Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Possible Candidate for Extended Criteria of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic Diagnosis and Therapy for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer

Epstein-Barr-virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) represents almost 7% of all GC and is a distinct subtype of GC with extreme DNA hypermethylation. EBVaGC is a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte-rich tumor with little lymph-node metastasis in its early stage and with a relatively favorable prognosis in its advanced stage. Using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, we recognize EBVaGC as a mainly depressed type with SMT-like protrusion in the upper part of the stomach near the gastric mucosal atrophic border or remnant stomach. The EBVaGC recognition rate of 21.4% with the endoscopic motif is not high, and further progress in endoscopic diagnosis of EBVaGC is needed. As less invasive endoscopic therapy, the extension of the criteria of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early EBVaGC with little lymph-node metastasis should be discussed. Endoscopic diagnosis of EBVaGC may be relevant for the selection of patients who could benefit from endoscopic treatment or chemotherapy.

Epstein–Barr virus detection in endoscopic submucosal dissection‐proven early gastric cancer with mixed‐type histology

BACKGROUNDS

Early gastric cancer (EGC) with mixed-type histology is a significant risk factor for additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). On the other hand, Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) with mixed-type histology is a favorable risk factor with regard to lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

We performed EBV detection in 13 ESD-proven lesions in 13 cases of early gastric cancer with mixed-type histology using EBV-encoded small RNA1 in situ hybridization (EBER1 ISH).

RESULTS

EBVaGC was diagnosed in only one (7.7%) of the tested lesions. That EBVaGC patient underwent surgery and there was no residual lesion and no lymph metastasis. EBVaGC is not frequent in EGC with mixed-type histology.

CONCLUSIONS

EBV testing of gastric biopsy specimens seems not to be useful to predict the mixed-type histology results of ESD. However, EBV testing for ESD specimens of EGC with mixed-type histology is expected to be useful for avoiding excessive additional surgery.

Clinicopathological features of Epstein-Barr virus-associated superficial early stage gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is known to be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. EBV-associated early gastric carcinoma (EBVEGC) has a lower incidence of lymph node involvement and could be an expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) treatment.

AIM

To clarify the prevalence and clinicopathological features of EBVEGC.

METHODS

This study reviewed 618 lesions in 519 patients treated with ESD between 2014 and 2016. Tissue microarray sections were subjected to in situ hybridization staining for EBV-encoded small RNA transcripts (EBER). Lesions positive for EBER were compared with control lesions and were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

12 (1.9%) of the 618 lesions were EBVEGC. EBVEGCs were more frequently located near the atrophic border than control lesions in the middle or upper stomach and were reddish. EBVEGC invasion was deeper and more often histologically undifferentiated. On narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy, the EBVEGC group significantly more often showed an endoscopic lace pattern, defined as an absent or obscure microsurface pattern and a microvascular pattern of a tiny, dense, and irregular subepithelial capillary network. The rate of curative resection was significantly lower in the EBVEGC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 1.9% of the ESD specimens were EBV-positive. Endoscopic features could raise clinical suspicion of EBV infection.

Data Set for Reporting Carcinoma of the Stomach in Gastrectomy

Context.—

A standardized detailed surgical pathology report is the cornerstone of gastric cancer management.

Objective.—

To guide management and prognostication for patients with gastric carcinomas globally, the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting aimed to produce an evidence-based international pathology reporting data set with a panel of globally recognized expert pathologists and clinicians.

Design.—

Based on published guidelines/data sets for gastric carcinomas, a working draft was developed by the chair of the expert panel of pathologists and clinicians. The draft was then circulated to the panel and discussed in a series of teleconferences and email communications until consensus was achieved. The draft data set was uploaded on the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting Web site for public comment. The data set was reviewed in consideration of the feedback, and a final version was approved by the panel.

Results.—

This data set was developed for gastrectomy specimens for primary gastric carcinomas, including neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, nonepithelial malignancies, and secondary tumors were excluded from this data set. The final data set contains 15 core (required) elements and 8 noncore (recommended) elements. A commentary is provided for each element.

Conclusions.—

The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting has published freely available, evidence-based data sets for gastric cancer reporting. Standardized reporting has been shown to improve patient care and facilitates data exchange and analysis for quality assurance, cancer epidemiology, and clinical and basic research.

A rare case of Epstein-Barr virus-positive early gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma successfully treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection alone

Gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (GCLS), a rare subset of gastric cancer, has a low frequency of lymphovascular invasion and a relatively better prognosis compared with conventional gastric cancer. We herein report a rare case of early GCLS successfully treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection alone. The lesion was located in the upper gastric body and approximately 9 mm in size. We assessed that the lesion was within an absolute indication for endoscopic resection. We performed endoscopic submucosal dissection and succeeded in en bloc resection. A histopathological assessment disclosed that the carcinoma was poorly differentiated with massive infiltration of lymphocyte and invaded the submucosal layer massively at 1000 μm in depth. There were no visible lymphovascular invasions in the specimen. Since the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded small RNA in situ hybridization revealed that cancer cells were positive for EBV, the patient was finally diagnosed with EBV-positive GCLS. We persuaded the patient to receive an additional surgery; however, the patient refused to undergo it. The patient has been followed for more than 5 years without recurrence.

Endoscopic and pathologic motifs for the clinical diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus‐associated gastric cancer

Objectives

Based on the recent therapeutic trends for gastric cancer (GC), the clinical impact of the diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)‐associated GC (EBVaGC) appears to be important. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic and pathologic motifs of GC lesions to narrow the number of candidates for EBV testing.

Methods

We performed EBV tests for 32 upper gastrointestinal lesions of 32 patients in the clinical setting. These tests were ordered by endoscopists or by pathologists without an endoscopist's order. EBV‐encoded small RNA1 (EBER1) in situ hybridization was used for the EBV tests. The endoscopic motif for the EBV test was the location in the upper part of the stomach or remnant stomach, mainly the depressed type with a submucosal tumor‐like protrusion of the lesion. The pathologic motif was carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (CLS) or CLS‐like histology of the lesion. We retrospectively analyzed the results of EBV tests for the endoscopic and pathologic motifs.

Results

The final pathological diagnoses of the 32 subjects were 26 GCs including CLS, gastric endocrine cell carcinoma, gastric hepatoid carcinoma, gastric T‐cell lymphoma, gastritis of the remnant stomach, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. When nontypical lesions were excluded, the EBER1‐positive rate was 42.3% (11/26) in GCs. Of the 14 GC lesions ordered examined by endoscopists, three (21.4%) were EBVaGC. Eight of the 12 (66.7%) GCs ordered examined by pathologists were EBVaGC.

Conclusions

The pathologic motif is expected to be useful and the endoscopic motif may be helpful for EBVaGC diagnosis.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: disease that requires special approach

Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer [EBV-associated GC, EBV( +) GC] is a distinct molecular subtype of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. It accounts for up to 10% of all molecular subtypes of gastric cancer (GC). It has unique genetic and epigenetic features, which determine its definitive phenotype with male and younger age predominance, proximal stomach localization, and diffuse adenocarcinoma histology. EBV( +) GC also has a unique epigenetic profile and mutational status with frequent mutations of PIK3CA, ARID1A and BCOR, and PD-L1 and PD-L2 amplifications, as well. The aim of this review is to highlight clinical significance of EBV( +) GC and prognostic role of EBV infection, and to determine potentially appropriate drug therapy for this disease.