Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of childhood epilepsy

Toward the use of novel alternative methods in epilepsy modeling and drug discovery

Epilepsy is a chronic brain disease and, considering the amount of people affected of all ages worldwide, one of the most common neurological disorders. Over 20 novel antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been released since 1993, yet despite substantial advancements in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind epileptogenesis, over one-third of patients continue to be resistant to available therapies. This is partially explained by the fact that the majority of existing medicines only address seizure suppression rather than underlying processes. Understanding the origin of this neurological illness requires conducting human neurological and genetic studies. However, the limitation of sample sizes, ethical concerns, and the requirement for appropriate controls (many patients have already had anti-epileptic medication exposure) in human clinical trials underscore the requirement for supplemental models. So far, mammalian models of epilepsy have helped to shed light on the underlying causes of the condition, but the high costs related to breeding of the animals, low throughput, and regulatory restrictions on their research limit their usefulness in drug screening. Here, we present an overview of the state of art in epilepsy modeling describing gold standard animal models used up to date and review the possible alternatives for this research field. Our focus will be mainly on ex vivo, in vitro, and in vivo larval zebrafish models contributing to the 3R in epilepsy modeling and drug screening. We provide a description of pharmacological and genetic methods currently available but also on the possibilities offered by the continued development in gene editing methodologies, especially CRISPR/Cas9-based, for high-throughput disease modeling and anti-epileptic drugs testing.

Tolerability and efficacy of perampanel in children with refractory epilepsy

AIM

There are few reports on the tolerability and efficacy of perampanel, a new antiepileptic drug with a novel mechanism of action, in children and adolescents. We aimed to describe our experience with perampanel add-on and mono-therapy in children with refractory epilepsy.

METHOD

Computerized medical records of children treated with perampanel in the paediatric neurology clinic from December 2012 to October 2015 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four children treated with perampanel (15 females, 9 males) aged 1 year 6 months to 17 years (mean 10y, standard deviation [SD] 4y 5mo) were identified. Adverse events were more common in children aged 12 years or older (89%) compared to younger children (53%), and were mainly behavioural. Ten (42%) children had 50 per cent or higher seizure reduction, two (8%) children had 33 per cent seizure reduction, and seizures were less severe in one (4%) child. Perampanel was discontinued in 13 (54%) children mostly due to adverse events. The mean duration of follow-up in the remaining 11 children was 8.1 months (SD 5.2) (range 1.3-17mo).

INTERPRETATION

Perampanel is associated with a relatively high rate of behavioural adverse events mostly in adolescents with refractory epilepsy.

AED Treatment Through Different Ages: As Our Brains Change, Should Our Drug Choices Also?

Patient age can impact selection of the optimal antiepileptic drug for a number of reasons. Changes in brain physiology from neonate to elderly, as well as changes in underlying etiologies of epilepsy, could potentially affect the ability of different drugs to control seizures. Unfortunately, much of this is speculative, as good studies demonstrating differences in efficacy across age ranges do not exist. Beyond the issue of efficacy, certain drugs may be more or less appropriate at different ages because of differing pharmacokinetics, including changes in hepatic metabolism, absorption, and elimination. Lack of appropriate drug formulations (such as liquid forms) may be a barrier to using drugs in the very young. Finally, some serious adverse events are seen either exclusively or preferentially at different ages.

The pharmacokinetics of commonly used antiepileptic drugs in immature CD1 mice

Rodents eliminate antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) faster than humans, creating challenges for designing clinically relevant protocols. Half-lives of AEDs in immature mice are unknown. The pharmacokinetics of commonly used AEDs were examined in CD1 mice using a single-dose protocol at postnatal day 19. After intraperitoneal therapeutic dosing, blood serum concentrations spanning 1-48 h post-administration and corresponding brain tissue concentrations at 4 h were analyzed. Half-lives of valproate, phenobarbital, diazepam (and metabolites), phenytoin, and levetiracetam were 2.6, 15.8, 22.3, 16.3, and 3.2 h, respectively, compared to 0.8, 7.5, 7.7, 16.0, and 1.5 h reported for adult mice. Brain-to-blood ratios were comparable with adult ratios. AEDs tested had longer half-lives and maintained therapeutic plasma concentrations longer than reported in mature mice, making clinically relevant protocols feasible.

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (Lev) in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Open-label observational, prospective, single arm, non-interventional study examining patients (≤14 years) with epilepsy, receiving mono- or combination therapy with levetiracetam. Levetiracetam was started at a dose of approximately 10mg/kg/day. The dose was titrated up with 10mg/kg increments if seizures were poorly controlled but the maximum daily dose could not be more than 60 mg/kg/day. Documented were seizure type and frequency, levetiracetam dose and side effects.

RESULTS

120 patients (39.3% females, mean age 4.5 ± 3.9 years) were enrolled. Average duration of follow-up was 10.3 ± 3.5 months. At study endpoint, 64.8% of patients got seizure free and 83.0% got a seizure reduction of ≥50%. Observed side effects were somnolence, dysphoria, nervousness, dystrophy, somnipathy, asitia, debilitation, etc. and the incidence rate in the study was 47.5%. Four (3.3%) of 120 patients withdrew because of intolerance of side effects. The estimated one year retention rate of levetiracetam was 73.3%. Poor effect was the most common reason for withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, it seemed that levetiracetam was safe and effective for a wide range of epileptic seizures in children with epilepsy.

Patient variation in veterinary medicine--part II--influence of physiological variables

In veterinary medicine, the characterization of a drug's pharmacokinetic properties is generally based upon data that are derived from studies that employ small groups of young healthy animals, often of a single breed. In Part I of the series, we focused on the potential influence of disease processes, stress, pregnancy and lactation on drug pharmacokinetics. In this Part II of the series, we consider other covariates, such as gender, heritable traits, age, body composition, and circadian rhythms. The impact of these factors with respect to predicting the relationship between dose and drug exposure characteristics within an animal population is illustrated through the use of Monte Carlo simulations. Ultimately, an appreciation of these potential influences will improve the prediction of situations when dose adjustments may be appropriate.

The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) consensus guidelines for the safety monitoring of bipolar disorder treatments

OBJECTIVES

Safety monitoring is an important aspect of bipolar disorder treatment, as mood-stabilising medications have potentially serious side effects, some of which may also aggravate existing medical comorbidities. This paper sets out the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) guidelines for the safety monitoring of widely used agents in the treatment of bipolar disorder. These guidelines aim to provide recommendations that take into consideration the balance between safety and cost-effectiveness, to highlight iatrogenic and preventive clinical issues, and to facilitate the broad implementation of therapeutic safety monitoring as a standard component of treatment for bipolar disorder.

METHODS

These guidelines were developed by an ISBD workgroup, headed by the senior author (MB), through an iterative process of serial consensus-based revisions. After this, feedback from a multidisciplinary group of health professionals on the applicability of these guidelines was sought to develop the final recommendations.

RESULTS

General safety monitoring recommendations for all bipolar disorder patients receiving treatment and specific monitoring recommendations for individual agents are outlined.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are derived from evolving and often indirect data, with minimal empirical cost-effectiveness data available to provide guidance. These guidelines will therefore need to be modified to adapt to different clinical settings and health resources. Clinical acumen and vigilance remain critical ingredients for safe treatment practice.

Special issues in the management of young children, older adults, and the developmentally disabled

The very young, the very old, and those with developmental disability have an increased risk of both epilepsy and prolonged and repetitive seizures. The special issues that affect their management are reviewed. Polypharmacy that occurs because of comorbid illnesses requiring chronic medication can result in dangerous drug-drug interactions. The antiepileptic drug's pharmacokinetic profile must be factored when treating young children and older adults. Patients who have taken an older enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug for years may have a markedly induced hepatic enzyme system that may alter drug metabolism. Overdose or toxicity may occur in older adults who may metabolize and clear antiepileptic drugs more slowly than younger patients. Benzodiazepines are the most rapidly effective acute therapy for repetitive or prolonged seizures. It is important to have a plan for management of prolonged and repetitive seizures. Long-term therapy should be managed in a manner that will eliminate the need for rescue therapies and visits to the emergency department.

Long-term use of oxcarbazepine oral suspension in childhood epilepsy: open-label study

Studies designed specifically for the pediatric population are needed to assess the tolerability and safety of the new antiepileptic drugs. The purpose of this study was to document the safety, ease of dosing, and acceptance of oxcarbazepine oral suspension in pediatric patients in monotherapy and polytherapy. A prospective, multicenter, open-label study was conducted at the neurology services of three pediatric university hospitals over 12 months. After obtaining signed informed consent, we enrolled a series of 62 patients with epilepsy aged between 2 months and 14 years who began oxcarbazepine treatment in monotherapy or in combination with other antiepileptic drugs to assess the seizure frequency, safety (adverse events), and acceptance of the pharmaceutical form by the patient's family. Fifty patients (80.6%) reduced seizures by at least 50%, 44 (71%) saw a reduction in seizure frequency of over 75%, and 29 (46.8%) were seizure free at the end of the study. The difference in the number of seizures before and after the study was statistically significant, both overall and by type of pathology. Adverse events occurred in four patients (6.4%) and required withdrawal of the drug in two cases (skin rash); three patients (4.8%) withdrew for inefficacy. Five patients (8.1%) withdrew from the treatment. We concluded that, in this series of patients, oxcarbazepine in oral suspension form was seen to help reduce seizure frequency, to have few side effects, and to be accepted by parents and patients.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of New-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs at the Extremes of Age

In recent years, several new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced in clinical practice. These agents, which include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide, are being increasingly used in the treatment of epilepsy at the extremes of age. For a rational prescribing of these drugs in specific age groups, major pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging need to be taken into consideration. A review of available evidence indicates that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of new-generation AEDs in children is increased by 20-170% (depending on the type of drug and characteristics of the patients studied) compared with adults, with the highest CL/F values usually being observed in the youngest age groups. These findings do not necessarily apply to the first weeks of life, when drug eliminating capacity is still undergoing maturation, as in the case of lamotrigine for which preliminary data suggest that CL/F in neonates aged <2 months can be much lower than in infants aged 2-12 months. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, CL/F is almost invariably reduced (on average by 10-50%) compared with values found in non-elderly adults. Age-related CL/F changes, together with the large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, contribute to the need for individualised dosage requirements in these patients. Measurement of serum drug concentrations can be useful as an aid to dosage individualization in these age groups but interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring data should also take into account the possibility of age-related changes in pharmacodynamic sensitivity and, for neonates and the elderly, alterations in drug binding to serum proteins.

Acute drug prescribing to children on chronic antiepilepsy therapy and the potential for adverse drug interactions in primary care

AIMS

To investigate the extent of acute coprescribing in primary care to children on chronic antiepileptic therapy, which could give rise to potentially harmful drug-drug interactions.

DESIGN

Acute coprescribing to children on chronic antiepileptic drug therapy in primary care was assessed in 178 324 children aged 0-17 years for the year 1 November 1999 to 31 October 2000. Computerized prescribing data were retrieved from 161 representative general practices in Scotland.

SETTING

One hundred and sixty-one general practices throughout Scotland.

RESULTS

During the study year 723 (0.41%) children chronically prescribed antiepileptic therapy were identified. Fourteen antiepileptic agents were prescribed, with carbamazepine, sodium valproate and lamotrigine accounting for 80% of the total. During the year children on chronic antiepileptic therapy were prescribed 4895 acute coprescriptions for 269 different medicines. The average number of acute coprescriptions for non-epileptic drug therapy were eight, 11, six, and six for the 0-1, 2-4, 5-11, and 12-17-year-olds, respectively. Of these acute coprescriptions 72 (1.5%) prescribed to 22 (3.0%) children were identified as a potential source of clinically serious interactions. The age-adjusted prevalence rates for potentially serious coprescribing were 86, 26, 22, and 33/1000 children chronically prescribed antiepileptic therapy in the 0-1, 2-4, 5-11, and 12-17-year-old age groups, respectively. The drugs most commonly coprescribed which could give rise to such interactions were antacids, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, theophylline and the low-dose oral contraceptive. For 10 (45.5%0 of the 20 children identified at risk of a potentially clinically serious adverse drug interaction, the acute coprescription was prescribed off label because of age or specific contraindication/warning.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary care, 3.0% of children on chronic antiepileptic therapy are coprescribed therapeutic agents, which could give rise to clinically serious drug-drug interactions.