Pharmacoeconomic impact of non-compliance with statins

Patient-reported barriers to statin adherence: Excerpts from a motivational interviewing intervention in older adults

OBJECTIVE

Despite a known benefit in the reduction of cardiovascular risk, adherence to statins remains suboptimal. A qualitative analysis was conducted within an intervention that identified trajectories of statin adherence in patients and used motivational interviewing (MoI) to improve adherence. The objective of this qualitative study was to evaluate transcripts of an MoI telephonic intervention to identify potential, past, and current barriers to statin adherence and barriers specific to distinct adherence trajectories.

METHODS

The MoI intervention was customized by past 1-year adherence trajectories (rapid discontinuation, gradual decline, and gaps in adherence). Two authors independently extracted and documented barriers from phone transcripts. Themes were derived from literature a priori and by cataloging recurring themes from the transcripts.

RESULTS

The transcripts of calls made to 157 patients were reviewed of which 25.2% did not communicate a specific adherence barrier despite falling into a low-adherence trajectory when examining refill data. The most commonly reported barriers to statin adherence included adverse effects (40.1%), forgetfulness (30.0%), and lack of skills or knowledge pertaining to statins (25%). More patients in the rapid discontinuation group perceived medication as unnecessary, whereas more patients in the gaps in adherence group reported a communication barrier with their health care provider. Several barriers among patients who fell into low-adherence trajectories were reported. Some patients did not report any barriers, which may have indicated denial. MoI phone calls were useful in providing knowledge, clarifying medication regimens, and reinforcing the need to take statins.

CONCLUSION

This study identified patient-reported barriers to statin adherence elicited during an MoI telephonic intervention conducted by student pharmacists. There were differences in barriers reported by patients from each trajectory, which emphasize the need for additional tailored interventions to improve patient adherence.

The efficacy of 'static' training interventions for improving indices of cardiorespiratory fitness in premenopausal females

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Many risk factors for CVD can be modified pharmacologically; however, uptake of medications is low, especially in asymptomatic people. Exercise is also effective at reducing CVD risk, but adoption is poor with time-commitment and cost cited as key reasons for this. Repeated remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) and isometric handgrip (IHG) training are both inexpensive, time-efficient interventions which have shown some promise in reducing blood pressure (BP) and improving markers of cardiovascular health and fitness. However, few studies have investigated the effectiveness of these interventions in premenopausal women.

METHOD

Thirty healthy females were recruited to twelve supervised sessions of either RIPC or IHG over 4 weeks, or acted as non-intervention controls (CON). BP measurements, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) were performed at baseline and after the intervention period.

RESULTS

IHG and RIPC were both well-tolerated with 100% adherence to all sessions. A statistically significant reduction in both systolic (- 7.2 mmHg) and diastolic (- 6 mmHg) BP was demonstrated following IHG, with no change following RIPC. No statistically significant improvements were observed in FMD or CPET parameters in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

IHG is an inexpensive and well-tolerated intervention which may improve BP; a key risk factor for CVD. Conversely, our single arm RIPC protocol, despite being similarly well-tolerated, did not elicit improvements in any cardiorespiratory parameters in our chosen population.

A community-based study of the relationship between coronary artery disease and osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Menopause is associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis (OP) and coronary artery disease (CAD). The goal of this study was to seek the possible relationship between CAD and OP in Chinese postmenopausal women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The total of 1825 participants with complete records were available for data analysis in this study. CAD was diagnosed if any one of the following was present: (i) history and/or treatment for angina and/or myocardial infarction; (ii) history of coronary artery revascularization procedures and/or coronary angiography with 50% or more stenosis in one or more of the major coronary arteries; and (iii) regional wall-motion abnormalities on rest echocardiography. OP was defined as T-score less than -2.5. Multiple regression models after controlling for confounding factors were performed to detect their relationships.

RESULTS

The multiple variable linear regression analyses failed to show a significant association between CAD and T-score. However, the multivariate logistic regression analyses after adjustment for relevant confounding factors detected significant associations between CAD and OP.

CONCLUSION

The present study provided data suggesting that CAD was independently and significantly associated with OP. The prevalence of OP was more frequent in Chinese postmenopausal women with CAD.

Statins and Nonadherence

Statin nonadherence is a major challenge to optimal management. Patients nonadherent to statin therapy do not receive the expected benefit relative to the degree of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering obtained. This is important because new evidence guidelines recommend statins as the first-line therapy for those in high-risk groups (secondary prevention, patients with diabetes 40-75 years of age, and LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL) and in selected primary prevention patients. Statin assignment in the latter group occurs only in those with an estimated ≥7.5% 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk after shared decision making in a clinician–patient risk discussion. However, in numerous studies, statin nonadherence shows little or no benefit in reducing cardiovascular events or mortality compared to placebo, effectively negating the risk reduction expected from statin use and concomitantly increasing the total cost of health care. The causes and solutions for nonadherence are multifactorial and include patient, clinician, and health system factors. We believe that a clinician–patient partnership that facilitates patients’ understanding of the potential for optimal benefit with the least adverse effects is an important first step toward improving adherence. A transtheoretical model of stages of behavior change helps clinicians address many of the common factors limiting adherence to statins. We conclude with a teaching tool emphasizing a structured approach to statin therapy with patient-centered risk discussions.

Patient co-payment and adherence to statins: a review and case studies

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the international literature about whether there is an association between co-payment and statin adherence, and to present case studies to illustrate the impact of a reduction in patient co-payment associated with generic drugs on improving therapy adherence.

METHODS

Studies that examined the impact of patient co-payment on statin adherence were identified in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EconLit up to January 2013. A standardized data extraction form was completed for each included study, collecting information about country, sample, setting, adherence measure, design, results about the impact of co-payment on statin adherence, and methodological quality. Two cases from the outpatient clinic of one the authors (PRS) were added.

RESULTS

The literature supported a statistically significant negative association between co-payment and statin adherence. This association appeared to be influenced by the absolute level of co-payments, the size of the co-payment change, whether co-payment increases or decreases, the time horizon over which the impact of a co-payment change is examined, the type of drug for which co-payment changes (e.g. generic or branded drug), the availability of alternative drugs and switching behaviour. Two case studies illustrated that cost issues are important to patients and that patient adherence to statin therapy improved following a switch to generic statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Current studies have demonstrated that statin adherence is influenced by co-payment and a range of patient, physician and pharmacy characteristics. Nevertheless, the power of these models to explain the variation in adherence remains limited.

The Association between KIF6 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism rs20455 and Serum Lipids in Filipino-American Women

The Trp719Arg allele of KIF6 rs20455, a putative risk factor for CHD especially in those with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), was investigated in Filipino-American women (FAW, n = 235) participating in health screenings in four cities. The rs20455 genotype of each subject was determined by a multiplex assay using a Luminex-OLA procedure. The risk allele Trp719Arg was present in 77% of the subjects. The genotype distribution was 23% Trp/Trp, 51% Arg/Trp, and 26% Arg/Arg. Genotype did not predict the presence of CHD risk factors. Moreover, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides mean values did not vary as a function of genotype. However, those with the Arg/Arg genotype on statin medication exhibited a significantly higher mean triglycerides level (P < 0.01). Approximately 60% of participants regardless of genotype exhibited LDL-C levels ≥100 mg/dL but were not taking medication. Approximately 43% of those with the Trp719Arg risk allele on statins exhibited elevated LDL-C levels. Our study suggests that the Trp719Arg allele of KIF 6 rs20455 is common among Filipino-American women; thus, even with borderline LDL-C levels would benefit from statin treatment. Secondly, many participants did not exhibit guideline recommended LDL-C levels including many who were on statin drugs.

The impact of regional co-payment and national reimbursement criteria on statins use in Italy: an interrupted time-series analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and their effectiveness is largely acknowledged. The consumption of statins increased four-fold during the 2000-2010 decade in Italy and national and regional control policies were developed. Restrictions to reimbursement were fixed at the national level, whereas co-payment was introduced in some, but not all, regions. The aim of the present study is to assess the impact of such policies on the consumption of statins in Italy between 2001-2007 among outpatients.

METHODS

The statin use was measured in terms of defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DDD/1000 inh. day) from May 2001 to December 2007. The study was conducted in 17 out of 21 regions, nine of which had implemented a co-payment policy. Time trends in consumption before and after the introduction of co-payment policies and reimbursement criteria were examined using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time-series, adjusting for seasonal components.

RESULTS

The consumption of statins increased by 22.9 DDD/1000 inh. day in May 2001 to 54.7 DDD/1000 inh. day in December 2007. On average, there was a 1.7% increase in statin use each month before the national guideline changed while the increase was about 0.5% afterwards. The revision of the reimbursement criteria was associated with a significant decrease in level (coefficient = -2.80, 95% CI -3.70 to -1.90 p-value <0.001) and trend (coefficient = -0.33, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.29 p-value <0.001). The introduction of co-payment was associated with a significant change in trend of consumption so that the overall use of the drug increased by 0.04 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.07, p-value < 0.001) DDD/1000 inh. day per month in the post-intervention period, but there was no evidence of a change in level of consumption (p-value = 0.163).

CONCLUSIONS

Consumption of statins in Italy increased almost three-fold during the study period. The restriction to reimbursement Interventions was associated with an immediate drop and a decrease in trend of statin use, while the regional copayment was associated with a small increase in trend of statin use.

Adherence to statins, subsequent healthcare costs, and cardiovascular hospitalizations

Statins are the primary agents used to decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Although adherence to statins improves the clinical outcomes, the affect of statin adherence on healthcare costs has not been well studied. To examine the relation among statin adherence, subsequent hospitalizations, and healthcare costs, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 381,422 patients, aged 18 to 61 years, using an integrated pharmacy and medical claims database. We measured adherence using the medication possession ratio (MPR) for 12 months and the healthcare costs and cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations during the subsequent 18 months. Of those studied, 258,013 (67.6%) were adherent (MPR ≥80%), 65,795 (17.3%) had an MPR of 60% to 79%, and 57,614 (15.1%) had an MPR of <60%. The adjusted all-cause total healthcare costs were lowest in the adherent group at $10,198 ± $39.4 (mean ± SE) versus $10,609 ± $77.7 (p <0.001) for an MPR of 60% to 79%, and $11,102 ± $84.3 (p <0.001) for an MPR of <60%. The adherent group had greater statin costs at $838 ± $1.0 versus $664 ± $2.0 (p <0.001) and $488 ± $2.2 (p <0.001). When evaluated by 5 levels of MPR, 0% to 59% and increments of 10% >60%, the adjusted total healthcare costs were lowest for the MPR 90% to 100% group and significantly greater statistically (p <0.001) for each lower level of adherence. Compared to the statin-adherent patients, cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations were more likely for the patients with an MPR of 60% to 79% (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.16) and an MPR of 0% to 59% (odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.31). In conclusion, statin adherence is associated with reductions in subsequent total healthcare costs and cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations.

Low bone mineral density is not associated with angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis in men

This study for the first time investigates the association of bone mineral density (BMD) with angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis in men. Our data show that the prevalence of low BMD is very high in men undergoing coronary angiography. However, neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis is associated with an increased prevalence of angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis.

INTRODUCTION

The association of low BMD with angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis in men is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 623 consecutive men undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of established or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). BMD was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry. CAD was diagnosed in the presence of any coronary artery lumen narrowing at angiography; coronary stenoses with lumen narrowing > or =50% were considered significant.

RESULTS

From the total study cohort (mean age of 64 +/- 11 years), 207 patients (33.2%) had osteopenia and 65 (10.4%) had osteoporosis; at angiography, CAD was diagnosed in 558 patients (89.6%) and 403 (64.7%) had significant coronary stenoses. In multivariate logistic regression analysis neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis was associated with an increased prevalence of CAD (adjusted odds ratios (ORs) = 0.71 [95% confidence interval 0.40-1.23]; p = 0.222 and 1.03 [0.38-2.80]; p = 0.955, respectively) or with significant coronary stenoses (OR 0.74 [0.52-1.07], p = 0.112 and 0.72 [0.41-1.26]; p = 0.251, respectively). Also, as a continuous variable, BMD was not associated with angiographically diagnosed CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of low BMD is very high in men undergoing coronary angiography. However, low BMD is not associated with angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis in men.

Green tea polyphenols improve cardiac muscle mRNA and protein levels of signal pathways related to insulin and lipid metabolism and inflammation in insulin-resistant rats

Epidemiological studies indicate that the consumption of green tea polyphenols (GTP) may reduce the risk of coronary artery disease. To explore the underlying mechanisms of action at the molecular level, we examined the effects of GTP on the cardiac mRNA and protein levels of genes involved in insulin and lipid metabolism and inflammation. In rats fed a high-fructose diet, supplementation with GTP (200 mg/kg BW daily dissolved in distilled water) for 6 wk, reduced systemic blood glucose, plasma insulin, retinol-binding protein 4, soluble CD36, cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids and LDL-C levels, as well as the pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and IL-6. GTP did not affect food intake, bodyweight and heart weight. In the myocardium, GTP also increased the insulin receptor (Ir), insulin receptor substrate 1 and 2 (Irs1 and Irs2), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (Pi3k), v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (Akt1), glucose transporter 1 and 4 (Glut1 and Glut4) and glycogen synthase 1 (Gys1) expression but inhibited phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (Pten) expression and decreased glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (Gsk3beta) mRNA expression. The sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (Srebp1c) mRNA, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (Mttp) mRNA and protein, Cd36 mRNA and cluster of differentiation 36 protein levels were decreased and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (Ppar)gamma mRNA levels were increased. GTP also decreased the inflammatory factors: Tnf, Il1b and Il6 mRNA levels, and enhanced the anti-inflammatory protein, zinc-finger protein, protein and mRNA expression. In summary, consumption of GTP ameliorated the detrimental effects of high-fructose diet on insulin signaling, lipid metabolism and inflammation in the cardiac muscle of rats.

A competing risks prescription refill model of compliance and persistence

OBJECTIVES

There is evidence to suggest that noncompliant and nonpersistent behaviors have differing risk factors, clinical consequences, and responses to intervention. This has led to calls for these behaviors to be defined and measured separately to characterize medication-taking behavior comprehensively. Current prescription refill models of compliance are, however, unable to appropriately distinguish between noncompliant and nonpersistent behaviors. To address this limitation, a prescription refill model of medication-taking behavior in which noncompliance and nonpersistence are treated as competing risks is presented.

METHODS

The proposed competing risks model of compliance and persistence is compared with a selection of widely applied prescription refill models of compliance and persistence using a common cohort of patients prescribed statin therapy.

RESULTS

The competing risks model allows the simultaneous measurement of noncompliance and nonpersistence, the partitioning of their individual contributions to medication-taking behavior, and the estimation of noncompliance risk for patients with varying treatment persistence. The results from this model provide information about the relative and overall contributions of noncompliant and nonpersistent behaviors to medication-taking behavior. The methodology also allows an assessment of the differential influence of various risk factors on these behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed competing risks model differentiates between noncompliant and nonpersistent behaviors using prescription refill data. Results from the model provide insights into the dynamics of noncompliant and nonpersistent behaviors that have not been possible with current prescription refill methodologies.

Non-adherence to statin therapy: a major challenge for preventive cardiology

BACKGROUND

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. In the last twenty years, effective lipid-lowering therapies, particularly statins, have become widely available to prevent and reverse the progression of disease. However, there is a significant gap between expected and actual benefits; this may be attributed to poor adherence to statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To define the extent, causes (including psychological aspects), consequences and management of non-adherence to statins.

METHODS

Literature using PubMed and Medline up to and including 30 July 2009.

RESULTS

Adherence to statin therapy is suboptimal in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Causes vary, and include patient factors (e.g., comorbidities, financial constraints, psychological issues), practitioner factors (e.g., poor knowledge of adherence, time constraints, poor communication skills and patient-doctor working alliance) and system factors (e.g., medication costs, lack of clinical monitoring, drug side effects). Non-adherence is associated with adverse health outcomes and increased costs of healthcare. A framework, based on a multidisciplinary approach, for addressing non-adherence, including managing the statin-intolerant patient, is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to statins is a significant issue for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Increased awareness of the causes and solutions for overcoming non-adherence, including safer prescribing, improvement in physician-patient alliance and reduction in drug costs, will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the use of statins and significantly improve patient care and outcomes.

Impact of fixed-dose and multi-pill combination dyslipidemia therapies on medication adherence and the economic burden of sub-optimal adherence

OBJECTIVE

To compare medication adherence between patients initiating fixed-dose combination versus multi-pill combination dyslipidemia therapies and assess the association between optimal adherence (MPR > or = 80%) and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-associated total healthcare resource utilization (THR) and costs (THC).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The HealthCore Integrated Research Database was used to identify patients > or =18 years newly initiating fixed-dose combination [niacin extended-release (NER) and lovastatin (NERL)] or multi-pill combination therapies [NER and simvastatin (NER/S) or lovastatin (NER/L)] between 1/1/2000 and 6/30/2006 (index date), with minimum 18 months of follow-up. Adherence was measured using medication possession ratio (MPR). Three multivariate models were developed controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. A logistic model evaluated the association between study cohorts and optimal adherence, while negative binomial and gamma models estimated the association between optimal adherence and CVD-associated THR and THC, respectively.

RESULTS

In all, 6638 NERL, 1687 NER/S, and 663 NER/L patients were identified. Fixed-dose combination patients were younger [mean (SD) ages of 51.9 (10.5) vs. 56.0 (9.4) [NER/S] and 56.1 (10.6) [NER/L]; p < 0.01], had lower comorbidity (Deyo-Charlson Index 0.50 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.7 +/- 1.1 and 0.6 +/- 1.1, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) and comprised fewer males (73.1 vs. 83.0% and 77.7%; p < 0.01 and p = 0.1). Fixed-dose combination patients had higher average 1-year MPR versus NER/S and NER/L patients (0.54 +/- 0.35 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.35 and 0.47 +/- 0.34, p < 0.01). NER/S and NER/L patients were 31.3% (95% CI: 22.9-39.5%) and 39.1% (95% CI: 26.7-49.4%) less likely to be optimally adherent than fixed-dose combination patients (p < 0.01). Additionally, optimally adherent patients had 8% and 40% decreases in annual CVD-attributable THR [0.920 (95% CI: 0.857-0.989); p = 0.023] and THC [0.601 (95% CI: 0.427-0.845); p = 0.003] versus sub-optimally adherent patients. Key limitations of the study include the limited ability of MPR to analyze the continuity of medication usage, inability to capture data on other key variables including race, income, and clinical characteristics such as smoking history, absence of laboratory values on all study patients, inability to capture over-the-counter fills of niacin, and inability to show causality of results obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence was significantly higher among patients initiating fixed-dose combination versus multi-pill combination dyslipidemia therapies in this managed-care population. Additionally, patients with optimal adherence had a significantly lower CVD-associated THR and THC versus patients with sub-optimal adherence.

The impact of proton pump inhibitor compliance on health-care resource utilization and costs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Standard pharmacotherapy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) includes treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study examined the effect of GERD patients' compliance with PPI therapy on health-care resource utilization and costs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of more than 25 million managed care lives in the United States from January 2000 through February 2005. Administrative claims data were obtained from the National Managed Care Benchmarks database, developed by Integrated Health Care Information Solutions. GERD-diagnosed patients who had at least two PPI dispensings were extracted and grouped into two treatment categories based on their PPI medication possession ratio (MPR): compliant (MPR > 0.8) and noncompliant. A regression-based difference-in-differences approach was used to estimate the effect of compliance on the frequency and costs of inpatient and outpatient visits and pharmacy costs. Statistical controls included health plan type, patient age, baseline use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of the total 41,837 patients studied, 68% were compliant. On an annual, per-patient basis, PPI compliance resulted in 0.47 fewer outpatient visits (P = 0.040), 0.03 fewer inpatient visits (P = 0.015), and 0.47 fewer hospitalization days (P = 0.001) from the pre-PPI use period, compared to noncompliance. PPI therapy increased pharmacy costs for both groups, but the total annual health-care costs were reduced for both groups. Compliant patients experienced a greater decline in total cost from the pre-PPI period compared to noncompliant patients (declines of $3261 vs. $2406 per patient per year, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Both health-care resource use and costs were reduced after initiation of PPI therapy. Additional reductions from the pre-PPI period were further observed by compliance with PPI therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of statins in the prevention of coronary heart disease events in middle-aged Finnish men

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin 20 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg in primary and secondary prevention of CHD in Finland.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The effect of statin therapy on the incidence of CHD and the expected total costs of the disease were described using a Markov state transition model. Due to the limited amount of evidence concerning mortality and morbidity for rosuvastatin, the model was used to transmute the efficiency data of all statins (decrease in total cholesterol) into long-term endpoints (myocardial infarction, death) using risk functions of the FINRISK and 4S studies. The study followed a characterized cohort of 55-year-old Finnish men with an average 3.3-6.6% baseline risk of dying from cardiovascular disease within a 10-year period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, compared with simvastatin, measured as cost of life years gained (euro/LYG) and cost of quality adjusted life years gained (euro/QALY).

RESULTS

The use of rosuvastatin increased the life expectancy by 0.27 years on average (LYG) compared with simvastatin, producing additional 0.08 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Compared with simvastatin, the cost of one LYG with rosuvastatin was euro10 834 and the cost of one QALY gained was euro36 548 (discount rate 5% per annum). Corresponding figures for atorvastatin were euro31 286/LYG and euro105 599/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

If the decision makers' willingness to pay for a QALY gained is around euro40 000 there is a high probability (>50%) that rosuvastatin represents a cost-effective form of therapy in the prevention of CHD in middle-aged men with an average 3.3-6.6% risk of dying within 10 years from cardiovascular disease. However, the true clinical impact of these results needs confirmation from on-going clinical trials, as the role of rosuvastatin in reducing clinical events is pending, but for simvastatin and atorvastatin established.

Predictors of 12-month outcome in smokers who received bupropion sustained-release for smoking cessation

AIM

To examine heterogeneity in outcome at 12 months following 8 weeks of treatment for smoking cessation with bupropion sustained-release (SR) 150 or 300 mg/day combined with behavioural counselling.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

Smokers were recruited from a large healthcare system and then randomized to receive either bupropion SR 150 mg/day (n = 763) or 300 mg/day (n = 761) taken for 8 weeks in combination with either proactive telephone counselling or a tailored mail approach.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

A comprehensive set of relevant individual pretreatment and treatment characteristics was included in the analysis. Smoking outcome at 12 months was defined as point-prevalence of any regular self-reported smoking within the 7 days prior to follow-up contact. Classification and regression tree analysis identified subgroups that varied with respect to likelihood of being nonsmokers at 12 months. Seven subgroups were identified among those receiving bupropion SR 150 mg/day (proportion of nonsmokers at 12 months ranged from 13.7% to 43.5%) and eight subgroups among those receiving bupropion SR 300 mg/day (proportion of nonsmokers at 12 months ranged from 9.6% to 51.7%). In the 150-mg/day group, those with the lowest rate reported no previous quit attempt of 1 month or more in duration while those with the highest rate all reported previous quit attempts of 1 month or longer. In the 300 mg/day group, those with the lowest rate had very high levels of dependence while those with the highest rate were more highly educated and smoked at a lower level. Across all subgroups, cost per 12-month quitter ranged from a low of USD302 to a high of USD2,502.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate the presence of a substantial amount of variation in outcome following treatment with both dosages of bupropion SR, with substantial cost consequences. Variation in outcome could be reduced by providing treatments tailored to subgroups of individuals who are at exceptionally high risk for smoking following a quit attempt.

The economic consequences of noncompliance in cardiovascular disease and related conditions: a literature review

OBJECTIVES

To review studies on the cost consequences of compliance and/or persistence in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related conditions (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes and heart failure) published since 1995, and to evaluate the effects of noncompliance on healthcare expenditure and the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions.

METHODS

English language papers published between January 1995 and February 2007 that examined compliance/persistence with medication for CVD or related conditions, provided an economic evaluation of pharmacological interventions or cost analysis, and quantified the cost consequences of noncompliance, were identified through database searches. The cost consequences of noncompliance were compared across studies descriptively.

RESULTS

Of the 23 studies identified, 10 focused on hypertension, seven on diabetes, one on dyslipidaemia, one on coronary heart disease, one on heart failure and three covered multiple diseases. In studies assessing drug costs only, increased compliance/persistence led to increased drug costs. However, increased compliance/persistence increased the effectiveness of treatment, leading to a decrease in medical events and non-drug costs. This offset the higher drug costs, leading to savings in overall treatment costs. In studies evaluating the effect of compliance/persistence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions, increased compliance/persistence appeared to reduce cost-effectiveness ratios, but the extent of this effect was not quantified.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncompliance with cardiovascular and antidiabetic medication is a significant problem. Increased compliance/persistence leads to increased drug costs, but these are offset by reduced non-drug costs, leading to overall cost savings. The effect of noncompliance on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions is inconclusive and further research is needed to resolve the issue.

Methods for integrating medication compliance and persistence in pharmacoeconomic evaluations

OBJECTIVES

Suboptimal compliance and failure to persist with drug treatments are important determinants of therapeutic nonresponse and are of potential economic significance. The present article aims to describe the methodologies that may be appropriate for integrating noncompliance and nonpersistence in economic evaluations.

METHODS

MEDLINE and NHS-EED were searched for economic evaluations published in the period between 1997 and 2005. Articles were included if they explored the dependence of cost-effectiveness results on varying levels of some form of compliance-related measure. The different methodologies used were reviewed and articles were appraised critically. Alternative methodological approaches are proposed, illustrated by an example of the impact of different persistence rates on a treatment's cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Ten articles were selected for inclusion. These were generally scant on detail relating to how compliance/persistence was assessed and what the impact was on health outcomes. The methods used included Markov models and decision analyses. Markov models allow for persistence to be included directly in the analysis, as patients transit during each cycle. Net-benefit regression models are well suited for analyzing prospective and retrospective studies where patient-level data are available, whereas discrete event simulations have the potential to offer more flexibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance and/or persistence are not included routinely in pharmacoeconomic analyses, despite their potential impact. Where compliance and/or persistence are included, a lack of methodological rigor and consistency in definitions often limits the usefulness of the analyses. The analytical techniques discussed in this article should serve as a basis for developing guidelines on appropriate methodology.

Evaluation of the prescription and utilization patterns of statins in an Italian local health unit during the period 1994-2003

OBJECTIVES

The prescription pattern of statins in the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Treviso (northern Italy) over a 10-year period was evaluated, with the aim of evaluating the persistence with and adherence to therapy.

METHODS

Data on 21,393 subjects who received at least one prescription for statins during the period between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2003 were retrieved from the LHU database in order to track the pharmacological history of individual patients. The data included age, sex, drug formulation, strength, number of drug packages prescribed, and prescription date. The adopted indicators for drug utilization included the Defined Daily Dose (DDD), the Received Daily Dose (RDD), and a surrogated Prescribed Daily Dose (sPDD), extrapolated from available prescription data. An Adherence to Therapy Index (ATI) was calculated from the ratio between the amount of drug actually prescribed and the amount of sPDD. Based on the ATI, patients were grouped into non-adherent, poor-adherent, and good-adherent groups. The distribution of adherence level among patient-age classes and statin-prescribed patients in primary or secondary prevention was evaluated.

RESULTS

All drug-utilization indicators showed an increase in statin use over the study period in terms of both the number of prescribed patients and the sPDD. Persistence with and adherence to therapy remained low, with a 50% discontinuation rate in the first year, and persistent patients did not follow the therapy regularly. Patients in secondary prevention were the most adherent to their drug regimen, although only 41% of these had a good compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest an increase in statin use which is, however, accompanied by poor patient persistence with and adherence to statin therapy.