Optimizing therapeutic decision-making for off-label medicines use: A scoping review and consensus recommendations for improving practice and research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023;32:1200-1222. [PMID: 37208845 PMCID: PMC10543391 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

PURPOSE

Off-label medicines use is a common and sometimes necessary practice in many populations, with important clinical, ethical and financial consequences, including potential unintended harm or lack of effectiveness. No internationally recognized guidelines exist to aid decision-makers in applying research evidence to inform off-label medicines use. We aimed to critically evaluate current evidence informing decision-making for off-label use and to develop consensus recommendations to improve future practice and research.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to summarize the literature on available off-label use guidance, including types, extent and scientific rigor of evidence incorporated. Findings informed the development of consensus recommendations by an international multidisciplinary Expert Panel using a modified Delphi process. Our target audience includes clinicians, patients and caregivers, researchers, regulators, sponsors, health technology assessment bodies, payers and policy makers.

RESULTS

We found 31 published guidance documents on therapeutic decision-making for off-label use. Of 20 guidances with general recommendations, only 35% detailed the types and quality of evidence needed and the processes for its evaluation to reach sound, ethical decisions about appropriate use. There was no globally recognized guidance. To optimize future therapeutic decision-making, we recommend: (1) seeking rigorous scientific evidence; (2) utilizing diverse expertise in evidence evaluation and synthesis; (3) using rigorous processes to formulate recommendations for appropriate use; (4) linking off-label use with timely conduct of clinically meaningful research (including real-world evidence) to address knowledge gaps quickly; and (5) fostering partnerships between clinical decision-makers, researchers, regulators, policy makers, and sponsors to facilitate cohesive implementation and evaluation of these recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide comprehensive consensus recommendations to optimize therapeutic decision-making for off-label medicines use and concurrently drive clinically relevant research. Successful implementation requires appropriate funding and infrastructure support to engage necessary stakeholders and foster relevant partnerships, representing significant challenges that policy makers must urgently address.

Predicting response to rFVIIa in neonates with intractable bleeding or severe coagulation disturbances

BACKGROUND

To date, clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in neonates is rather limited because of the lack of controlled studies. ΑIM: The objective of this study was to present further experience from our center with regard to the use of rFVIIa in newborns with severe bleeding or coagulopathy resistant to conventional therapy and to determine factors affecting the clinical outcome.

METHODOLOGY

We performed a retrospective data analysis of 29 neonates with intractable bleeding or severe coagulation disturbances. All patients received 100 μg/kg of rFVIIa per dose bolus intravenously (maximum of 23 doses), as rescue procedure after other interventions had failed to achieve hemostasis.

RESULTS

Fourteen neonates survived (group A), whereas 15 died (group B). There was no difference in birth weight, gestational age, and bleeding site and causes between the 2 groups. In the neonates who survived, rFVIIa had been administered earlier in the disease process (<24 h of beginning of bleeding) compared with those who died (P=0.009). In all 29 neonates, international normalized ratio was directly restored (from 2.99±1.4 before rFVIIa administration to 1.6±1.1 afterward, P<0.001) and prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were significantly decreased after administration of rFVIIa (from 28 to 16.4 and from 180 to 67, respectively; P=0.001 and 0.05, respectively). Blood products administered were significantly less in group A than in group B, as time from the beginning of bleeding to the administration of rFVIIa was significantly less in group A than in group B. Neither acute adverse events nor thromboembolic complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this neonatal group with intractable bleeding and/or severe coagulation disturbances, rFVIIa was more effective in early intervention as rescue therapy, without any adverse events in all neonates. Upon failure to achieve hemostasis with initial administration of blood products, fast intervention with rFVIIa could be considered in neonates with serious bleeding and coagulation disorders.

The practical management of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant therapy

Oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage is increasing in incidence and is the most feared complication of therapy with vitamin K1 antagonists. Anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage has a high risk of ongoing bleeding, death, or disability. The most important aspect of clinical management of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage is represented by urgent reversal of coagulopathy, decreasing as quickly as possible the international normalized ratio to values ≤1·4, preferably ≤1·2, together with life support and surgical therapy, when indicated. Protocols for anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage emphasize the immediate discontinuation of anticoagulant medication and the immediate intravenous administration of vitamin K1 (mean dose: 10-20 mg), and the use of prothrombin complex concentrates (variable doses calculated estimate circulating functional prothrombin complex) or fresh-frozen plasma (15-30 ml/kg) or recombinant activated factor VII (15-120 μg/kg). Because of cost and availability, there is limited randomized evidence comparing different reversal strategies that support a specific treatment regimen. In this paper, we emphasize the growing importance of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage and describe options for acute coagulopathy reversal in this setting. Additionally, emphasis is placed on understanding current consensus-based guidelines for coagulopathy reversal and the challenges of determining best evidence for these treatments. On the basis of the available knowledge, inappropriate adherence to current consensus-based guidelines for coagulopathy reversal may expose the physician to medico-legal implications.

Trauma-induced coagulopathy--a review of the systematic reviews: is there sufficient evidence to guide clinical transfusion practice?

Systematic reviews are accepted as a robust and less biased means of appraising and synthesizing results from high-quality studies. This report collated and summarized all the systematic review evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of trauma-related coagulopathy and transfusion, thereby covering the widest possible body of literature. We defined 4 key clinical questions: (1) What are the best methods of predicting and diagnosing trauma-related coagulopathy? (2) Which methods of clinical management correct coagulopathy? (3) Which methods of clinical management correct bleeding? and (4) What are the outcomes of transfusion in trauma? Thirty-seven systematic reviews were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1950-July 2010), EMBASE (1980-July 2010), The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2010), National Guidelines Clearing House, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, and UKBTS SRI Transfusion Evidence Library (www.transfusionevidencelibrary.com). The evidence from the systematic review literature was scanty with many gaps, and we were not able to conclusively answer any of our 4 questions. Much more needs to be understood about how coagulopathy and bleeding in trauma are altered by transfusion practices and, most importantly, whether this translates into improved survival. There is a need for randomized controlled trials to answer these questions. The approach described in this report provides a framework for incorporating new evidence.

Effect of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Critical Bleeding: Clinical Experience of a Single Center

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been successfully used ‘‘off-label’’ in patients with refractory life-threatening hemorrhage. Intravenous rFVIIa was given to 31 patients unresponsive to standard therapy with blood products and surgical reexploration, who were bleeding due to trauma, surgery, organ transplantation, liver cirrhosis, ruptured uterus. We recorded their coagulation and hematologic profiles, acid-base balance, blood loss, number of red blood cells (RBC), plasma and platelet transfusions, complications, and survival. rFVIIa (mean dose 132.2 ± 56.3 μg/kg) effectively contained the hemorrhage in 28/31 (90.3%) cases, with a mean reduction in blood loss from 12.4 ± 10.2 to 2.7 ± 2.2 L (P < .0001). The need for RBC, platelet, and plasma transfusion decreased significantly after rFVIIa, with a consequent significant improvement in clotting of test hematocrit, pH, and bicarbonates. Four patients had adverse events potentially related to rFVIIa. The survival rates after 1 and 30 days were 48.4% and 29.1%, respectively.