Calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of hypertension

[Quality of conventional release verapamil prescription in patients with arterial hypertension]

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients who were being treated for hypertension with conventional release verapamil (CRV), and to notify the professional responsible for their health care on cardiovascular risk to which they are exposed and achieve a reduction in the number of patients who are treated with this drug.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental prospective before and after study without a control group was conducted on 7289 patients diagnosed with hypertension who were on treatment with CRV, between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 in 8 Colombian cities, collected from a database for dispensing medicines. Socio-demographic and pharmacological variables were evaluated. A total of 108 educational interventions were performed on those responsible for their health care, and evaluated within three months with the proportion of suspension of the prescriptions of CRV being evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67.9±11.8 years (range: 26-96 years), of which 70.6% were men. Withdrawal of treatment with CRV was achieved in a total of 1922 patients (26.3% of users), distributed as follows: 1160 (60.4%) were the presentation of 120mg, while 762 (39.6%) the 80mg. The variable being treated in the city of Medellin (OR: 17.6; 95% CI: 11.949 to 25.924; P<.01) was statistically significantly associated with the replacement of CRV for another antihypertensive.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively moderate adherence to recommendations about the proper use of CRV in hypertensive patients, was found. Intervention programs that reduce inappropriate prescribing of potential risks to patients of insurance companies and cities where the change was not achieved, must be enforced.

Antipsychotic pharmacotherapy and orthostatic hypotension: identification and management

Orthostatic hypotension is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics that may delay or prevent titration to a dose necessary to control psychotic symptoms. Complications of orthostatic hypotension include syncope, transient ischaemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction and death. The risk of orthostatic hypotension associated with antipsychotic therapy is increased in patients with disorders of the autonomic nervous system, fluid imbalance and those taking concomitant drug therapy that affects haemodynamic tone. Prospective monitoring for changes in postural blood pressure is important because patients with psychotic disorders often do not articulate symptoms of orthostasis and the subjective report of dizziness does not correlate well with orthostatic blood pressure changes. Nonpharmacological strategies and patient education, most notably, slowly rising from the supine position, are crucial first steps in the prevention and treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension. Pharmacological treatment is only recommended when symptomatic orthostatic hypotension persists despite proper nonpharmacological therapy and there is a compelling indication for antipsychotic treatment. Fludrocortisone is a reasonable first choice for symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. Other agents including desmopressin and midodrine may be considered in patients who do not respond favourably to a trial of fludrocortisone, but safety concerns and lack of evidence limit the utility of these agents.

Calcium channel blockers: their pharmacologic and therapeutic role in hypertension

The prevalence of hypertension is increasing steadily in the US, particularly among African Americans. It is now clear that a large proportion of patients are inadequately controlled, with many patients requiring at least two agents to achieve their target BP. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), comprising two subclasses--dihydropyridines and nondihydropyridines--have been for many years one of the mainstays of hypertension therapy. However, the use of CCBs as monotherapy has recently been overshadowed by the introduction of newer classes of agents such as angiotensin receptor blockers. Examining the pharmacologic and clinical effects of CCBs in essential hypertension and among specific patient groups (e.g. African Americans, patients with renal disease) paves the way for understanding why these agents are currently enjoying a resurgence in popularity as the basis for several fixed-dose combination regimens that promise to improve BP control and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

The calcium-channel blocker, azelnidipine, enhances the inhibitory action of AT1 receptor blockade on ischemic brain damage

OBJECTIVE

The combined effects of a calcium-channel blocker (CCB) with an angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker were investigated in focal brain ischemia induced by middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In male C57BL/6J mice, permanent occlusion of the MCA-induced focal cerebral ischemia and neurological deficit after 24 h, accompanied by a reduction of cerebral blood flow and an increase in superoxide production in the ischemic area. Administration of azelnidipine, a CCB, at 1.0 mg/kg per day for 10 days significantly suppressed these changes after MCA without affecting systolic blood pressure. Such inhibitory effects of azelnidipine on brain ischemia could be observed in AT1a receptor-deficient mice. In addition, olmesartan, an AT1 receptor blocker, at 3.0 mg/kg per day also diminished the ischemic brain area and neurological score, as well as superoxide production and the reduction of cerebral surface blood flow in C57BL/6 mice. The combination of lower doses of azelnidipine (0.1 mg/kg per day) and olmesartan (0.5 mg/kg per day) significantly attenuated the ischemic brain area, neurological score, superoxide production and the reduction of cerebral surface blood flow after MCA occlusion in C57BL/6 mice, whereas either of these agents alone at these doses did not affect brain ischemia.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that azelnidipine inhibited ischemic brain damage induced by MCA occlusion, at least in part, through suppression of blood flow change and oxidative stress via a signaling mechanism independent of AT1 receptor stimulation. Moreover, azelnidipine synergistically enhanced the inhibitory action of olmesartan on brain ischemia, suggesting beneficial combined effects of a CCB with an AT1 receptor blocker on ischemic brain damage.

Relaxant responses to calcium channel antagonists and potassium channel opener in human saphenous vein

1.-- As shown in a parallel study the magnitude of depolarization induced in human saphenous vein by raising external potassium ([K(+)](e)) falls markedly below the theoretical values predicted by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equations. This anomaly prompted us to re-examine the relaxant actions of L-type (nifedipine) and T-type (mibefradil) Ca(2+) channel antagonists, and relaxant and electrophysiological effects of the K(+) channel opener, pinacidil, on saphenous veins contracted by the elevation of [K(+)](e). 2.-- Nifedipine produced concentration-dependent relaxations in tissues contracted at various high [K(+)](e). In tissues contracted with 20 mm [K(+)](e), the pIC(50) for nifedipine was significantly (8.20 +/- 0.05; n = 6; mean +/- SEM; P < 0.05) greater than in tissues contracted with > or =40 mm [K(+)](e). 3.-- Tissues contracted with 20 mm [K(+)](e) also relaxed in response to mibefradil (pIC(50) = 6.1 +/- 0.14) and pinacidil (pIC(50) = 6.45 +/- 0.08), the latter being almost completely reversed (93.4 +/- 9.9%) by addition of glibenclamide (10 microm). 4.-- The resting E(m) of smooth muscle cells of saphenous vein was -77.0 +/- 0.7 mV (n = 52), and 20 mm [K(+)](e) produced a modest but significant depolarization to -73.0 +/- 0.7 mV (n = 52). Incubation with pinacidil plus 20 mm [K(+)](e) resulted in a significant hyperpolarization of the E(m) to -82 +/- 0.6 mV (n = 52). 5.-- N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester did not impede the relaxant responses of nifedipine, mibefradil or pinacidil. 6.-- In conclusion, the relaxant effects of nifedipine and pinacidil (i) occurred at an E(m) distinctly below the presumed threshold for the opening of the classic (Ca(V)1.3alpha(1)) L-type Ca(2+) channels, and (ii) did not depend on generation of nitric oxide.

Comparison of blood pressure control with amlodipine and controlled-release isradipine: an open-label, drug substitution study

An open-label drug substitution study showed that controlled-release isradipine (Dynacirc-CR) can be safely substituted for amlodipine on a mg-for-mg basis in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. When controlled-release isradipine was substituted for amlodipine, blood pressure was more effectively controlled, and edema rates were reduced. When subjects resumed amlodipine therapy, the previous gain in blood pressure reduction and lessening of edema vanished. The basis for this more favorable pattern of efficacy and side-effects with controlled-release isradipine, although mechanistically unresolved, may relate to a lesser degree of sympathetic nervous system activation.

Amlodipine at high dose increases preproendothelin-1 expression in the ventricles and aorta of normotensive rats

BACKGROUND

High doses of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers can activate the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system. Both noradrenaline and angiotensin II stimulate preproendothelin-1 gene expression, yet the effects of high doses of dihydropyridines on preproendothelin-1 expression in vivo remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of high doses of dihydropyridines on preproendothelin-1 expression in the ventricles and aorta of normotensive rats.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with amlodipine 5 or 20 mg/kg per day (Amlo 5 or Amlo 20) in drinking water for 5 days or 5 weeks. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured by tail-cuff plethysmography. Gene expression was examined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Amlo 5 increased heart rate during the first week only and had no effect on blood pressure and ventricular weight and gene expression. Amlo 20 reduced blood pressure transiently and increased heart rate consistently. It did not change relative left ventricular weight (corrected for body weight) after 5 days, but increased it after 5 weeks; it increased relative right ventricular weight at both time points. Aorta weight (mg/mm) was decreased after 5 weeks of treatment with both dosages of amlodipine. Preproendothelin-1 mRNA levels were increased by Amlo 20 in the ventricles and aorta and, concomitantly, renin mRNA was increased in the kidney. Less consistently, interleukin-6 mRNA also increased in ventricles, whereas cardiotrophin-1 mRNA remained unchanged. The sensitivity of isolated aorta to the contractile effect of noradrenaline was decreased by Amlo 5, but not by Amlo 20.

CONCLUSIONS

In Sprague-Dawley rats, high-dose amlodipine, while promoting neurohormonal activation, induced overexpression of preproendothelin-1 mRNA in the ventricles and aorta. Endothelin-1 overexpression could contribute to the lack of inhibitory effect of high-dose amlodipine on ventricular mass in normotensive rats.