Budesonide inhalation suspension for the treatment of asthma in infants and children

Dry Powder Inhaler with the technical and practical obstacles, and forthcoming platform strategies

A Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) is a technique as well as a device used to inhale formulation which is in the form of dry powder, and is inhaled through the nose or mouth. It was developed for the purpose of treating conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Asthma, and even cystic fibrosis etc. The aim of the review is to discuss the different methods of preparation of dry powders along with the characterization of DPI. Here we present the outline of different methods like supercritical fluid extraction (SCF), spray drying, and milling. The review focussed on various devices including single and multi-dose devices used in the DPI. It also highlights on recent advances in the DPI including nano particulate system, siRNA-based medication, liposomes, and pro-liposomes based delivery. In COVID-19 silver nanoparticles-based DPIs provide very prominent results in the infected lungs. Moreover, this review states that the AI-based DPI development provides and improvement in the bioavailability and effectiveness of the drug along with the role of artificial neural networks (ANN). The study also showed that nasally administered drugs (nose to brain) can easily cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and enter the central nervous system (CNS) through the olfactory and trigeminal pathway which provides effective CNS concentrations at lower dosage. It is suggested that DPIs not only target respiratory complications but also treat CNS complications too. This review provides support and guides the researcher in the recent development and evaluation of DPI.

Indian Guidelines on Nebulization Therapy

Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated.

Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 Prevents Asthmatic Airway Inflammation and Remodelling in Rats through the Improvement of Intestinal Barrier Function and Systemic TGF-β Production

INTRODUCTION

The use of probiotics has been broadly popularized due to positive effects in the attenuation of aberrant immune responses such as asthma. Allergic asthma is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by airway inflammation and remodelling.

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of oral administration of Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 on asthmatic airway inflammation and lung tissue remodelling in rats and its relation to the maintenance of an adequate intestinal barrier.

METHODS

Wistar rats were ovalbumin (OVA) sensitized and challenged and orally treated with L. lactis. Lung inflammatory infiltrates and cytokines were measured, and remodelling was evaluated. Serum OVA-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels were assessed. We also evaluated changes on intestinal environment and on systemic immune response.

RESULTS

L. lactis diminished the infiltration of proinflammatory leucocytes, mainly eosinophils, in the bronchoalveolar compartment, decreased lung IL-4 and IL-5 expression, and reduced the level of serum allergen-specific IgE. Furthermore, L. lactis prevented eosinophil influx, collagen deposition, and goblet cell hyperplasia in lung tissue. In the intestine, L. lactis-treated asthmatic rats increased Peyer's patch and goblet cell quantity and mRNA expression of IgA, MUC-2, and claudin. Additionally, intestinal morphological alterations were normalized by L. lactis administration. Splenocyte proliferative response to OVA was abolished, and serum levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β were increased by L. lactis treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that L. lactis is a potential candidate for asthma prevention, and the effect is mediated by the improvement of intestinal barrier function and systemic TGF-β production.

Chronic asthma-induced behavioral and hippocampal neuronal morphological changes are concurrent with BDNF, cofilin1 and Cdc42/RhoA alterations in immature mice

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have found that persistent hypoxia caused by chronic asthma, especially during childhood, affects the development and function of the brain, but the mechanism is unclear. In the present study, BDNF and its signal pathway was investigated in mediating chronic asthma induced-neuronal changes that lead to behavior alterations.

METHODS

The chronic asthma model was induced by sensitization with ovalbumin for more than 9 weeks in immature mice. Morris water maze test (MWMT), open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze test (EPMT) were used to conduct behavioral evaluation. Neuronal morphology in hippocampal CA1, CA3 and DG was assessed using ImageJ's Sholl plugin and RESCONSTRUCT software. BDNF signaling pathway related molecules was determined by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Chronic asthma does affect the behavioral performances of immature mice evaluated in MWMT, OFT, and EPMT. The analysis by three-dimensional reconstruction software found that following the behavioral alteration of asthmatic mice, dendritic changes also occurred in hippocampal neurons, including shortened dendrite length, significantly reduced number of dendritic branches, decreased density of dendritic spines, and reduced percentage of functional dendritic spine types. At the same time, by immunofluorescence and western blotting, we also found that alterations in dendritic morphology were consistent with activation of cofilin1 and changes in BDNF-Cdc42/RhoA levels. Some of the changes mentioned above can be alleviated by intranasal administration of budesonide.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that response similar to nicotine withdrawal or/and hypoxia induced by childhood chronic asthma enhances the BDNF-Cdc42/RhoA signaling pathway and activates cofilin1, leading to the remodeling of actin, causing the loss of dendritic spines and atrophy of dendrites, eventually resulting in behavioral alterations.

Five-day course of budesonide inhalation suspension is as effective as oral prednisolone in the treatment of mild to severe acute asthma exacerbations in adults

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence is available on the use of budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) for the treatment of mild to severe acute asthma exacerbations (AAE) in adults in an inpatient setting. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a five-day course of BIS compared with oral prednisolone (OP) in the management of adults with AAE.

METHODS

A retrospective study examined the response of 28 patients hospitalized with mild to severe acute asthma exacerbation from January 2003 to December 2003. These patients, who were steroid free ≥ 1 yr, were administered a five-day course of BIS (2 × 2 mg bid) or OP (2 × 15 mg bid). PEF, FEV(1) and asthma symptom scores were recorded daily.

RESULTS

The BIS (n = 13) and OP (n = 15) treatment groups were comparable at baseline for demographic characteristics and prebronchodilator (fenoterol) FEV(1) of 52.4% predicted normal value and 54.6% predicted normal value, respectively. Mean change of morning PEF was 152 L/min during BIS treatment and 130 L/min for OP treatment; the mean changes of morning forced expiratory volumes in 1 s (FEV(1)) were 1.0 and 0.7 L, respectively. The mean change in daytime symptom scores were -1.6 and -1.3 in the BIS and the OP groups, respectively. Improvements in PEF, FEV(1) and daytime symptom scores were significantly different between baseline and after treatment in each treatment group (p < 0.05). However, improvements in both BIS and OP groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide inhalation suspension may be an alternative treatment of acute asthma exacerbation in adults who are at risk for systemic corticosteroids.

Inhaled Corticosteroids

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective controllers of asthma. They suppress inflammation mainly by switching off multiple activated inflammatory genes through reversing histone acetylation via the recruitment of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2). Through suppression of airway inflammation ICS reduce airway hyperresponsiveness and control asthma symptoms. ICS are now first-line therapy for all patients with persistent asthma, controlling asthma symptoms and preventing exacerbations. Inhaled long-acting β₂-agonists added to ICS further improve asthma control and are commonly given as combination inhalers, which improve compliance and control asthma at lower doses of corticosteroids. By contrast, ICS provide much less clinical benefit in COPD and the inflammation is resistant to the action of corticosteroids. This appears to be due to a reduction in HDAC2 activity and expression as a result of oxidative stress. ICS are added to bronchodilators in patients with severe COPD to reduce exacerbations. ICS, which are absorbed from the lungs into the systemic circulation, have negligible systemic side effects at the doses most patients require, although the high doses used in COPD has some systemic side effects and increases the risk of developing pneumonia.

Effect on growth of long-term treatment with intranasal triamcinolone acetonide aqueous in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend treatment with intranasal corticosteroids for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), but concerns remain about possible adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To present the 1- and 2-year growth results for children with AR treated with triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray.

METHODS

Thirty-nine children (aged 6.1-14.3 years at study entry) were treated with triamcinolone acetonide aqueous for 1 year, and a subset of 30 children completed a second year of treatment. The dose was physician titered to achieve control over AR symptoms. For each child, statural heights at baseline and at the 1- and 2-year (where available) visits, together with growth rates, were measured and were compared with predicted values.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between measured and predicted heights at the 1- and 2-year visits. The mean (SD) measured--predicted difference was 0.3 (2.2) cm (95% confidence interval, -0.4 to 1.0 cm) at the 1-year visit and 0.5 (3.0) cm (95% confidence interval, -0.6 to 1.6 cm) at the 2-year visit. Mean differences in measured and predicted growth rates were nonsignificant at the 1- and 2-year visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous titered to control AR symptoms and given for 1 or 2 years had no significant effect on statural growth in children with AR.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered via two dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

The dry powder inhaler (DPI) device for budesonide inhalation powder 200 microg (DPI-A) was redesigned to improve dosing consistency and provide new features (budesonide inhalation powder 90 microg and 180 microg; DPI-B).

OBJECTIVE

Two multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies compared the efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered via each DPI versus placebo, and the systemic exposure of budesonide from each device.

METHODS

Asthmatic adults with mild-to-moderate asthma (N = 621) and patients 6-17 years with mild asthma (N = 516) received budesonide DPI-B 360 microg or DPI-A 400 microg twice-daily (total daily dose 720 microg or 800 microg), budesonide DPI-B 180 microg or DPI-A 200 microg once daily (total daily dose 180 microg or 200 microg), or matching placebo. Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and secondary variables (asthma symptoms, beta(2)-adrenergic agonist use, peak expiratory flow [PEF], and withdrawals due to worsening asthma) versus placebo were measured.

RESULTS

In both studies, FEV(1) significantly (p < 0.05) improved for all active treatments versus placebo except once-daily budesonide DPI-B 180 mug in adults. In the adult study, significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvements in all secondary variables occurred with all active treatments versus placebo. In the pediatric/adolescent study, improvements in AM/PM PEF were significantly (p <or= 0.011) greater with twice-daily budesonide DPI-B 360 microg versus placebo. Numerically fewer patients in all active-treatment groups withdrew due to worsening asthma versus placebo. Adverse event profiles were similar among groups. In the pediatric/adolescent study, no significant differences in mean 24-h urine cortisol or cortisol: creatinine ratio assessments were observed between the active treatment groups and the placebo group. Although pharmacokinetic variables were generally similar across subgroups in the adult (n = 77) and pediatric/adolescent (n = 32) studies, pairwise treatment comparisons of twice-daily budesonide DPI-B 360 microg versus DPI-A 400 microg and once-daily budesonide DPI-B 180 microg versus DPI-A 200 microg showed large variability for the area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval and the maximum detected drug plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of budesonide DPI-A and DPI-B versus placebo were demonstrated across the low to medium inhaled corticosteroid dose range in children >or= 6 years with very mild asthma and adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The study is limited by the evaluation of only two doses for each product in both studies. Additionally, the studies were not designed to test equivalence or noninferiority between the active products. Pharmacokinetic characterization was limited because of the small sample sizes.

Successful treatment of previously uncontrolled adult asthma with budesonide inhalation suspension: five-year case histories

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nebulized budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) is effective in treating adults with asthma that has been uncontrolled by inhaled therapies.

CASE SUMMARIES

Three adults with severe persistent asthma were switched to BIS after poor outcomes with other controller medications, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). BIS dosages were initiated with 1 mg twice daily. Based on physician discretion as symptoms improved, dosages were decreased to 0.5 mg twice daily (2 pts.) or once daily (1 pt.). Patients were instructed to self-manage their asthma, increasing their dosages during periods of asthma worsening. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was assessed before and after the initiation of BIS. The number of healthcare visits and oral corticosteroid courses recorded in patient medical records during the 3 years before and 5 years after initiation of BIS therapy were compared. In all 3 cases, BIS improved asthma control. BIS consistently increased PEF and reduced the number of urgent care visits and oral corticosteroid courses. All patients reported satisfaction with BIS therapy.

DISCUSSION

Despite proven effectiveness of ICSs for persistent asthma, some patients fail to respond optimally to treatment administered via an inhaler. These 3 case reports suggest that BIS is effective in treating adults with severe persistent asthma who fail to respond optimally to treatment with other ICS preparations. Failure to use inhalers properly, previous poor adherence in 1 case, or patient preference for the nebulizer might explain why nebulized BIS was more effective than other inhaler therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching adults with uncontrolled asthma to BIS therapy may be a valuable treatment option for those who are unable to achieve optimal asthma control, despite asthma education and training on inhaler technique.