton pump of the gastric parietal cell via the production of covalent disulphide bonds, relatively stable inhibition of H+,K+-ATPase. However, the older PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole et pantoprazole) have notable limitations. These drugs exhibit substantial interpatient variability and may have significant interactions with other drugs. These first-generation PPIs also do not achieve a rapid and sustained suppression of gastric acid, leading to the development of new acid-pump antagonists. The new-generation PPIs, esomeprazole and rabeprazole, offer several pharmacokinetic advantages: lower oxidative hepatic metabolism rate via the CYP 2C19 reducing the activity variations due to genetic polymorphisms and decreasing the risk of significant drug-drug interactions (advantages mainly for rabeprazole), lower metabolic clearance of esomeprazole (S-enantiomer of omeprazole) increasing plasma concentrations and acid suppression of this new PPI, higher accumulation of rabeprazole in the parietal cell due to its higher pKa. Gastric pH studies and therapeutic trials have demonstrated significant advantages of esomeprazole and rabeprazole compared with the older PPIs, which omeprazole is the prototype: a greater inhibition of acid secretion, a more rapid onset of action to provide reflux symptoms relief over 24 hours with lower GERD-related cost for rabeprazole, a sustained acid suppression, cost-effectiveness advantages for esomeprazole in the healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis compared with lansoprazole, reduced potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions with rabeprazole compared with omeprazole and esomeprazole. Due to their properties, esomeprazole and rabeprazole are the best candidates for "on demand" treatment of GERD.

Diagnosis and management of reflux esophagitis

Esophagitis has generally been considered rare in dogs and cats. However, it may not be as uncommon as previously thought due to the increased awareness of the disease and the increasing availability of endoscopy. Esophagitis can be caused by gastroesophageal reflux, trauma, foreign bodies, ingestion of caustic substances, structural abnormalities (ie, hiatal hernia, neoplasms), and chronic vomiting. This article will focus on the diagnosis and treatment of esophagitis secondary to gastroesophageal reflux. This is a diagnosis based on clinical signs, exclusion of other causes of esophagitis, and typical radiographic, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings.

Progress with novel pharmacological strategies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a chronic disorder characterised by an increased exposure of the oesophagus to intragastric contents. Currently, GORD symptoms are maintained under control with antisecretory agents, mainly gastric proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Although impaired oesophageal motility may partly underlie the pathophysiology of GORD, the use of prokinetic agents has been found to be unsatisfactory. To date, novel pharmacological approaches for GORD are mainly related to the control of transient lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) relaxations (TLOSRs). The majority of patients with GORD have reflux episodes during TLOSRs, which are evoked by gastric distension, mainly occurring after ingestion of a meal. Patients with reflux disease with normal peristalsis and without or with mild erosive disease could potentially benefit from anti-TLOSR therapy. This therapy might also be of value to treat some severe forms of esophagitis in combination with PPIs. GABA-B-receptor agonists are the most promising class of agents identified so far for TLOSR control. The GABA-B-receptor agonist, baclofen, is the most effective compound in inhibiting TLOSRs in humans. Since baclofen has several CNS adverse effects, novel orally available GABA-B agonists are needed for effective and well tolerated treatment of GORD. Endogenous or exogenous cholecystokinin (CCK) causes a reduction in LOS pressure, an increase in TLOSR frequency and a reduction in gastric emptying. In healthy volunteers and patients with GORD, loxiglumide, a selective CCK1-receptor antagonist, was found to reduce the rate of TLOSRs, although its effect on postprandial acid reflux may be modest. Orally effective CCK antagonists are not marketed to date. The anticholinergic agent atropine, given to healthy volunteers and patients with GORD, markedly reduced the rate of TLOSRs. Because of severe gastrointestinal (and other) adverse effects of anticholinergics, including worsening of supine acid clearance and constipation, it is unlikely that this class of drugs will have a future as anti-TLOSR agents on a routine basis. In spite of their effectiveness in reducing TLOSR rate, untoward adverse effects, such as addiction and severe constipation, currently limit the use of morphine and other opioid mu-receptor agonists. The same applies to nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, which are associated with marked gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, urinary and respiratory adverse effects. Animal studies provide promising evidence for the use of cannabinoid receptor 1 agonists, by showing potent inhibition of TLOSRs in the dog, thus opening a new route for clinical investigation in humans. A better understanding of TLOSR pathophysiology is a necessary step for the further development of novel drugs effective for anti-reflux therapy.

Lansoprazole for maintenance of remission of erosive oesophagitis

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, which is experienced daily by a significant proportion of individuals, may result in serious sequelae such as erosive oesophagitis. Short-term treatment with acid antisecretory therapy (a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine H(2) receptor antagonist) is highly effective in healing the erosive oesophagitis lesion. However, numerous studies confirm that unless maintenance therapy is initiated virtually all patients will experience oesophagitis relapse within 1 year, as well as an increasing severity of oesophagitis and risk for complications such as Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma. Studies evaluating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor and H(2) antagonist maintenance therapy have found that only the proton pump inhibitors significantly reduce the incidence of oesophagitis relapse. Pharmacoeconomic studies have also confirmed that proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy is cost effective, by virtue of the ability of these agents to reduce the incidence of relapse as well as prolong the time to relapse and increase the number of weeks per year that patients are without symptoms. Lansoprazole, a member of the proton pump inhibitor class of agents, has been extensively studied in the treatment of patients with a variety of acid-related disorders. Among those with erosive oesophagitis, maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 or 30mg once daily is highly effective in preventing relapse. Studies have documented that lansoprazole 15 and 30mg once daily for six months prevents oesophagitis relapse in up to 81 and 93% of patients, respectively, with comparable percentages of patients remaining in remission after 1 year of treatment. These high rates of remission have also been observed in studies of patients with lesions that were difficult to heal at baseline (resistant to healing with at least 3 months of H(2) antagonist therapy). Moreover, lansoprazole produces high remission rates regardless of the grade of erosive oesophagitis before acute healing. Among symptomatic patients with heartburn, lansoprazole provides rapid and effective relief of daytime and night-time heartburn and prevents relapse of symptoms. Lansoprazole has a wide margin of safety and is well tolerated when administered as monotherapy in short- and long-term clinical trials. Taken together these data suggest that proton pump inhibitor therapy represents the preferred and ideal long-term management strategy for the patient with erosive oesophagitis. Lansoprazole is a well-established member of this class of agents and, as such, has an extensive body of literature that supports its safety, tolerability and clinical efficacy in preventing relapse in these patients.

Esomeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg is efficacious in the long-term management of patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a placebo-controlled trial of on-demand therapy for 6 months

BACKGROUND

On-demand therapy may offer an effective approach to the long-term management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis.

AIM

To examine the efficacy of the novel proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole as on-demand therapy in endoscopy-negative GORD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Endoscopy-negative GORD patients who achieved complete resolution of heartburn after short-term esomeprazole or omeprazole treatment (n = 721) were randomized to esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 282), 40 mg (n = 293) or placebo (n = 146) on demand (maximum one dose/day) for 6 months. The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were time to study discontinuation due to (i) unwillingness to continue and (ii) inadequate control of heartburn, respectively.

RESULTS

Both doses of esomeprazole were more effective than placebo. During the 6-month period, 42% of placebo recipients discontinued treatment due to unwillingness to continue, compared with 8% and 11% of esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg recipients, respectively. Overall, more patients treated with esomeprazole were free from gastrointestinal symptoms after 6 months of on-demand therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole 20 mg was superior to placebo for on-demand treatment of GORD; a higher dose did not confer additional clinical benefit. Over 90% of patients were willing to continue on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg over a 6-month period.

Cost effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis: comparison of on-demand esomeprazole with conventional omeprazole strategies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20mg compared with two alternative omeprazole treatment strategies for the long-term management of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis.

DESIGN

A simple Markov model was designed to compare the cost effectiveness of on-demand esomeprazole 20mg therapy for 6 months with a strategy consisting of intermittent 4-week acute treatment courses of omeprazole 20mg once daily or a strategy consisting of continuous omeprazole treatment (20mg once daily) following acute treatment of first relapse while on no drug treatment (a commonly used conventional care strategy). Relapse probabilities were based on pooled results from two 6-month placebo-controlled clinical studies of on-demand esomeprazole 20mg treatment in patients with GORD without oesophagitis and on results from a GORD study with a 6-month untreated follow-up. The expected number of relapses per patient was used as the effectiveness measure. SETTING AND PERSPECTIVE: Patient management assumptions were based on a UK physician survey. The cost-effectiveness analysis considered UK direct medical costs from the perspective of the National Health Service.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis showed that after 6 months treatment, 90% of patients could control symptoms effectively with on-demand esomeprazole 20mg. The expected number of relapses per patient was estimated at 0.10 for on-demand esomeprazole, 0.57 to 1.12 for intermittent omeprazole and 0.47 to 0.75 for conventional omeprazole treatment. The esomeprazole strategy incurred considerably lower direct medical costs (16 to 61%) than either omeprazole strategy.

CONCLUSION

On-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20mg is cost effective compared with two alternative omeprazole treatment strategies in patients with GORD without oesophagitis.

Esomeprazole 20 mg maintains symptom control in endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a controlled trial of 'on-demand' therapy for 6 months

BACKGROUND

Most patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), regardless of endoscopic status, suffer symptomatic relapse within 6 months of stopping acid suppressant therapy.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of 'on-demand' treatment of GERD with esomeprazole, the first proton pump inhibitor developed as an optical isomer.

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind study, 342 endoscopy-negative GERD patients demonstrating complete resolution of heartburn during the final week of a 4-week treatment period with esomeprazole 20 mg or omeprazole 20 mg once daily were randomized to receive esomeprazole 20 mg or placebo on demand (maximum of one dose per day) for a further 6 months. Use of rescue antacids was permitted.

RESULTS

All 342 patients (191 males), aged 19-79 (mean 49) years, were evaluable in the intention-to-treat analysis. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment due to insufficient control of heartburn was significantly higher among placebo compared to esomeprazole recipients (51% vs. 14%; P < 0.0001). Patients randomized to esomeprazole on-demand therapy remained in the study longer than those in the placebo group (mean 165 vs. 119 days). Over 50% took the study medication for periods of 1--3 consecutive days (esomeprazole) or 4--13 consecutive days (placebo). Use of antacids was > 2-fold higher among placebo recipients. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups, when adjusted for time spent in the study, as were the clinical laboratory profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

On-demand therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg is effective and well tolerated in maintaining symptom control in endoscopy-negative GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in intellectually disabled individuals: how often, how serious, how manageable?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an important and frequently occurring problem among intellectually disabled individuals (IDI). Early suspicion and recognition of the presence of GERD in IDI is the cornerstone of adequate management of these patients. The prevalence of GERD among institutionalized IDI with an IQ < 50 is about 50%, with 70% of these reflux patients having endoscopically established reflux esophagitis. In case of symptoms as hematemesis, rumination, or dental erosions, there is an increased risk for GERD. GERD has also been shown to be associated with cerebral palsy, an IQ < 35, scoliosis, and the use of anticonvulsant drugs or benzodiazepines. To establish the diagnosis, 24-h pH measurement or endoscopy should be used in all those intellectually disabled individuals in whom GERD clinically is suspected. The efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in IDI with GERD is indisputable. In IDI, adults as well as children, PPIs are highly effective, independent of the severity of esophagitis. Marked improvement of symptoms and quality of life can be noticed after medical treatment, thereby decreasing the need for surgery in this complicated group of patients.

The efficacy of extended-interval dosing of omeprazole in keeping gastroesophageal reflux disease patients symptom free

The potential economic advantage of alternate-day therapy for GERD maintenance must be weighed against the potential cost of failure before it can be widely instituted. The studies presented have helped develop a clinical picture of the patients who may benefit from alternate-day therapy without risk of complications or potential increases in management costs. Bank et al., reporting on a group of patients, found that patients with Grade II-IV disease had a 61% success rate at two to eight years. Bank defined success as both maintenance of endoscopic healing and symptom control. Ladas et al. found a 66.7% success rate defined as clinical and endoscopic remission in Grades II-III disease. Kurucar et al. monitored symptom control and esophageal complications in his patients and found the regimen to have a 26% success rate in Grades III-IV disease. Lind et al. found that 83% of patients could remain symptom free with on-demand therapy if they were endoscopy-negative at baseline. The results of the Mantides et al. study are important because they imply that alternate-day omeprazole therapy may be more effective than alternatives for step-down treatment, such as ranitidine or cisapride. Furthermore, patients can be educated to increase their frequency of use if symptoms should arise. Not only does this give the patient a sense of self-empowerment over his or her disease state, but it avoids the cost of switching to a PPI due to failure with an H2RA or a motility agent. Alternate-day use of omeprazole should be attempted only during the maintenance phase of GERD therapy. Patients requiring >20 mg/d to achieve healing appeared to be poor candidates for alternate-day omeprazole maintenance therapy. Based on available studies, it would seem that patients with Grades 0-II GERD would benefit most from alternate-day therapy. A role for alternate-day therapy in Grades III-IV is apparent from the results presented but requires greater caution in view of the differing success rates (26-61%) in various studies. With Grades II-III esophagitis, a mean 24-hour gastric pH >6 and a gastric pH <4 less than 10% of the time during the initial healing phase with omeprazole 20 mg/d appeared to be associated with success on alternate-day therapy. Evidence that all marketed PPIs have similar success is not available and should not be extrapolated from the data presented. Evidence that downward dosage adjustments of PPIs versus extending dosage intervals are effective in the maintenance of GERD should be recognized. Lansoprazole has been approved for treating erosive esophagitis at 30 mg/d, with the maintenance dose established at 15 mg/d. Studies showing that lansoprazole 15 mg/d is more effective than alternate-day therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg exist, although similar studies with omeprazole have not been performed. The abstracts describing the use of alternate-day omeprazole accounted for all enrollees and included endoscopic grading or pH monitoring to document disease severity at baseline. Most also included these same objective measures as end points in combination with symptom control. This strengthens the data since the positive predictive value of typical symptoms is variable. However, there are also several significant limitations. Abstracts provide only limited information on methods. All studies other than Lind et al. lacked randomization. This study was also the only one that blinded patients to their treatment. Sample sizes for the majority of the trials were quite small. Statistical analyses were not performed on any of the trial results with the exception of the trial by Lind et al. In light of the lack of evidence of statistical significance as well as study design flaws, conclusions should be drawn cautiously. Larger well-designed trials looking at both the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of alternate day omeprazole are required before a definitive recommendation can be made.

Gastrointestinal drugs

Various drugs are commonly used for the many gastrointestinal problems that are routinely seen in dogs and cats. Many of these drugs are briefly reviewed in this article. Anecdotal as well as documented findings are provided that will hopefully allow the clinician to use them wisely and effectively in the many clinical situations that arise daily. Emetics, although not used for gastrointestinal problems, are also reviewed because of their obvious connection with the gastrointestinal tract.

Review article: current practice and future perspectives in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is primarily due to incompetence of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and crural diaphragm, with transient LOS relaxation frequently accounting for daytime reflux. In the absence of drugs that adequately correct the motility defects of GERD, treatment is directed towards decreasing gastric acidity. Oesophageal healing is related to control of 24-h intragastric acidity, the degree of acid suppression and duration of treatment. H2-receptor antagonists are generally less effective in GERD than in peptic ulcer disease. While providing symptomatic relief in non-erosive GERD, they are often ineffective in healing erosive oesophagitis. Proton pump inhibitors provide more rapid and complete healing and symptom resolution. They are superior to H2-receptor antagonists in the long-term management of erosive oesophagitis and in reducing recurrence of oesophageal stricture following mechanical dilatation. In Barrett's oesophagus, high-dose proton pump inhibitors in combination with laser/photodynamic ablation therapy can produce metaplastic regression, although this does not preclude future emergence of adenocarcinoma. Surgical morbidity and mortality rates in GERD generally remain higher than those associated with long-term pharmacotherapy. However, direct comparisons between laparascopic anti-reflux surgery and proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy remain to be performed. Although there is no evidence that H. pylori infection worsens the severity of oesophagitis or that H. pylori is carcinogenic in the metaplastic oesophageal mucosa. It has been suggested that H. pylori-positive patients requiring long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy receive bacterial eradication therapy to reduce the risk of developing atrophic gastritis.

Management of gastrointestinal motility disorders. A practical guide to drug selection and appropriate ancillary measures

The focus of management of gastrointestinal motility disorders should be to improve survival and quality of life. Some motor disorders are annoying, but are compatible with virtually normal activity and carry no significant life risk. Conversely, other motor disorders are highly incapacitating and may shorten life expectancy because of complications and nutritional impairment. Management is based first on establishing the correct diagnosis and prognosis; secondly, on adjusting therapy to the severity of illness; and thirdly, on preventing significant complications. Simple recommendations on appropriate changes in lifestyle and reassurance may suffice in mild cases. Pharmacological therapy and, exceptionally, surgical or nutritional measures may be required in other patients. Generally, pharmacological agents should be directed towards correcting specific pathophysiological abnormalities, but this is not always possible. Symptomatic relief may be achieved on an empirical basis. Long term treatment may often require the combination of different therapeutic approaches either sequentially or simultaneously.