Comparison of the effects and disposition kinetics of lidocaine and (+/-)prilocaine in patients undergoing axillary brachial plexus block during day case surgery

Comparison of Different Local Anesthetics in Cervical Facet Medial Branch Blockade

OBJECTIVE

Cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs) are frequently used for the treatment of facet arthropathy. The present study compares the effectiveness of lidocaine and prilocaine in CMBB procedures.

METHODS

Patients with facet arthropathy scheduled for CMBB were randomly divided into 2 groups who were administered a combination of 2 mg dexamethasone and either 1% lidocaine or 1% prilocaine with a total volume of 1 mL per level. All patients were assessed prior to the procedure (baseline), and at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and patient satisfaction was evaluated at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were included in the study (n = 49 in the lidocaine group and n = 48 in the prilocaine group). A significant decrease was noted in the NRS-11 and NDI scores recorded during all follow-up assessments in both groups (P < 0.001), while the NRS-11, NDI scores, and patient satisfaction did not statistically differ between groups at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month following the procedure (P ˃ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CMMB achieved with either lidocaine or prilocaine decreased the recorded pain severity and disability scores to a similar degree. The selection of either lidocaine or prilocaine for CMBB is thus at the clinician's discretion.

[Outpatient treatment of acute injuries of upper extremities with axillary plexus anesthesia in the emergency department-Is that possible without continuous anesthesia attendance?]

BACKGROUND

The incorporation into the routine operating procedure of patients with small but acute hand and forearm injuries requiring surgery who present in the emergency admission department, represents a challenge due to limited resources. The prompt treatment in the emergency admission department represents an alternative. This article retrospectively reports the authors' experiences with a treatment algorithm in which emergency patients were treated by ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPB) and surgery carried out in the emergency department without further anesthesia attendance.

METHODS

Patients were preselected by the surgeon if they were suitable for a standardized treatment without anesthesia attendance during surgery. If there were no anesthesiological or surgical contraindications patients received an ABPB in the holding area of the operating room (OR) under standard monitoring. Blocks were performed as a multi-injection, ultrasound-guided technique which is anatomically described in detail. Patients >60 kg received a total volume of 30 ml of a mixture of 10 ml 1% ropivacaine (100 mg) and 20 ml 2% prilocaine (400 mg). Patients <60 kg received the same mixture with a reduced volume of 25 ml corresponding to 82.5 mg ropivacaine and 332.5 mg prilocaine. After controlling for block success patients were admitted to the emergency department and the surgical procedure was carried out under supervision by the surgeon without further anesthesia attendance. At discharge patients were explicitly instructed that in the case of any complications or a continuation of the block for more than 24 h they should contact the emergency department.

RESULTS

Between January 2013 and November 2017 a total of 566 patients (46.4 years, range 11-88 years, 174.9 cm, range 140-211cm, 80.8 kg, range 42-178kg, ASA 1/2/3, 190/338/38, respectively) were treated according to a standardized protocol. The ABPBs were performed by 74 anesthetists. In 5% of the patients the initial block was incomplete and rescue blocks were performed with a maximum of 2‑3ml 1% prilocaine per corresponding nerve. After completion the block was ensured and all patients underwent surgery without further analgesics or local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon. Complications related to the ABPB and readmissions were not observed.

CONCLUSION

It could be demonstrated that minor surgery could be carried out safely and effectively with a defined algorithm using ABPB in selected patients outside the OR without permanent anesthesia attendance: however, indispensable prerequisites for such procedures are careful patient selection, patient compliance, the safe and effective performance of the ABPB and reliable agreement with the surgeon.

Tourniquet Deflation Prior to 20 Minutes in Upper Extremity Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Bier blocks, or intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA), are a method of anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries. This study reports our experience with tourniquet deflation prior to 20 minutes with upper extremity IVRA.

METHODS

This study was designed as a retrospective cohort analysis. Records, including intraoperative and immediate postoperative anesthesia notes, of 430 patients who underwent IVRA with an upper extremity Bier block and a corresponding tourniquet time of less than 20 minutes were reviewed. Patient demographics, procedure(s) performed, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, volume of lidocaine used in Bier block, tourniquet time, and any complications were recorded.

RESULTS

This cohort consisted of 127 males and 303 females. The 3 most common procedures performed were carpal tunnel release (315), trigger finger release (47), and excision of masses (34). The average tourniquet time for this cohort was 16 minutes (range, 9-19 minutes), and the average volume of lidocaine (0.5% plain) injected was 44 mL (range, 30-70 mL). A tourniquet time of 17 minutes or less was observed in 339 patients, and 170 patients had tourniquet times of 15 minutes or less. Five complications were recorded: intraoperative vomiting, mild postoperative nausea/vomiting, severe postoperative nausea and vomiting, and transient postoperative hypotension that responded to a fluid bolus.

CONCLUSIONS

No major complications were observed in our cohort of upper extremity IVRA and tourniquet times of less than 20 minutes. Several variables play a role in the safety of upper extremity IVRA.