Filgrastim in patients with neutropenia: potential effects on quality of life

Prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim enables the management of severe neutropenia without dose delays in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with TAS‑102 plus bevacizumab

Combined treatment with bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) leads to an increased chance of survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, this treatment is associated with an increased frequency of severe neutropenia (number of neutrophils <1,000), which should ideally be managed without dose delays. The present study provided a retrospective review of 35 patients with mCRC, and aimed to elucidate the benefits of prophylactic pegfilgrastim for the treatment of severe neutropenia. Patients received TAS-102 (35 mg/m²) orally twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day treatment cycle, along with intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15. Moreover, the patients received 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 15 of each cycle. The incidence of adverse events (AEs), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. In the first and subsequent cycles, 23 and 12 patients, respectively, received pegfilgrastim. The most common AE experienced was grade 3/4 neutropenia (8 patients; 22.9%). Among these 8 patients, 6 (17.1%) and 3 (8.6%) exhibited neutropenia prior to receiving pegfilgrastim or following discontinuation of pegfilgrastim administration, respectively. Moreover, 1 individual among these 8 patients (2.9%) demonstrated grade 3 neutropenia both prior to receiving pegfilgrastim and following discontinuation of pegfilgrastim. A total of 2 patients (5.7%) exhibited grade 3 bone pain, which prevented sustainable administration of pegfilgrastim and resulted in grade 3 neutropenia. Dose delays and dose reduction of TAS-102 due to neutropenia were required in 5 (14.3%) and 2 (5.7%) patients, respectively, during the treatment period. None of the patients exhibited severe neutropenia during chemotherapy after pegfilgrastim administration, thereby preventing dose delays and dose reduction of TAS-102. The relative dose intensity was 96.8% (65.0-100.0%), and the DCR was 54.3%. The median PFS and median OS were 4.4 and 14.9 months, respectively. In conclusion, prophylactic pegfilgrastim may facilitate the management of severe neutropenia without dose delays in patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab.

Pancytopenia Resulting From Low-Dose Methotrexate Use: A Diagnostic Challenge

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease primarily affecting small joints which leads to crippling erosion of the articular cartilage and bone. It is associated with complications related to both its disease course and treatment. Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist responsible for modulating cell-specific signaling pathways and inhibiting the proinflammatory properties of major cell lineages involved in the pathogenesis of RA. It is considered to be the first-line agent in RA because of its disease-modifying ability and safety profile at low doses. This case report discusses how a middle-aged female presented with severe bone marrow suppression secondary to MTX toxicity, an unusual presentation at the usual low-dose regimen. Her presentation overlapped with several other conditions, especially with Felty’s syndrome, a rare complication of RA, characterized by the triad of splenomegaly, neutropenia, and RA. Other differentials included hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, hematologic neoplasms, drug reaction, and infection. Therefore, it was essential to exclude all possible differentials before initiating therapy. We found the corrected reticulocyte count coupled with a good response to leucovorin to be an effective way to differentiate MTX-induced pancytopenia from other possible hematologic diagnoses without the use of a bone marrow biopsy. Additionally, our case incidentally demonstrated a potential interaction between piperacillin/tazobactam and MTX.

Optimizing Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Transcript for Enhanced Expression in Escherichia coli

The human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a hematopoietic growth factor used to prevent and treat neutropenia. G-CSF stimulates the bone marrow to produce infection-fighting granulocytes. Food and Drug Administration of the United States approved G-CSF in 1991 and its PEGylated version in 2002 as a prophylactic and therapeutic measure against neutropenia. Recombinant human G-CSF is produced in surrogate host Escherichia coli and is PEGylated at N-terminal. Besides neutropenia, G-CSF is also used in bone marrow transplantation for the mobilization and maturation of peripheral blood stem cells. Considering the requirement of producing G-CSF therapeutic in large quantities, construct designing for high expression is critical for the biopharmaceutical and industrial application. Earlier studies have employed approaches such as codon optimization, use of strong promoters, employment of protein tags, secretion signals, optimization of protein folding, etc., for increasing expression and yield of therapeutic proteins. In this study, it was observed that mRNA transcribed from the native human cDNA of G-CSF and the codon-optimized variant leads to low protein expression in E. coli. To understand the underlying reasons, the mRNA secondary structure of the 5′ end of the G-CSF transcript was analyzed. This analysis revealed the presence of stable secondary structures at the 5′ end of the G-CSF transcript, arising from the native human gene and even from the codon-optimized sequence. These secondary structures were disrupted through translationally silent mutations within the first 24 nucleotides of the transcript without affecting the protein sequence. Interestingly, through this approach, the G-CSF protein expression was increased 60 folds as compared to native G-CSF construct. We believe that these findings create a roadmap for optimization of G-CSF transcript for enhanced expression in E. coli and could be employed to increase the expression of other therapeutic proteins.

Appropriateness of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the dose-limiting adverse effects of chemotherapy. Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors (G-CSFs) minimize the incidence of FN and reduce the risk of neutropenia complications. This study was conducted to address the prescription pattern of G-CSF for primary prophylaxis of FN during the first cycle of chemotherapy in solid tumors.

METHOD

This prospective observational study was done to investigate the G-CSF prescription pattern in patients receiving the first cycle of chemotherapy for solid tumors and compare it with the NCCN guideline recommendations.

RESULT

Based on the guideline, prophylactic G-CSF administration was indicated in 26 of the 96 patients (27.1%) and all of them received G-CSF. On the other hand, 70 patients (72.9%) did not meet the guideline criteria for prophylaxis, but 60 (62.5%) of them received G-CSF. Seven doses of pegfilgrastim and 165 doses of filgrastim were used inappropriately in the study population, which was associated with an economic burden of about 224.7 million IRR (5350 USD).

CONCLUSION

Taken together, inconsistencies with the guideline were observed in this prospective evaluation, suggesting that submitting rationalized policies to decrease G-CSF prescription, especially in patients with a lower or intermediate FN risk, yields substantial cost savings.

The incidence and timing of leukocyte overshoot after pegfilgrastim administration

INTRODUCTION

Pegfilgrastim is a PEGylated formulation of filgrastim with a long half-life. It is highly convenient and less burdensome for patients. However, white blood cell count may temporarily increase after administration; in particular, a leukocyte overshoot may be observed. The present study retrospectively examined the incidence and timing of leukocyte overshoot after pegfilgrastim administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients (118 occasions of pegfilgrastim) were evaluated. Leukocyte overshoot was defined as white blood cell count ≥10,000/mm³ exceeding the reference value.

RESULTS

Leukocyte overshoot was observed in 71.2% (84/118) occasions, in 76.4% (42/55) patients. The maximum white blood cell count ≥30,000/mm³ was observed in 30.5% (36/118) occasions in 45.5% (25/55) patients and was observed in 39.3% (33/84) occasions on day 1 after pegfilgrastim administration and 26.2% (22/84) on day 2. Leukocyte overshoot has been observed in only 23.1% (9/39) patients administered with normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. However, there were no patients with white blood cell counts ≥30,000/mm³.

CONCLUSION

There was a higher frequency of occurrence of leukocyte overshoot in response to pegfilgrastim than in response to normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. High incidence of leukocyte overshoot was observed when blood was collected 1-2 days after administration of pegfilgrastim. It is important for patients to understand the characteristics of pegfilgrastim by conducting pharmaceutical guidance.

Evidence-Based Use of Colony-Stimulating Factors in Elderly Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia and its complications represent the major dose-limiting toxicity of cancer chemotherapy, especially in the elderly. Hematopoietic growth factors have been shown to reduce the severity and duration of febrile neutropenia (FN) and to sustain chemotherapy dose intensity.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken of studies of the relationship between age and the risk of neutropenia and its complications. Recent studies of the "Awareness of Neutropenia in Chemotherapy Study Group" related to the impact of age on neutropenic complications are also summarized.

RESULTS

The risk of FN associated with standard regimens increases with age and appears to be greatest during the first cycle of chemotherapy. FN continues to have a considerable clinical, economic, and quality-of-life impact on affected individuals. The risk of mortality associated with hospitalization with FN also increases with age but is largely associated with the higher rate of comorbidities observed in the elderly population. Despite increasing evidence that elderly patients experience similar benefit from cancer chemotherapy, reductions in dose intensity often compromise response rates and long-term survival. The hematopoietic growth factors reduce the risk of neutropenic events and the need for reduced dose intensity in elderly cancer patients. Primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) reduces the risk of FN and its complications in elderly patients receiving moderately intensive systemic chemotherapy for responsive malignancies. CSFs also appear to reduce cost and improve quality of life in selected elderly patients receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary prophylaxis with CSFs should be considered in elderly patients with responsive and potentially curable malignancies who receive moderately intensive chemotherapy.

ZOHé: A Prospective Study of the Use of Biosimilar Filgrastim Zarzio in Clinical Practice in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy for Lymphoid Malignancies

BACKGROUND

The ZOHé study was a prospective, observational, multicenter study in France to assess use of biosimilar filgrastim Zarzio in routine clinical practice in patients undergoing neutropenia-inducing chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years undergoing chemotherapy for a malignant disease and with a first prescription for Zarzio were enrolled in 2 cohorts: solid tumor (1174 patients) or hematological malignancy (633 patients); the latter is reported here. Analyses primarily described the prescription and use of Zarzio in current practice, and included identification of factors linked to prescription for primary prophylaxis, comparison of use in relation to European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines, and estimation of chemotherapy dose intensity maintenance in patients given Zarzio.

RESULTS

Use of Zarzio in clinical practice was relatively standardized and followed label indication in 96.7% of the analysis population (633 patients). Most patients had ≥ 2 EORTC patient-related risk factors for febrile neutropenia (FN). Chemotherapy dose intensity was maintained in 85.2% of evaluable patients and 89.6% of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving R-CHOP (rituximab-cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone). The safety profile of Zarzio was confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical practice in France, Zarzio is mostly used as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancies. Patient-related risk factors appear to have more weight in clinicians' decisions to give Zarzio than the FN risk category of the chemotherapy regimen alone in real-world practice.

Neutropenia: occurrence and management in women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

to identify the prevalence, and describe the management of, neutropenia throughout the chemotherapy treatment among women with breast cancer.

METHODS

observational study, cycles of chemotherapy. 116 neutropenic events were recorded, and 63.3% of the patients presented neutropenia at some point of their treatment, 46.5% of these presenting grade II. The management used was temporary suspension between the cycles and the mean number of delays was 6 days. The study was prospective and longitudinal, where the evaluation of the hematological toxicities was undertaken at each cycle of chemotherapy, whether neoadjuvant or adjuvant.

RESULTS

79 women were included, who received 572 cycles. However, the reasons for the suspensions were the lack of a space in the chemotherapy center, followed by neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

neutropenia is one of the most common and serious adverse events observed during the chemotherapy. Nursing must invest in research regarding this adverse event and in management strategies for organizing the public health system, so as to offer quality care.

Pegfilgrastim-Induced Hyperleukocytosis

Objective:

To report a pediatric case of pegfilgrastim-induced hyperleukocytosis.

Case Summary:

A 3-year-old boy with medulloblastoma therapy presented with white blood cell (WBC) count 0.1 × 103/μL and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 0.014 × 103/μL on day 27 following a course of induction chemotherapy. The patient received pegfilgrastim 200 μg/kg the following day. On his return 6 days later for the next planned course of chemotherapy, hyperleukocytosis was determined, with WBC 149 × 103/μL and ANC 110 × 103/μL (“neutrophil overshoot”). No sources of the elevated WBC count other than administration of pegfilgrastim (eg, steroids, antiepileptics, infection) were present. Chemotherapy was delayed until the WBC count had fallen to 35.2 × 103/μL (ANC 28.9 × 103/μL). No sequelae from this adverse effect occurred.

Discussion:

Pegfilgrastim has unique saturable neutrophil receptor-mediated clearance, the ability for self-regulation. Due to this clearance mechanism, hyperleukocytosis associated with pegfilgrastim use is uncommon in adults and has not been previously reported in pediatrics. The pegfilgrastim dose in children is under investigation; however, 100–110 μg/kg has been effective and safe in this population. Use of the Naranjo probability scale suggested that pegfilgrastim was the probable cause of hyperleukocytosis in our patient.

Conclusions:

Pegfilgrastim 200 μg/kg, in excess of the 100 μg/kg dose used in limited pediatric clinical trials, appeared to exceed saturable neutrophil receptor-mediated clearance. The inability of this mechanism to self-regulate neutrophil counts in the normal range led to neutrophil overshoot. Routine pediatric use of the pegylated dosage form of G-CSF should await further published clinical trials to validate a safe and effective dose.

Leucogen tablets at 60 mg three times per day are safe and effective to control febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE

To investigate whether it is safe to use leucogen tablets 60 mg three times per day (180 mg for a day) and whether this regimen could reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia caused by chemotherapy.

METHODS

This prospectively designed study focused on the safety and effectiveness of leucogen tablets 60mg three times per day for a group of cancer patients during chemotherapy for mainly lung or gastric cancers. The tablets were administered from 5 days before until the termination of chemotherapy. Neutropenia and other healthcare encounters were defined as events and occurrence was estimated for comparison.

RESULTS

We identified 39 patients receiving leucogen tablets 60mg three times per day, including 11 with gastric, 12 with lung and 16 with other sites of cancer. The mean age was 65 (29-75) years and there were 27 male and 12 female patients. The mean duration of leucogen tablets intake was 59 days. Eighteen patients were treated with taxane-based, 4 with irinotecan-based and 17 with other chemotherapy. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 0%. Twelve patients were found severe neutropenia (grade III/IV), and the duration of severe neutropenia (grade III/IV) was 5 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events were attributable to complications of myelosuppressive chemotherapy or the primary disease (i.e., alopecia, nausea, asthenia, neutropenia, and severe hepatic renal dysfunction). No chemotherapy was delayed and no treatment related death was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that leucogen tablets 60mg three times per day (180mg for a day) are safe and could be effective for preventing febrile neutropenia in patients with chemotherapy.

Immunomodulatory Response Triggered by the Alkaloids, 3-Amino-7-Benzylbenzimidazo[3,2-a] Quinolinium Chloride (ABQ-48) and 3-Nitro-7-Benzylbenzimidazo [3,2-a] Quinolinium Chloride (NBQ-48)

ABQ-48 (3-amino-7-benzylbenzimidazo[3,2-a]quinolinium chloride) and NBQ-48 (3-nitro-7-benzylbenzimidaw[3,2-a] quinolinium chloride) are un-natural alkaloids containing a planar heteroaromatic systems characterized by quaternized nitrogen fused to benzothiazole nucleus. Both compounds are structurally related to naturally occurring substances such as elliptine (from Ochrosia), and berberine (from Berberis). Previous in vitro studies have shown these agents to control tumor-cell proliferation indicating that both BQS are active but especially ABQ-48 at a 1 OuM dose with over 80% control of the proliferation of multiple cancer cell lines from various etiologies including colon, melanoma, CNS and ovarian cells. Mechanism of action studies have also been conducted however this is the first approach to evaluate immune modulatory activity of these novel BQS. Immune-based therapy is an increasing field in which scientists identify how the immunomodulatory activity of known and newly discovered compounds elicits an immune response that could be used against diseases. In this study, our main objective was to apply an in vitro model to show the immunomodulatory effects of ABQ-48 and NBQ-48 by analyzing the cytokine profile resulting after extracted murine spleen cells were treated with both BQS using a fluorescence-based multiplex ELISA approach. Screened cytokines included: G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1a, IL-2, IL-3, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IL-21, IL-23, IFN-γ, and TNF-α. Our study results show ABQ 48 and NBQ-48 to stimulate the release of G-CSF, IL-2, IL-6, and, IFN-γ when mouse splenocytes are incubated with serial dilutions of these agents. Our finding opens new possibilities of potentially using ABQ-48 and NBQ-48 as immunomodulatory agents; with intend to activate the immune system such as the production of neutrophils against cancer or reducing chemotherapy side effects.

Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prophylaxis: how results are affected by research design

Aims: To examine the impact of research design on results in two published comparative effectiveness studies. Methods: Guidelines for comparative effectiveness research have recommended incorporating disease process in study design. Based on the recommendations, we develop a checklist of considerations and apply the checklist in review of two published studies on comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors. Both studies used similar administrative claims data, but different methods, which resulted in directionally different estimates. Results: Major design differences between the two studies include: whether the timing of intervention in disease process was identified and whether study cohort and outcome assessment period were defined based on this temporal relationship. Conclusion: Disease process and timing of intervention should be incorporated into the design of comparative effectiveness studies.

Modelling chemotherapy effects on granulopoiesis

Background

Although the growth-factor G-CSF is widely used to prevent granulotoxic side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapies, its optimal use is still unknown since treatment outcome depends on many parameters such as dosing and timing of chemotherapies, pharmaceutical derivative of G-CSF used and individual risk factors. We showed in the past that a pharmacokinetic and –dynamic model of G-CSF and human granulopoiesis can be used to predict the performance of yet untested G-CSF schedules. However, only a single chemotherapy was considered so far.

In the present paper, we propose a comprehensive model of chemotherapy toxicity and combine it with our cell kinetic model of granulopoiesis. Major assumptions are: proportionality of cell numbers and cell loss, delayed action of chemotherapy, drug, drug-dose and cell stage specific toxicities, no interaction of drugs and higher toxicity of drugs at the first time of application. Correspondingly, chemotherapies can be characterized by a set of toxicity parameters which can be estimated by fitting the predictions of our model to clinical time series data of patients under therapy. Data were either extracted from the literature or were received from cooperating clinical study groups.

Results

Model assumptions proved to be feasible in explaining granulotoxicity of 10 different chemotherapeutic drugs or drug-combinations applied in 33 different schedules with and without G-CSF. Risk groups of granulotoxicity were traced back to differences in toxicity parameters.

Conclusion

We established a comprehensive model of combined G-CSF and chemotherapy action in humans which allows us to predict and compare the outcome of alternative G-CSF schedules. We aim to apply the model in different clinical contexts to optimize and individualize G-CSF treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-014-0138-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in a Canadian outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Data on real-life utilization of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (g-csfs) in Canada are limited. The objective of the present study was to describe the reasons for, and the patterns of, g-csf use in selected outpatient oncology clinics in Ontario and Quebec.

METHODS

In a retrospective longitudinal cohort study, a review of medical records from 9 Canadian oncology clinics identified patients being prescribed filgrastim (fil) and pegfilgrastim (peg). Patient characteristics, reasons for g-csf use, and treatment patterns were descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

Medical records of 395 patients initiating g-csf therapy between January 2008 and January 2009 were included. Of this population, 80% were women, and breast cancer was the predominant diagnosis (59%). The most commonly prescribed g-csf was fil (56% in Ontario and 98% in Quebec). The most frequent reason for g-csf use was primary prophylaxis (42% for both fil and peg), followed by secondary prophylaxis (37% fil, 41% peg). Those proportions varied by tumour type and chemotherapy regimen. Delayed g-csf administration (more than 1 day after the end of chemotherapy) was frequently observed for fil, but rarely reported for peg, and that finding was consistent across tumours and concurrent chemotherapy regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of g-csf varies with the malignancy type and the provincial health care setting. The most commonly prescribed g-csf agent was fil, and most first g-csf prescriptions were for primary prophylaxis. Delays were frequently observed for patients receiving fil, but were rarely reported for those receiving peg.

Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF)

BACKGROUND

Myelosuppressive chemotherapy can lead to dose-limiting febrile neutropenia. Prophylactic use of recombinant human G-CSF such as daily filgrastim and once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim may reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. This comparative study examined the effect of pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim on the risk of hospitalization.

METHODS

This retrospective United States claims analysis utilized 2004-2009 data for filgrastim- and pegfilgrastim-treated patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast, lung, ovarian, or colorectal cancers. Cycles in which pegfilgrastim or filgrastim was administered within 5 days from initiation of chemotherapy (considered to represent prophylaxis) were pooled for analysis. Neutropenia-related hospitalization and other healthcare encounters were defined with a "narrow" criterion for claims with an ICD-9 code for neutropenia and with a "broad" criterion for claims with an ICD-9 code for neutropenia, fever, or infection. Odds ratios (OR) for hospitalization and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by generalized estimating equation (GEE) models and adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Per-cycle healthcare utilization and costs were examined for cycles with pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prophylaxis.

RESULTS

We identified 3,535 patients receiving G-CSF prophylaxis, representing 12,056 chemotherapy cycles (11,683 pegfilgrastim, 373 filgrastim). The mean duration of filgrastim prophylaxis in the sample was 4.8 days. The mean duration of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in the sample was 1.0 day, consistent with the recommended dosage of pegfilgrastim - a single injection once per chemotherapy cycle. Cycles with prophylactic pegfilgrastim were associated with a decreased risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization (narrow definition: OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.16-1.13; broad definition: OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.59) and all-cause hospitalization (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35-0.72) versus cycles with prophylactic filgrastim. For neutropenia-related utilization by setting of care, there were more ambulatory visits and hospitalizations per cycle associated with filgrastim prophylaxis than with pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. Mean per-cycle neutropenia-related costs were also higher with prophylactic filgrastim than with prophylactic pegfilgrastim.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comparative effectiveness study, pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia-related or all-cause hospitalization relative to filgrastim prophylaxis.

Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and sargramostim prophylaxis for neutropenia-related hospitalization: two US retrospective claims analyses

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have compared the effectiveness of filgrastim (FIL), pegfilgrastim (PEG), and sargramostim (SAR) to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy (M-CT). Two large commercial database analyses were separately conducted to examine the incidence of neutropenia-related and all-cause hospitalizations associated with FIL, PEG, and SAR prophylaxis for patients receiving M-CT for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma, or solid tumors.

METHODS

Separate retrospective US claims database analyses utilized patient data from January 1, 2004 to April 30, 2010 using the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) and January 1, 2001 to August 31, 2009 using OptumInsight's (formerly Ingenix) database. Patients were ≥18 years old and treated with M-CT for NHL, Hodgkin lymphoma, and solid tumors. All identified M-CT cycles with prophylactic (first 5 days of cycle) FIL, PEG, or SAR were included in the analysis. Patterns of administration and incidence rates of all-cause and neutropenia-related hospitalization were examined on a per-cycle basis.

RESULTS

In total, 9330 and 8762 patients with cancer, representing 30,264 and 24,215 chemotherapy cycles (28,189 and 22,649 (PEG), 1669 and 1351 (FIL), 406 and 215 (SAR)) from the HIRD(SM) and OptumInsight databases, respectively, were included in the separate database analyses. Both the HIRD(SM) and OptumInsight analysis showed that SAR and FIL prophylaxis had a higher risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization (SAR: OR = 3.48 [95%CI = 2.11, 5.74] and 2.81 [1.62, 4.87]; FIL: 1.78 [1.28, 2.48] and 2.36 [1.82, 3.06], respectively) and all-cause hospitalization (SAR: 2.18 [1.41, 3.36] and 2.41 [1.58, 3.68]; FIL:1.57 [1.25, 1.97] and 1.95 [1.60, 2.38], respectively) vs PEG.

LIMITATIONS

Medical claims do not contain information about chemotherapy dose, and hospitalizations were not validated against the patient's chart.

CONCLUSION

In this comparative effectiveness study, use of PEG was associated with a lower risk of neutropenia-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared to use of FIL or SAR prophylaxis.

Epidemiology of febrile neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia (FN) continues to represent a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and cost in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. The reported rates of FN vary considerably among studies depending on the treatment regimen, delivered dose intensity, and patient population. The risk of initial FN appears to be highest during the first cycle of chemotherapy and is greatest in certain high-risk groups including elderly patients and those with various comorbidities. Febrile neutropenia continues to have considerable clinical, economic, and quality-of-life impact on affected patients. The risk of mortality associated with FN continues to be relatively high in patients with hematologic malignancies, patients presenting with comorbid illnesses, and patients with bacteremia, pneumonia, or other infection-related complications. The reduction in chemotherapy dose intensity that frequently follows an episode of FN may have considerable life-threatening impact on disease control in responsive and potentially curable malignancies. The economic burden of FN is substantial, with the greatest proportion of the cost associated with the relatively limited number of patients hospitalized for prolonged periods as a result of comorbidities or complications. The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) may reduce the risk and cost associated with cancer treatment by reducing the probability of hospitalization with FN. Primary prophylaxis with the CSFs may be warranted in patients receiving intensive regimens or in those at greater risk because of age or comorbidities. Further study of various risk factors for FN should help identify patients at greatest risk and likely candidates for targeted use of the hematopoietic growth factors.

Quality management of potential chemotherapy-induced neutropenic complications: evaluation of practice in an academic medical center

GOALS

Management of the risk of potential chemotherapy-induced neutropenic complications such as febrile neutropenia (FN) and severe neutropenia (SN) is a quality of care priority. How frequently does care at our institution conform to established guidelines?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective chart review study included a random sample of 305 cancer patients receiving care at a single US academic medical center. Abstracted data included demographics, risk factors, and outcome variables (e.g., development of FN/SN, administration of myeloid growth factors). To evaluate quality of care, we assessed conformance between actual practice and established clinical practice guidelines for the use of myeloid growth factors from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 305 cases reviewed, 8% were classified as low risk (<10%), 48% as intermediate risk (10-20%), and 44% as high risk (>20%), using the risk classifications in the NCCN guidelines modified to accommodate illness and other risk factors. Thirty-four percent received prophylactic administration of myeloid growth factors. Half of the cases had adequate documentation of mid-cycle absolute neutrophil count to determine whether FN/SN developed. Among these cases with adequate documentation, 21% developed FN/SN. Use of growth factors did not conform to established quality guidelines. Overall, 77 of 133 (58%) high-risk cases received myeloid growth factors, whereas six of 25 (24%) low-risk cases received myeloid growth factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine clinical practice in this academic oncology setting was poorly aligned with established guidelines; there is substantial opportunity to standardize clinical strategies and increase conformance with evidence-based guidelines.

Drug Reimbursement Policies in Canada—Need for Improved Access to Critical Therapies

Public drug programs in Canada are increasingly implementing cost management strategies. A multidisciplinary review of these strategies—specifically, the special authorization (SA) process—found that implementation of the SA practice is costly and causes inequity in access, underutilization, and delays in treatment for urgently required therapies, all potentially leading to negative health outcomes. We present potential solutions and a set of recommendations for decision-makers to base reimbursement decisions on the best clinical evidence, eliminate regional variability in access, ensure timely access to urgently required treatments, and monitor the impact of reimbursement policies on health outcomes.

Assessment of neutropenia-related quality of life in a clinical setting

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To examine how neutropenia affects quality of life (QOL) and explore strategies to assess neutropenia-related QOL in clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, abstracts, conference proceedings, and clinical practice guidelines.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Neutropenia can have a detrimental effect on the QOL of patients receiving chemotherapy. A neutropenia-related QOL questionnaire can help nurses better identify patients at risk for developing neutropenia and monitor patients who already have it. In some cases, the questionnaire may be the first step in the initiation of interventions to improve patient care. Ideally, the QOL questionnaire should be easy to use, provide clinically meaningful information, and be easily adapted from existing QOL measurement tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective implementation of QOL assessments into clinical practice can lead to the initiation of interventions that may improve neutropenia-related QOL in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses can enhance their clinical judgment and affect patient treatment by implementing a questionnaire that assesses patients' neutropenia-related QOL.

Risks and consequences of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Neutropenia represents a major dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy and is associated with an increased risk of infection, impaired patient quality of life, and interference with the delivery of full-dose chemotherapy. These complications increase not only morbidity and mortality associated with cancer treatment but also the overall cost of care for cancer patients. Conversely, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a surrogate for delivered dose intensity has been associated with improved cancer survival. Administration of myeloid growth factors, such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim, reduces the risk for neutropenic complications and facilitates the delivery of full-dose chemotherapy. There is an ongoing effort to identify patients at increased risk for developing neutropenic complications who would likely benefit from preemptive myeloid growth factor therapy. Appropriate use of myeloid growth factors is associated with reduced neutropenic complications, improved patient quality of life, and potentially improved disease control and long-term survival.

Perioperative prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in high-risk colorectal cancer patients for an improved recovery: A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to improve the postoperative outcome of high-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 and 4) recovering from colorectal cancer surgery by using recombinant human G-CSF (filgrastim) as perioperative prophylaxis.

METHODS

In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection were randomized to filgrastim or placebo. Filgrastim (5 mug/kg) or placebo was administered in the afternoon on day -1, 0, and +1 relative to the operation. Primary endpoints were in a hierarchic order: quality of life (QoL) over time (determined at discharge, 2 and 6 months after operation with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire) and the McPeek recovery score, which measures death and duration of stays in the intensive care unit and hospital. Predefined secondary endpoints were global QoL, subdomains of QoL, postoperative recovery, duration of stay, 6-month overall survival, complication rates, and cellular and immunologic parameters.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in both primary endpoints between the treatment groups. A significant improvement (P < .05) was obtained by filgrastim prophylaxis in the QoL subdomain family life /- social functioning,; thus, more patients recovered to their preoperative state (14 vs 4 with placebo) as determined by structured interviews. Duration of hospital stay (14 vs 12 days) and noninfectious complications were decreased from 8% to 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk patients undergoing major operation for colorectal cancer profited from filgrastim prophylaxis with regard to duration of hospital stay, noninfectious complications, social QoL, and subjective recovery from operation. These endpoints, however, were secondary, and the primary endpoints (overall QoL and the McPeek index) did not show comparable benefits. A new confirmatory trial with the successful endpoints of this trial, as well as a cost analysis, will be needed to confirm the results before a general recommendation for the prophylactic use of G-CSF in high-risk cancer patients can be given.

Neutropenia: State of the Knowledge Part II

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To summarize the current available evidence for oncology nurses so that they may predict and prevent complications of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), provide optimal education to patients, and become familiar with the state of the knowledge of neutropenia by understanding the evidence and guidelines for patients with cancer who may experience CIN.

DATA SOURCES

Review of primary literature, meta-analyses, available systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines, and discussions at the State of the Knowledge on Neutropenia Symposium.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The evidence for nursing interventions to prevent CIN complications is underdeveloped. Strong empirical support to prevent infection in patients with CIN (e.g., restrictions in diet, isolation procedures, providing accurate patient education) is lacking. Several areas of preventive measures by patients, hand washing, and skin care have a stronger evidence base and should have high priority on patient education plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong evidence is available for several nursing interventions to prevent infection in patients with CIN. Many existing practices lack empirical support and should be identified and reviewed in the clinical setting for appropriate patient management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Oncology nurses can use the findings from the symposium to revise their care standards for patients anticipated to experience CIN. Research and practice performance improvement projects may be undertaken by oncology nurses to improve the delivery of evidence-based nursing care to this vulnerable patient population.

Experiencing neutropenia: quality of life interviews with adult cancer patients

Background

Neutropenia is a common toxicity in chemotherapy but detailed information about how neutropenia is associated with changes in patients' quality of life is not readily available. This prospective study interviewed patients with grade 4 neutropenia to provide qualitative information on patients' experience of developing and coping with grade 4 neutropenia during a cycle of chemotherapy.

Methods

A sample of 34 patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia during the first cycle of chemotherapy completed a total of 100 structured clinical interviews. Interviews were transcribed, and 2 raters inductively developed 5 broad categories comprising 80 specific complaint domains nominated by patients. Thirty-five patient-nominated problems were mentioned in 5% or more of the interviews.

Results

Fatigue was the most common physical symptom. Interference in daily routine, negative self-evaluation, negative emotion, and social isolation were other common complaints associated with neutropenia.

Conclusion

Neutropenia is associated with a number of negative experiences among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, and these negative experiences have an adverse effect on the patient's quality of life. Oncology nurses can play a key role in helping patients manage adverse effects to maintain their quality of life.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Cytotoxic chemotherapy suppresses the hematopoietic system, impairing host protective mechanisms and limiting the doses of chemotherapy that can be tolerated. Neutropenia, the most serious hematologic toxicity, is associated with the risk of life-threatening infections as well as chemotherapy dose reductions and delays that may compromise treatment outcomes. The authors reviewed the recent literature to provide an update on research in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its complications and impact, and they discuss the implications of this work for improving the management of patients with cancer who are treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Despite its importance as the primary dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, much concerning neutropenia and its consequences and impact remains unknown. Recent surveys indicate that neutropenia remains a prevalent problem associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Much research has sought to identify risk factors that may predispose patients to neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia, in an effort to predict better which patients are at risk and to use preventive strategies, such as prophylactic colony-stimulating factors, more cost-effectively. Neutropenic complications associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, possibly compromised treatment outcomes, and excess healthcare costs. Research in quantifying the risk of neutropenic complications may make it possible in the near future to target patients at greater risk with appropriate preventive strategies, thereby maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs.