Rational prescribing of antibacterials in ambulatory children

Shorter versus longer duration of Amoxicillin-based treatment for pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common typical bacterial cause of pneumonia among children. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 5-day Amoxicillin-based empiric treatment. However, longer treatments are frequently used. This study aimed to compare shorter and longer Amoxicillin regimens for children with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 5-day and 10-day courses of Amoxicillin for the treatment of CAP in children older than 6 months in an outpatient setting. Studies involving overlapping populations, lower-than-standard antibiotic doses, and hospitalized patients were excluded. The outcome of interest was clinical cure. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I² statistics. Two independent authors conducted the critical appraisal of the included studies according to the RoB-2 tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool to evaluate the certainty of evidence of our results. Three RCTs and 789 children aged from 6 months to 10 years were included, of whom 385 (48.8%) underwent a 5-day regimen. Amoxicillin-based therapy was used in 774 (98%) patients. No differences were found between 5-day and 10-day therapy regarding clinical cure (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.05; p = 0.49; I² = 0%). Subgroup analysis of children aged 6-71 months showed no difference in the rates of the same outcome (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.05; p = 0.38; I² = 0%). The GRADE tool suggested moderate certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that a short course of Amoxicillin (5 days) is just as effective as a longer course (10 days) for uncomplicated CAP in children under 10 years old. Nevertheless, generalizations should be made with caution considering the socioeconomic settings of the studies included.PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022328519.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• In the outpatient setting, a few international guidelines recommend a 10-day Amoxicillin course as first-line treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). • Recent trials have shown that shorter courses of Amoxicillin may be as effective as 10-day regimens in uncomplicated pneumonia.

WHAT IS NEW

• When comparing 5-day to 10-day Amoxicillin regimens, evidence suggests no significant difference in clinical cure rates for uncomplicated CAP in outpatient settings. • Generalizations should be made with caution considering the socioeconomic context of the population within the included studies.

Examining a New Scale for Evaluating Taste in Children (TASTY)

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric medication taste impacts adherence, and current recommendations advocate for direct input from pediatric patients on medication taste during drug development. However, the lack of a widely used, validated measurement tool limits taste assessments. This protocol examines the validity of, and preferences for, a newly created self-report taste rating scale designed with images centered on taste (TASTY), compared with 2 existing hedonic taste scales.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, single-center, randomized survey of child-parent dyads recruited from pediatric ambulatory care clinics and ancillary service waiting rooms. Parents facilitated the survey by identifying foods that they perceived their child would recall as pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant. Children were asked to rate each of the 3 food items on each of 3 different faces scales presented in random order. Parents and children were also asked which scale they preferred and why.

RESULTS

Ninety child-parent dyads completed this study (mean child age was 6.7 ± 2.9 years, 58% female). All 3 scales performed comparably with no significant differences (p > 0.05). However, concordance between parental assignment and child rankings was markedly lower in 3-year-olds (r < 0.4) and 4-year-olds (r < 0.6) than for children 5 years and older (r > 0.9). TASTY was preferred by both parents and children when compared with the other scales.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel hedonic taste scale for pediatric use is equally valid and preferred to comparable faces scales. The TASTY scale may be beneficial in developing standardized methodology for evaluating drug palatability.

Optimizing oral medications for children

BACKGROUND

Active pharmaceutical ingredients that taste bitter and/or irritate the mouth and throat are aversive to children as well as many adults. Effective methods of avoiding unpleasant tastes for adults (eg, encapsulating the medicine in pill, capsule, or tablet form) are problematic because many children cannot or will not swallow these. The unpalatable flavor of the medicine can thwart the benefits of even the most powerful of drugs. Failure to consume medication may do the child harm and can even be life-threatening.

OBJECTIVES

This article provides an overview of the current knowledge of the sensory capabilities and preferences of children as it relates to flavor, defined here as the combined input of taste, smell, and chemical irritation. The methods used to evaluate flavor perception in children are reviewed. Recent scientific advances are summarized that shed light on why the bitter taste of oral pharmaceuticals is an ongoing formulation problem and how discoveries of novel flavor molecules and modulators of bitter tastes hold considerable promise for the future. Alternative methods for evaluation of the palatability of medicines are described.

METHODS

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development sponsored a Pediatric Formulation Initiative workshop on December 6 and 7, 2005, in Bethesda, Maryland. Information for this article was gathered from literature reviews that were then discussed during this workshop as well as during several conference calls with the Taste and Flavor Working Group members. Terms for the MEDLINE search (1970-2007) included infant, children, taste, olfaction/smell, flavor, chemical senses, palatability, sensory testing, pharmaceutical, and medicines.

RESULTS

Children have well-developed sensory systems for detecting tastes, smells, and chemical irritants, and their rejection of unpalatable medications is a reflection of their basic biology. Sugars, salt, and other substances reportedly reduce the bitterness of several pharmaceuticals. Adding pleasant flavor volatiles such as bubble gum may help induce children to consume a medicine, but such volatile compounds are not effective in suppressing the strong bitter tastes associated with some medications. Also, because individual experiences and culture mainly determine which odors are attractive, a universally appealing volatile flavoring agent may be difficult to identify. Sensory panelists who are sensitive to the pediatric palate, which is different from adults, and new techniques involving animal models, isolated parts of the receptor cells, and even electronic devices that detect taste and flavor are among the tools that may be used to evaluate the palatability of medications and predict compliance among pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are no easy solutions to this dilemma, children's acceptance of many medicines can be improved by applying the knowledge gleaned from basic research in the chemical senses. Further development and validation of sensory methods will provide a better understanding of the sensory world of the child. This understanding, combined with new technologies and results of animal model studies, will enhance drug acceptance and compliance in pediatric populations. A better understanding of the scientific basis for distaste and how to ameliorate it is a public health priority.

A pooled analysis of seven randomized crossover studies of the palatability of cefdinir oral suspension versus amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil, azithromycin, and amoxicillin in children aged 4 to 8 years

OBJECTIVE

This analysis of the results of 7 trials compared the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir oral suspension and 4 other pediatric antibiotic oral suspensions--amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil, azithromycin, or generic amoxicillin--using a visual smile-face scale.

METHODS

Data from 7 randomized, single-blind, cross-over trials were pooled and analyzed. In each study, children aged 4 to 8 years were asked to taste and smell 2 different antibiotic suspensions and assign preference using a visual smile-face scale. Ratings were converted to a numeric score ranging from 5 (really good) to 1 (really bad).

RESULTS

A total of 1011 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment-order groups; 965 were evaluable for the taste and smell analyses. Baseline demographics of evaluable subjects were similar among test groups. Approximately even proportions of participants were female or male (50.1 % vs 49.9%), most (84.1%) were white, and slightly more participants were aged 7 or 8 years rather than younger (age 4 years, 16.0%; age 5 years, 17.4%; age 6 years, 18.7%; age 7 years, 23.2%; age 8 years, 24.8%). Of the 965 children who tasted both antibiotic suspensions and determined their preference, 798 (82.7%) rated the taste of cefdinir as really good or good (the highest possible ratings); 712 (73.8%) assigned the same ratings to amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil, azithromycin, or generic amoxicillin (P < or = 0.001). With regard to smell, 671 (69.5%) rated the smell of cefdinir as really good or good; 636 (65.9%) assigned these same ratings to the comparator agents (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

In this pooled analysis of data from 7 randomized, single-blind, crossover trials, children between the ages of 4 and 8 years preferred the taste of cefdinir oral suspension to that of other pediatric antibiotic suspensions. Based on smile-face scores, subjects found the smell of cefdinir oral suspension to be at least as good as that of the comparators.

Stability, Dose Uniformity, and Palatability of Three Counterterrorism Drugs—Human Subject and Electronic Tongue Studies

PURPOSE

These studies evaluated the ability of common household food and drink products to mask the bitter taste of three selected anti-terrorism drugs.

METHODS

Three anti-terrorism drugs (doxycycline, ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, and potassium iodide) were mixed with a variety of common household food and drinks, and healthy adult volunteers evaluated the resulting taste and aftertaste. In parallel, the ASTREE Electronic Tongue was used to evaluate taste combinations. Stability of the mixtures over time was monitored, as was the dosage uniformity across preparations.

RESULTS

Foods and drinks were identified that satisfactorily masked the bitter flavor of each drug. Dose uniformity and stability were also acceptable over the range studied, although some combinations were significantly less stable than others. The electronic tongue was able to differentiate between tastes, but ranked masking agents in a different order than human volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxycycline, potassium iodide, and ciprofloxacin, which are stockpiled in solid tablet form, can conveniently be prepared into more palatable formulations, using common household foods and drinks. The electronic tongue can be used to perform an initial screening for palatability.

Primary compliance with medication prescribed for paediatric patients discharged from a regional hospital

OBJECTIVE

To establish the rate of primary compliance with medication of children discharged from the paediatric ward of a regional hospital.

METHODS

All paediatric admissions to a regional hospital for a 14-week period from April to July 2000 were studied. Patient data were collected for those paediatric inpatients discharged on medication. Written prescriptions kept by the local Aboriginal Medical Service and computerized data from local pharmacies were collected and the numbers filled were compared to ward discharge prescriptions.

RESULTS

There were 160 medical paediatric admissions. The median admission age was 19 months. There was no difference in patient sex, number of drugs prescribed, diagnosis of infection, mean age or the proportion of children under 2 years, between filled and unfilled prescriptions. In total, 49 prescriptions were filled from a total of 65 written (75%). This figure compares unfavourably with that of the metropolitan tertiary referral centre.

CONCLUSIONS

: Primary compliance was suboptimal, with the majority of unfilled prescriptions being for antibiotics. These findings suggest that a remediable cause of treatment failure may be primary non-compliance with medication in regional settings.

Clinical efficacy of 3 days versus 5 days of oral amoxicillin for treatment of childhood pneumonia: a multicentre double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

For most infections, especially acute respiratory infections (ARIs), the recommended duration of therapy is not based on strong scientific or clinical criteria. Shorter courses of antibiotics for non-severe pneumonia would result in lower costs, enhance patient compliance, and might help to contain antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of 3-day and 5-day courses of amoxicillin in children with non-severe pneumonia.

METHODS

We recruited 2000 children, aged 2-59 months, with non-severe pneumonia (WHO criteria) diagnosed in the outpatient departments of seven hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 days or 5 days of treatment with oral amoxicillin. The primary outcome was treatment failure. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

We allocated 1000 children to 3 days of treatment and 1000 to 5 days. Treatment failed in 209 (21%) patients in the 3-day group, and in 202 (20%) in the 5-day group (difference 0.7%; 95% CI -1.8 to 3.2). In 12 (1%) children in the 3-day group and in 13 (1%) in the 5-day group the disease relapsed (difference 0.1%; -0.6 to 0.8). Treatment was more likely to fail in children who did not adhere to treatment (p<0.0001), in those younger than 12 months (p<0.0001), in those whose illness lasted for 3 days or longer (p=0.004), in those whose respiratory rate was more than 10 breaths/min above the age-specific cut-off (p=0.004), and in those with vomiting (p=0.009). Non-adherence was also associated with failure of treatment in the 5-day group (p<0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with oral amoxicillin for 3-days was equally as effective as treatment for 5 days in children with non-severe pneumonia. The most important risk factor for treatment failure was non-compliance, which was also associated with longer duration of therapy.

Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin versus erythromycin for the treatment of pertussis: a prospective, randomized, single blind trial

BACKGROUND

Pertussis is still a prevalent public health problem, and antibiotic therapy may decrease disease severity and limit communicability. Erythromycin is the recommended antibiotic for treatment and prophylaxis of pertussis; however, side effects of erythromycin limit its usefulness in some patients. Clarithromycin, a newer macrolide, has good in vitro activity against Bordetella pertussis and a better side effect profile.

GOALS OF THE STUDY

To compare the microbiologic and clinical efficacy and the clinical safety of a 7-day course of clarithromycin vs. a 14-day course of erythromycin in children with pertussis.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single blind (investigator), parallel group trial.

METHODS

Children from 1 month to 16 years of age presenting with a clinically defined pertussis syndrome were eligible for the study. After obtaining informed written consent, we randomized patients to receive either clarithromycin (7.5 mg/kg/dose twice a day for 7 days) or erythromycin (13.3 mg/kg/dose three times a day for 14 days). Nasopharyngeal cultures for B. pertussis were performed at enrollment and after end of treatment. Clinical assessments were performed at enrollment, at end of treatment and at a 1-month follow-up visit. Adverse event data were collected throughout the study.

RESULTS

The clarithromycin (n = 76) and erythromycin (n = 77) groups were well-matched for age and previous pertussis immunization. Microbiologic eradication and clinical cure rates were 100% (31 of 31) for clarithromycin and 96% (22 of 23) for erythromycin. The clarithromycin group had significantly fewer adverse events [45% (34 of 76) for clarithromycin vs. 62% (48 of 77) for erythromycin; P = 0.035], and compliance with the medication regimen was significantly higher in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A 7-day regimen of clarithromycin and a 14-day course of erythromycin were equally effective for treatment of pertussis. Clarithromycin was better tolerated than conventional erythromycin therapy.

Comparison of the palatability of the oral suspension of cefdinir vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil and azithromycin in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence to therapeutic regimens is extremely important to successful treatment of acute otitis media. Among pediatric patients medication palatability, particularly that of oral suspensions, is essential for patient acceptance, therapeutic compliance and successful outcome.

METHODS

A series of six randomized, single blind, crossover trials were conducted, each comparing cefdinir oral suspension with one of the following antibiotic oral suspensions: amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium; cefprozil; or azithromycin. Each medication comparison was evaluated in a single center and multicenter study. Subjects 4 to 8 years of age were asked to taste and smell each medication and assign preference using a visual "smile-face" scale. Ratings were converted to a numeric score ranging from 5 ("really good") to 1 ("really bad").

RESULTS

Among the 715 subjects 85% rated the taste of cefdinir as good or really good, the highest possible ratings; 63% of subjects assigned the same ratings to amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil or azithromycin. Seventy-one percent rated the smell of cefdinir as good or really good; 64% assigned the same ratings to the comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings from these trials, children 4 to 8 years of age preferred the taste and smell of cefdinir oral suspension to that of the comparator agents.

Drug utilization reviews of oral quinolone, cephalosporin, and macrolide use in nonacute care: a systematic review

Drug utilization review (DUR) is a tool for monitoring the appropriateness of physicians' prescribing patterns. The present systematic overview was undertaken to determine the extent of appropriate use of oral quinolones, cephalosporins, and macrolides in nonacute-care settings in North America reported in published DUR studies. Potentially relevant DURs conducted since 1987 were retrieved from an electronic search of 6 databases (augmented by manual searches of bibliographies of appropriate articles) and from personal communications with local experts. Independent reviewers applied objective criteria to select the DURs for inclusion. Quality assessments were performed by 4 independent reviewers using the Edmonton Quality Assessment Tool for Drug Utilization Reviews, an instrument developed to assess the potential for systematic bias in a DUR. Data from the studies included were abstracted independently by 2 reviewers using a standard data-collection form. Twelve of 587 (2.0%) articles met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies targeted the appropriateness of prescriptions for ciprofloxacin (appropriateness range, 5% to 95%), 3 included cephalosporins (range, 0% to 100%), and 2 examined erythromycin (40%). There were 2 primary reasons for a rating of inappropriate: (1) the prescription was not first-line therapy, or (2) there was insufficient documentation in the patient record. The designation inappropriate did not mean that the drug did not benefit the patient. Of the 4 intervention-based DURs, 1 study showed a significant improvement in appropriate use. Because of heterogeneity in study design, delivery of interventions, and outcome assessment, a pooled estimate of effect was not derived. Four studies estimated the cost of inappropriate prescribing to the institutional study site, which ranged from $20,500 to $173,359 annually; however, these estimates cannot be generalized because of various limitations. When the 12 studies were assessed for methodologic quality, 1 study was rated as high, 7 as moderate, and 4 as low. Levels of prescribing appropriateness reported in the DUR literature should be interpreted cautiously. The DUR studies included in this review varied greatly in the methodologic rigor applied to sample selection, standardized data collection, application of standardized screening criteria, and validated data analysis.