Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and use in the management of the complications of diabetes mellitus

Investigating the Transfer of Lisinopril Into Human Milk: A Quantitative Analysis

ABSTRACT

Lisinopril is commonly prescribed to manage conditions such as hypertension and heart failure. Although concerns about fetal toxicity have traditionally limited the use of lisinopril in women of reproductive age, recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines promote aggressive treatment of hypertension, which may require the use of pharmacologic agents not previously considered in the postpartum period. We aimed to estimate infant exposure to maternal lisinopril through breast milk and report the tolerance of the breastfed infant. Five volunteers taking lisinopril provided samples of their human milk and their associated health information for research through the InfantRisk Center Human Milk Biorepository. The milk pharmacokinetics of lisinopril were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The mean milk concentration of lisinopril was 0.49 ng/mL per 10 mg daily dose. The relative infant dose was 0.06% for lisinopril, more than 100 times lower than the standard 10% safety threshold. The minimal transfer of lisinopril into human milk in this study suggests the drug is unlikely to pose a clinically significant risk to healthy breastfed infants.

A comparative evaluation of fixed dose and separately administered combinations of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in treatment-naïve adult hypertensive patients in a rural Nigerian community

Background

Antihypertensive drugs administered as fixed dose combination (FDC) therapy compared to separately administered combination therapy have been proposed to improve treatment compliance/adherence, and therefore the efficacy of blood pressure (BP) control treatment.

Aim

The aim of this present study is to compare the blood pressure control, renal end-organ protection and medication compliance/adherence in patients receiving FDC and those receiving separately administered combinations of Lisinopril and Hydrochlorothiazide in treatment-naive hypertensive adult patients in a rural Nigerian community.

Method

ology: This randomized two-arm prospective longitudinal 8-week parallel-group study was carried-out for 6-month at the Ajegunle Community between April 2018 and October 2018. Efficacy variables included the changes from baseline in mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP) and mean sitting diastolic BP (MSDBP). Medication safety, compliance/adherence and renal end-organ protection were assessed.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Prevalence of hypertension was found to be 32.9%. The mean blood pressure of all the participants was 165.6 ± 16.5 mmHg and 98.5 ± 11.5 mmHg for systolic BP and diastolic BP respectively, while the mean pulse rate of the participants was 85.0 ± 13.4 beats/min. At the 8-week end point, both regimens had achieved significant reductions from baseline in MSSBP (−33.18 and −37.16 mm Hg, respectively; both, P < 0.05) and MSDBP (−12.97 and −17.53 mm Hg; both, P < 0.05). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Adherence was better in the FDC arm and there was no any reported case of proteinuria occurrence in both arms.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of hypertension in the community shows that there is unmet need in diagnosis and awareness of the disease. Both combination therapies were well tolerated; but the FDC antihypertensive therapy resulted in statistically significant amount of BP reductions than the separately administered combination antihypertensive therapy. Making FDCs available and affordable will help many hypertensive patients to achieve their target BP control goals easily.

A novel multi-parametric high content screening assay in ciPTEC-OAT1 to predict drug-induced nephrotoxicity during drug discovery

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a major concern in the clinic and hampers the use of available treatments as well as the development of innovative medicines. It is typically discovered late during drug development, which reflects a lack of in vitro nephrotoxicity assays available that can be employed readily in early drug discovery, to identify and hence steer away from the risk. Here, we report the development of a high content screening assay in ciPTEC-OAT1, a proximal tubular cell line that expresses several relevant renal transporters, using five fluorescent dyes to quantify cell health parameters. We used a validation set of 62 drugs, tested across a relevant concentration range compared to their exposure in humans, to develop a model that integrates multi-parametric data and drug exposure information, which identified most proximal tubular toxic drugs tested (sensitivity 75%) without any false positives (specificity 100%). Due to the relatively high throughput (straight-forward assay protocol, 96-well format, cost-effective) the assay is compatible with the needs in the early drug discovery setting to enable identification, quantification and subsequent mitigation of the risk for nephrotoxicity.

Targeting Neovascularization in Ischemic Retinopathy: Recent Advances

Pathological retinal neovascularization (RNV) is a common micro-vascular complication in several retinal diseases including retinopathy of prematurity, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration and central vein occlusion. The current therapeutic modalities of RNV are invasive and although they may slow or halt the progression of the disease they are unlikely to restore normal acuity. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop treatment modalities, which are less invasive and therefore associated with fewer procedural complications and systemic side effects. This review article summarizes our understanding of the pathophysiology and current treatment of RNV in ischemic retinopathies; lists potential therapeutic targets; and provides a framework for the development of future treatment modalities.

Effect of eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, on the development of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic rats

BACKGROUND

Aldosterone antagonists are reported to have beneficial effects on diabetic nephropathy by effective blocking of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. We investigated the renoprotective effect of the selective aldosterone receptor blocker eplerenone, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril, and combined eplerenone and lisinopril treatment in type 2 diabetic rats.

METHODS

ANIMALS WERE DIVIDED INTO SIX GROUPS AS FOLLOWS: Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rat control, OLETF rats treated with a low dose of eplerenone (50 mg/kg/day), OLETF rats treated with a high dose of eplerenone (200 mg/kg/day), OLETF rats treated with lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day), OLETF rats treated with a combination of both drugs (eplerenone 200 mg/kg/day and lisinopril 10 mg/kg/day), and obese non-diabetic Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka rats for 26 weeks.

RESULTS

Urinary albumin excretion was significantly lower in the lisinopril group, but not in the eplerenone group. Urinary albumin excretion was decreased in the combination group than in the lisinopril group. Glomerulosclerosis and renal expression of type I and type IV collagen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, transforming growth factor-β1, connective tissue growth factor, and fibronectin mRNA were markedly decreased in the lisinopril, eplerenone, and combination groups.

CONCLUSION

Eplerenone and lisinopril combination showed additional benefits on type 2 diabetic nephropathy compared to monotherapy of each drug.

The effect of captopril on progression of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in those of working age in the world. However, it is a preventable vision loss. According to current animal studies, it could be hypothesized that using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors could play a crucial role as a protective factor in the progression of retinopathy in human. Because little known is about this effect in humans, we designed a case-control study to explore whether captopril could be a protective factor for prevention of retinopathy in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted on 164 patients with type 2 diabetes. Thirty-three patients with retinopathy were considered as cases, and 41 patients, without retinopathy, were designated as controls. All biochemical data were collected from results of laboratory tests at the last clinical visit. Dilated eye examination was performed by a trained ophthalmologist using direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy on dilated pupils.

RESULTS

Retinopathy was determined to be 35.4% and occurred more in men. Older age, male sex, longer duration of diabetes, higher systolic blood pressure, uncontrolled diabetes, and lower body mass index were associated with retinopathy. In our model only age (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-7.9) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.3-9.9) were found to be associated with the risk of retinopathy. Forty-five percent had hypertension. Age (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.8-4.7), duration of diabetes (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.5-3.87), and HbA1c (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.82-7.64) were associated with developing retinopathy in patients with diabetes and hypertension. However, captopril was shown to be a protective factor after adjusting other variables in our model. This effect was not statistically significant (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.37-6.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of using captopril to slow or prevent the progression of retinopathy has been demonstrated in this study. However, statistically it is very difficult to be confident in interpreting the results, and therefore more trials are needed.

An overview of chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometric detection for determination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in biological material

Gas and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS, LC-MS) methods for the determination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and their metabolites in biological material have been reviewed. Since 1980s those hyphenated techniques have been applied to quantitate ACE inhibitors and the dynamic increase in the number of relevant publications can be observed in recent years. Although most of the methods available in the literature were analyses of plasma or serum, assays of blood and urine were also included. Additionally, sample pretreatment methods, separation conditions and ionization modes were overviewed. Some information on chemical structures, cis-trans izomerization and stability of compounds in question was also included. Most of the reported methods were successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic studies in humans.

Comparison of valsartan 160 mg with lisinopril 20 mg, given as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic, for the treatment of hypertension: the Blood Pressure Reduction and Tolerability of Valsartan in Comparison with Lisinopril (PREVAIL) study

BACKGROUND

The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to provide good blood pressure (BP) control without eliciting adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the risk-benefit profile of the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan with that of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril in patients with mild to severe hypertension. The primary objective was to show that the equipotent BP-lowering effect of the valsartan-based treatment is accompanied by a better tolerability profile.

METHODS

This 16-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at 88 outpatient centers across Italy. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients aged > or = 18 years with mild to severe hypertension (systolic BP [SBP], 160-220 mm Hg; diastolic BP [DBP], 95-110 mm Hg) were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily, oral, self-administered treatment with valsartan 160-mg capsules or lisinopril 20-mg capsules under double-blind conditions for 4 weeks. Responders continued monotherapy, whereas nonresponders had hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg added for the final 12 weeks of the study. The 2 primary variables used to assess the equivalence of therapeutic efficacy of the 2 regimens were sitting SBP and sitting DBP, which were measured at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, and 16. The rate of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was used to assess whether 1 treatment had a better tolerability profile than the other. Tolerability was assessed by collecting information about AEs by means of questioning the patient or physical examination at each visit.

RESULTS

A total of 1213 patients were enrolled (635 men, 578 women; mean [SD] age, 54.5 [10.1] years [range, 28-78 years]). The study was completed by 1100 patients (553 receiving valsartan and 547 receiving lisinopril). Fifty-one patients (8.4%) treated with valsartan and 62 (10.2%) [corrected] treated with lisinopril withdrew, mainly because of AEs (9 [1.5%] and 23 patients [3.8%], respectively). The valsartan- and lisinopril-based treatments were similarly effective in reducing sitting BP, with mean SBP/DBP reductions of 31.2/15.9 mm Hg and 31.4/15.9 mm Hg, respectively. At the end of the study, BP was controlled in 82.6% [corrected] of the patients receiving valsartan and 81.6% of those receiving lisinopril. AEs were experienced by 5.1% of the patients treated with valsartan and 10.7% of those treated with lisinopril (P=.0001), with dry cough observed in 1.0% and 7.2% of patients, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Valsartan and lisinopril were both highly effective in controlling BP in these patients with mild to severe hypertension, but valsartan was associated with a significantly reduced risk for AEs, especially cough.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition partially prevents deficits in water maze performance, hippocampal synaptic plasticity and cerebral blood flow in streptozotocin-diabetic rats

Vascular dysfunction is important in the pathogenesis of peripheral complications of diabetes. However, the effects of diabetes on cerebral blood flow and the role of vascular deficits in the pathogenesis of diabetic encephalopathy are still unknown. The present study examined whether experimental diabetes is associated with reduced cerebral blood flow and whether treatment with enalapril can improve cerebral perfusion and function (blood flow and functional cerebral deficits). Streptozotocin-diabetic rats were treated with the ACE inhibitor enalapril (24 mg/kg) from onset of diabetes. After 14 weeks of diabetes, 12 enalapril treated and 12 untreated diabetic rats, and 12 nondiabetic age-matched control rats were tested in a spatial version of the Morris water maze. After 16 weeks of diabetes, in the same groups, blood flow in the hippocampus and thalamus was measured by hydrogen clearance microelectrode polarography. In a separate study, hippocampal long-term potentiation was measured after 26 weeks of diabetes. Water maze performance and hippocampal long-term potentiation were impaired in diabetic rats. Furthermore, blood flow in diabetic rats was reduced by 30% (P<0.001) in the hippocampus and by 37% (P<0.005) in the thalamus compared to nondiabetic controls. Enalapril treatment significantly improved water maze performance (P<0.05), hippocampal long term potentiation (P<0.05) and hippocampal blood flow (P<0.05). Cerebral perfusion is reduced in diabetic rats compared to controls. Treatment aimed at the vasculature can improve cerebral blood flow, deficits in Morris maze performance and long term potentiation. These findings suggest that vasculopathy plays a role in the development of cerebral dysfunction in diabetic rats.

Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the candesartan and lisinopril microalbuminuria (CALM) study

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the effects of candesartan or lisinopril, or both, on blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion in patients with microalbuminuria, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, parallel group, double blind study with four week placebo run in period and 12 weeks' monotherapy with candesartan or lisinopril followed by 12 weeks' monotherapy or combination treatment.

SETTING

Tertiary hospitals and primary care centres in four countries (37 centres).

PARTICIPANTS

199 patients aged 30-75 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Candesartan 16 mg once daily, lisinopril 20 mg once daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blood pressure and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks mean (95% confidence interval) reductions in diastolic blood pressure were 9.5 mm Hg (7.7 mm Hg to 11.2 mm Hg, P<0.001) and 9.7 mm Hg (7.9 mm Hg to 11.5 mm Hg, P<0.001), respectively, and in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio were 30% (15% to 42%, P<0.001) and 46% (35% to 56%, P<0.001) for candesartan and lisinopril, respectively. At 24 weeks the mean reduction in diastolic blood pressure with combination treatment (16.3 mm Hg, 13.6 mm Hg to 18.9 mm Hg, P<0. 001) was significantly greater than that with candesartan (10.4 mm Hg, 7.7 mm Hg to 13.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) or lisinopril (mean 10.7 mm Hg, 8.0 mm Hg to 13.5 mm Hg, P<0.001). Furthermore, the reduction in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio with combination treatment (50%, 36% to 61%, P<0.001) was greater than with candesartan (24%, 0% to 43%, P=0.05) and lisinopril (39%, 20% to 54%, P<0.001). All treatments were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Candesartan 16 mg once daily is as effective as lisinopril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure and microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Combination treatment is well tolerated and more effective in reducing blood pressure.