1
|
Does Vaccinating against Influenza in a Given Epidemic Season Have an Impact on Vaccination in the Next Season: A Follow-Up Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19137976. [PMID: 35805631 PMCID: PMC9265947 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
To improve the uptake of influenza vaccine in the elderly, it is important to understand the factors that predict vaccination. The study objective was to explain influenza vaccination uptake in the next season (2019/2020) in a sample of primary care clinic patients from Gryfino, Poland, vaccinated in 2018/2019 with the free-of-charge quadrivalent vaccine. A baseline and a follow-up survey assessed respondent intentions to receive a vaccine (2018), then (2020) vaccine uptake and its predictors. Patients (n = 108, 54.6% males, Mage = 66.7 ± 6.7) filled in a researcher-administered questionnaire. A majority (69.3%) intended to get vaccinated in the next season, with 25.9% receipt. Of those willing to be immunized, only 31.9% were vaccinated in the next season; of those whose decision was dependent on reimbursement, none received influenza vaccine; of undecided patients, 23.1% were vaccinated. Multivariable analysis indicated that living with a partner (OR 6.22, p = 0.01), being employed (OR = 4.55, p = 0.05) and past vaccination behavior (OR 4.12; p = 0.04) were predictors of vaccine uptake. The findings show limited follow-through on initial influenza vaccination plans for the nearest season in previously vaccinated elderly patients. Future interventions should additionally focus on unanticipated barriers to vaccination, such as those revealed in this study, to increase vaccination coverage rates.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sugishita Y, Sugawara T. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for elderly people. Vaccine 2021; 39:7531-7540. [PMID: 34857422 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
For elderly people who have low incidence of influenza, calculation of credible vaccine effectiveness (VE) sometimes becomes difficult. Currently, VE for elderly people is insufficient to ascertain the precise efficacy specifically. Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination of elderly people is discussed widely in terms of topics and areas. This report describes research results demonstrating influenza vaccination effectiveness among elderly people based on recent findings. Newly available influenza vaccination for elderly people appears to be cost-effective compared with that of trivalent inactiveted influenza vaccine. Overall, for all influenza virus types, it remains unclear whether influenza vaccination shows high VE. A decreasing effect of repeated vaccination was confirmed partially by test negative design and a serological study of cohorts. However, some studies have found no such decreasing effect. Measurement of VE and subsequent analysis of the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for elderly people requires long-term monitoring using serological studies and test negative design.
Collapse
|
3
|
Liprandi ÁS, Liprandi MIS, Zaidel EJ, Aisenberg GM, Baranchuk A, Barbosa ECD, Sánchez GB, Alexander B, Zanetti FTL, Santi RL, Múnera-Echeverri AG, Perel P, Piskorz D, Ruiz-Mori CE, Saucedo J, Valdez O, Juanatey JRG, Piñeiro DJ, Pinto FJ, Quintana FSW. Influenza Vaccination for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Americas: Consensus document of the Inter-American Society of Cardiology and the Word Heart Federation. Glob Heart 2021; 16:55. [PMID: 34381676 PMCID: PMC8344961 DOI: 10.5334/gh.1069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular mortality is decreasing but remains the leading cause of death world-wide. Respiratory infections such as influenza significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Despite of proven benefits, influenza vaccination is not fully implemented, especially in Latin America. Objective The aim was to develop a regional consensus with recommendations regarding influenza vaccination and cardiovascular disease. Methods A multidisciplinary team composed by experts in the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease from the Americas, convened by the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC) and the World Heart Federation (WHF), participated in the process and the formulation of statements. The modified RAND/UCLA methodology was used. This document was supported by a grant from the WHF. Results An extensive literature search was divided into seven questions, and a total of 23 conclusions and 29 recommendations were achieved. There was no disagreement among experts in the conclusions or recommendations. Conclusions There is a strong correlation between influenza and cardiovascular events. Influenza vaccination is not only safe and a proven strategy to reduce cardiovascular events, but it is also cost saving. We found several barriers for its global implementation and potential strategies to overcome them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Sosa Liprandi
- School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, AR
- Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Güemes, Buenos Aires, AR
- InterAmerican Society of Cardiology, AR
| | | | - Ezequiel José Zaidel
- Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Güemes, Buenos Aires, AR
- Pharmacology Department, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, AR
| | - Gabriel M. Aisenberg
- University of Texas John P and Kathrine G McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, Texas, US
| | - Adrián Baranchuk
- Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Science Center, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, CA
| | - Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Sao Francisco-Santa Casa, Porto Alegre, BR
- Artery LatAm, LatinAmerican Society of Hypertension, BR
| | - Gabriela Borrayo Sánchez
- Cardiology Department, Mexican Social Security Institute, Mexican National Association of Cardiologists, MX
| | - Bryce Alexander
- Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Science Center, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, CA
| | | | - Ricardo López Santi
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de La Plata, Buenos Aires, AR
- Argentine Federation of Cardiology, AR
| | | | - Pablo Perel
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, GB
- World Heart Federation, Geneva, CH
| | - Daniel Piskorz
- Argentine Federation of Cardiology, AR
- Cardiology Department, British Hospital of Rosario, Santa Fe, AR
| | | | - Jorge Saucedo
- Cardiology Department, Froedtert Hospital and Medical College, Milwaukee, US
| | - Osiris Valdez
- Cardiology Department, Centro Médico Central Romana, La Romana, DO
- Central America Society of Hypertension, DO
| | - José Ramón González Juanatey
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spanish Society of Cardiology, ES
| | | | - Fausto J. Pinto
- World Heart Federation, Geneva, CH
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Santa María, PT
- University of Lisbon, PT
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination in older people: An umbrella review of evidence from meta-analyses of both observational and randomized controlled studies. Ageing Res Rev 2020; 62:101118. [PMID: 32565328 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination is the main public health intervention to prevent influenza. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination including systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Peer-reviewed systematic reviews with meta-analyses of prospective studies that investigated the association of influenza vaccination with any health-related outcome, as well as RCTs that investigated the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination, were included. Among 1240 references, 6 meta-analyses were included. In cohort studies of community-dwelling older people influenza vaccination was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart disease and for influenza/pneumonia (strength of evidence: convincing). Evidence in lowering the risk of mortality in community-dwelling older people, of all deaths/severe respiratory diseases in high risk community-dwelling older people and of hospitalization for influenza/pneumonia in case-control studies, was highly suggestive. In RCTs, influenza vaccination, compared to placebo/no intervention, was associated to higher risk of local tenderness/sore arm and to a reduced risk of influenza like-illness. Both these associations showed moderate evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). In conclusion, influenza vaccination in older people seems safe and effective. Further, the evidence on safety and efficacy of vaccines in this population might benefit by an extension of the follow-up period both in RCTs and in longitudinal studies, beyond the usual 6-month period, in order to be able to evaluate the impact of vaccination on long term outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ganczak M, Gil K, Korzeń M, Bażydło M. Coverage and Influencing Determinants of Influenza Vaccination in Elderly Patients in a Country with a Poor Vaccination Implementation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2017. [PMID: 28632192 PMCID: PMC5486351 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The seasonal influenza vaccination uptake of the elderly in Poland is one of the lowest in Europe. Objective: to assess the vaccination coverage and influencing determinants in patients ≥65 years of age. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted (November 2015–April 2016) among consecutive patients admitted to a municipal hospital located in the city of Szczecin, North-west Poland. Patients completed researcher-administered, anonymous questionnaires on socio- demographic data/factors related to the vaccination. Results: The response rate: 92.0%. Among 230 patients (79.6% women, median of age 69 years, range 65–89) who agreed to participate, 34.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.6–41.0%) were vaccinated. About 15.7% of respondents had not previously heard about the vaccination; 41.3% of those who stated they were vaccinated or planned on being vaccinated the following year, compared to 19.3% of respondents who stated they were not currently vaccinated (p < 0.001). A multivariable regression analysis revealed that patient factors, such as younger age (Odds Ratio, OR = 7.69), living in the urban area (OR = 7.69), having comorbidities (OR = 2.70), having a vaccinated family member (OR = 3.57), and being informed about vaccination (OR = 5.00) were each associated with greater odds of being immunized. Willingness for vaccination the next year was strongly associated (OR = 8.59) with vaccination status. Conclusions: The influenza vaccination uptake in the elderly population in Poland is disturbingly low. Improved education strategies are needed to increase the uptake. Vaccinated respondents are more likely to plan on being vaccinated the following year. Future interventions related to maximizing vaccination coverage should be more tailored, focusing especially on older patients living in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ganczak
- Department of Epidemiology and Management, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Karolina Gil
- Students' Scientific Association, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Marcin Korzeń
- Department of Methods of Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Marta Bażydło
- Department of Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shields GE, Elvidge J, Davies LM. A systematic review of economic evaluations of seasonal influenza vaccination for the elderly population in the European Union. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014847. [PMID: 28601824 PMCID: PMC5623429 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Council of the European Union (EU) has recommended that action should be taken to increase influenza vaccination in the elderly population. The aims were to systematically review and critically appraise economic evaluations for influenza vaccination in the elderly population in the EU. METHODS Electronic searches of the NHS Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, MEDLINE and Embase databases were run to identify full economic evaluations. Two levels of screening were used, with explicit inclusion criteria applied by two independent reviewers at each stage. Prespecified data extraction and critical appraisal were performed on identified studies. Results were summarised qualitatively. RESULTS Of the 326 search results, screening identified eight relevant studies. Results varied widely, with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranging from being both more effective and cheaper than no intervention to costing €4 59 350 per life-year gained. Cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to variations in influenza strain, vaccination type and strategy, population and modelling characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Most studies suggest that vaccination is cost-effective (seven of eight studies identified at least one cost-effective scenario). All but one study used economic models to synthesise data from different sources. The results are uncertain due to the methods used and the relevance and robustness of the data used. Sensitivity analysis to explore these aspects was limited. Integrated, controlled prospective clinical and economic evaluations and surveillance data are needed to improve the evidence base. This would allow more advanced modelling techniques to characterise the epidemiology of influenza more accurately and improve the robustness of cost-effectiveness estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma E Shields
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jamie Elvidge
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda M Davies
- Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kwon DS, Kim K, Park SM. Factors associated with influenza vaccination coverage among the elderly in South Korea: the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV). BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012618. [PMID: 28031209 PMCID: PMC5223688 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The annual outbreak of influenza is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality among the elderly population around the world. While there is an annual vaccine available to prevent or reduce the incidence of disease, not all older people in Korea choose to be vaccinated. There have been few previous studies to examine the factors influencing influenza vaccination in Korea. Thus, this study identifies nationwide factors that affect influenza vaccination rates in elderly Koreans. METHODS We obtained data from the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2009 (KNHANES IV), a nationwide health survey in Korea. To assess influenza vaccination status, we analysed answers to a single question from the survey. From the respondents, we selected 3567 elderly population aged 65 years or older, to analyse the effects of variables including sociodemographic, health behavioural risk, health status and psychological factors on vaccination coverage. We identified factors that affect vaccination status using a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The rate of influenza vaccination in this elderly population was 75.8%. Overall, the most significant determinants for choosing influenza vaccination were a recent history of health screening (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.26, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.66) and smoking (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.98). Other contributing factors were age, household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, physical activity level, self-reported health status and a limitation in daily activities. In contrast, psychological factors, including self-perceived quality of life, stress and depressive mood, did not show close association with vaccination coverage. CONCLUSIONS To boost influenza vaccination rates in the elderly, an influenza campaign should focus on under-represented groups, especially smokers. Additionally, promoting routine health screening for the elderly may be an efficient way to help achieve higher vaccination rates. Our results highlight the need for a new strategy for the vaccination campaign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Soonil Kwon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyuwoong Kim
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang Min Park
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Boer PT, Frederix GWJ, Feenstra TL, Vemer P. Unremarked or Unperformed? Systematic Review on Reporting of Validation Efforts of Health Economic Decision Models in Seasonal Influenza and Early Breast Cancer. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2016; 34:833-845. [PMID: 27129572 PMCID: PMC4980411 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0410-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transparent reporting of validation efforts of health economic models give stakeholders better insight into the credibility of model outcomes. In this study we reviewed recently published studies on seasonal influenza and early breast cancer in order to gain insight into the reporting of model validation efforts in the overall health economic literature. METHODS A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Embase to retrieve health economic modelling studies published between 2008 and 2014. Reporting on model validation was evaluated by checking for the word validation, and by using AdViSHE (Assessment of the Validation Status of Health Economic decision models), a tool containing a structured list of relevant items for validation. Additionally, we contacted corresponding authors to ask whether more validation efforts were performed other than those reported in the manuscripts. RESULTS A total of 53 studies on seasonal influenza and 41 studies on early breast cancer were included in our review. The word validation was used in 16 studies (30 %) on seasonal influenza and 23 studies (56 %) on early breast cancer; however, in a minority of studies, this referred to a model validation technique. Fifty-seven percent of seasonal influenza studies and 71 % of early breast cancer studies reported one or more validation techniques. Cross-validation of study outcomes was found most often. A limited number of studies reported on model validation efforts, although good examples were identified. Author comments indicated that more validation techniques were performed than those reported in the manuscripts. CONCLUSIONS Although validation is deemed important by many researchers, this is not reflected in the reporting habits of health economic modelling studies. Systematic reporting of validation efforts would be desirable to further enhance decision makers' confidence in health economic models and their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter T de Boer
- Department of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics (PTEE), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Talitha L Feenstra
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn Vemer
- Department of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics (PTEE), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hashim A, Dang V, Bolotin S, Crowcroft NS. How and why researchers use the number needed to vaccinate to inform decision making--a systematic review. Vaccine 2014; 33:753-8. [PMID: 25543164 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) is a measure that has been widely used in the scientific literature to draw conclusions about the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of various immunization programmes. The main objective of this review is to examine how and why the NNV has been used and reported in the published literature. METHODS Electronic databases were searched and records were screened against the eligibility criteria by two independent authors. We included papers that reported and interpreted NNV. RESULTS We identified 27 studies, the designs including observational studies, economic analyses, systematic reviews, and commentaries. The NNV has been used in the literature to describe three main themes: potential benefits of vaccination programmes, cost-effectiveness, and economic analyses, and modelling studies to compare different vaccination strategies. CONCLUSIONS NNV has been used in a wide variety of ways in the literature, yet there are no defined thresholds for what is a favourable NNV. Furthermore, the generalizability of the NNV is usually limited. Further work is required to determine the most appropriate use of this measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Hashim
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1V2.
| | - Vica Dang
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1V2.
| | - Shelly Bolotin
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1V2; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , 155 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7.
| | - Natasha S Crowcroft
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1V2; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , 155 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Preaud E, Durand L, Macabeo B, Farkas N, Sloesen B, Palache A, Shupo F, Samson SI. Annual public health and economic benefits of seasonal influenza vaccination: a European estimate. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:813. [PMID: 25103091 PMCID: PMC4141103 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination is currently the most effective means of preventing influenza infection. Yet evidence of vaccine performance, and the impact and value of seasonal influenza vaccination across risk groups and between seasons, continue to generate much discussion. Moreover, vaccination coverage is below recommended levels. METHODS A model was generated to assess the annual public health benefits and economic importance of influenza vaccination in 5 WHO recommended vaccination target groups (children 6 - 23 months of age; persons with underlying chronic health conditions; pregnant women; health care workers; and, the elderly, 65 years of age) in 27 countries of the European Union. Model estimations were based on standard calculation methods, conservative assumptions, age-based and country-specific data. RESULTS Out of approximately 180 million Europeans for whom influenza vaccination is recommended, only about 80 million persons are vaccinated. Seasonal influenza vaccination currently prevents an annual average of between 1.6 million and 2.1 million cases of influenza, 45,300 to 65,600 hospitalizations, and 25,200 to 37,200 deaths. To reach the 75% vaccination coverage target set by the EU Council Recommendation in 2009, an additional 57.4 million person would need to be vaccinated in the elderly and other risk groups. By achieving the 75% target rate set in EU-27 countries, average annual influenza- related events averted would increase from current levels to an additional +1.6 to +1.7 million cases, +23,800 to +31,400 hospitalization, +9,800 to +14,300 deaths, +678,500 to +767,800 physician visits, and +883,800 to +1,015,100 lost days of work yearly. Influenza-related costs averted because of vaccination would increase by an additional + €190 to + €226 million yearly, in vaccination target groups. CONCLUSIONS Full implementation of current influenza vaccination recommendations of 75% vaccination coverage rate (VCR) in Europe by the 2014-2015 influenza season could immediately reduce an important public health and economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laure Durand
- />Sanofi Pasteur, 2, Avenue Pont Pasteur, Lyon, 69007 France
| | | | - Norbert Farkas
- />Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics AG, Lichtstrasse 35, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Abraham Palache
- />Abbott, C.J. van Houtenlaan 36, 1381 CP Weesp, The Netherlands
| | - Francis Shupo
- />Creativ-Ceutical Ltd, The Bank Chambers, Borough High Street, London, SE1 9QQ UK
| | | | - on behalf of Vaccines Europe influenza working group
- />Sanofi Pasteur MSD, 162 av Jean Jaures, Lyon, 69367 France
- />Sanofi Pasteur, 2, Avenue Pont Pasteur, Lyon, 69007 France
- />Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics AG, Lichtstrasse 35, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
- />GlaxoSmithKline, Rue de l’Institut 89, Rixensart, Belgium
- />Abbott, C.J. van Houtenlaan 36, 1381 CP Weesp, The Netherlands
- />Creativ-Ceutical Ltd, The Bank Chambers, Borough High Street, London, SE1 9QQ UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kovács G, Kovács G, Kaló Z, Kaló Z, Jahnz-Rozyk K, Jahnz-Rozyk K, Kyncl J, Kyncl J, Csohan A, Csohan A, Pistol A, Pistol A, Leleka M, Leleka M, Kipshakbaev R, Kipshakbaev R, Durand L, Durand L, Macabeo B, Macabeo B. Medical and economic burden of influenza in the elderly population in central and eastern European countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013; 10:428-40. [PMID: 24165394 PMCID: PMC4185899 DOI: 10.4161/hv.26886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Revised: 10/09/2013] [Accepted: 10/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Influenza affects 5-15% of the population during an epidemic. In Western Europe, vaccination of at-risk groups forms the cornerstone of influenza prevention. However, vaccination coverage of the elderly (> 65 y) is often low in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE); potentially because a paucity of country-specific data limits evidence-based policy making. Therefore the medical and economic burden of influenza were estimated in elderly populations in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Poland, Romania, and Ukraine. Data covering national influenza vaccination policies, surveillance and reporting, healthcare costs, populations, and epidemiology were obtained via literature review, open-access websites and databases, and interviews with experts. A simplified model of patient treatment flow incorporating cost, population, and incidence/prevalence data was used to calculate the influenza burden per country. In the elderly, influenza represented a large burden on the assessed healthcare systems, with yearly excess hospitalization rates of ~30/100,000. Burden varied between countries and was likely influenced by population size, surveillance system, healthcare provision, and vaccine coverage. The greatest burden was found in Poland, where direct costs were over EUR 5 million. Substantial differences in data availability and quality were identified, and to fully quantify the burden of influenza in CEE, influenza reporting systems should be standardized. This study most probably underestimates the real burden of influenza, however the public health problem is recognized worldwide, and will further increase with population aging. Extending influenza vaccination of the elderly may be a cost-effective way to reduce the burden of influenza in CEE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute; Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute; Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Jan Kyncl
- National Institute of Public Health; Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology; Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Kyncl
- National Institute of Public Health; Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology; Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Agnes Csohan
- Bela Johan National Center for Epidemiology; Budapest, Hungary
| | - Agnes Csohan
- Bela Johan National Center for Epidemiology; Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Mariya Leleka
- I. Ya.Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University; Ternopil, Ukraine
| | - Mariya Leleka
- I. Ya.Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University; Ternopil, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|