Extended-release carbamazepine capsules : in bipolar I disorder

Structural characterization and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a CoII complex with imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine

A new mononuclear tetra-hedral CoII complex, di-chlorido-bis-(imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-κN1)cobalt(II), [CoCl2(C7H6N2)2], has been synthesized using a bioactive imidazo-pyridine ligand. X-ray crystallography reveals that the solid-state structure of the title complex exhibits both C-H⋯Cl and π-π stacking inter-actions in building supra-molecular assemblies. Indeed, the mol-ecules are linked by C-H⋯Cl inter-actions into a two-dimensional framework, with finite zero-dimensional dimeric units as building blocks, whereas π-π stacking plays a crucial role in building a supra-molecular layered network. An exhaustive investigation of the diverse inter-molecular inter-actions via Hirshfeld surface analysis enables contributions to the crystal packing of the title complex to be qu-anti-fied. The fingerprint plots associated with the Hirshfeld surface clearly display each significant inter-action involved in the structure, by qu-anti-fying them in an effective visual manner.

Development of Extended-Release Oral Flexible Tablet (ER-OFT) Formulation for Pediatric and Geriatric Compliance: an Age-Appropriate Formulation

Development of age-appropriate formulation suitable for pediatric and geriatric patients involves various challenges. The objective of this research was to develop extended-release oral flexible tablet (ER-OFT) formulation using carbamazepine (CBZ) as model drug for pediatric and geriatric compliance. ER-microparticles of carbamazepine, a BCS class 2, and narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drug, were prepared using ethyl cellulose as matrixing polymer and hypromellose as hydrophilic pore former. Microparticles were prepared using high-shear granulator fitted with an atomizing spray system. Granulation of carbamazepine and ethyl cellulose (EC-FP) with ethanolic binder solution resulted in ER-microparticles with extended-release >16 h. Release kinetics of ER microparticles showed Higuchi model by drug diffusion and erosion. Korsemeyer-peppas release exponent "n" value 0.42 suggested Fickian diffusion. ER-OFT was prepared by blending of ER-microparticles with water-insoluble compressible aid and disintegrating agent. ER-OFT was characterized for performance characteristics and elemental impurities. As the polymer content in formulation was <10%, the size of ER-OFT was smaller compared to marketed ER-formulations. ER-OFT showed in vitro disintegration time of <30 s as per USP and dispersion time of ∼60 to 180 s in 5 to 10 mL of water. Drug release profiles of ER-microparticles and ER-OFT were comparable as f2 values were >50. In vitro dissolution of ER-OFT was comparable to the marketed ER formulation in the pH range of GIT. ER-OFT can be orally swallowed, orally disintegrating, and used as dispersible tablets. Compared to non-disintegrating type ER-formulations, ER-OFT would provide uniform drug release in GIT with low within-subject variability an essential criterion for NTI drug.

Level of response and safety of pharmacological monotherapy in the treatment of acute bipolar I disorder phases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In recent years, combinations of pharmacological treatments have become common for the treatment of bipolar disorder type I (BP I); however, this practice is usually not evidence-based and rarely considers monotherapy drug regimen (MDR) as an option in the treatment of acute phases of BP I. Therefore, we evaluated comparative data of commonly prescribed MDRs for both manic and depressive phases of BP I. Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the ClinicalStudyResults.org and other data sources were searched from 1949 to March 2009 for placebo and active controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Risk ratios (RRs) for response, remission, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs), lack of efficacy, or discontinuation due to any cause, and the number needed to treat or harm (NNT or NNH) were calculated for each medication individually and for all evaluable trials combined. The authors included 31 RCTs in the analyses comparing a MDR with placebo or with active treatment for acute mania, and 9 RCTs comparing a MDR with placebo or with active treatment for bipolar depression. According to the collected evidence, most of the MDRs when compared to placebo showed significant response and remission rates in acute mania. In the case of bipolar depression only quetiapine and, to a lesser extent, olanzapine showed efficacy as MDR. Overall, MDRs were well tolerated with low discontinuation rates due to any cause or AE, although AE profiles differed among treatments. We concluded that most MDRs were efficacious and safe in the treatment of manic episodes, but very few MDRs have demonstrated being efficacious for bipolar depressive episodes.

Primary insomnia treated with Zolpidem in an 18-month-old child

This report describes a case of an 18-month-old child who was treated for primary insomnia with Zolpidem. To the best of our knowledge, the published literature is devoid of any information on use of Zolpidem in infants and children.

Extended-release formulations for the treatment of epilepsy

This review analyses the concept of extended-release (ER) formulations in epilepsy and evaluates ER formulations of carbamazepine, valproic acid and a modified-release (MR) formulation of oxcarbazepine. ER formulations are usually designed to reduce dose frequency and maintain relatively constant or flat plasma drug concentration. It is questionable whether flat plasma concentrations of an antiepileptic drug (AED) improve antiepileptic efficacy compared with fluctuating plasma concentrations. More certainly, they minimise concentration-related adverse effects, and the dosing flexibility and consistency of plasma concentrations may simplify the management of antiepileptic drug therapy. Neurologists would like ER formulations that can be administered once- and/or twice-daily to tailor therapy for the individual patient; however, switching dosage schedules from multiple dosages per day to once daily, although more convenient, will not generally improve therapeutic coverage (maintenance of effective drug concentration in biological fluids and tissue). Pharmacokinetically, the impact of a missed dose is greater the larger the dose and the less frequent the administration. Therefore, the risk of breakthrough seizure is higher during AED once-daily administration than twice-daily administration. Consequently, the increased compliance observed with fewer dosages per day should be weighed against the impact or forgiveness of omitted dose(s) and the shorter 'forgiveness' period associated with once-daily administration. Currently, the trend is to treat patients with epilepsy with ER formulations because of the better compliance, convenience and flat plasma concentration versus time curve. Thus, it seems that the term 'flatter is better' for AED plasma profiles has precipitated in the last 10-15 years among neurologists and epilepsy caregivers, and is being promoted by marketing forces of pharmaceutical companies. Data from the literature support the trend to treat epileptic patients with twice-daily administration of the existing ER formulations of valproic acid and carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine-MR; however, the author of this article is not convinced that these ER formulations can guarantee a complete therapeutic coverage throughout the 24-hour dosing interval following once-daily administration. Epilepsy is a single-episode disease, and the convenience and possible better compliance associated with once-daily administration must be weighed against the shorter 'forgiveness' period and possible higher risk of breakthrough seizure due to sub-therapeutic plasma levels and/or omitted doses. Data suggest just a small difference in compliance between once- and twice-daily administration, with no significant difference in efficacy. Therefore, the increased compliance following once-daily administration may be counter-productive in minimising the occurrence of sub-therapeutic drug concentrations. Weighing up the advantages and disadvantages for once- versus twice-daily administration of ER formulations in epilepsy leads to a conclusion in favour of twice-daily administration.

Historical Review of Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

The management of bipolar disorder has seen significant evolution in terms of the number of treatment options now approved for both the acutely manic phase and the maintenance stages of the illness. In addition, new formulations of traditional agents are available for clinicians to use in their treatment approach. One such example is carbamazepine, which has approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute and mixed mania in an extended-release formulation that uses a three-bead delivery system. Although the parent compound has been available for decades, its approval for bipolar disorder is recent despite numerous clinical trials that have supported its use in both the acute and maintenance phases of bipolar disorder. Advantages of the new formulation include less fluctuation in plasma concentration and, in general, improved tolerability. However, issues remain with regard to cytochrome P450 drug-related interactions and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (e.g., drug concentrations, epoxide metabolite concentrations, hematology, and liver function tests) as part of the treatment and monitoring process. We review the current body of literature describing the use of carbamazepine in bipolar disorder during both the acute and maintenance phases of the disorder, including trials of both monotherapy and combination therapy, as well as findings from trials that included patients with rapid cycling and mixed episodes.