Benefit and risks of local anesthetics in infants and children

Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants for perioperative management of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally, necessitating effective anesthesia management. Single-shot spinal anesthesia has limitations due to its duration and the dose-limiting adverse effects of local anesthetics.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with local anesthetics in the perioperative management of CS pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review with network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library for Clinical Trials, and Embase.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included women undergoing CS under single-shot spinal anesthesia with any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anesthetic. We selected single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English. We excluded crossover, non-randomized, up-and-down dose-finding studies and clinical trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms.

RESULTS

We included 166 RCTs with 14 925 patients assigned to 32 interventions. Buprenorphine and diamorphine were the highest-ranked treatments for reducing pain intensity at 24 hours, though not statistically significant. Morphine alone or in combination with meperidine, neostigmine, epinephrine, or nalbuphine significantly increased the duration of effective analgesia and reduced opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine significantly prolonged the motor block duration. The safety profile of intrathecal adjuvants was generally adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

While the strength of evidence, overall, was very low to low, our study suggests that while none of the interventions significantly reduced pain intensity at 24 hours, several significantly prolonged effective analgesia and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine prolonged the duration of motor block. None of the intrathecal adjuvants evaluated significantly increased the occurrence of severe adverse events. Future large-scale RCTs are essential to provide more robust evidence.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024479424.

The efficacy of wound catheter infusion with local anesthetics for the treatment of postoperative pain in children: A systematic review

Wound catheter infusion (WCI) with local anesthetics (LA) is a regional anesthesia technique, which has shown to produce effective postoperative analgesia in adults, without any adverse effects on wound healing. To investigate the efficacy and safety of WCI with LA for the treatment of postoperative pain in children, we conducted a systematic review of literature published until 2020. The literature search included articles concerning subcutaneous WCI with LA, in the surgical wound, as treatment of postoperative pain, in children <18 years of age. Exclusion criteria were studies describing peripheral nerve blocks, intercostal, abdominal or thoracic wall blocks and single local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical wound. The articles were appraised for quality and only randomized controlled trials with a Jadad score ≥3 were included for evaluation of results concerning postoperative pain scores and opioid use. All relevant original studies, including observational studies and case reports, were assessed for adverse events and measurements of LA plasma concentrations during WCI. A total of 1907 articles were found, leading to 92 relevant abstracts selected for further review. After exclusion of articles of which full texts could not be retrieved or because of exclusion criteria, 28 articles remained. Thirteen articles described randomized controlled trials, of which 10 were assessed as good or excellent in quality. Due to the small number and heterogeneity of the studies, the data could not be pooled. Instead, results were described per type of procedure: abdominal surgery, extremity surgery, thoracic surgery and iliac crest bone harvesting. Reduced pain scores and opioid needs were demonstrated after abdominal and extremity surgery. In five studies, plasma levels of LA were measured, which all remained below toxic thresholds. In all relevant studies, no serious adverse events concerning the use of WCI were reported.

Postoperative analgesia for Kasai portoenterostomy using external oblique intercostal blocks

BACKGROUND

External Oblique Intercostal (EOI) fascial plane blockade is a relatively new regional anesthetic technique used for a variety of upper abdominal surgical procedures. Proponents of this block praise its simple sonoanatomy, extensive local anesthetic (LA) spread, and ease of catheter placement, while avoiding encroachment into the surgical field or dressing sites; nevertheless, it is underutilized in pediatric surgery. Kasai portoenterostomy is a common pediatric surgical procedure for biliary atresia typically done via an open abdominal approach with an extended subcostal incision. Postoperative analgesic management with epidural anesthetic techniques are considered but may be limited by periprocedural coagulopathy concerns.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a neonate who underwent successful analgesic management of Kasai portoenterostomy with bilateral EOI block catheters. Opioid consumption and other postoperative outcomes were comparative to previously reported literature of epidural analgesia in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this report is to describe the outcomes and technical approach in a neonate who received EOI blocks as an alternative to epidural anesthetic management. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy and complication rate of EOI blockade to epidural analgesia for Kasai portoenterostomy surgery.

Lidocaine aerosol preoperative application for improving the comfort of pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Background and Aims

The use of lidocaine aerosol for pediatric tonsil and adenoidectomy has been reported less frequently. We hope to improve the perioperative comfort of pediatric patients undergoing these procedures by applying lidocaine aerosol.

Methods

A total of 122 pediatric patients receiving tonsil and adenoidectomy were randomly divided into a lidocaine aerosol group (Group L) and a saline group (Group C), with 61 patients in each group; 2.4% alkaline lidocaine aerosol and saline were sprayed in the pharynx before induction. Our primary outcome were the incidence and rate ratio (RR) of postoperative pharyngeal complications (oropharyngeal dryness, dysphagia, hoarseness, and sore throat) and the pharyngeal comfort score, the latter of which was assessed by the occurrence of the above complications (yes = 0 point, none = 1 point). The secondary outcomes included preoperative and intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate, the incidence of choking during the induction period, the intraoperative opioid dosage, and the pain level and depth of sedation at 2, 6, and 24 h postoperatively. Statistical software used in this study included PASS15.0, SPSS 26.0, and GraphPad Prism 9.3.1, and statistical methods used included the t-test, the χ² test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

The incidence and RR of postoperative pharyngeal complications such as oropharyngeal dryness (RR: 0.667, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.458-0.970, p = 0.03), dysphagia (RR: 0.333, 95% CI: 0.114-0.976, p = 0.03), hoarseness (RR: 0.647, 95% CI: 0.433-0.967, p = 0.03), and sore throat (RR: 0.727, 95% CI: 0.547-0.967, p = 0.03) were significantly lower in Group L than in Group C at 2 h postoperatively, and the incidence and RR of postoperative sore throat was significantly lower in Group L than in Group C at 6 h postoperatively (RR: 0.717, 95% CI: 0.547-0.942, p = 0.01). The postoperative pharyngeal comfort scores were significantly higher in Group L than in Group C at all postoperative time points (p < 0.05). The Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher (p < 0.01) and FLACC (face, legs, activity, crying, and consolability) score was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in Group L than in Group C at 2 h postoperatively. In Group C, the blood pressure and heart rate significantly faster at all time points immediately after intubation and afterward, except at the end of surgery (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In pediatric tonsil and adenoidectomy, the application of lidocaine aerosol before induction can reduce the incidence of postoperative pharyngeal complications, improve the child's postoperative pharyngeal comfort, and better realize perioperative "comfort medical treatment."

Auditory Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Cochlear Implantation Before 12 Months of Age: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature to determine auditory outcomes of cochlear implantation in children ≤12 months old.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 9/1/2021 using PRISMA guidelines.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies analyzing auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in children ≤12 months of age were included. Non-English studies and case reports were excluded. Outcome measures included functional and objective auditory results. Two independent reviewers evaluated each abstract and article. Heterogeneity and bias across studies were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 305 articles identified, 17 met inclusion criteria. There were 642 children ages 2 to 12 months at CI. The most common etiologies of hearing loss were congenital CMV, meningitis, idiopathic hearing loss, and GJB2 mutations and other genetic causes. All studies concluded that early CI was safe. Overall, outcomes improved following early CI: IT-MAIS (9 studies), LittlEARS (4 studies), PTA (3 studies), CAP (3 studies), GASP (3 studies), and LNT (3 studies). Nine studies compared outcomes to an older implantation group (>12 months); of these (n = 450 early CI, n = 1189 late CI), 8 studies showed earlier CI achieved comparable or better auditory outcomes than later implantation, whereas 1 study (n = 120) concluded no differences in speech perception improvement.

CONCLUSION

Auditory outcomes were overall improved in children ≤12 months old undergoing CI. Studies that compared early to late CI demonstrated similar or better auditory outcomes in early implantation group. Given the comparable safety profile and critical time period of speech and language acquisition, earlier CI should be considered for infants with hearing loss.

Local anesthetics systemic toxicity in children: analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database

PURPOSE

To characterize clinical profile of pediatric local anesthetic (LA) systemic toxicity (LAST) and to identify determinants of life-threatening outcomes.

METHODS

Spontaneous reports notified to the French Pharmacovigilance Network were retrieved and followed by a case-by-case review, according to the following criteria: LA as suspected drug, age < 18 years, adverse drug reactions related to nervous system, cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric or general disorders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors leading to life-threatening reaction (i.e. continuous seizures or cardiorespiratory arrest).

RESULTS

Among 512 cases retrieved, 64 LAST cases were included (neonates 11%, infants 30%, children 36%, adolescents 23%) mainly involving lidocaine (47%), lidocaine + prilocaine (22%) and ropivacaine (14%). Toxicity profiles were neurological (58%), cardiac (11%) or mixed (20%) and 7 patients (11%) developed methemoglobinemia. LAST was life-threatening for 23 patients (36%) and 2 patients died. Doses were above recommendations in 26 patients (41%) and were not different between life-threatening and non-life-threatening cases. The context of use (general and orthopedic surgery, p = 0.006) and the type of LA agent (lidocaine, p = 0.016) were independently associated with a life-threatening outcome.

CONCLUSION

In this national retrospective analysis, LAST in children appear to be a rare event. Neurological and cardiac signs were the most frequently reported reactions. LAST in children can be life-threatening, even at therapeutic doses. Although a fatal outcome may anecdotally occur, the vast majority of patients recovered after appropriate medical care.

Possibility of Avoiding Anesthesia in the Reduction of Greenstick and Angulated Forearm and Distal-End Radius Fractures in Children: A Comparative Study

Introduction Greenstick and angulated forearm bone fractures are the most common fractures in children and invariably require closed reduction under anesthesia. However, pediatric anesthesia is somewhat risky and not always available in developing countries like India. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the standard (quality) of closed reduction without anesthesia in children and to determine satisfaction among parents. Materials and methods The present study included 163 children with closed angulated fractures of the distal radius and fracture shafts of both forearm bones, who were treated by closed reduction. One hundred and thirteen were treated without any anesthesia (study group) on an outpatient department (OPD) basis, whereas 50 children of similar age and fracture type underwent reduction with anesthesia (control group). After reduction by both methods check X-ray was done to evaluate the quality of the reduction. Results The average age of the 113 children in the present study was 9.5 years (range: 3.5-16.2 years), of which 82 children had radius or ulna fractures, and 31 had isolated distal radius fractures. In 96.8% of children, ≤10° of residual angulation was achieved. Furthermore, 11 children (12.4%) used paracetamol or ibuprofen for pain control in the study group. Moreover, 97.3% of parents stated that they would like their children to be treated without anesthesia if any fracture occurred again. Conclusions Closed reduction of greenstick angulated forearm and distal-end radius fracture in children in the OPD without anesthesia achieved satisfactory reduction and high parent satisfaction while reducing the risks of pediatric anesthesia and its associated complications.

Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% mepivacaine in mandibular third molar germectomy using different anaesthetic techniques: a split-mouth clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, one of the most discouraging aspects for many patients undergoing dental procedures is the administration of local anaesthesia. Therefore, there is a constant search for new techniques to avoid the invasive and painful nature of the injection. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of local anaesthetics with articaine 4% or mepivacaine 2% (both with epinephrine 1:100.000), using different anaesthetic techniques to perform germectomy of lower third molars and to assess patients' feelings and pain during surgery.

METHODS

Totally 50 patients (ranged 11-16 years) who required germectomy of mandibular third molars were recruited. Each patient received local anaesthesia on one side with articaine inoculated with plexus technique while on the other side with mepivacaine using inferior alveolar nerve block technique. The patients' evaluation was performed on pre and intraoperative tactile-pressure feelings and intraoperative pain with four levels on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Surgical operations lasted less with more efficient analgesia when articaine was used. The additional intraosseous injection was required mainly in the mepivacaine group intraoperatively. A few patients had tactile-pressure feelings while intraoperative pain sensation was absent in 90% of cases with articaine. Significant differences were found in the cases who reported "absent" and "moderate" VAS values, favoring the use of articaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Articaine injected with a plexus anaesthetic technique seems to be more clinically manageable than mepivacaine for the mandibular third molar germectomy. The discomfort of tactile-pressure feelings and pain experienced was lower using articaine anaesthetic technique used.

Transversus abdominis plane block with different bupivacaine concentrations in children undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a single-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge on the ideal local anesthetic concentration for the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in pediatrics is scarce. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of US-guided TAPB at two different concentrations of bupivacaine in pediatrics undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

After random allocation, 74 children aged 1-8 were randomized to receive US-guided TAPB by using 1 mg.kg^- 1 bupivacaine as either 0,25% (0,4 ml.kg^- 1) (Group 1) or 0,125% (0,8 ml.kg^- 1) (Group 2) concentration. All blocks were performed under general anesthesia, immediately after the induction, unilaterally with a lateral approach. All subjects received intravenous 15 mg/kg paracetamol 0.15 mg/kg dexamethasone and 0.1 mg/kg ondansetron intraoperatively. The primary outcome was the efficacy which is assessed by postoperative FLACC behavioral pain assessment score at 15', 30', 45', 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, and 24 h. The secondary outcomes were to assess the total dose of rescue analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, the incidence of side effects, complications and satisfaction levels of the patients' parents and the surgeons.

RESULTS

Sixty-four children were recruited for the study. Postoperative pain scores were equal between the two groups. There was no need for a rescue analgesic in any group after the postoperative 6^thhour. No local or systemic complication or side effect related to anesthesia or surgery was reported.

CONCLUSION

TAPB using 1 mg.kg^- 1 bupivacaine administered as either high volume/low concentration or low volume/high concentration was providing both adequate analgesia and no side effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrals.gov , NCT04202367 .

Possibilities of Influencing Procedural Pain Associated with Premature Newborn Retinopathy Screening with Oral Clonidine

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to compare the analgesic/sedative effects of various fundus-related procedural pain management strategies on the risk of retinopathy in premature infants.

METHOD

This was a prospective comparative study involving a total of 94 neonates randomized to three groups meeting the criteria for at-risk neonates. Ophthalmologic screening was performed to evaluate the outcome of three procedural pain management strategies. The intensity of pain over time during and after the screening examination was evaluated. At the same time, we also looked at the occurrence of vegetative symptoms and their influence by the chosen medication. Pain response was observed in all 94 neonates enrolled in the study. In group A, no pain treatment was given. Group B had a local anesthetic oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% introduced into both eyes immediately prior to the examination. Group C received oral clonidine. The study was conducted as a pilot project and aimed to clarify the problem so that a project with a higher proband representation could take place in the future. Consequently, we performed quantitative analysis of complete pain and vegetative functions, followed by a qualitative analysis of their internal components.

RESULTS

In our study, we identified the most considerable effects for all three groups, including NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) responses immediately during and after the examination. The influence of vegetative functions is of a longer-term nature and increased values can be clearly demonstrated even six hours after the examination.

CONCLUSION

The current results identify and quantify differences among all three methods of pain treatment on the level of single variables. Their internal structures, however, can be analysed only qualitatively because of the small size of the analysed sample.

Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Current Status and Trends of Postoperative Pain in Children from 1950-2021

Background

Postoperative pain in children has been overlooked for a long time. The knowledge structure, research hotspots and trends related to postoperative pain in children are unclear and have not been systematically summarized.

Purpose

We aimed to analyze the current state of research on postoperative pain in children and to conduct in-depth mining of the knowledge structure.

Methods

The PubMed database for publications on postoperative pain in children between 1950 and 2021 was searched. Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB) was performed to obtain the co-word matrix and co-occurrence matrix. The H-index method was used to extract high-frequency main Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms/subheadings.

Results

The high-frequency MeSH terms were analyzed by biclustering, strategic diagram and social network analyses. Totally, 4022 publications were retrieved. The analysis showed that 60 countries or regions published relevant documents, with the United States publishing the most significant number of papers. Totally, 811 journals published relevant papers, with Pediatric Anesthesia ranking first. Moreover, we extracted 43 high-frequency main MeSH terms/subheadings and clustered them into five categories: overview, aetiology and epidemiology, pharmacotherapy, opioid administration and dosing, and prevention and control of postoperative pain in children.

Conclusion

Pharmacological treatments, pain prevention and control are the focus of research and are becoming increasingly mature. Opioid stewardship and regional anesthesia is the trend and focus of future research. Our study offers a better understanding of the current status and knowledge structure of postoperative pain in children and provides a reference for improving postoperative pain management in children in the future.

Comparison of adjuvant pharmaceuticals for caudal block in pediatric lower abdominal and urological surgeries: A network meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Caudal block helps relieve pain after sub-umbilical surgery in pediatric patients; however, the duration for which it exerts its analgesic effect is limited. The addition of certain adjuvant agents to local anesthetics (LAs) that are used to administer caudal block can prolong postoperative analgesia. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficiencies and side effects of caudal adjuvants in the settings of pediatric lower abdominal and urological surgeries.

DESIGN

A network meta-analysis (NMA).

PATIENTS

One hundred and twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 6800 pediatric patients were included in the final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Different adjuvant agents, namely clonidine, dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, magnesium, midazolam, morphine, neostigmine, and tramadol.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. The secondary outcomes included the requirement for additional analgesia, analgesic consumption, and postoperative complications. The effects and rankings were evaluated using NMA and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve scores, respectively.

RESULTS

Neostigmine, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone were found to be the three most effective adjuvants that prolong the duration of analgesia for caudal block, and these adjuvants extended this duration by 8.9 h (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-10.7), 7.3 h (95% CI, 6.0-8.6), and 5.9 h (95% CI, 4.0-7.7), respectively. Caudal neostigmine was associated with an increase in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, whereas dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone showed no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA provided evidence and suggested that dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone may be the most beneficial adjuvant pharmaceutics adding to LAs for caudal block in children. However, given the off-label status of caudal dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone, further high-quality RCTs are still warranted, especially to determine whether delayed neurological complications will occur.

Epidural space "ballooning" during local anaesthetic injection in infants and children: An ultrasound observational study

BACKGROUND

Infants and children require a larger dose of a local anaesthetic (LA) to establish epidural analgesia than adults, but the reason for this remains unclear. We hypothesised that prominent ventro-dorsal expansion of the epidural space limits cranio-caudal spread of LA in infants. Accordingly, we studied the dimensions of the epidural space with real-time ultrasound (US) before and after epidural injection.

METHODS

Ninety-six infants and children aged 0-12 years who underwent abdominal surgery under combined epidural and general anaesthesia were examined in this prospective observational study. Using a micro-convex probe, US recordings of the posterior epidural space were performed while a LA (0.5 ml kg^-1 ) was infused at 0.54 ml s^-1 . The width in the ventro-dorsal dimension (VDD) of the posterior epidural space before and after injection was recorded; the change in VDD was defined as "ballooning". Correlations between "ballooning" and patient age, body mass index, and volume and rate of LA administration were analysed.

RESULTS

"Ballooning" correlated positively but weakly with age (R²  = 0.25; p < .001) and the infused LA volume (R²  = 0.32; p < .001). The "magnitude of ballooning" ("ballooning" per ml of injected LA) correlated negatively but weakly with age (R²  = 0.27; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

"Magnitude of ballooning" of the epidural space become inconspicuous with growing during epidural injection. This effect may slow the cranio-caudal spread of LA and explain partially why larger volumes of LA are required to effect a block in children.

EFFECT OF PRE-COOLING ON PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH DENTAL INJECTIONS IN CHILDREN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

OBJECTIVES

Several methods, including cooling of the injection site, have been proposed for pain control during the dental local anesthetic injection. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the scientific evidence on the precooling of the injection site to reduce pediatric dental injection pain.

DATA SOURCES

The search terms were selected according to the Medical Subject Headings and non-Medical Subject Headings. The main keywords included dental injection, cooling, pain, and children. Potentially eligible studies involved the subjective or objective pain evaluation in children receiving any dental injection. Risk of bias assessment was carried out using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. An electronic search was carried out for published studies in the English language up to March 2020 on Scopus, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. Of 761 articles retrieved initially, 14 were eligible to be included in the systematic review, of which 6 articles were excluded. Regarding the type of intervention, 6 articles used cooling agents in the intervention group, and 2 studies used the Buzzy device (a combination of cold and vibratory stimuli). All studies included in the systematic review except one considered that the use of intra- or extra-oral cooling could reduce pain during anesthesia injections in children significantly.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the evidence presented in this review was limited and had low quality. It may be concluded that application of cold agents before dental anesthesia can be more helpful than the traditional dental injection in reducing pain in children. Besides, the use of the Buzzy device showed promising results, as shown by 2 studies.

Impact of Eliminating Local Anesthesia on Immediate Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Ambulatory Adenotonsillectomy

Our goal was to standardize intraoperative analgesic regimens for pediatric ambulatory tonsillectomy by eliminating local anesthetic use and to determine its impact on postoperative pain measures, while controlling for other factors.

METHODS

We assembled a quality improvement team at an ambulatory surgery center. They introduced a standardized anesthetic protocol, involving American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification 1 and 2 patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Local anesthesia elimination was the project's single intervention. We collected pre-intervention data (79 cases) from July 5 to September 17, 2019 and post-intervention data (59 cases) from September 25 to December 17, 2019. The intervention requested that surgeons eliminate the use of local anesthetics. The following outcomes measures were evaluated using statistical process control charts and Shewhart's theory of variation: (1) maximum pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit, (2) total post-anesthesia care unit minutes, and (3) postoperative opioid rescue rate.

RESULTS

No special cause variation signal was detected in any of the measures following the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that eliminating intraoperative local anesthetic use does not worsen postoperative pain control at our facility. The intervention eliminated the added expenses and possible risks associated with local anesthetic use. This series is unique in its standardization of anesthetic regimen in a high-volume ambulatory surgery center with the exception of local anesthesia practices. The study results may impact the standardized clinical protocol for pediatric ambulatory adenotonsillectomy at our institution and may hold relevance for other centers.

The effect of sevoflurane anesthesia for dental procedure on neurocognition in children: a prospective, equivalence, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Dental procedures under general anesthesia (DGA) was found to improve the oral health-related quality of children's life. However, some parents and pediatricians expressed concern about the neurotoxicity of general anesthesia. The purpose of this trial was to whether DGA in children has an adverse effect on neurocognition.

METHODS

In this prospective, assessor-masked, controlled, equivalence trial, we recruited 340 children younger than 7 years who were undergoing caries treatment between Feb 1, 2019, and Aug 31, 2019, without factors affecting neurodevelopment. They received either sevoflurane-based general anesthesia or awake-local anesthesia. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition was used to evaluate the neurocognitive function of children at 6 months after surgery, and the Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) was selected as the primary outcome. The predefined clinical equivalence margin was 5 (1/3 SD of FSIQ score). If the 95% CI of the difference between the average FSIQ score of the two groups is within - 5 to + 5, then the two groups are equivalent.

RESULTS

The outcome data were obtained from 129 children in the general anesthesia group and 144 in the local anesthesia group. The median length of general anesthesia was 130 min (IQR 110-160). The mean FSIQ score in the general anesthesia group was 103·12 (SD 8.94), and the mean of the local anesthesia group was 103·58 (SD 8.40). There was equivalence in means of FSIQ score between the two groups (local minus general anesthesia 0.46, 95% CI - 2.35 to 1.61). There was no significant difference in FSIQ scores between different age groups and different anesthesia durations. Only the mother's education could affect the primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, prolonged DGA with a sevoflurane-only anesthetic in preschool children, does not adversely affect neurocognitive function at 6 months after surgery compared with awake-local anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015216 . Registered Mar 15 2018.

Comparative Analgesic Efficacies of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Rectus Sheath Block in Paediatric Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial and Retrospective Cohort Studies

Background

The optimal dose and concentration of analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine (RPV) and bupivacaine (BPV) for postoperative pain relief in paediatric abdominal surgery patients is still unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis compared the efficacy of these analgesics, their administered modes (ultrasound-guided RSB versus LAI) for postoperative pain relief, and side effects.

Methods

Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, were exhaustively searched with predefined keywords. Eight randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies were selected. Analgesic effect, postoperative pain score, level of side effect, applied dose, and concentration of drug were analysed.

Results

Drug dose ranged from 0.5–2.5 mL/kg of 0.2 to 0.5% concentrations. Male participant for RSB and LAI treatment groups varied from 40–62% and 25–83%, respectively. Mean age of RSB and LAI groups ranged from 3.8–11.65 years and 4.3–11.27 years, respectively. Our meta-analysis revealed that RSB could reduce total opioid use postoperatively (WMD = −0.02, 95% CI: −0.02, −0.02), with I² value of 15%. We found that the RPV (0.25%, 2.5 ml/kg) was optimal in suppressing the pain. Its lower concentration (0.2%) was ineffective, whereas higher one (0.375%) seems to increase risk of systemic toxicity. Similarly, BPV (0.25%, 2.5 mg/kg) efficaciously reduced the pain score, while its lower concentration was ineffective. The combined postoperative pain score in the RPV-treated group was found to be significantly reduced (p < 0.01) with I² value of 85% indicating high heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Both RPV and BPV were significantly effective in reducing postoperative pain score. It appears that RSB could be a preferred choice to deliver analgesia, due to reduced opiate dose requirement and improved clinical safety without significant postoperative adverse events.

Vorteile, Sicherheit und Nebenwirkungen der Tumeszenz‐Lokalanästhesie bei dermatologischen Operationen an Säuglingen

Die Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie (TLA) spielt bei dermatochirurgischen Eingriffen eine wichtige Rolle. Die TLA bietet etliche Vorteile, wie lang anhaltende Betäubung, reduzierte Blutung während der Operation und Vermeidung möglicher Komplikationen einer Vollnarkose. Einfache Durchführung, günstiges Risikoprofil und breites Indikationsspektrum sind weitere Gründe dafür, dass TLA zunehmend auch bei Säuglingen eingesetzt wird. Es gibt nicht nur viele Indikationen für chirurgische Exzisionen im Säuglingsalter, wie angeborene Naevi, sondern es hat auch erhebliche Vorteile, wenn diese Exzisionen in einem frühen Alter durchgeführt werden. Dazu zählen die geringere Größe der Läsionen sowie die unproblematische Wundheilung und Geweberegeneration im Säuglingsalter. Dennoch müssen hinsichtlich der Anwendung der TLA bei Säuglingen einige Aspekte berücksichtigt werden, darunter die Dosierung, eine veränderte Plasmaproteinbindung und die Notwendigkeit einer adäquaten und lang anhaltenden Schmerzkontrolle.

Benefits, safety and side effects of tumescent local anesthesia in dermatologic surgery in infants

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) plays an important role in dermatosurgical procedures. TLA has several benefits such as long-lasting anesthesia, reduced bleeding during surgery and the avoidance of general anesthesia-associated complications. Convenience and a favorable risk profile along with a broad spectrum of indications are further reasons why TLA is increasingly applied in infants as well. There are not only a variety of indications for surgical excisions in infancy, such as congenital nevi, but also substantial benefits when performing these excisions at an early age. These include the smaller size of the lesions as well as the unproblematic wound healing and tissue regeneration in infancy. Nevertheless, several aspects need to be considered when applying TLA in infants including dosing, altered plasma protein binding and the need for adequate and long-lasting pain control.

Educational Perspectives: Anesthesia 101: What the Neonatologist Needs to Know About Anesthesiology

As the complexity of medicine increases, so too do the challenges with multidisciplinary communication and coordinated patient care. Anesthesiology represents a field for which there is no required study for medical students, pediatric residents, or neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows in the United States, so a neonatologist may have never received any formal training in anesthesiology (and vice versa for pediatric anesthesiologists in neonatology). In this review, we address frequently asked questions of neonatologists to anesthesiologists to better frame common issues. These topics include thermal regulation, fluid management, airway management, and the field of regional anesthesiology. Finally, collaborative efforts between the surgical and medical fields, such as the American College of Surgeons Children's Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program, and the American Academy of Pediatrics NICU Verification Program, are ongoing and robust; these programs represent important opportunities to significantly improve the perioperative care of infants. Our hope is that this summary can serve as a primer and reference for those caring for neonatal patients during any perioperative period, including seasoned neonatologists and those early in their training. It is our further desire that this review will lead to improved communication and collegiality between the specialties.

Ropivacaine: A Novel Local Anaesthetic Drug to Use in Otorhinolaryngology Practice

Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide local anaesthetic agent which has a significant vasoconstrictive property, long duration of action, least central nervous system and cardiac complications due to the pure (S)-enantiomer property by reversible inhibition of sodium ion influx in nerve fibres. By using additives the duration of analgesia may be prolonged. Ropivacaine has been used routinely in our otorhinolaryngology procedures since 2010 (10 years). The present article details the clinical applications of ropivacaine and its current place as a local anaesthetic in otorhinolaryngology practice.

Randomized Controlled Study Using Ropivacaine with Intravenous Adjuvants in Spinal Anaesthesia In Lower Limb Surgeries

Background

In recent years, several adjuvants have been used to prolong the duration of the subarachnoid block. These adjuvants have either been used via intrathecal route or intravenous (i.v.) route. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine have been used as adjuvants to local anesthetic drugs by intrathecal, epidural, caudal, and i.v. routes and for peripheral nerve blocks. In this study, we endeavored at finding the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and clonidine in improving the analgesia quality and duration of the subarachnoid block.

Setting and Design

A prospective, double-blind, randomized control trial comprising 70 subjects posted for elective lower limb surgeries.

Materials and Methods

Seventy patients were selected at random and were allocated to two groups (Group C and Group D) of 35 each. In Group C, the patients received isobaric ropivacaine with clonidine 1.0 μg.kg^-1 intravenously. In Group D, the patients received isobaric ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg.kg^-1 intravenously. Perioperatively, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation were recorded and documented every 5 min till the end of surgery. Time of onset, level of sensory blockade, and duration of sensory blockade were recorded. Motor block was assessed using modified Bromage scale. Data validation and analysis were carried out by SPSS version 16. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Time of onset of sensory block in Dexmedetomidine group and Clonidine group was 2.70 ± 1.25 minutes and 3.50 ± 1.23 minutes respectively (P = 0.021). Time of onset of motor block in Dexmedetomidine group and Clonidine group was 3.55 ± 1.60 minutes and 4.30 ± 1.45 minutes respectively (P = 0.034). Time for 2 segment regressions of sensory block in Dexmedetomidine group and Clonidine group was 140.30 ± 12.32 minutes and 125.65±14.33minutes respectively (P = 0.047). Time of regressions of motor blockade to Bromage Scale 1 in Dexmedetomidine group and Clonidine group was 148.65 ± 15.23 minutes and 129.70 ± 19.35 minutes respectively (P = 0.032).

Conclusion

The use of i.v. dexmedetomidine perioperatively prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block significantly when compared to i.v. clonidine.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Using Manual Bolus Atomization Versus Micropump Nebulization and Morphine Requirements in Young Children

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of local anesthetics is used in adults and children for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic surgery. Population pharmacokinetics (PK) of IP bupivacaine has not been determined in children. Objectives of this study were (1) to develop a population PK model to compare IP bupivacaine administered via manual bolus atomization and micropump nebulization and (2) to assess postoperative morphine requirements after intraoperative administration. We hypothesized similar PK profiles and morphine requirements for both delivery methods.

METHODS

This was a prospective, sequential, observational study. After institutional review board (IRB) approval and written informed parental consent, 67 children 6 months to 6 years of age undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic urological surgery received IP bupivacaine at the beginning of surgery. Children received a total dose of 1.25 mg/kg bupivacaine, either diluted in 30-mL normal saline via manual bolus atomization over 30 seconds or undiluted bupivacaine 0.5% via micropump nebulization into carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation tubing over 10-17.4 minutes. Venous blood samples were obtained at 4 time points between 1 and 120 minutes intraoperatively. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental and compartmental analyses. Nonlinear regression modeling was used to estimate PK parameters (primary outcomes) and Mann-Whitney U test for morphine requirements (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics between the 2 delivery methods were comparable. No clinical signs of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity were observed. The range of peak plasma concentrations was 0.39-2.44 µg/mL for the manual bolus atomization versus 0.25-1.07 μg/mL for the micropump nebulization. IP bupivacaine PK was described by a 1-compartment model for both delivery methods. Bupivacaine administration by micropump nebulization resulted in a significantly lower Highest Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) and shorter time to reach Cmax (Tmax) (P < .001) compared to manual bolus atomization. Lower plasma concentrations with less interpatient variability were observed and predicted by the PK model for the micropump nebulization (P < .001). Adjusting for age, weight, and sex as covariates, Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower with micropump nebulization (P < .001). Regardless of the delivery method, morphine requirements were low at all time points. There were no differences in cumulative postoperative intravenous/oral morphine requirements between manual bolus atomization and micropump nebulization (0.14 vs 0.17 mg/kg; P = .85) measured up to 24 hours postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

IP bupivacaine administration by micropump nebulization demonstrated lower plasma concentrations, less interpatient variability, low risk of toxicity, and similar clinical efficacy compared to manual bolus atomization. This is the first population PK study of IP bupivacaine in children, motivating future randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy.

Safety of local anesthetics

Local anesthetics are essential medications for the conduction of dermatological procedures. They stop the depolarization of nerve fibers and are divided into two main categories, the amide and ester types. Systemic toxicity with reflex on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems is their most feared adverse reactions, and the anaphylactic reaction is the most concerning one. Although potentially fatal, these events are extremely rare, so local anesthetics are considered safe for use in in-office procedures.

Infant with status epilepticus secondary to systemic lidocaine toxicity from topical application

A previously healthy 11-month-old infant presented to the emergency department in status epilepticus. There was no clear trigger of her seizure activity which resolved with benzodiazepines and fosphenytoin. On further review, her parents disclosed that she had been prescribed topical 4% lidocaine cream for a groin rash and was ultimately diagnosed with lidocaine toxicity in the emergency department. She was monitored in the intensive care unit without cardiovascular abnormalities or recurrence of seizure activity. Emergency medicine providers must maintain a broader differential of status epileptics and be able to recognise and manage potential complications from systemic lidocaine toxicity.

A Review of Regional Anesthesia in Infants

Regional anesthesia provides effective anesthesia and pain relief in infants with age-specific data attesting to safety and efficacy. Regional anesthesia decreases exposure to opioids and general anesthetic agents and associated adverse drug effects, suppresses the stress response, and provides better hemodynamic stability compared to general anesthesia. Regional anesthesia can prevent long-term behavioral responses to pain. As a result, the overall number and variety of nerve blocks being used in infants is increasing. While neuraxial blocks are the most common blocks performed in infants, the introduction of ultrasound imaging and a better safety profile has advanced the use of peripheral nerve blocks. Infant-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of local anesthetic medications are reviewed including risk factors for the accumulation of high serum levels of unbound, pharmacologically active drug. Bupivacaine accumulates with continuous infusion and 2-chloroprocaine can be used as an alternative. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity has the highest incidence in infants less than 6 months of age and is associated with bolus dosing and penile nerve blocks. Local anesthetic toxicity is treated by securing the airway, suppression of seizure activity and implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Administration of intralipid (intravenous lipid emulsion) is initiated at the first sign of toxicity. A high level of expertise in regional anesthesia is needed when treating infants due to their unique development.

Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures

The safe sedation of children for procedures requires a systematic approach that includes the following: no administration of sedating medication without the safety net of medical/dental supervision, careful presedation evaluation for underlying medical or surgical conditions that would place the child at increased risk from sedating medications, appropriate fasting for elective procedures and a balance between the depth of sedation and risk for those who are unable to fast because of the urgent nature of the procedure, a focused airway examination for large (kissing) tonsils or anatomic airway abnormalities that might increase the potential for airway obstruction, a clear understanding of the medication's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and drug interactions, appropriate training and skills in airway management to allow rescue of the patient, age- and size-appropriate equipment for airway management and venous access, appropriate medications and reversal agents, sufficient numbers of appropriately trained staff to both carry out the procedure and monitor the patient, appropriate physiologic monitoring during and after the procedure, a properly equipped and staffed recovery area, recovery to the presedation level of consciousness before discharge from medical/dental supervision, and appropriate discharge instructions. This report was developed through a collaborative effort of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry to offer pediatric providers updated information and guidance in delivering safe sedation to children.

Methemoglobinemia in an Infant After Sclerotherapy With High-Dose Doxycycline

Methemoglobinemia occurs when the heme moiety of hemoglobin (Hb) is oxidized from the ferrous to ferric state, leading to impairments in oxygen transport and delivery. Methemoglobinemia is rare in pediatric patients but has been described in the setting of congenital abnormalities in the Hb structure, inherited enzyme deficiencies, oxidative Hb injury in response to illness, and oxidative Hb injury due to toxicants. We present a 1-week-old infant born with a cervical lymphangioma who developed persistent desaturations that were unresponsive to oxygen after sclerotherapy with doxycycline. Arterial blood gas revealed a high Pao₂ despite low saturations being found on pulse oximetry and a methemoglobin level that was found to be elevated. Further sclerotherapy was discontinued, the saturations eventually normalized, and the methemoglobin level decreased. This is a novel report of sclerotherapy with doxycycline associated with the development of methemoglobinemia.

The Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Bupivacaine on Caudal Epidural Block in Children: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the analgesics effect and safety of dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with bupivacaine (BU) on caudal epidural block. MATERIAL AND METHODS Published studies were identified using the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception until October 2017. Relative risk (RR), the standardized mean difference (SMD), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the STATA 12.0. RESULTS Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for this meta-analysis, involving a total of 691 patients. There was a longer duration of postoperative analgesia in children receiving DEX (SMD=3.19, 95% CI: 2.16-4.22, P<0.001). Furthermore, there was a lower number of patients requiring rescue analgesics in the (BU) + (DEX) group (6 hours: RR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.05-0.17, P<0.001; 12 hours: RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.79, P=0.003; 24 hours: RR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.51-0.85, P=0.002). Finally, the occurrence of adverse events, between BU and DEX + BU group, was not statistically significant (RR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.58-1.58, P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS DEX seems to be a promising adjuvant to BU increase duration of caudal analgesia without an increase in side effects in children. However, the result may be influenced by clinical heterogeneity. More large-scale, multicenter, approaching, double-blinded RCTs are required to confirm our results.

Effect of Coadministration of Lidocaine on the Pain and Pharmacokinetics of Intramuscular Amikacin in Children With Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

Currently recommended treatment for multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) includes 4-8 months of an injectable medication, which is poorly tolerated. We evaluated the impact of coadministering lidocaine on pain and pharmacokinetics of intramuscular injections of amikacin in children with MDR-TB.

METHODS

Children 8-18 years of age, receiving amikacin for MDR-TB treatment in Cape Town, South Africa, were eligible for this randomized crossover trial. Participants received a 15 mg/kg dose of intramuscular amikacin with and without additional lidocaine (0.2-0.4 mg/kg) on different days and were randomized to the order of the treatments (the sequence). Participants and staff completing evaluations were blinded to sequence. Samples were drawn predose, and at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose for measurement of plasma amikacin concentrations. Pain was assessed by participants using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale (0-5) predose, immediately after the injection and then at 30 and 60 minutes. Pharmacokinetic measures were calculated using noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve children were included, median age 11.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 9.9-13.4 years). Participant-reported pain scores immediately after the amikacin injection were lower when lidocaine was coadministered: 1.0 (IQR, 0.5-2.0) with lidocaine versus 2.5 (1.0-4.0) without lidocaine (P = 0.004). The median area under the concentration time curve0-8 and median maximum plasma concentration of amikacin were 109.0 μg × h/mL (IQR, 84.7-121.3) and 36.7 μg/mL (IQR, 34.1-40.5) with lidocaine compared with 103.3 μg × h/mL (IQR, 81.7-135.0; P = 0.814) and 34.1 μg/mL (IQR, 35.6-46.4; P = 0.638) without lidocaine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The coadministration of lidocaine resulted in reduced pain immediately after the injection and did not alter amikacin area under the concentration time curve or maximum plasma concentration.

Nurse Practitioner-Administered Chloroprocaine in Children with Postoperative Pain

BACKGROUND

Pain is a complex physical and emotional experience. Therefore, assessment of acute pain requires self-report when possible, observations of emotional and behavioral responses and changes in vital signs. Peripheral nerve and epidural catheters often provide postoperative analgesia in children. Administration of chloroprocaine (a short acting local anesthetic) via a peripheral nerve or epidural catheter allows for a comparison of pain scores, observations of emotional and behavioral responses and changes in vital signs to determine catheter function.

AIMS

The aims of this study are to describe the use chloroprocaine injections for testing catheters; patient response; and how changes to pain management are guided by the patient response.

METHODS

This study describes the use of chloroprocaine injections to manage pain and assess the function of peripheral nerve or epidural catheters in a pediatric population. We examined 128 surgical patients, (0-25 years old), who received chloroprocaine injections for testing peripheral nerve or epidural catheters. Patient outcomes included: blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and pain intensity scores.

RESULTS

There were no significant adverse events. The injection guided intervention by determining the function of regional analgesia in the majority (98.5%) of patients.

DISCUSSION

Chloroprocaine injections appear to be useful to evaluate functionality of peripheral nerve and epidural catheters after surgery in a pediatric population.

Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends

Although beneficial in acute and chronic pain management, the use of local anaesthetics is limited by its duration of action and the dose dependent adverse effects on the cardiac and central nervous system. Adjuvants or additives are often used with local anaesthetics for its synergistic effect by prolonging the duration of sensory-motor block and limiting the cumulative dose requirement of local anaesthetics. The armamentarium of local anesthetic adjuvants have evolved over time from classical opioids to a wide array of drugs spanning several groups and varying mechanisms of action. A large array of opioids ranging from morphine, fentanyl and sufentanyl to hydromorphone, buprenorphine and tramadol has been used with varying success. However, their use has been limited by their adverse effect like respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritus, especially with its neuraxial use. Epinephrine potentiates the local anesthetics by its antinociceptive properties mediated by alpha-2 adrenoreceptor activation along with its vasoconstrictive properties limiting the systemic absorption of local anesthetics. Alpha 2 adrenoreceptor antagonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine are one of the most widely used class of local anesthetic adjuvants. Other drugs like steroids (dexamethasone), anti-inflammatory agents (parecoxib and lornoxicam), midazolam, ketamine, magnesium sulfate and neostigmine have also been used with mixed success. The concern regarding the safety profile of these adjuvants is due to its potential neurotoxicity and neurological complications which necessitate further research in this direction. Current research is directed towards a search for agents and techniques which would prolong local anaesthetic action without its deleterious effects. This includes novel approaches like use of charged molecules to produce local anaesthetic action (tonicaine and n butyl tetracaine), new age delivery mechanisms for prolonged bioavailability (liposomal, microspheres and cyclodextrin systems) and further studies with other drugs (adenosine, neuromuscular blockers, dextrans).

Pharmacologic Considerations of Anesthetic Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Comprehensive Review

Acute pain in the pediatric population has important differences in terms of biology, intrapopulation variation, and epidemiology. Discussion as to the pharmacologic considerations of anesthetic agents, such as induction agents, neuromuscular blockers, opioids, local anesthetics, and adjuvant agents, is presented in this article. Special considerations and concerns, such as risk for propofol infusion syndrome and adverse potential side effects of anesthesia agents, are discussed. Anesthesiologists managing pediatric patients need to have a firm understanding of physiologic and pharmacologic differences compared with the adult population. Future studies to improve the understanding of pharmacokinetics in the pediatric population are needed.

Awake caudal anaesthesia in neonates/young infants for improved patient safety

Caudal epidural block in a conscious infant is a recognised technique that allows the avoidance of general anaesthesia and risks associated with it. It is also technically easier to perform reliably compared with an awake subarachnoid block in skilled hands.1 While local anaesthetic systemic toxicity is a rare complication of caudal anaesthesia, this case illustrates the potential for caudal anaesthesia done awake in enhancing patient safety through early recognition of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity.

A Review of Local Anesthetics: Minimizing Risk and Side Effects in Cutaneous Surgery

BACKGROUND

The specialty of dermatology relies heavily on local anesthesia for diagnosis and management of skin disease. The appropriate selection, preparation, administration, and monitoring of these medications affect surgical outcome and patient safety and satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comprehensive literature review of the side effects and risks associated with local anesthetics used in cutaneous surgery. Current recommendations to reduce risk and minimize side effects are reviewed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of the English-language medical literature search was performed.

RESULTS

No current review articles of the side effects and risks of local anesthetics were identified. This review serves to discuss local anesthetics commonly used in dermatology and cutaneous surgery along with practical information regarding prevention of adverse outcomes and addressing local and systemic reactions when they arise.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthetics commonly used in cutaneous surgery have potential risks and side effects. Appropriate selection and utilization of local anesthetics and knowledge of the means to prevent and address these risks can impact surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction and safety, and ultimately patient experience in the dermatology clinic.

Comparative Evaluation of the Local Anesthetic Activity of Root Extract of Anacyclus pyrethrum and its Interaction at the Site of Injection in Guinea Pigs

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the local anesthetic activity of root extracts of the Anacyclus pyrethrum, and to check its effect of interaction at the site of injection in guinea pigs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample included thirty guinea pigs each weighing 450-500 g, maintained under standard conditions. The root extracts were prepared using three solvents, in 1% and 2% concentration and injected in guinea pigs. The animals were divided into five groups, six in each group based on the type of extract used along with a control and a standard drug. All the animals received 0.5 ml of intradermal injection of the prepared extract, with 1% concentration in the left and 2% in the right dorsal flank of the animal and were checked for local anesthetic activity by a pinprick test. After 72 h, biopsy was done from the injected site to check for drug interaction.

RESULTS

The number of negative response obtained from 2% ethanol extract is more effective when compared to other extracts. Histological samples showed inflammatory changes in 1% aqueous extract in a single animal.

CONCLUSION

Among the test compounds, 2% ethanol showed more significant effect; hence, it is suggested to synthesize more compounds in this series and evaluate their pharmacological actions.

Evaluation of the effects of ketamine on spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine

Spinal anesthesia or regional anesthesia is a potent anesthetic procedure. Additional modalities have been sought to increase the duration of block in spinal anesthesia. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blocker that has an anesthetic effect when injected intrathecally and has a synergic effect with bupivacaine. Ketamine also has potent analgesic properties. The present study investigated the effect of intrathecally administered ketamine on spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine. Sprague-Dawley rats at post-natal day 21 were exposed to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine. Separate groups of rats were treated with intrathecal ketamine at a 5 or 10 mg/kg bodyweight dose along with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine. The thermal and mechanical withdrawal latencies of the animals were determined using hot plate and von Frey filaments, respectively. A rotarod apparatus was employed to assess the capacity of the rats to rotate the spindle at 24 h following anesthesia. The gait of the rat pups was also assessed. Intrathecal administration of ketamine resulted in dense blocks and extended the duration of spinal blocks as evidenced by thermal latencies and responses to von Frey filaments. The latency to fall was shorter in rats exposed to ketamine along with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia. The gait parameters were also more disturbed upon ketamine administration. In conclusion, ketamine administration with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine increased the intensity and duration of spinal blockade, thereby increasing the anesthetic effects.

Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016

The safe sedation of children for procedures requires a systematic approach that includes the following: no administration of sedating medication without the safety net of medical/dental supervision, careful presedation evaluation for underlying medical or surgical conditions that would place the child at increased risk from sedating medications, appropriate fasting for elective procedures and a balance between the depth of sedation and risk for those who are unable to fast because of the urgent nature of the procedure, a focused airway examination for large (kissing) tonsils or anatomic airway abnormalities that might increase the potential for airway obstruction, a clear understanding of the medication's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and drug interactions, appropriate training and skills in airway management to allow rescue of the patient, age- and size-appropriate equipment for airway management and venous access, appropriate medications and reversal agents, sufficient numbers of staff to both carry out the procedure and monitor the patient, appropriate physiologic monitoring during and after the procedure, a properly equipped and staffed recovery area, recovery to the presedation level of consciousness before discharge from medical/dental supervision, and appropriate discharge instructions. This report was developed through a collaborative effort of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry to offer pediatric providers updated information and guidance in delivering safe sedation to children.

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Ultrasound-Guided Regional Block Techniques for Surgical Anesthesia in Open Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (II/IH) nerve blocks have been described as analgesic adjuncts for inguinal hernia repair, but the efficacy of these techniques in providing intraoperative anesthesia, either individually or together, is not known. We designed this retrospective cohort study to test the hypothesis that combining TAP and II/IH nerve blocks ("double TAP" technique) results in greater accordance between the preoperative anesthetic plan and actual anesthetic technique provided when compared to TAP alone. Based on this study, double TAP may be preferred for patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair who wish to avoid general anesthesia.

[Delayed convulsion after lidocaine instillation for bronchoscopy]

INTRODUCTION

Lidocaine toxicity usually appears rapidly and is directly correlated with plasma concentrations of the drug.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a late neurologic toxicity occurring after instillation of lidocaine during fibre-optic bronchoscopy. A patient with bronchiolitis obliterans underwent a diagnostic bronchoscopy. She received multiples instillations of Xylocaine(®) 2% (lidocaine). Three and a half hours later, she had a tonic-clonic seizure. Seven hours later, this recurred. Lidocaine plasma levels were in the toxic range at the time of the first seizure (18.32μg/mL) with a significant decrease in the concentration noted 24hours later.

CONCLUSION

The slow absorption of lidocaine into the blood from the bronchial tree explains the delayed neurologic toxicity. Our observation is a reminder that complications can occur due to high doses of lidocaïne administrated by instillation. Thus, if the recommended dose of lidocaine is exceeded, it is essential to monitor patients closely for a prolonged period, especially those with fibrosing lung disease in order to avoid possible late toxicity.

Caudal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery

Objective:

To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine 0.175% and bupivacaine 0.175% injected caudally into infants for lower abdominal surgery.

Methods:

Eighty infants, aged 3-12 months, ASA I-II scheduled to undergo lower abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: Group R received 1ml.kg^-1 0.175% ropivacaine and Group B received 1ml.kg^-1 0.175% bupivacaine via caudal route. Postoperative analgesia, sedation and motor block were evaluated with modified objective pain scale, three-point scale and modified Bromage scale respectively. Postoperative measurements including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), pain (OPS), sedation and motor block score were recorded for four hours in the postoperative recovery room. Parents were contacted by telephone after 24 hours to question duration of analgesia and side effects.

Results:

No significant differences were found among the groups in demographic data, MAP, HR, OPS and sedation scores during four hours postoperatively. The duration of analgesia was 527.5±150.62 minutes in Group R, 692.77±139.01 minutes in Group B (p=0.004). Twelve (30%) patients in Group R, 16 (40%) patients in groupB needed rescue analgesics (p=0.348). Rescue analgesics were administered (1 time/2 times) (9/3) (22.5/7.5%) in Group R and 16/0 (40/0%) in Group B, where no statistically significant difference was determined between the groups (p=0.071). Motor blockade was observed in 7 (17.5%) patients in Group R, and 8 (20%) patients in Group B (p=0.774).

Conclusion:

This study indicated, that a concentration of 0.175% ropivacaine and 0.175% bupivacaine administered to the infants via caudal route both provided effective and similar postoperative pain relief in infants, who underwent lower abdominal surgery.