Radiation-recall skin disorders associated with the use of antineoplastic drugs. Pathogenesis, prevalence, and management

Cabazitaxel-induced ureteritis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a single center case series 2014-2024

BACKGROUND

One of the main and effective therapy choices for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is cabazitaxel (CBZ). Cystitis and hematuria are among the most significant non-hematological adverse events associated with CBZ treatment. But because the prevalence of CBZ-induced ureteritis has not been thoroughly studied, this case series investigation was carried out to emphasize the condition's clinical relevance and potential treatment alternatives.

CASE PRESENTATION

Between June 2014 and May 2024, 354 patients diagnosed with mCRPC were treated with CBZ at the Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital. A total of 36 patients (10%) exhibited ureteritis-like symptoms, presenting with discomfort in the pelvis, lower abdomen, or flanks, with or without hematuria. Radiological evidence of ureter changes was present in 29 out of 36 individuals (80%), along with hydronephrosis/hydroureter in some patients. Prior to therapy with CBZ, radiation to the pelvis or lower abdomen was documented in 7 out of 36 patients (19%). Various analgesics and dosage modifications were considered for the therapy of CBZ-induced ureteritis, with treatment discontinuation yielding the most favorable results.

CONCLUSION

The onset of ureteritis during CBZ treatment is an underrated side effect in clinical practice. Hematuria and hydronephrosis/hydroureter are the most associated complications. Both analgesics and dosage reduction should be contemplated for management, while therapy cessation may be requisite in certain individuals.

Radiation recall dermatitis in HER 2 positive breast cancer patients triggered by trastuzumab: A rare case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is a localized drug-induced inflammatory skin reaction occurring exclusively in a previously irradiated site months to years after discontinuation of ionizing radiation. The symptoms of RRD can range from mild redness to extensive dermatitis. Antineoplastic drugs such as doxorubicin, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine are most commonly associated with radiation recall reactions. These reactions can also occur with antibiotics and anti-tubercular drugs.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-years-old woman with hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer (right), clinical stage cT4dN1Mx, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with AC > TH protocol at 3 weeks intervals (Anthracycline-Doxorubicin plus Cyclophosphamide X 4 cycles, then docetaxel plus Trastuzumab X 4 cycles) followed by modified radical mastectomy followed by adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy. She received the 5th cycle and 6th cycle trastuzumab monotherapy just before the start of surgery and radiotherapy, respectively. After 1 month of completion of radiotherapy, during her seventh cycle of Trastuzumab monotherapy, she developed mild edema with erythematous change over the previously irradiated area with fever. A skin biopsy was taken to exclude any recurrence; however, no evidence of malignancy was found.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

We diagnosed it as a case of RRD. We managed her conservatively. Later, she was rechallenged with the same dose in subsequent cycles with systemic steroid coverage, which she tolerated very well, except for the reappearance of mild erythema following each cycle of maintenance dose of Trastuzumab.

CONCLUSION

Radiation recall dermatitis is an extremely rare phenomenon; hence, an acquaintance of clinicians with this rare entity is essential for timely diagnosis and appropriate management.

Radiation Recall Dermatitis With Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

This case report describes a woman in her 70s with a history of breast cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia who presented with a painful rash of the bilateral chest extending onto the flanks.

Radiation recall reactions: An oncologic enigma

Radiation recall reactions (RRR) are uncommon but are a well-known phenomenon to oncologists. Tissue damage in a prior irradiation portal is 'recalled' after the administration of a drug, historically cytotoxics, or more recently, targeted or immunotherapeutic agents. Even COVID-19 vaccines are a reported cause. RRR are enigmatic in that their cause is unknown, but they generally have the histopathological and clinical features of acute or chronic inflammation. They can occur in a variety of tissues, the commonest being skin, which accounts for two-thirds of reported cases. They are generally relatively mild and self-limiting once the trigger drug is stopped, although severe cases with tissue necrosis have occurred. Rechallenge with drug does not necessarily cause reactivation of the reaction. Symptomatic treatment with steroids and antihistamines are usually effective, but their impact on the clinical course is unclear. Various hypotheses have been proposed as to the mechanism of RRR; a non-immune fixed drug reaction-like condition, dysregulated release of reactive oxygen species, abnormalities of tissue vasculature and impaired DNA repair. All could lead to a characteristic inflammatory microenvironment, resulting in dysfunction of tissue stem cells, keratinocyte necrosis and dermal abnormalities. Alternatively or in addition, low levels of inflammatory tissue cytokines induced by previous irradiation might be further upregulated by drug exposure. Most information in this review refers to data derived from cutaneous RRR, since they are the most common form reported.

Radiation recall dermatitis following letrozole administration in patient with a remote history of radiation therapy

We report the case of letrozole-induced radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) in a patient with a remote history of radiation therapy. There is only one previously known case of RRD triggered by letrozole in a patient with a recent (<3 month) history of radiation. Previously, only four other cases of aromatase-inhibitor-induced RRD have been reported. This case is significant for cancer care teams considering personalized treatments. In addition, improved long-term outcomes in cancer patients may lead to increases in and underdiagnoses of RRD. Likewise, RRD is patient specific, exacerbating health concerns, and can be difficult to recognize without proper awareness, documentation, and classification of triggering drugs. The authors hope to address these issues in this report.

COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Radiation Recall Phenomenon

Radiation recall phenomenon (RRP) is an uncommon, late occurring, acute inflammatory skin reaction that emerges in localized areas coincident with previously irradiated radiation therapy (RT) treatment fields. RRP has been known to be triggered by a number of chemotherapy agents. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first description of RRP after administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for COVID-19, or any other currently available vaccine against COVID-19. Acute skin reactions were observed in 2 RT patients with differing timelines of RT and vaccinations. In both cases however, the RRP presented within days of the patient receiving the second dose of vaccine. For each RT course, the treatment planning dosimetry of the radiation fields was compared with the area of the observable RRP. RRP developed within the borders of treatment fields where prescription dose constraints were prioritized over skin sparing. Our observation is currently limited to 2 patients. The actual incidence of RRP in conjunction with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or any other vaccine against COVID-19 is unknown. For patients with cancer being treated with radiation with significant dose to skin, consideration should be given to the probability of RRP side effects from vaccinations against COVID-19.

Radiation recall dermatitis after treatment of stage IV breast cancer with nivolumab: a case report

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is an uncommon dermatologic reaction provoked notably by chemotherapy in an area of skin irradiated weeks to years prior. We report a case of RRD with nivolumab in a woman with breast cancer. The patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast with an isolated spinal metastasis approached in an oligometastatic fashion with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Unfortunately, after progression of bony metastases treated with radiotherapy, the patient received nivolumab and subsequently developed a rash corresponding to the adjuvant radiation field. This case highlights the unpredictable nature and characteristic rash of RRD. It is an important differential diagnosis for multidisciplinary teams who also see chemotherapy-induced dermatitis and immune-related adverse events.

Radiation Recall in a Patient with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Case Report and a Literature Review

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is a rare and poorly understood phenomenon, constituting an inflammatory skin reaction to a previously irradiated area of skin following the administration of certain agents, usually chemotherapy. Our patient developed RRD 66 years after receiving radiation therapy; to the best of our knowledge, this is the longest reported period in the literature. The mainstay of therapy is to withhold the agent that elicited the adverse reaction, followed by symptomatic management. Subjecting patients to further chemotherapy can provoke another episode of RRD. Therefore, clinical judgment in this regard is usually recommended.

Skin diseases of the breast and nipple: Inflammatory and infectious diseases

Certain dermatologic conditions are unique to the breast and nipple, whereas others may incidentally involve these structures. All require a nuanced approach to diagnosis and treatment because of the functional, sexual, and aesthetic importance of this area. The lactating patient requires special management because certain treatment options are contraindicated. All dermatologic conditions involving the breast and nipple require careful evaluation because malignancy of the breast can be mistaken for a benign condition or may trigger the development of certain dermatologic conditions. The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews common and uncommon inflammatory and infectious conditions of the breast and nipple and provides insight into both the diagnosis and the treatment of this heterogeneous group of diseases. For the purposes of this article, these conditions are divided into 4 distinct categories: 1) dermatitis; 2) radiation-induced changes; 3) mastitis; and 4) miscellaneous dermatologic conditions of the breast and nipple.

The incidence and management of cutaneous adverse events of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is found in many cancers, including those of the head and neck area, non-small-cell lung cancer, and colorectal, cervical, prostate, breast, ovary, stomach, and pancreatic cancer. The EGFR inhibitors are used at present in the treatment of such cancers. Skin lesions that develop during and after cancer treatment may be due to specific cytostatics, molecular-targeted drugs, radiation therapy, complementary therapy, or the cancer itself, and hence knowledge is essential to distinguish between them. The mechanism through which skin toxicity arises during treatment with EGFR inhibitors is not well known, but seems to be due to the modification of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signal path associated with its activation, which results in the similarity between the adverse effects of EGFR inhibitors and the treatment of melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. The most common side effects are pruritus, xerosis, papulopustular rash, hand-foot skin reaction, alopecia and dystrophy of the hair, and paronychia. This work presents options for prevention and suggestions for managing these adverse events, which are of importance in the care of patients undergoing oncological treatment.

A Case of Radiation Recall Dermatitis of Scalp in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia After Prophylactic Cranial Radiotherapy

The radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) phenomenon is defined as the “recalling” of the skin following the administration of drugs; this induces a response or flare-like reaction over the skin that is exposed to radiation. In this case report, a young female developed RRD on Day 18 after the completion of cranial radiotherapy, that is, four days after the restart of the chemotherapy with doxorubicin. It is a self-limiting condition with supportive care as the treatment. When encountered in hematological malignancies, undue treatment breaks can delay definitive treatment and can eventually cause a relapse. 

Radiation recall after capecitabine in a patient with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report

Background

Capecitabine has been commonly used in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, radiation recall after capecitabine for nasopharyngeal carcinoma has not been reported.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 64-year-old Chinese woman with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma previously treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation 6 years ago. She developed cervical, mediastinal, and abdominal nodal relapses 14 months later. She then received capecitabine with initial excellent tumor response for 1 year but disease recurrence was noticed at the peripancreatic nodal region, which was successfully treated with concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine. Unfortunately, she developed progressive erythema of the face and neck region at exactly the previous irradiation site for her initial nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 2 months after taking capecitabine. She initially ignored it, but it became more confluent and serious. Eventually, a facial skin biopsy was performed showing nonspecific chronic inflammation only. The diagnosis was most likely radiation recall phenomenon since capecitabine was the only drug she received before development of this dermatological manifestation on her previously irradiated face and neck. Treatment was conservative and supportive albeit with no significant clinical improvement.

Conclusions

Radiation oncologists should be aware of this potential risk of capecitabine, especially when it is administered for a long period of time.

A Case of Severe Rectal Hemorrhage Possibly Caused by Radiation Recall after Administration of Gemcitabine

Radiation recall is an acute inflammatory reaction that can be triggered when systemic agents are administered long time after radiotherapy. Because radiotherapy is now indicated for many types of cancer, care should be taken regarding possible toxic events relating to radiotherapy in combination with radio-sensitizing agents. Gemcitabine, one such anti-cancer agent, is widely used, especially for urologic cancers. We report an intriguing case of possible radiation recall in the rectum caused by gemcitabine administration 37 years after radiation therapy. From a review of the literature, it appears that there have been no reported cases of radiation recall in the rectum with such a long interval between radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Here, we describe the case and provide a literature review.

Case report of cold-weather-induced radiation recall dermatitis after chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin

BACKGROUND

The radiation recall reaction (RRR) is an inflammatory reaction that occurs in previously irradiated areas. The phenomenon is probably due to an idiosyncratic hypersensitivity reaction, in which a second agent can recall the inflammatory reaction.

CASE REPORT

This case report documents a cold-weather-induced radiation recall dermatitis (RRD). We observed a severe RRD in a patient after chemoradiotherapy treatment with cisplatin for a nasopharyngeal carcinoma, precipitated by cold temperatures, which developed 9 days after completion of therapy. In the medical literature, RRD following extreme cold temperatures seems to be a peculiar event.

CONCLUSION

Until further information on the interaction is available, future studies on combined chemotherapy with cisplatin should be carefully monitored and any side effects clearly documented. This case suggests that environmental conditions may play a contributing role in the development of RRD. This case also implies that neither fraction size nor total radiation dose is a determining factor in the development of the dermatologic reaction.

Myeloma after local external beam radiotherapy jet: Is it a new entity?

Multiple myeloma, also known as Kahler's disease, is a cancer of plasma cells that abnormally accumulate in bone marrow. Radiation therapy may be indicated in multiple myeloma to relieve pain, alleviate spinal cord compression or reduce tumor mass. We report the case of a patient presenting a multiple myeloma, treated with radiation therapy for a spinal cord compression, who developed, eleven months later, an in-field subcutaneous relapse. We called this phenomenon myeloma appearance after local external beam radiotherapy jet (MAALEJ). A review of literature was performed trying to explain this uncommon relapse feature.

Radiation recall reaction: two case studies illustrating an uncommon phenomenon secondary to anti-cancer agents

Radiation recall phenomenon is a tissue reaction that develops throughout a previously irradiated area, precipitated by the administration of certain drugs. Radiation recall is uncommon and easily neglected by physicians; hence, this phenomenon is underreported in literature. This manuscript reports two cases of radiation recall. First, a 44-year-old man with nasopharyngeal carcinoma was treated with radiotherapy in 2010 and subsequently developed multi-site bone metastases. A few days after the docetaxel-based chemotherapy, erythema and papules manifested dermatitis, as well as swallowing pain due to pharyngeal mucositis, developed on the head and neck that strictly corresponded to the previously irradiated areas. Second, a 19-year-old man with recurrent nasal NK/T cell lymphoma initially underwent radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy after five weeks. Erythema and edema appeared only at the irradiated skin. Both cases were considered chemotherapeutic agents that incurred radiation recall reactions. Clinicians should be knowledgeable of and pay attention to such rare phenomenon.

A child with gemcitabine-induced severe radiation recall myositis resulting in a compartment syndrome

Chemotherapeutic induction of radiation recall (RR) is a rare event in which a chemotherapeutic agent given days to years after radiation therapy causes an inflammation reaction of the tissues within the irradiated area-"recalling" increased radiation effects to that area. In this unique case, a 14-year-old girl with a synovial sarcoma of the forearm was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Gemcitabine was administered in an adjuvant setting inducing a RR reaction. The severity of the inflammation resulted in a forearm myositis secondarily causing a compartment syndrome that was treated with several prolonged courses of corticosteroids. The symptoms of RR and compartment syndrome have resolved 1 year postonset, although magnetic resonance imaging continues to show myositis and soft-tissue edema. This case highlights the need to maintain a heightened awareness to recognizing the signs and symptoms of RR and the potential severity of RR in pediatric cancer patients in conjunction with chemotherapeutic agents used more frequently in adults.

Locoregional interaction of ixabepilone (ixempra) after breast cancer radiation

BACKGROUND

Radiation recall is an acute inflammatory reaction within a previously irradiated field triggered by chemotherapy administration. We observed a series of patients with unexpectedly severe reactions that included radiation recall and delayed healing when patients received the microtubule stabilizer ixabepilone (Ixempra; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) after radiation. We therefore decided to evaluate our experience in patients receiving ixabepilone following radiotherapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients treated with curative intent in the Department of Radiation Oncology at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2008-2011 who received any ixabepilone after completion of external-beam radiation therapy. These patients received adjuvant ixabepilone on one of two protocols, either for locally advanced breast cancer or for metastatic breast cancer. In total, 19 patients were identified and their charts were subsequently reviewed for evidence of ixabepilone-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients identified who received ixabepilone following radiation therapy, three (15.8%) had unexpectedly serious reactions in the months following radiation therapy. Complications included delayed wound closure and drain placement into the seroma, intense erythema, and delayed wound closure and grade 4 chest wall necrosis requiring latissimus flap and skin grafting. The average number of days between the end of radiation therapy and documentation of reaction was 99.

CONCLUSIONS

Ixabepilone chemotherapy may induce radiation recall and delayed wound healing when used shortly after the completion of external-beam radiotherapy. Significant clinical interactions have not been previously reported and merit further evaluation.

Partial breast irradiation in a patient with bilateral breast cancers and CREST syndrome

PURPOSE

To describe the first documented use of partial breast irradiation (PBI) in a patient with calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasias (CREST) syndrome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 50-year-old woman with well-controlled CREST syndrome for 6 years was diagnosed with bilateral early-staged breast cancers. She underwent bilateral lumpectomies, sentinel lymph node biopsies, and PBI delivered via bilateral MammoSite catheters (Cytyc Corp., Marlborough, MA) followed by chemotherapy. She was monitored perioperatively, at 6 months and at 1 year for worsening of her CREST-related symptoms and complications associated with surgery and radiation therapy. Both surgeon and patient's opinion of her cosmetic outcome were also recorded at 1-year followup.

RESULTS

The patient experienced mild acute cellulitic changes in the perioperative period, which resolved with antibiotics. At 6 months, she exhibited a Grade 1 late toxicity, which has remained stable at 1-year followup. The patient and surgeon are very pleased with her cosmetic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated PBI was delivered safely to a patient with collagen vascular disease. By decreasing the surface area receiving radiation with accelerated PBI, we believe that the toxicity associated with the treatment was minimized. Future studies will be necessary to clarify the use of PBI in patients with collagen vascular disease.

Radiation recall with anticancer agents

There is still much that needs to be understood about radiation recall, and it is not currently possible to predict which patients will be affected and to which drugs they will react. Furthermore, there are no clearly defined characteristics of drugs that cause radiation recall, and thus, it is a possibility that must be kept in mind with use of any drug after radiotherapy, including those from new drug classes. Although it is not yet possible to design treatment regimens to eliminate the risk of radiation recall, it seems likely that risks can be minimized by prolonging the interval between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of full-dose chemotherapy.

Radiation recall is an acute inflammatory reaction confined to previously irradiated areas that can be triggered when chemotherapy agents are administered after radiotherapy. It remains a poorly understood phenomenon, but increased awareness may aid early diagnosis and appropriate management. A diverse range of drugs used in the treatment of cancer has been associated with radiation recall. As most data come from case reports, it is not possible to determine the true incidence, but to date the antineoplastic drugs for which radiation recall reactions have been most commonly reported include the anthracycline doxorubicin, the taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel, and the antimetabolites gemcitabine and capecitabine. Radiation recall is drug-specific for any individual patient; it is not possible to predict which patients will react to which drugs, and rechallenge does not uniformly induce a reaction. There are no identifiable characteristics of drugs that cause radiation recall, and thus, it is a possibility that must be kept in mind with use of any drug after radiotherapy, including those from new drug classes. Although it is not yet possible to design treatment regimens to eliminate the risk of radiation recall, it seems likely that risks can be minimized by prolonging the interval between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of chemotherapy.

Panmucositis and chemosensitisation associated with betel quid chewing during dose-dense adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The severity of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis has previously been reported to be greater in patients who chew betel quid (areca), an addictive habit shared by hundreds of millions of individuals worldwide. Here, we report a case of fulminant panmucositis complicating dose-dense adjuvant breast cancer treatment in a betel-chewing patient without evidence of other risk factors.

METHODS

Grade IV mucositis was triggered by the initial use of standard-dose anthracycline chemotherapy, and involved not only the mouth but also the genital and anal mucosa, as well as other severe non-mucosal toxicities.

RESULTS

Despite subsequent treatment with dose-reduced CMF and docetaxel regimens-which are seldom associated with mucosal toxicity at these dose intensities in the absence of neutropenia-high-grade oral mucositis continued to complicate the therapeutic course.

CONCLUSION

These observations suggest that the potentiation of chemotherapy-induced mucositis by quid chewing may not be mediated solely by local effects on the oral epithelium, but also involves the systemic absorption of toxic chemosensitising molecules.