EUS-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Perihilar Biliary Strictures after Further Transpapillary Intervention Has Been Judged to Be Impossible or Ineffective

Suprapapillary placement of plastic versus metal stents for malignant biliary hilar obstructions: a multicenter, randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of the suprapapillary placement of inside plastic stents (iPSs) for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstructions (MHOs) is unknown compared with that of uncovered inside metal stents (iMSs). This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic placement of these stents for unresectable MHOs.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized study was conducted at 12 Japanese institutions. The enrolled patients with unresectable MHOs were allocated to iPS and iMS groups. The primary outcome was defined as the time to recurrent biliary obstruction in patients for whom the intervention was both technically and clinically successful.

RESULTS

Among 87 enrollments, 38 patients in the iPS group and 46 patients in the iMS group were analyzed. Technical success rates were 100% (38 of 38) and 96.6% (44 of 46), respectively (P = 1.00). After transferring 1 unsuccessful iMS-group patient to the iPS group (since iPSs were deployed), the clinical success rates were 90.0% (35 of 39) for the iPS group and 88.9% (40 of 45) for the iMS group from a per-protocol analysis (P = 1.00). Among the patients with clinical success, the median times to recurrent biliary obstruction were 250 (95% confidence interval, 85-415) and 361 (95% confidence interval, 107-615) days (log-rank test, P = .34). No differences were detected in rates of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This Phase II randomized trial did not show any statistically significant difference in stent patency between suprapapillary plastic versus metal stents. Considering the potential advantages of plastic stents for malignant hilar obstruction, these findings suggest that suprapapillary plastic stents could be a viable alternative to metal stents for this condition.

Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Background and Aim

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2015 and January 2022 were included in this study. Patient characteristics and procedural details were retrospectively analyzed. Guidewire manipulations were classified as conventional technique or loop technique, based on the shape of the guidewire tip.

Results

A total of 52 patients (Median age: 73 years, 38 male and 14 female) underwent EUS-HGS. The median guidewire insertion time was 49 s and the median overall procedure time was 20.5 min. The initial guidewire direction was toward the peripheral side in 23 patients (44%). Technical success rate of the EUS-HGS was 100%. Twenty patients (38%) underwent the procedure using the loop technique and 32 (62%) with the conventional technique. In the logistic regression analysis, an angle between the bile duct and needle of >70° was independently associated with use of the loop technique (OR 9.84; 95% CI: 2.24-43.13; P <0.01).

Conclusion

This study revealed the utility of the loop technique in EUS-HGS. This technique is recommended if the bile duct is punctured at an angle >70°.

Efficacy of EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in prolonging survival of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background and Objectives

The background of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients treated with EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS).

Methods

All patients with pCCA who underwent EUS-HGS from 2010 to 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was clinical success; the secondary outcomes were technical success, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and oncological outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were analyzed to identify variables related to survival.

Results

Thirty-four patients (50% females, 76 years old) were included; 24 (70.6%) presented with distant metastasis. Indications for EUS-HGS were ERCP failure (64.7%), duodenal stricture (23.5%), postsurgical anatomy (5.9%), and dilation limited to the left intrahepatic duct (5.9%). The technical success rate was 97.1%. The clinical success rate was 64.7%. Nine (26.5%) presented AEs, 2 fatal (bleeding and leakage). The overall survival was 91 (31-263) days. On multivariate analysis, EUS-HGS clinical success (Exp[b]: 0.23 [0.09-0.60]; P = 0.003) and chemotherapy (Exp[b]: 0.06 [0.02-0.23]; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with survival. The survival was longer in patients who achieved EUS-HGS clinical success (178[61-393] vs. 15[73-24] days; hazard ratio: 6.3; P < 0.001) and in those starting chemotherapy (324[178-439] vs. 31 [9-48]; hazard ratio: 1.2; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

EUS-HGS is effective in pCCA patients despite a not negligible AE rate. Clinical success, potentially leading to jaundice resolution and chemotherapy start, significantly improves survival.

Recent advances regarding endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is still associated with a number of controversies to be resolved. The superiority of bilateral drainage in comparison to unilateral drainage has not been proven obviously yet. However, bilateral drainage is necessary to treat obstructive jaundice in some UMHBO patients, and this may be connected with preservation of the functional liver volume. The partial stent-in-stent (SIS) method and side-by-side (SBS) method developed as bilateral drainage methods. There is no significant difference in the technical or clinical success rates of the SIS and SBS methods. In addition, these methods are comparable in terms of adverse events, patency period, and survival period. On the other hand, reintervention for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after the SBS method seems to be easier in comparison to cases with RBO after the SIS method; however, there is no remarkable difference in the clinical results of these procedures. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage also has become an option for patients with UMHBO. Left hepatic drainage using EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has become common; however, few studies have reported the results of bridging drainage for the right lobe using the EUS-HGS route or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy. A few studies addressed the results of newly designed stents, such as the 6-mm braided metal stent and inside stent. The development of various drainage methods and new devices is necessary for the further advancement of endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with UMHBO, further studies to evaluate those methods and devices are warranted.

Usefulness of a newly designed laser-cut metal stent with an anchoring hook and thin delivery system for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in experimental settings (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is associated with high rates of adverse events. The present study evaluated the feasibility of a newly designed stent equipped with a dilatation and antimigration system for EUS-HGS in phantom and animal models.

METHODS

The newly designed stent was a partially covered laser-cut stent with antimigration anchoring hooks and a thin tapered tip (7.2F). The feasibility of these stents for biliary obstruction was compared with that of conventional stents. Evaluated outcomes were resistance force to migration in phantom and ex vivo models, rates of technical success and adverse events, and histology in an in vivo model.

RESULTS

The resistance forces on the distal (3.59 vs 1.73 N and 6.21 vs 1.74 N) and proximal (3.58 vs 1.5 N and 5.97 vs 1.67 N) sides in phantom and ex vivo models were significantly higher for hook stents than for conventional stents. Although EUS-HGS was successfully performed in all cases with both stents (100% [10/10] vs 100% [8/8]), the success rate of EUS-HGS without using a fistulous tract dilation device was significantly higher with hook stents (100% [10/10]) than with conventional stents (13% [1/8]). No adverse events occurred with either stent. Pathologic examination showed adhesion between the stomach and liver.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong resistance to migration and the absence of the dilation step are important advantages of newly designed hook stents. These stents may therefore be feasible and safe for EUS-HGS.

Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as a rescue of re-intervention after the placement of multiple metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Endoscopic transpapillary re-intervention (ETP-RI) after multiple self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is challenging, but endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) could be an alternative following failed ETP-RI. We investigated appropriate re-intervention (RI) methods in MHBO after multiple SEMS placement and evaluated RI with EUS-BD (EUS-RI) benefits following ETP-RI failure.

METHODS

Patients requiring RI after multiple SEMS placement for MHBO between October 2017 and April 2021 were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, metallic-stent type, stent-placement configuration, overall survival, stent patency, re-intervention results, and re-intervention technical and clinical success rates were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients underwent ETP-RI for MHBO. ETP-RI's technical success rate was 69.4%. Of 15 failed ETP-RI cases, all underwent EUS-RI, achieving technical and clinical success rates of 86.7% and 100%, respectively. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) after RI was significantly different between EUS-RI and ETP-RI (212 vs 84 days; P = .01). On multivariate analysis, EUS-RI was the only factor associated with TRBO (odds ratio: 4.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-19.91; P = .04). Acute pancreatitis and bile peritonitis were present in 6.1% of ETP-RI and 13.3% of EUS-RI cases, respectively; both improved conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-RI was effective and safe in difficult ETP-RI cases after multiple SEMS placement for MHBO.

EUS-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage: a large retrospective series and subgroup comparison between percutaneous drainage in hilar stenoses or postsurgical anatomy

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage (EUS-IBD) struggles to find a place in management algorithms, especially compared to percutaneous drainage (PTBD). In the setting of hilar stenoses or postsurgical anatomy data are even more limited. Patients and methods  All consecutive EUS-IBDs performed in our tertiary referral center between 2012 - 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Rendez-vous (RVs), antegrade stenting (AS) and hepatico-gastrostomies (HGs) were compared. The predefined subgroup of EUS-IBD patients with proximal stenosis/surgically-altered anatomy was matched 1:1 with PTBD performed for the same indications. Efficacy, safety and events during follow-up were compared. Results  One hundred four EUS-IBDs were included (malignancies = 87.7 %). These consisted of 16 RVs, 43 ASs and 45 HGs. Technical and clinical success rates were 89.4 % and 96.2 %, respectively. Any-degree, severe and fatal adverse events (AEs) occurred in 23.3 %, 2.9 %, and 0.9 % respectively. Benign indications were more common among RVs while proximal stenoses, surgically-altered anatomy, and disconnected left ductal system among HGs. Procedures were shorter with HGs performed with specifically designed stents (25 vs . 48 minutes, P  = 0.004) and there was also a trend toward less dysfunction with those stents (6.7 % vs . 30 %, P  = 0.09) compared with previous approaches. Among patients with proximal stenosis/surgically-altered anatomy, EUS-IBD vs. PTBD showed higher rates of clinical success (97.4 % vs. 79.5 %, P  = 0.01), reduced post-procedural pain (17.8 % vs. 44.4 %, p = 0.004), shorter median hospital stay (7.5 vs 11.5 days, P  = 0.01), lower rates of stent dysfunction (15.8 % vs. 42.9 %, P  = 0.01), and the mean number of reinterventions was lower (0.4 vs. 2.8, P  < 0.0001). Conclusions  EUS-IBD has high technical and clinical success with an acceptable safety profile. HGs show comparable outcomes, which are likely to further improve with dedicated tools. For proximal strictures and surgically-altered anatomy, EUS-IBD seems superior to PTBD.

The placement of multiple plastic stents still has important roles in candidates for chemotherapy for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Placement of uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (U-SEMSs) of patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (UPHC) is recommended as the treatment of first choice to address bile stasis. The aim of this study was to determine which of the following two endoscopic stents might be the stent of first choice for the treatment of biliary stasis in patients with UPHC: plastic stents (PSs) or U-SEMSs.

METHODS

U-SEMSs, deployed as a stent-in-stent, were selected as the stents of first choice from 2013 and 2014, while PSs began to be selected as the stents of first choice from 2015 onward.

RESULTS

The median time to recurrent biliary obstruction were 66 days in the PS group (N = 38) and 105 days in the U-SEMS group (N = 37; P = .04). Emergency endoscopy was necessitated in 76.3% (29/38) of patients of the PS group and 54.1% (20/37) of patients of the U-SEMS group (P = .0434). The success rate of the first reintervention was 96.5% (27/29) in the PS group and 55% (11/20) in the U-SEMS group (P = .0002). Sustainable chemotherapy could be carried out in 55.2% of patients in the PS group and 32.4% of patients in the U-SEMS group (P = .0472). Multivariate analysis identified selection of U-SEMS as the stent of first choice as the only independent factor predictive of successful reintervention (P = .0016, odds ratio = 0.058). However, the stent selection was not an independent factor for feasible chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Plastic stent placement could enhance the success rate of reintervention in patients with UPHC and might be facilitated by sustainable chemotherapy. However, stent selection might not have an influence on the prognosis.

Inside Plastic Stents versus Metal Stents for Treating Unresectable Malignant Perihilar Biliary Obstructions: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Background/Aims:

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of inside plastic stents (iPSs) versus those of metal stents (MSs) for treating unresectable perihilar malignant obstructions.

Methods:

For all patients who underwent endoscopic suprapapillary placement of iPS(s) or MS(s) as the first permanent biliary drainage for unresectable malignant perihilar obstructions between January 2014 and August 2019, clinical outcomes using iPSs (n=20) and MSs (n=85), including clinical efficacy, adverse events, and time to recurrence of biliary obstruction (RBO), were retrospectively evaluated.

Results:

There were no differences in clinical effectiveness (95% for the iPS group vs. 92% for the MS group, p=1.00). Procedure-related adverse events, including pancreatitis, acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, and death, were observed for 8% of the MS group, although no patient in the iPS group developed such adverse events. The median time to RBO was 561 days (95% confidence interval, 0–1,186 days) for iPSs and 209 days (127–291 days) for MSs, showing a significant difference (p=0.008).

Conclusions:

Time to RBO after iPS placement was significantly longer than that after MS placement. IPSs, which are removable, unlike MSs, were an acceptable option.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the biliary system: Techniques, indications and future perspectives

Over the last decade, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has evolved into a widely accepted alternative to the percutaneous approach in cases of biliary obstruction with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP). The available evidence suggests that, in experienced hands, EUS-BD might even replace ERCP as the first-line procedure in specific situations such as malignant distal bile duct obstruction. The aim of this review is to summarize the available data on EUS-BD and propose an evidence-based algorithm clarifies the role of the different EUS-BD techniques in the management of benign and malignant biliary obstructive disease.

Drainage of the right liver under EUS guidance: A bridge technique allowing drainage of the right liver through the left liver into the stomach or jejunum

Background and Objective:

EUS-guided biliary drainage is now comparable to percutaneous drainage. This technique can be used in cases of complex drainage of the hilum, mainly for salvage therapy to drain the left liver. In cases of inaccessible papilla or altered anatomy, EUS-guided biliary drainage for hilar stenosis of the liver could be used as the first approach. However, this technique has limited applicability for the right liver. In this feasibility study, we reported drainage of the right liver using the bridge technique and hepaticogastrostomy.

Patients and Methods:

This retrospective study was based on a prospective registry from January 2013 to February 2017. Patients with inaccessible papilla due to altered anatomy or duodenal invasion and drainage under EUS guidance and bridge technique without previous biliary drainage were included in the study. The bridge technique was used to place an uncovered biliary stent between the right and left liver. The left liver was drained with a hepaticogastrostomy.

Results:

Twelve patients were included in the study. Stenosis was Type II for nine, IIIA for two, and Type IV for one patient. Technical and clinical success was 100% and 83%, respectively. Morbidity was 33% (four patients), including three with abdominal pain managed conservatively and one with a percutaneous salvage drainage. Postoperative mortality was 8% (uncontrolled sepsis). The mean survival was 6 months. Chemotherapy could be administered in 70% (seven) patients in cases of clinical success.

Conclusion:

The bridge technique under EUS guidance could be a first alternative for draining malignant hilar stenosis in cases of the inaccessible papilla.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage for Unresectable Hilar Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage is the current standard of care for unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and bilateral metal stent placement is shown to have longer patency. However, technical and clinical failure is possible and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is sometimes necessary. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is increasingly being reported as an alternative rescue procedure to PTBD. EUS-BD has a potential advantage of not traversing the biliary stricture and internal drainage can be completed in a single session. Some approaches to bilateral biliary drainage for hilar MBO under EUS-guidance include a bridging method, hepaticoduodenostomy, and a combination of EUS-BD and transpapillary biliary drainage. The aim of this review is to summarize data on EUS-BD for hilar MBO and to clarify its advantages over the conventional approaches such as endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage and PTBD.