Endoscopic Treatment of Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Stent implantation is an effective approach for palliative treatment of Bismuth-Corlette type III-IV malignant hilar biliary obstructions (MHBOs). In this article, we reviewed the currently used access methods for biliary stent placement (percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, endoscopic biliary drainage, endosonography guided biliary drainage), the available stent types (plastic stent, self-expanding metallic stent, full cover self-expanding metallic stent, radioactive self-expanding metallic stent), major approaches (unilateral, bilateral) and deployment methods (stent-in-stent, stent-by-stent). Finally, this review gives an outlook on perspectives of development in stenting and other palliative methods in MHBO.

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus endoscopic biliary stenting for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Propensity score-matched multicenter comparative study

OBJECTIVES

For preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO), current guidelines recommend endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) due to the higher risk of cholangitis after endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) during the waiting period before surgery. However, few studies have supported this finding. Therefore, we aimed to compare the outcomes of preoperative ENBD and EBS in patients with MHBO.

METHODS

Patients with MHBO who underwent laparotomy for radical surgery after ENBD or EBS were included from retrospectively collected data from 13 centers (January 2014 to December 2018). We performed a 1:1 propensity score matching between the ENBD and EBS groups. These patients were compared for the following: cholangitis and all adverse events (AEs) after endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) until surgery, time to cholangitis development after EBD, postsurgical AEs, and in-hospital death after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 414 patients identified, 355 were analyzed in this study (226 for ENBD and 129 for EBS). The matched cohort included 63 patients from each group. The proportion of cholangitis after EBD was similar between the two groups (20.6% vs. 25.4%, P = 0.67), and no significant difference was observed in the time to cholangitis development. The proportions of surgical site infections, bile leaks, and in-hospital mortality rates were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

For PBD of MHBO, the proportion of AEs, including cholangitis, after EBD until surgery was similar when either ENBD or EBS was used.

Comparison of Two Types of Guidewires for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: There is insufficient information regarding the optimal guidewire for managing malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Therefore, a newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire was compared with the conventional 0.035-inch guidewire for selective cannulation of both intrahepatic ducts (IHDs) in patients with MHBO. Methods: Patients were randomly enrolled into the curved type newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire group (0.025 group) or the curved type conventional 0.035-inch guidewire group (0.035 group). The primary outcome was the selective cannulation rate of IHD. If the assigned guidewire failed to pass the stricture within 5 min, the crossover guidewire was selected. If the crossover guidewire failed to cross the stricture within the next 5 min, it was judged as a failed selective cannulation of both IHDs. Results: A total of 90 patients were enrolled (0.025 group, n = 47; 0.035 group, n = 43). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the groups regarding sex, age, BMI, obstruction level, and clinical presentation. Four patients (8.5%) in the 0.025 group the cannulation of the IHD failed and the conventional 0.035-inch guidewire was substituted in a second attempt; the 0.035-inch guidewire failed to cross the stricture in all four patients. In the 0.035 group, eleven patients (25.6%) failed to achieve selective cannulation of IHD, and the 0.025-inch guidewire was substituted; the newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire crossed the stricture in ten of these (10/11, 90.9%). The selective cannulation rate of IHD was significantly higher in the 0.025 group (95.1% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.043). Conclusions: The 0.025 group exhibited a higher success rate for selective cannulation of both IHDs in MHBO than did the 0.035 group.

Retrospective evaluation of slim fully covered self-expandable metallic stent for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports of covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for malignant hilar-biliary obstruction (MHBO) because of risk of biliary branch obstruction. We studied feasibility and efficacy of 6-mm-diameter, slim, fully covered SEMS (SFCSEMS) in a relatively large cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated SFCSEMS in unresectable MHBO from December 2016 to September 2021 in Juntendo University Hospital.

RESULTS

We enrolled consecutive 54 unresectable MHBO (18 bile duct, 11 gallbladder, eight pancreatic, two hepatocellular, and 15 metastatic cancer cases) including Bismuth-type II (n = 11), III (n = 17), and IV (n = 26), and placed two (n = 35) or three (n = 19) SFCSEMS. The technical and clinical success rate was 100% and 92.5%, respectively, with 76.3 min of mean procedure time. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) was observed in 35.2% and the median cumulative time to RBO (TRBO) was 181 days. Other adverse events were 11.1% (four mild-pancreatitis, one segmental-cholangitis, and one cholecystitis). There were no failed cases of stent exchange and second SFCSEMS (n = 6) showed significantly lower RBO (16.7% vs. 81.8%, P = .0364) and longer TRBO (undefined vs 86 days; P = .0617) than plastic stent (n = 11).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic placement of SFCSEMS for unresectable MHBO was effective and feasible with low incidence of segmental cholangitis, and exchange strategy of SFCSEMS was promising.

Effect of percutaneous stenting strategy of unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction by three-dimensional reconstruction volumetry

PURPOSE

To explore clinical outcomes of percutaneous stent implantation using volumetric criteria for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Additionally, aimed to identify the predictors of patients' survival.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients who were initially diagnosed with MHBO between January 2013 to December 2019 in our center were retrospectively included. Patients were stratified according to the drainage achieved ≥50%, <50% of the total liver volume. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (≥50% drainage), and Group B (<50% drainage). The main outcomes were evaluated in terms of relief of jaundice, effective drainage rate, and survival. Related factors that affect survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

62.5% of the included patients reached effective biliary drainage. The successful drainage rate was significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.001). The median overall survival (mOS) of included patients was 6.4 months. Patients who received drainage ≥50% of hepatic volume achieved longer mOS than those who received drainage <50% of hepatic volume (7.6 months vs. 3.9 months, respectively, p = 0. 011). Patients who received effective biliary drainage had longer mOS than those who received ineffective biliary drainage (10.8 months vs. 4.4 months, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients who received anticancer treatment had longer mOS than those who only received palliative therapy (8.7 months vs. 4.6 months, respectively, p = 0.014). In the multivariate analysis, KPS Score ≥ 80 (p = 0.037), ≥50% drainage achieved (p = 0.038), and effective biliary drainage (p = 0.036) were protective prognostic factors that affected patients' survival.

CONCLUSION

Drainage achieved ≥50% of the total liver volume by percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting seemed to have a higher effective drainage rate in MHBO patients. Effective biliary drainage may create chances for these patients to receive anticancer therapies that seem to provide survival benefits.

Efficacy of a novel large-cell Niti-S stent with a slim delivery system for hilar biliary obstruction: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

The large-cell Niti-S stent is useful for multiple stenting in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Recently, a novel uncovered self-expandable metallic stent (USEMS) (a Niti-S large-cell SR slim delivery system) was developed. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this USEMS slim delivery system in MHBO patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes related to USEMS placement, the clinical course, and the period to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) were evaluated in MHBO patients who received multiple USEMSs with the Niti-S large-cell SR slim delivery system.

RESULTS

Twenty-two MHBO patients underwent the placement of multiple USEMSs, including the novel slim-delivery stent. Six patients had a past history of upper gastrointestinal reconstruction (Billroth I: 1, Billroth II: 4, Roux-en-Y: 1). The number of USEMSs placed in each patient was 2-6. Three procedures were reinterventions. The new slim delivery system was placed as the first stent in ten patients and as an additional stent in the remaining patients. Seven patients were drained using only Niti-S large-cell SR slim delivery stents. The technical and clinical success rates were both 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Placing multiple USEMSs in patients with a past history of abdominal surgery or in reintervention is difficult. Although difficult cases were included in this study, stent-in-stent placement with the novel Niti-S large-cell SR slim delivery system was useful in treating MHBO patients. In addition, this novel stent might be the first choice for MHBO patients.KEY MESSAGESEndoscopic multistenting for MHBO is challenging. In addition, reintervention or multistenting for MHBO patients with a past history of abdominal surgery becomes more difficult.The novel Niti-S large-cell SR slim delivery USEMS is useful as an additional stent because the delivery system is thin and suitable for a 0.025 guidewire. In addition, the novel stent is of the braided type and has a large mesh. Therefore, the novel stent is expected to have strong radial force and can be used as the first SEMS.The Niti-S large-cell SR slim delivery stent is long enough to be used in patients with upper gastrointestinal reconstruction. Although this study included patients with reintervention or a past history of upper gastrointestinal reconstruction, the technical success rate of multiple stenting for MHBO patients was 100%. The slim-delivery stent might overcome several difficulties of endoscopic multistenting.

The Feasibility of Whole-Liver Drainage with a Novel 8 mm Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent Possessing an Ultra-Slim Introducer for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstructions

BACKGROUND

In the case of an unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO), the optimal drainage method has not yet been established. Recently, an 8 mm, fully covered, self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) with an ultra-slim introducer has become available. In this article, the results of whole-liver drainage tests using this novel FCSEMS for MHBO are reported.

METHODS

Unresectable MHBOs up to Bismuth IIIa with strictures limited to the secondary branches were eligible. The proximal end of the stent was placed in such a way as to avoid blocking the side branches, and the distal end was placed above the papilla when possible. Consecutive patients treated between April 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The technical and functional success rates, rates and causes of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), revision for RBO, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (Bismuth I/II/IIIa: 1/7/3) were enrolled. Two stents were placed in nine patients and three were placed in two patients. Both the technical and functional success rates were 100%. RBO occurred in four (36%) patients due to sludge formation. Revision was performed for three patients, with the successful removal of all stents. The median TRBO was 187 days, and no late AEs other than the RBO occurred. Regarding the distal position of the stent, the RBO rate was significantly lower (14.3% vs. 75%, p = 0.041) and the cumulative TRBO was significantly longer (median TRBO: not reached vs. 80 days, p = 0.031) in the case of the placement above the papilla than the placement across the papilla.

CONCLUSION

For unresectable MHBOs of Bismuth I, II, and IIIa, whole-liver drainage with a novel 8 mm FCSEMS possessing an ultra-slim introducer was feasible and potentially safe, with favorable stent patency. Placement above the papilla might be preferrable to placement across the papilla.

Endoscopic re-intervention after stent-in-stent versus side-by-side bilateral self-expandable metallic stent deployment

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is widely performed; however, re-intervention after recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is often challenging. We compared stent-in-stent (SIS) and side-by-side (SBS) SEMS placement for MHBO considering re-intervention for RBO.

METHODS

One hundred five consecutive patients with MHBO who underwent endoscopic bilateral SEMS placement in our hospital and its affiliated institutions were enrolled in this study; 75 patients underwent partial SIS deployment between December 2005 and December 2012; and 30 underwent SBS deployment between January 2013 and March 2019. Initial treatments and re-interventions in each group were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success rate (92% vs 100%, P = 0.179), procedure duration (46 vs 35 min, P = 0.382), functional success rate (97.1% vs 100%, P = 1.00), complication rate (24.6% vs 20.0%, P = 0.797), time to RBO (260 vs 312 days; Gray test, P = 0.815), and rate of RBO (59.4% vs 70.0%, P = 0.371) were not significantly different between the SIS and SBS groups. However, bilateral re-stenting with plastic stents through SEMS was successful in 63.4% of patients in the SIS group compared with 100% of patients in the SBS group (P = 0.0013). Median time to RBO upon first re-stenting with a plastic stent was 75 days (range, 11-195 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic re-stenting after RBO was significantly more successful in the SBS group than in the SIS group. SBS method is suitable for MHBO considering revisionary stent placement.

Recent advances regarding endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is still associated with a number of controversies to be resolved. The superiority of bilateral drainage in comparison to unilateral drainage has not been proven obviously yet. However, bilateral drainage is necessary to treat obstructive jaundice in some UMHBO patients, and this may be connected with preservation of the functional liver volume. The partial stent-in-stent (SIS) method and side-by-side (SBS) method developed as bilateral drainage methods. There is no significant difference in the technical or clinical success rates of the SIS and SBS methods. In addition, these methods are comparable in terms of adverse events, patency period, and survival period. On the other hand, reintervention for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after the SBS method seems to be easier in comparison to cases with RBO after the SIS method; however, there is no remarkable difference in the clinical results of these procedures. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage also has become an option for patients with UMHBO. Left hepatic drainage using EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has become common; however, few studies have reported the results of bridging drainage for the right lobe using the EUS-HGS route or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy. A few studies addressed the results of newly designed stents, such as the 6-mm braided metal stent and inside stent. The development of various drainage methods and new devices is necessary for the further advancement of endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with UMHBO, further studies to evaluate those methods and devices are warranted.

Endoscopic metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: an update meta-analysis of unilateral versus bilateral stenting

Introduction

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) can arise in patients with malignant hilar hepatobiliary tumors or lymph nodules. Most MHBO patients are not suitable for surgical resection due to the advanced tumor stage. The only palliative treatment available is provided by endoscopic or percutaneous stenting.

Aim

To compare the efficacy of endoscopic unilateral versus bilateral metal stent insertion for treating MHBO.

Material and methods

A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified all relevant studies published until June 2020. The meta-analysis was undertaken using RevMan v5.3.

Results

We identified 154 studies initially, eight of which were used in our meta-analysis. The eight studies included 818 MHBO patients treated using either endoscopic unilateral (n = 396) or bilateral (n = 422) metal stenting. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in clinical success rate (OR = 2.64; p = 0.18), complication rate (OR = 0.63; p = 0.46), or OS (HR = 1.03; p = 0.53). The bilateral group had a lower stent dysfunction rate without significance (OR = 1.43; p = 0.09). Significantly longer stent patency was observed in the bilateral group (HR = 1.28; p = 0.01). Technical success rate was significantly higher in the unilateral group (OR = 0.26; p = 0.04). Funnel plot analysis indicated an absence of publication bias related to the selected study endpoints.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicated that endoscopic unilateral stenting had a greater technical success rate for MHBO patients than bilateral stenting. However, the bilateral stenting could achieve longer stent patency.

Multi-center study of endoscopic revision after side-by-side metal stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

The recent development of ultra-thin delivery systems, which enable simultaneous insertion of two metal stents, has encouraged wider adoption of side-by-side (SBS) stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). However, the management of stent occlusion after SBS placement has not been well-characterized. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) after SBS placement in patients with MHBO.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent E-RI for stent occlusion after SBS placement between 2013 and 2020 at three tertiary-care referral centers were investigated. We evaluated the technical success, clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and adverse events other than RBO rates associated with E-RI. Furthermore, the factors associated with successful E-RI were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The technical success and clinical success rates were 79.1% (53/67) and 76.1% (51/67), respectively. Early adverse events other than RBO occurred in 4.5% (3/67) and late events in 3.9% (2/51). The RBO rate after E-RI was 52.9% (27/51), and the median time to RBO after E-RI was 85 days. Common bile duct (CBD) diameter (odds ratio 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-5.01; P = 0.003) and metastatic disease (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.64; P = 0.015) were independently correlated with E-RI success in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that E-RI after SBS placement is technically feasible and safe, but the success rate was significantly lower in patients with narrow CBDs and metastatic diseases. These factors may be useful for the selection of the initial stenting method.

Prospective multicenter evaluation of moving cell metallic stents in endoscopic multiple stent deployment for hepatic hilar obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Bilateral stent deployment for malignant biliary obstruction (MHBO) can be achieved using side-by-side (SBS) or stent-in-stent (SIS) procedures. Compared with SBS techniques, the procedural steps of SIS are technically complex due to the necessity of introducing the delivery system into a contralateral biliary tract through the mesh of the SEMS. To overcome this issue, a novel uncovered SEMS, the HILZO Moving Cell Stent (MCS) has been released. The present study examined the technical feasibility of treating MHBO using bilateral deployment of this novel stent without dilating the mesh of the first stent to achieve insertion of the second stent within a single session, using a prospective, multicenter setting.

METHOD

The primary outcome in the present study was the technical success rate. Technical success was defined as deployment of bilateral MCSs into two or more biliary tracts using SIS without a dilation device in a single-session.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients with complications of MHBO were enrolled in this study. Bilateral SIS using two MCS was successfully performed in 23 patients without using dilation devices among 27 patients (initial technical success rate; 85.2%). Median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was 271 days. Stent dysfunction was observed in 12 patients (44.4%), and re-intervention was successfully performed in all patients without one patient who instead received best supportive care.

CONCLUSIONS

The SIS technique using MCS without dilation of the mesh may be technically feasible and safe. In addition, this may be useful for re-intervention. Further comparative randomized trials are needed.

Risk factors for dysfunction of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on the risk factors for dysfunction of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) in preoperative patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO).

METHODS

We searched the database between February 2011 and December 2018 and identified patients with MHBO who underwent radical operation. The rate of dysfunction of the initial EBD, risk factors for dysfunction of the initial EBD and survival after surgery were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 131 patients [95 males (72.5%); mean age, 69.5 (±7.3) years; Bismuth-Corlette classification (BC) I/II/IIIa/IIIb/IV, 50/26/22/17/16; hilar cholangiocarcinoma/gall bladder cancer, 115/16]. Dysfunction of the initial EBD occurred in 28 patients (21.4%). The cumulative incidences of dysfunction of the initial EBD in all patients were 18.4%, 38.2% and 47.0% at 30, 60 and 90 days, respectively (Kaplan-Meier method). The rate of dysfunction of the initial EBD increased in patients with BC-IV (P = .03). Multivariate analysis showed that BC-IV and pre-EBD cholangitis were significantly associated with the occurrence of dysfunction of the initial EBD. Survival rates were not significantly different according to the initial biliary drainage methods and presence/absence of the initial EBD dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysfunction of the initial EBD frequently occurs in patients with the BC-IV and those with pre-EBD cholangitis.

Stent with radioactive seeds strand insertion for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Purpose: This study aimed to assess clinical efficacy and long-term patient outcomes in individuals with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) that had been treated via insertion of a stent with a radioactive seed strand (RSS).Material and methods: A total of 84 MHBO patients were treated via either normal stent insertion (n = 48) or stent with RSS insertion (n = 36) from January 2015 to December 2018.Results: The technical success rates of normal stent insertion and stent with RSS insertion were 93.8% (45/48) and 97.2% (35/36), respectively (p = .632), with clinical success rates of 93.3% (42/45) and 100% (35/35), respectively (p = .252). In these two patient groups, 11 and seven patients, respectively, suffered from stent dysfunction (p = .637). In the normal and RSS groups, median stent patency was 165 and 225 days, respectively (p < .001). All patients in the present study died due to tumor progression, with median survival times of 188 and 250 days in the normal and RSS stent groups, respectively (p < .001).Conclusion: Relative to normal stent insertion, combined stent with RSS insertion can effectively prolong both stent patency and patient survival in patients with MHBO.

Efficacy and safety of EUS biliary drainage in malignant distal and hilar biliary obstruction: A comprehensive review of literature and algorithm

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) encompasses a variety of malignancies arising from the pancreaticobiliary system. This can be divided into malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) or malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) biliary obstruction to which clinical outcomes and technical considerations of various biliary drainage methods may differ. EUS biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been increasingly influential in the management of MBO together with other familiar biliary drainage methods such as ERCP and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Conventionally, ERCP has always been the primary choice of endoscopic biliary drainage in both MHBO and MDBO and that PTBD or EUS-BD is used as a salvage method when ERCP fails for which current guidelines recommends PTBD, especially for MHBO. This review was able to show that with today's evidence, EUS-BD is equally efficacious and possesses a better safety profile in the management of MBO and should be on the forefront of endoscopic biliary drainage. Therefore, EUS-BD could be used either as a primary or preferred salvage biliary drainage method in these cases.

Combined side-by-side and stent-in-stent method for triple metal stenting in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic placement of three branched self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for high-grade malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is technically challenging. We examined the feasibility and efficacy of a novel stenting method combining side-by-side and stent-in-stent (SBSIS) placement for MHBO.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2018, 27 consecutive patients with high-grade MHBO underwent SBSIS placement. We evaluated the technical success, functional success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), adverse events other than RBO, and reintervention success rates associated with SBSIS placement.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 85% (23/27). Insertion of the third SEMS failed in four patients, and median diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) was significantly smaller in patients in whom technical failure occurred (5 mm vs 8 mm; P = 0.004). Functional success was achieved in all patients in whom the procedure was a technical success. Rate of adverse events other than RBO was 15% (4/27). RBO rate was 43% (10/23), and median time to RBO was 157 days. Success rate of endoscopic reintervention for RBO was 89% (8/9).

CONCLUSION

SBSIS placement showed favorable results and is a promising option in patients with high-grade MHBO requiring triple metal stenting. However, it might be preferable to avoid SBSIS in patients with a narrow CBD. Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000035721.

Endoscopic side-by-side uncovered self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

AIM

To investigate outcomes of endoscopic bilateral side-by-side placement across the papilla using 10-mm-diameter uncovered self-expandable metal stents for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 23 patients who underwent endoscopic biliary uncovered self-expandable metal stent placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction between January 2015 and September 2016 at our institution. We performed endoscopic side-by-side placement across the papilla using 10-mm-diameter longer-model uncovered self-expandable metal stents. Outcomes included the technical and functional success rates, recurrent biliary obstruction rate, time to recurrent biliary obstruction, reintervention rate, and incidence of adverse events other than recurrent biliary obstruction.

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients, 10 with malignant hilar biliary obstruction underwent endoscopic side-by-side uncovered self-expandable metal stent placement across the papilla (median age, 83 years; 6 men). The locations of malignant hilar biliary obstruction were Bismuth types II (n = 3), III (n = 3), and IV (n = 4). The median common bile duct diameter was 8 mm. The technical and functional success rates were 100% and 80%, respectively. Seven patients (70%) developed recurrent biliary obstruction because of stent occlusions, including early hemobilia in two patients and late tumor ingrowth in five patients. The median time to recurrent biliary obstruction was 66 (95% confidence interval: 29-483) days. Six patients (60%) required reintervention, and 1 (10%) underwent transcatheter arterial embolization for right hepatic arterial pseudoaneurysm. Early adverse events other than recurrent biliary obstruction occurred in four patients and late adverse event in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic side-by-side placement across the papilla using 10-mm-diameter uncovered self-expandable metal stents was technically feasible for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction; however, it might be better to avoid this method for patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction because of high recurrent biliary obstruction rate and shorter time to recurrent biliary obstruction.

Reintervention for stent occlusion after bilateral self-expandable metallic stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic reintervention for stent occlusions following bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is challenging, and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) of the revisionary stent remains unclear. We aimed to clarify a suitable reintervention method for stent occlusions following bilateral SEMS placement for MHBO.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2014, 52 consecutive patients with MHBO who underwent endoscopic reintervention for stent occlusion after bilateral SEMS placement were enrolled at two university hospitals and one tertiary care referral center. We retrospectively evaluated the technical and functional success rates of the reinterventions, and the time to RBO of the revisionary stents.

RESULTS

Technical and functional success rates of the reinterventions were 92% (48/52) and 90% (43/48), respectively. Univariate analysis did not determine any significant predictive factors for technical and functional failures. Median time to RBO of the revisionary stents was 68 days. Median time to RBO was significantly longer for revisionary SEMS placement than for plastic stent placement (131 days vs 47 days, respectively; log-rank test, P = 0.005). Revisionary SEMS placement was the only independent factor that was significantly associated with a longer time to RBO of the revisionary stent in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.95; P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Revisionary SEMS placement is a suitable endoscopic reintervention method for stent occlusion following bilateral SEMS placement from the perspective of time to RBO of the revisionary stent.

Air cholangiography in endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent (SIS) placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) is one of the major palliative treatments for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cholangitis can occur frequently due to inadequate drainage, especially after contrast injection into the biliary tree. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of air cholangiography-assisted stenting.

METHODS

This study included 47 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who underwent endoscopic bilateral SEMS placement using the SIS technique. They were divided into two groups, air (n = 23) or iodine contrast (n = 24) cholangiography. We retrospectively compared comprehensive clinical and laboratory data of both groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences found between the two groups with respect to technical success (87% versus 87.5%, air versus contrast group, respectively), functional success (95% versus 95.2%), 30-day mortality (8.3% versus 8.7%) and stent patency. Post-ERCP adverse events occurred in 5 (21.7%) of the patients in the air group and 8 (33.3%) of the patients in the contrast group. Among these, the rate of cholangitis was significantly lower in the air group (4.8% versus 29.2%, p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, air cholangiography, technical success and a shorter procedure time were significantly associated with a lower incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Air cholangiography-assisted stenting can be a safe and effective method for endoscopic bilateral SIS placement of SEMS in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Small cell- versus large cell-sized metal stent in endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although the large cell-sized biliary stent facilitates contralateral stent deployment through the mesh of the first metallic stent for stent-in-stent (SIS) technique, there are concerns about its vulnerability to tumor ingrowth. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic bilateral SIS placement according to the cell size of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS).

METHODS

A total of 58 patients were enrolled who underwent endoscopic bilateral SIS placement of SEMS for malignant hilar biliary obstruction as a result of cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer. Finally, 43 patients who underwent successful stent insertion were included in the analysis and divided into the small cell-sized stent (SCS; n = 21) and the large cell-sized stent (LCS; n = 22) groups. We retrospectively compared comprehensive clinical and laboratory data in both groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in successful drainage (SCS vs LCS, 100% vs 100%, respectively), early complications (38.1% vs 18.2%), late complications (14.3% vs 22.7%), stent occlusion (42.9% vs 45.5%), tumor ingrowth (33.3% vs 45.5%) or overgrowth (9.5% vs 0%). Duration of stent patency and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.086 and P = 0.320, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic bilateral SIS placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction shows no differences in stent patency, survival, complications and clinical course according to the cell size of SEMS.

High single-session success rate of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement with modified large cell Niti-S stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement in a stent-in-stent method for malignant hilar biliary obstruction is technically challenging. Technical difficulties in the initial placement and reinterventions for stent occlusion are disadvantages inherent to this stent-in-stent method. We previously reported the feasibility of Niti-S large cell D-type biliary stents (LCD). This multicenter prospective consecutive study evaluated the efficacy of bilateral SEMS placement using modified LCD with large and uniform cells, a slimmer delivery system and high radial force.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From July 2010 to June 2011, 26 consecutive patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction underwent endoscopic bilateral placement of modified LCD in a stent-in-stent method at three tertiary hospitals. Ten patients had gallbladder cancer, eight had cholangiocarcinoma, four had lymph node metastasis, two had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and two had liver metastasis.

RESULTS

Single-session and final technical success rate was 96% and 100%, respectively. Functional success rate was 89%. Stent occlusion occurred in 11 patients (42%) because of sludge (n = 7) or tumor ingrowth (n = 4). Endoscopic bilateral reintervention was technically easy and successful: six patients had stent clearance by balloon sweeping and five had plastic stent placement. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, median survival and stent patency were 220 days and 157 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified LCD achieved a high technical success rate both in the initial stent-in-stent placement and in bilateral reinterventions in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.